Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of the Environment The Basic Science of Air Pollution Transport Brian J. Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
Advertisements

Front Range Ozone Early Action Compact Presentation to WESTAR Regional Ozone Conference Steven Arnold Air Pollution Control Division March 9th, 2004.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
Ozone, PM2.5 and Regional Haze Timeline Dan Johnson Western States Air Resources Council.
1 Air Planning Section EPA Region 6. ActionTarget Date EPA Letter to Governors on Designations (120-day letters) December 21, 2011 Designations and.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
1 ST. LOUIS REGION AIR QUALITY REPORT EWGCOG Staff Report July 7, 2006.
Control Measures for the 8-hour Ozone SIP Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Environmental Protection Division 1 AWMA Georgia Air Update August 10, 2007 Heather Abrams, Branch Chief.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
Air Quality Planning, Metro. Washington, DC-MD-VA Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG October 27, 2005.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 Pollution Transport from Other Air Basins San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District September 20, 2007.
IOWA Department of Natural Resources Air Quality Program Development Jim McGraw Environmental Program Supervisor  8 hr Ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS Implementation.
Maryland’s Innovative Measures State Implementation Plan 2004 EPA Air Innovations Conference Brian J. Hug – Chief, Air Quality Policy and Planning Division.
Regional Issues Facing Colorado and Other Western States WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Denver, Colorado March 30, 2010 Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and State Implementation Plans North Carolina Division of Air Quality National Ambient Air Quality Standards and.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Regulatory Requirements For Modeling. Air Quality Model Estimates Developing Air Pollution Control Plans Assessment of Environmental Impacts Projecting.
Mobile Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13 th, 2012 Washington, DC 1.
Status of the Particulate Matter (PM) Air Quality Standards November 28, 2012.
The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.
1 SJVAPCD DRAFT SCHEDULES May 2, Hr OZONE ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN PM10 ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION PLAN.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
1 Mississippi Air Quality Update Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality Air Division August 5, 2011.
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
State Implementation Plans Could Rule Your Life or why NAAQS Are Important Chuck Sams R9 Air Quality Program Manager.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Fine Particulate Matter SIP for Washington DC Special Stakeholder Meeting February 20, 2008.
EPA’s New National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Sunil Kumar MWAQC July 28,
Putting the Pieces Together OTC Fall Meeting November 2-3, 2005 Planning to Meet the SIP Submittal Deadlines.
Exceptional Events and Fire Policy Presented by Don Hodge, U.S. EPA Region 9 Interagency Air and Smoke Council meeting May 2, 2012 Disclaimer: Positions.
Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
CALGRID Modeling Overview A First Look A Modeling Effort by the OTC Modeling Committee Presented by: Jeffrey Underhill, Ph.D. NHDES OTC/MANE-VU Annual.
Ozone Data and Outreach Stan Belone Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Air Quality Program.
Reasonable Further Progress Policy and Mid-Course Reviews John Summerhays EPA Region 5 June 20, 2007.
SO 2 NAAQS Modeling MassCAIR Stakeholder Meeting December 13, 2011.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
N EW Y ORK S TATE D EPARTMENT OF E NVIRONMENTAL C ONSERVATION Short Term Ambient Air Quality Standards and The Effect on Permitting Margaret Valis NESCAUM,
The Regulatory Assistance Project 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, VT Phone: web: Energy Efficiency as an Air.
PROPOSED FINE PARTICULATE ATTAINMENT/ NONATTAINMENT DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATIONS This proposal is available on the DEP Website at
Developing a Tribal Implementation Plan
The Air Pollution Control Act of 1955
Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee: Focus and Priorities
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Planning to Achieve the 8-Hour Ozone Standard
Overview of New Source Review (NSR)
Updated Oil & Gas Emissions Projections for 2023 and Aug. 11, 2016
Updated Oil & Gas Emissions Projections for 2023 and 2028
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
PM 2.5 Designation Process and Timeline
Presentation transcript:

Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division Air Quality Planning and Monitoring Program

Maryland’s Air Quality We have problems with long term ozone exposure Fine particulate levels are generally very close to the federal standard Regional Haze issues Air pollution contributes significantly to Bay pollution

A Quick Primer on How Ground Level Ozone is Formed

Maryland’s 8-Hour Ozone NAA’s Baltimore Region Washington County EAC Cecil County (Part of Phil. NAA) Kent and Queen Anne’s County Region Washington DC Region

What is Fine Particulate Matter? Particulate matter, or PM, is the term for particles found in the air, including dust, dirt, soot, smoke, and liquid droplets. These small particles can be suspended in the air for long periods of time. Some particles are large or dark enough to be seen as soot or smoke. Others are so small that individually they can only be detected with an electron microscope.

Why is PM2.5 different from ozone? Source: EPA

What do our PM2.5 nonattainment areas look like? Baltimore Region Washington Region Washington County Nonattainment Area

The Role of Pollution Transport New science now confirms that a large mass of ozone covers our region and float in mass from one state to the next over large parts of the East MDE/University of Maryland airplanes routinely measure the “incoming” ozone cloud at 100 to 110 parts per billion (ppb) –New standard = 85 ppb On any given day, well over half of MD’s ozone originates in upwind states. –On some days the upwind contribution may be 70% or more

What is a SIP? A nice neat report A large file of information Filing cabinets full of documentation All of the above Multiple Choice:

2005 – A Transition Period Ozone  1-hour standard recently revoked  Planning for the 8-hour standard has been initiated Fine Particulate Matter (PM fine or PM 2.5)  Slightly behind the 8-hour ozone standard, but planning process begins this year Regional Haze  Clearly linked to PM fine, but with slightly different planning requirements Other SIP pollutants  Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Lead

Key Dates - Ozone April 2004 –EPA finalizes designations for new 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas –Becomes effective on June 15, 2004 June 2005 – 1-hour standard revoked Fall/ Winter 2005(?) – EPA issues final pieces of regulatory guidance for implementing the new ozone standard June 2007 – SIPS due –Modeling, Demonstrations, Control Programs, more later June 2010 – Attainment date for moderate areas –Summer of 2009 becomes very important

Key Dates – PM Fine and Haze December 2004 – EPA finalizes designations for PM fine standard (effective April 5, 2005) PM fine designations trigger Regional Haze planning requirements Fall/ Winter 2005(?) – EPA issues draft regulatory guidance for implementing new PM fine standard (final in 2006?) April 5, 2008 SIPS due –Modeling –Demonstrations (other corroborating evidence) –Control programs Early Attainment date for PM fine nonattainment areas

Technical Work Monitoring –Monitoring for ozone, PM fine and regional haze –Driven by regulatory requirements, but also plays an important role in public outreach efforts –An area is designated nonattainment if it consistently measures air quality with concentrations of one of the criteria pollutants greater than the national standards –Attainment of a standard is based on several years of monitored air quality measurements

Inventories –For ozone, PM fine and Regional Haze Direct and indirect/precursor emissions –Used to quantify the sources and extent of emissions in an area –Provide a baseline from which reductions may be measured –Used in the modeling demonstration Need inventories from other states Technical Work (2)

Air Quality Modeling –Ozone, PM fine and regional Haze –A number of air quality models are used to predict the air quality benefits resulting from emission reduction strategies “Screening” models and regulatory models –“Grounded” with monitored data –Modeling “domains” now cover most of the U.S. A very large regional process Technical Work (3)

Basic Requirements SIPS are due in 2007/2008 Must include: –Control programs/regulations –An attainment demonstration Modeling or other technical analysis that shows control programs will reduce emissions enough to meet standards in 2010 –A Rate-of-Progress (ROP) demonstration Demonstration that control programs will reduce emissions by specific increments (I.e. 3% per year) over time –Maintenance Plan Once an area has demonstrated three years of air quality that meets a NAAQS, it is required to ensure that the area will continue to meet the standard into the future (allowing for growth) –Numerous other SIP elements

Timeline

Thanks….. Brian Hug Air Quality Planning and Monitoring Program