What’s up with the FCC? Robert Corn-Revere Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSTRUCTIONS Test your knowledge: Click on either the True or False box. To advance to the next screen: 1.Click on the red arrow at the right-hand, bottom.
Advertisements

FCC – Part 4 Law and Policy. Telephone Conversations Station must notify the outside party of its intention to air the conversation before broadcast.
Chapter 12 Prostitution, Pornography, & the Sex Trade
1 Chapter 12 Media Effects From Sexual Content. 2 The Nature of Sexual Content “Sexual” content  All types of media that either show or imply sexual.
Obscenity – is anything that treats sex or nudity in an offensive or lewd manner, violates recognized standards of decency, and lacks serious literary,
Chapter 13.4 Freedom of the Press Government Mr. Biggs.
INSTRUCTIONS Test your knowledge: Click on either the True or False box. To advance to the next screen: 1.Click on the red arrow at the right-hand, bottom.
Pacifica vs. FCC The dawn of Federal indecency enforcement.
Fox vs. FCC. Legal Definition of “Indecency” “language that describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards for.
8 - Free Speech Harvard CSCI E-2a November 17, 2008 Harvard CSCI E-2a November 17, 2008.
Sexually Oriented Material. Erotica w Sexually oriented material that can be evaluated positively.
Chapter 7.6 Content Regulation. 2 History of Censorship Legal source of American speech protection is the 1791 First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
Freedom of Speech in Cyberspace 1. The U.S. Constitution - The 1 st Amendment: The 1 st Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment.
Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Assembly. The Purpose of Freedom of Speech 1 to guarantee to each person a right of free expression, in the spoken and.
C C. Wright Mills The Sociological Imagination. C. Wright Mills August 28, 1916 – March 20, 1962 Political Sociologist The New Men of Power: America's.
Bootcamp 2009 Porn, Predators, and the Pressure to Police Jennifer Stisa Granick, Civil Liberties Director.
Q4: Who would be the audience for your media product?
By: Annalee Barrette. Characters: Nick Carraway- narrator, Mr. Jay Gasby, Nick’s second cousin- Daisy Buchanan, her husband-Tom Buchanan and Jordan Baker.Characters:
Egyptian Revolution of rd period: 8 th grade ELA Honors Ms. Giusti October 1, 2014.
Rules and Regulations Adam Lundquist. Quote  “Best test of truth is in the power of thought to get accepted into the free market”  Justice Holmes 
© 2014 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, STEM  Center for Teaching and Learning™ Game Art and Design Unit 1 Lesson 4 Game.
Licensing A prospective licensee must meet these qualifications: The applicant must be a citizen of the United States or have less than 25% foreign ownership.
Randall Woodfield.
Early Definitions of Obscenity Roth v. United States (1957) - Does the average person, applying contemporary community standards, find the dominant theme.
FCC Indecency Litigation Update Robert Corn-Revere Davis Wright Tremaine LLP First Amendment Lawyers Association February 2007.
Outcomes & Objectives Objectives To evaluate the situation in the USA for Black people today. To revise the key events of the story of Black people in.
Unit I: Game Ratings ERSB GAD. Ethics in Game Design GAD Ethics is applying a moral judgment of right and wrong, moral and immoral to something. Ethical.
Reading the wrong message 1. If a girl wears sexy clothes: She thinks..... These clothes are cool, cute, fashionable, comfortable He might think …… She’s.
American Government Chapter 19 Section 3. Freedom of Speech 1 st and 14 th Amendments Guarantees spoken and written word liberty Ensures open discussion.
Freedom of Speech and Press. The Big Idea While the 1st and 14th Amendments gives Americans the right to express ideas freely, the Constitution and the.
1950s Family Dynamics Today’s Topic: Televisions and the Evolution of the American Family.
OBSCENE AND PORNOGRAPHY: SUPREME COURT CASES AND PUBLIC OPINION Online Pornography.
Since the advent of television in the 1940s, television has influenced changes to America politically, culturally, economically, and socially.
Freedom of Speech and the Press Whatever happened to freedom of speech?
Freedom of the Press Freedom of Assembly, Association, and Petition Unit 6: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, Lesson 2 How has the Supreme Court expanded.
Broadcasting & Cable Communications: Greatly different from Print Media because of statutes & regulations.
Fleeting Images and Expletives. Legal Definition of “Indecency” “language that describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 3: Freedom of Speech.
Which of these resulted in station sanctions? A.Bono B.Cher C.Saving Private Ryan D.All of !$#$%&!
NAACP L.A. president resigns. The NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People; an African-American civil rights organization in.
Obscenity Indecency Profanity WTF? Regulation of Offensive Content.
Censorship. What is Censorship? The suppression of speech or communication that may be considered “harmful”... Who determines what's “harmful?” Always.
How It StartedHow It Started  October 30, 1973, WBAI broadcasted the late George Carlin’s monologue, Filthy Words  Father went straight to the Federal.
Obscenity By: Kong Her, Jon Colvin, Alex Lee, Humsab Moua & Vladimir Chernyy.
Obscenity By: Kong Her, Jon Colvin, Alex Lee, Humsab Moua & Vladimir Chernyy Made on October 16, 2015.
Media Ethics/Media Law/Consolidation A survey in 2005 shows 1/3 high school students thinks the press should be more restricted. 36% think newspapers should.
BROADCAST LAW AND THE FCC. RULES AND REGULATION Does a company that profits from the public airwaves have a responsibility to that same public?
School Accounts Presented by: Mrs. Mazzola.
Presented by: Veronica, Tanya, Sarahi, and Diana Violence Input in Children through Media.
Title IX: Our Community’s Responsibility for a Safer SEU.
Intellectual Freedom Questions & Answers!. What Is Intellectual Freedom? Intellectual freedom is the right of every individual to both seek and receive.
Freedom of Assembly and Press. Freedom of Assembly Right to assemble (gather and protest) can be regulated based ―time, place, and manner of protest Nazi.
 Democracy requires a free press.  The framers of the Bill of Rights based the concept of freedom of the press on libertarianism: The philosophy that.
Fast And Furious: Fast Furious Money Women Death Cars Racing Illegal Tense Alpha male Group Ending Beginning Loud music Police involvement Other groups.
Banned Books Week 2013 The Final Installment of our Free Speech and Censorship Unit!
Media Regulation GOVT 2305, Module 7.
Censorship.
Intro to the First Amendment
Libel, Privacy, & Decency
Sexual Violence & the Law
Media Regulation October 19, 2017.
Boundaries of Free Expression III (Obscenity II and Violence/Cruelty)
Limits to the Freedom of Speech
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
Regulation of Mass Media
Day 2 It’s Banned Books Week! September 27- October 3
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
Presentation transcript:

What’s up with the FCC? Robert Corn-Revere Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

2004 Super Bowl Forfeiture FCC reaffirmed fine of $550,000 against CBS O&O stations and issued a forfeiture order. FCC reaffirmed fine of $550,000 against CBS O&O stations and issued a forfeiture order. Commission held that it did not matter whether CBS intended to violate the rules; the broadcast “appeared to be pandering.” Commission held that it did not matter whether CBS intended to violate the rules; the broadcast “appeared to be pandering.” CBS is responsible for Janet Jackson & Justin Timberlake’s actions under respondeat superior. CBS is responsible for Janet Jackson & Justin Timberlake’s actions under respondeat superior.

Without a Trace Notice of Apparent Liability FCC proposed fine of $3.6 million for broadcasts in the Central and Mountain time zones. Reduced to $3.25 million. FCC proposed fine of $3.6 million for broadcasts in the Central and Mountain time zones. Reduced to $3.25 million. Complaint focused on what it called a “teen orgy.” No nudity involved. Complaint focused on what it called a “teen orgy.” No nudity involved. FCC concluded the scene “goes well beyond what the story line could reasonably be said to require.” FCC concluded the scene “goes well beyond what the story line could reasonably be said to require.”

Notices of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture “The Surreal Life 2” (February 8, 2004) ($27,500 forfeiture to WBDC Broadcasting for reality show with porn stars and pixilated breasts) “The Surreal Life 2” (February 8, 2004) ($27,500 forfeiture to WBDC Broadcasting for reality show with porn stars and pixilated breasts) “Con El Corazón En La Mano” (October 9, 2004) ($32,500 forfeiture to NBC Telemundo station KWHY-TV, Los Angeles, for rape scene in telenovela “Con El Corazon En La Mano”) “Con El Corazón En La Mano” (October 9, 2004) ($32,500 forfeiture to NBC Telemundo station KWHY-TV, Los Angeles, for rape scene in telenovela “Con El Corazon En La Mano”) “Fernando Hidalgo Show” (October 19, 2004) ($32,500 forfeiture to WJAN-TV-CA, Miami for interview with bare-breasted female guest) “Fernando Hidalgo Show” (October 19, 2004) ($32,500 forfeiture to WJAN-TV-CA, Miami for interview with bare-breasted female guest) “Video Musicales” (February 2-March 8, 2002) ($220,000 – reduced from $385,000 – to Aerco Broadcasting Corp. for music videos and a DVD promo on WSJU-TV, San Juan) “Video Musicales” (February 2-March 8, 2002) ($220,000 – reduced from $385,000 – to Aerco Broadcasting Corp. for music videos and a DVD promo on WSJU-TV, San Juan) “The Blues: Godfathers and Sons” (March 11, 2004) ($15,000 forfeiture to KCSM, San Mateo Community College for PBS documentary “The Blues: Godfathers and Sons”) “The Blues: Godfathers and Sons” (March 11, 2004) ($15,000 forfeiture to KCSM, San Mateo Community College for PBS documentary “The Blues: Godfathers and Sons”) “The Pursuit of D.B. Cooper” (March 15, 2003) ($27,500 forfeiture to KTVI, St. Louis, for broadcast of film “The Pursuit of D.B. Cooper”) “The Pursuit of D.B. Cooper” (March 15, 2003) ($27,500 forfeiture to KTVI, St. Louis, for broadcast of film “The Pursuit of D.B. Cooper”)

Indecent And/Or Profane Broadcasts But No Forfeiture Proposed “The 2002 Billboard Music Awards” (December 9, 2002) (2002 Billboard Music Award show on FOX in which Cher said “fuck ‘em”) “The 2002 Billboard Music Awards” (December 9, 2002) (2002 Billboard Music Award show on FOX in which Cher said “fuck ‘em”) “The 2003 Billboard Music Awards” (December 10, 2003) (2003 Billboard Music Award Show on FOX in which Nicole Richie said “shit” and “fuck”) “The 2003 Billboard Music Awards” (December 10, 2003) (2003 Billboard Music Award Show on FOX in which Nicole Richie said “shit” and “fuck”) “NYPD Blue” (FCC held that “dick” and “dickhead” were OK, but that “bullshit” is indecent and profane based on complaints against 9 episodes broadcast between January 14 and May 6, 2003) “NYPD Blue” (FCC held that “dick” and “dickhead” were OK, but that “bullshit” is indecent and profane based on complaints against 9 episodes broadcast between January 14 and May 6, 2003) “The Early Show” (December 13, 2004) (FCC held that guest calling another “Survivor” contestant a “bullshitter” during a news interview was indecent and profane) “The Early Show” (December 13, 2004) (FCC held that guest calling another “Survivor” contestant a “bullshitter” during a news interview was indecent and profane)

Broadcasts That Do Not Violate Indecency/Profanity/Obscenity Restrictions “Alias” (January 5, 2005)(non-graphic sex scene is not indecent because it doesn’t violate community standards) “Alias” (January 5, 2005)(non-graphic sex scene is not indecent because it doesn’t violate community standards) “Will and Grace” (November 11, 2004) (scenes of characters adjusting clothed breasts do not violate contemporary community standards) “Will and Grace” (November 11, 2004) (scenes of characters adjusting clothed breasts do not violate contemporary community standards) “Two and a Half Men” (February 21, 2005) (scene where female doctor apparently is touching character’s scrotum during a medical exam while he makes “mildly suggestive comments” is not indecent) “Two and a Half Men” (February 21, 2005) (scene where female doctor apparently is touching character’s scrotum during a medical exam while he makes “mildly suggestive comments” is not indecent) “Committed” (March 8, 2005) (woman apparently grabbing a man’s genitals to help him hit the high notes in the national anthem is not indecent) “Committed” (March 8, 2005) (woman apparently grabbing a man’s genitals to help him hit the high notes in the national anthem is not indecent) “Golden Phoenix Hotel & Casino Commercial” (February 19, 2005) (casino commercial for “Perfect 10” show is not obscene or indecent) “Golden Phoenix Hotel & Casino Commercial” (February 19, 2005) (casino commercial for “Perfect 10” show is not obscene or indecent) “The Oprah Winfrey Show” (March 18, 2004) (“highly graphic and explicit” discussion of sexual language of teens that “continues at length,” including such terms as “tossed salad,” “rainbow party,” and “booty call” is not indecent) “The Oprah Winfrey Show” (March 18, 2004) (“highly graphic and explicit” discussion of sexual language of teens that “continues at length,” including such terms as “tossed salad,” “rainbow party,” and “booty call” is not indecent) Political Advertisement (October 14, 2004) (political advertisement with references to rape and sodomy is not indecent) Political Advertisement (October 14, 2004) (political advertisement with references to rape and sodomy is not indecent)

Broadcasts That Do Not Violate Indecency/Profanity/Obscenity Restrictions “The Amazing Race 6” (December 21, 2004) (graffiti in background that says “fuck cops” is not indecent or profane because it is “not graphic or explicit” and “the image is displayed only momentarily”) “The Amazing Race 6” (December 21, 2004) (graffiti in background that says “fuck cops” is not indecent or profane because it is “not graphic or explicit” and “the image is displayed only momentarily”) Various Programs Containing Expletives (various dates between August 31, 2004 and February 28, 2005) (Complaints dismissed against various programs that included language such as “hell,” “damn,” “bitch,” “pissed off,” “up yours,” “ass,” “for Chist’s sake,” “kiss my ass,” “fire his ass,” “ass is huge,” and “wiping his ass” as not indecent or profane. Programs included The Simpsons, North Shore, Father of the Pride, Girlfriends, Half and Half, Second Time Around, America’s Next Top Model, Family Matters, Cuts, and one “unspecified program.) Various Programs Containing Expletives (various dates between August 31, 2004 and February 28, 2005) (Complaints dismissed against various programs that included language such as “hell,” “damn,” “bitch,” “pissed off,” “up yours,” “ass,” “for Chist’s sake,” “kiss my ass,” “fire his ass,” “ass is huge,” and “wiping his ass” as not indecent or profane. Programs included The Simpsons, North Shore, Father of the Pride, Girlfriends, Half and Half, Second Time Around, America’s Next Top Model, Family Matters, Cuts, and one “unspecified program.) “Family Guy” (January 16, 2005) (use of the word penis along with various euphemisms in story about father’s anxiety that his penis is smaller than his son’s is not indecent or profane) “Family Guy” (January 16, 2005) (use of the word penis along with various euphemisms in story about father’s anxiety that his penis is smaller than his son’s is not indecent or profane) “The Academy Awards” (February 27, 2005) (Chris Rock saying the “Superman” film “sucked” and saying “sit their asses down,” along with a video clip showing a woman eating a sausage which was suggestive of oral sex, were not indecent) “The Academy Awards” (February 27, 2005) (Chris Rock saying the “Superman” film “sucked” and saying “sit their asses down,” along with a video clip showing a woman eating a sausage which was suggestive of oral sex, were not indecent) “8 Simple Rules” (February 4, 2005) (the term “hampsterbaiting,” an evident reference to animal masturbation, is not indecent) “8 Simple Rules” (February 4, 2005) (the term “hampsterbaiting,” an evident reference to animal masturbation, is not indecent)

Broadcasts That Do Not Violate Indecency/Profanity/Obscenity Restrictions “The Today Show” (January 11, 2005) (brief exposure of man’s penis during news footage of rescue attempt from a flood is not indecent because it is not graphic, is not repeated, and, in context, not patently offensive) “The Today Show” (January 11, 2005) (brief exposure of man’s penis during news footage of rescue attempt from a flood is not indecent because it is not graphic, is not repeated, and, in context, not patently offensive) “The Simpsons” (September 9, 2004) (scene of Mr. Burns and Smithers at a strip club is not indecent) “The Simpsons” (September 9, 2004) (scene of Mr. Burns and Smithers at a strip club is not indecent) “America’s Funniest Home Videos” (February 5, 2005) (video of infant falling back onto pacifier in segment entitled “butt plug” is not indecent) “America’s Funniest Home Videos” (February 5, 2005) (video of infant falling back onto pacifier in segment entitled “butt plug” is not indecent) “Green Bay Packers v. Minnesota Vikings” (January 9, 2005) (player pretending to “moon” the crowd is not indecent) “Green Bay Packers v. Minnesota Vikings” (January 9, 2005) (player pretending to “moon” the crowd is not indecent) “Medium” (January 17, 2005) (scene of husband shooting wife in the head during a therapy session depicts violence, not indecency) “Medium” (January 17, 2005) (scene of husband shooting wife in the head during a therapy session depicts violence, not indecency)

Without a Trace – Teen Sex

Oprah on Teen Sex Rainbow PartyTossed Salad

When is talking about teen sex OK? Discussion on Oprah was “highly graphic and explicit,” as well as “not brief,” but these factors were outweighed by the fact that it was not “pandering” or “shocking” in context. Discussion on Oprah was “highly graphic and explicit,” as well as “not brief,” but these factors were outweighed by the fact that it was not “pandering” or “shocking” in context. Program focused on the importance of “serious, potentially harmful behaviors of teens” and “[i]t would have been difficult to educate parents regarding teenagers’ sexual activities without at least briefly describing those activities.” Program focused on the importance of “serious, potentially harmful behaviors of teens” and “[i]t would have been difficult to educate parents regarding teenagers’ sexual activities without at least briefly describing those activities.”

And when is it not? According to the FCC, the 60 seconds or so that were the subject of the complaint went “well beyond what the story line could reasonably be said to require.” According to the FCC, the 60 seconds or so that were the subject of the complaint went “well beyond what the story line could reasonably be said to require.” Godfathers and Sons: “[W]e disagree that the use of such language was necessary to express any particular viewpoint in this case.” It was not “demonstrably essential to the nature of an artistic or educational work or essential to informing viewers on a matter of public importance.” Godfathers and Sons: “[W]e disagree that the use of such language was necessary to express any particular viewpoint in this case.” It was not “demonstrably essential to the nature of an artistic or educational work or essential to informing viewers on a matter of public importance.”

To vest a few fallible men … with vast powers of literary or artistic censorship, to convert them into what J.S. Mill called a “moral police,” is to make them despotic arbiters of literary products. If one day they may ban mediocre books as obscene, another day they may do likewise to a work of genius. Originality, not too plentiful, should be cherished, not stifled …. [A]uthors must cope with publishers who, fearful about the judgments of governmental censors, may refuse to accept the manuscripts of contemporary Shelleys or Mark Twains or Whitmans. United States v. Roth, 237 F.2d 796, 823 (2d Cir. 1956) (Frank, J., concurring) (Appendix to opinion), aff’d, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).