Transportation Operations Group Toward a Consistent and Robust Integrated Multi-Resolution Modeling Approach for Traffic Analysis May 17-21, 2009 Jeff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
An Open-Source Data Hub for Improving the Effectiveness of Integrated Modeling Applications Brandon Nevers (KAI) Xuesong Zhou, Jeff Taylor (Univ. of Utah)
Breaking the Static Barrier: Building Regional Support for Implementation of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Long-Range Planning Processes TRB Planning Applications.
Introduction to VISSIM
DynusT (Dynamic Urban Systems in Transportation)
ARC’s Strategic Thoroughfare Plan Bridging the Gap from Travel Demand Model to Micro-Simulation GPA Conference Fall 2012 Presented By: David Pickworth,
Dynamic Traffic Assignment: Integrating Dynameq into Long Range Planning Studies Model City 2011 – Portland, Oregon Richard Walker - Portland Metro Scott.
Applying DynusT to the I-10 Corridor Study, Tucson, AZ ITE Western District Meeting Santa Barbara June 26th, 2012 Jim Schoen, PE, Kittelson & Assoc. Khang.
12th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. October 11,2007 Application of Dynameq in Montréal: bridging the gap between regional models and microsimulation Application.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
Case Study 4 New York State Alternate Route 7. Key Issues to Explore: Capacity of the mainline sections of NYS-7 Adequacy of the weaving sections Performance.
GIS-based Road Network Information in Travel Demand Modeling Ahmed Mohideen Abishek Komma Vipul Modi.
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
15 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey Joyoung Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Byungkyu Brian Park, University.
Planning Applications: A City- wide Microsimulation Model for Virginia Beach Craig Jordan, Old Dominion University Mecit Cetin, Old Dominion University.
Automatic loading of inputs for Real Time Evacuation Scenario Simulations: evaluation using mesoscopic models Josep M. Aymamí 15th TRB National Transportation.
Integration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in a Four-Step Model Framework – A Deployment Case Study in PSRC Model 13TH TRB National Transportation Planning.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. An Integrated Travel Demand, Mesoscopic and Microscopic.
Can Multi-Resolution Dynamic Traffic Assignment live up to the Expectation of Reliable Analysis of Incident Management Strategies Lili (Leo) Luo, P.E.,
An Empirical Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Paradigms Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Qi Yang Caliper Corporation 14.
A Calibration Procedure for Microscopic Traffic Simulation Lianyu Chu, University of California, Irvine Henry Liu, Utah State University Jun-Seok Oh, Western.
Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.
Best Practices Related to Research Problem Identification, Scoping, and Programming: A Researcher’s View Martin Pietrucha, Director The Thomas D. Larson.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
TRB Planning Applications Conference May 9th, 2011
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
From EMME to DYNAMEQ in the city of MALMÖ. THE COMPANY Founded in early 2011 Currently located in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö Small company (currently.
April 2010 Scott Smith Volpe Center / RITA / U.S. DOT Transportation Border Working Group Meeting Boston, MA An Integrated Regional Planning / Microsimulation.
Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Comparing Dynamic Traffic Assignment Approaches for Planning
2007 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Daytona Beach, Florida Pseudo Dynamic Traffic Assignment A Duration Based Static Assignment.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
DKS Associates. 2 Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP) Travel Demand vs. Simulation Models Micro vs. Meso Simulation Models US-101 Corridor Modeling.
Getting to Know Cube.
Dynamic Origin-Destination Trip Table Estimation for Transportation Planning Ramachandran Balakrishna Caliper Corporation 11 th TRB National Transportation.
S. Erdogan 1, K. Patnam 2, X. Zhou 3, F.D. Ducca 4, S. Mahapatra 5, Z. Deng 6, J. Liu 7 1, 4, 6 University of Maryland, National Center for Smart Growth.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. City of Montreal TRB Technical Conference May 9, 2007 A Multi-resolution Modelling Framework in the Montréal Area A Multi-resolution.
MATRIX ADJUSTMENT MACRO (DEMADJ.MAC AND DEMADJT.MAC) APPLICATIONS: SEATTLE EXPERIENCE Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani Sujay Davuluri Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager. Exploring Cube Base and Cube Voyager Use Cube Base and Cube Voyager to develop data, run scenarios, and examine.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
TRANSIMS Version 5 Network Files January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
DVRPC TMIP Peer Review Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Oct. 29 th, 2014.
Methodological Considerations for Integrating Dynamic Traffic Assignment with Activity-Based Models Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Srinivasan Sundaram.
Analysis of the IH 35 Corridor Through the Austin Metropolitan Area TRB Planning Applications Conference Jeff Shelton Karen Lorenzini Alex Valdez Tom Williams.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
Advanced Simulation and Performance Measurement in the BNMC-CDB North Area.
September 2008What’s coming in Aimsun: New features and model developments 1 Hybrid Mesoscopic-Microscopic Traffic Simulation Framework Alex Torday, Jordi.
METRO Dynamic Traffic Assignment in Action COST Presentation ODOT Region 4 April 1,
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program(ATTAP) MIDCAP & MUID
Development of New Supply Models in Maryland Using Big Data
Problem 5: Network Simulation
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Presentation transcript:

Transportation Operations Group Toward a Consistent and Robust Integrated Multi-Resolution Modeling Approach for Traffic Analysis May 17-21, 2009 Jeff Shelton, TTI Yi-Chang Chiu, Univ. of Arizona TRB – Transportation Planning Conference Houston, TX

Transportation Operations Group Outline  Introduction – Mesoscopic – Microscopic  Multi-Resolution Modeling – Concept – Conversion Process – Modeling Issues  Case Study  Applications

Transportation Operations Group Outline  Introduction – Mesoscopic – Microscopic  Multi-Resolution Modeling – Concept – Conversion Process – Modeling Issues  Case Study  Applications

Transportation Operations Group Introduction  Integrating mesoscopic dynamic traffic assignment (DTA) and microscopic traffic simulation and assignment models can be advantageous for region- wide operational planning projects – DTA – region-wide estimation of traffic redistribution – Microscopic – local operational analysis  The integration synergizes the strengths of both models.  Challenges remain in model translation and interface  Modeling issues to be addressed – Consistency – Situation in which feedback is needed

Transportation Operations Group Simulation-Based Dynamic Traffic Assignment (SBDTA)  Address issues that may fall beyond the reach of both: – Microscopic models: (dynamic but small-scale) typically used by traffic engineers for project traffic studies – Macroscopic models: (large-scale but static) typically used by transportation planners for long-range planning – SBDTA – dynamic and large-scale  The scenarios of interest may result in shifts of network or corridor-wide traffic flow patterns. – Significant change to roadway configuration – Certain corridor management strategies

Transportation Operations Group Mesoscopic Dynamic Traffic Assignment  DynusT v2.0 – Free version available for DYNASMART-P users  Dynamic simulation and assignment tool for regional operational planning analysis  Equilibrium-based Dynamic Traffic Assignment – Assigned paths are based on experienced (actual) travel time  Applications – Assess impacts of ITS technologies – Work zone planning and traffic management – Evaluate HOV/HOT lanes – Congestion pricing – Special event/emergency evacuation

Transportation Operations Group Microscopic  VISSIM 5.1  A driver-behavior-based simulation tool capable of performing multiple applications including – Analyzing complex intersections – Border crossings inspection booths – Managed lanes – University campus settings  Fined-grained analysis – Vehicle interactions – Individual lane analysis  Simulate multiple modes of transportation simultaneously 3-D graphics

Transportation Operations Group Outline  Introduction – Mesoscopic – Microscopic  Multi-Resolution Modeling – Concept – Conversion Process – Modeling Issues  Case Study  Applications

Transportation Operations Group Concept  What is multi-resolution modeling? – Integrating mesoscopic and microscopic models for the purpose of achieving a specific goal » Analyze network at both the system-wide and localized levels  Why is multi-resolution modeling so important? – Mesoscopic & microscopic models are not mutually exclusive – They are complimentary to one another and can accomplish optimal modeling capabilities. – Retain the best characteristics of both » Realistic representation of regional traffic » Detailed interactions

Transportation Operations Group Concept Mesoscopic Model Sub-area Cut Model Conversion Process Integration Tool Microscopic Model

Transportation Operations Group Concept DynusTVISSIMVISUM Sub- Area

Transportation Operations Group Multi-Resolution Modeling Framework Regional Travel Demand Model Initial Network Conversion (DynusT) Calibration Speed Profile OD Traffic Model Sub-Area CutDVC VISSIM Calibration Network Modification Field Data Rerun DTA Detailed Analysis No Yes

Transportation Operations Group DTA Model Preparation  Convert the GIS layer of the Travel Demand Model to Mesoscopic format.  Disaggregate 24-hour matrix based upon car & truck – Home to work – Work to home – Home to private – Private to home – Thru – External Local – Non-home based external local  Multiply each matrix by corresponding hourly factor

Transportation Operations Group DTA Model Preparation H-WW-HH-PP-HTHRUEXLONHBEXLO Multiply each matrix by hourly factor Summation of matrices gives you directional 1-hour matrix

Transportation Operations Group DTA Model Preparation 24 - one hour matrices

Transportation Operations Group Calibration  Traffic flow model – Traffic simulation in DynusT is based upon the Anisotropic Mesoscopic Simulation (AMS) model – Moves vehicles based upon speed-density (v-k) relationship – v-k relationship is derived from Greenshields equation

Transportation Operations Group Calibration  Time-Dependent OD – Minimize the deviation between simulated and actual screen line counts & speed profile – Iterative process – Program solves linearized quadratic minimization problem – Results in updated OD matrices Traffic Network Traffic Flow Model Intersection Controls Estimated Time- Dependent OD Matrices Traffic Assignment/ Simulation Linear Optimization Model Optimized Affected, Time-Dependent OD Pairs Results Update Demand Assignment Results

Transportation Operations Group Conversion Process  Sub-area cut – Remove unneeded sections of network – Renumbering of new zones, nodes and links – Retains paths and flows that travel through the sub-area

Transportation Operations Group Conversion Process  DynusT-VISSIM Converter – Developed by researchers from TTI and UA – Converts roadway network to VISUM network – Retains network geometry – Converts all time- dependent paths and flows – Creates separate transportation systems (car, truck)

Transportation Operations Group Conversion Process  Microscopic model – Calibrate VISSIM model to reflect realistic roadway conditions – Perform detailed “fine- grained” analyses » Speed profile for individual lanes » Lane-changing behaviors » Vehicle interactions at merge areas – Create 3-D graphics for presentations

Transportation Operations Group Modeling Issues  Consistency – Network » Lane configuration » Geometric design – Paths and flow » Verify same origin/destination paths » Verify number of vehicles generated – Speed profile » Perform field data collection to determine speed and vehicle counts » Obtain v-k curve from simulation output » Calibrate models with field data

Transportation Operations Group Modeling Issues Density (veh/mi) Speed (mph)

Transportation Operations Group Modeling Issues When Feedback is Necessary Rerun DTA Regional Travel Demand Model Initial Network Conversion (DynusT) Calibration Speed Profile OD Traffic Model Sub-Area CutDVC VISSIM Calibration Network Modification Field Data Detailed Analysis No Yes

Transportation Operations Group Outline  Introduction – Mesoscopic – Microscopic  Multi-Resolution Modeling – Concept – Conversion Process – Modeling Issues  Case Study  Applications

Transportation Operations Group Case Study City Council proposes ordinance to restrict trucks from using left lane on I-10 corridor Model entire 22-mile corridor Analyze during peak hour traffic Freeway grade affects truck acceleration Use separate truck demand How does the ordinance affect the freeway and surrounding arterials?

Transportation Operations Group Case Study Which type of model do I use? Macroscopic Mesoscopic Microscopic

Transportation Operations Group Case Study  Truck restricted lanes – A case study to analyze the effectiveness of restricting trucks from left-most fast lane on freeway – 22-mile corridor of I-10 in El Paso, TX – Analyze a.m. peak, p.m. peak, & mid-day – Determine benefits » Speed on left-most lane » Acceleration/Deceleration patterns » Vehicle interactions at merge areas – DynusT estimates region-wide truck trajectories (route and flows) – VISSIM models detailed IH-10 truck lane operations given truck trajectories

Transportation Operations Group Model Development 106 Origin/Destination links Routes created

Transportation Operations Group Model Development GPS unit was used to input freeway grading information

Transportation Operations Group Model Development Field data collection-freeway speed profile (PM peak hour)

Transportation Operations Group Model Development Data provided by TxDOT Automatic Traffic Recorder Stations

Transportation Operations Group Model Development

Transportation Operations Group Case Study SpeedAccel/Decel

Transportation Operations Group Case Study SpeedAccel/Decel

Transportation Operations Group Case Study Speed – Left vs. Right Lane

Transportation Operations Group Outline  Introduction – Mesoscopic – Microscopic  Multi-Resolution Modeling – Concept – Conversion Process – Modeling Issues  Case Study  Applications

Transportation Operations Group Applications  Managed lanes – Truck restricted lanes – HOV lanes – HOT lanes – Time-dependent variable pricing

Transportation Operations Group Applications  Geometric design alternatives – Freeway direct connect » Various design configurations – Ramp reconfiguration » Braided ramps » “X” ramps

Transportation Operations Group Applications  Traffic impact studies – New retail shopping centers » Driveways » Pedestrian crossings – University campus planning » Integrating various modes of transportation (e.g. student, faculty, staff, pedestrians, transit) » New parking facilities » Campus core closure – Traffic calming

Transportation Operations Group Questions ?