Kalundborg, Denmark www.inbicon.com. Crop Residues: Potential, Problems and Solutions EPAC Biofuel Summit Larry Johnson; Inbicon A/S June 7, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tim Reinbott University of Missouri Bradford Research and Extension Center.
Advertisements

James C. Greenwood President & CEO. The Future of Food and Fuel is Biotechnology.
Soil C change with management Balancing Crop Biomass for Bioenergy and Conservation REAP - Renewable Energy Assessment Project Jane M-F Johnson 1, Ronald.
ECONOMIC MODELING OF A LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS BIOREFINING INDUSTRY Francis M. Epplin Lawrence D. Mapemba Gelson Tembo Department of Agricultural Economics.
Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energyeere.energy.gov 1 Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov The Future of Biomass-Based Energy: The DOE Perspective.
Cover Crops and Biofuels Implications for Soil Characteristics and Plant Development Deanna Boardman October 21, 2009.
Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Growing Energy How Biofuels Can Help End America’s Oil Dependence Jeff Fiedler Natural Resources Defense Council March 22, 2005.
Socio-Economic Impacts of U.S. Ethanol Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Risk Assessment and Economics of Forest Biorefinery Concepts USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.
Biomass for Biofuel.
Biofuel Crop Production
DOE/USDA Biomass Feedstock Gate Review Meeting March, 2005 Note: Each presentation is allotted 35 minutes; 20 min. for the presentation and 15 min. for.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Economic Models of Biofuels and Policy Analysis John Miranowski,* Professor of Economics Iowa State University *With Alicia Rosburg, Research Assistant.
Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding Agriculture’s Contribution to the Energy Supply Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte University of Tennessee.
Switchgrass to Ethanol Production John Pangle April 12, 2007.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Integrated Biomass Supply Analysis & Logistics IBSAL Shahab Sokhansanj and Anthony Turhollow.
The Energy Bill, Biofuel Markets and the Implications for Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chesapeake College, Wye Mill, MD February 21, 2008 University.
Cellulosic Ethanol In-Chul Hwang. What is Cellulosic Ethanol? Ethanol made from cellulosic biomass which Ethanol made from cellulosic biomass which comprises.
Biofuels, Energy Security, and Future Policy Alternatives Wally Tyner Purdue University.
Future of the Bioeconomy and Biofuels: Overview, Industry, and Agriculture? Dan Otto Chad Hart John A. Miranowski Iowa State University.
Crop Farming and Sustainability The good and the bad.
ABFC2015 New Orleans, LA – June 9, 2015 Sorghum: An established crop for sustainable, global production.
CORN STOVER APPROACHING ITS REAL WORTH CTIC Meeting David Glassner National Renewable Energy Lab Jim Hettenhaus c.e.a.Chief Executive Assistance October.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Environment and Natural Resources Stewardship: Opportunities and Issues Jim Pease and Matt Helmers.
Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile,
Pros & Cons of Counting Indirect Land Use Change Ron Plain, Ph.D. Professor of Agricultural Economics University of Missouri-Columbia
NRCS Programs Provide Biofuel and Biomass Opportunities for Producers Switchgrass harvest for biofuels, Photo: NRCS Iowa.
Pennsylvania Biomass Energy Opportunities. Co-firing Biomass with Coal The opportunity to burn biomass with coal to produce electricity is better in PA.
United States Department of Agriculture Renewable Energy Programs Advance Biofuels Leadership Conference 2011 USDA’s Support For The President’s Clean.
Agricultural Economics Grain Market Outlook by Cory G. Walters University of Kentucky (859)
Putting the Hopes and Fears of Climate Change Legislation in Perspective _________________________________________ Sustainable Agriculture: The Key to.
NexSteppe Vision Be a leading provider of scalable, reliable and sustainable feedstock solutions for the biofuels, biopower and biobased product industries.
Lou Burke Manager, Emerging Technology ConocoPhillips
Removing Risk from the Biomass Supply Chain: Growing a Sustainable Pathway Biofuels Law and Regulation Conference Sam Jackson May 2, 2014.
Energy and Products from Agricultural Biomass: Prospects and Issues F. Larry Leistritz Donald M. Senechal Nancy M. Hodur Presented at: IAIA 2007 Conference,
Beyond Corn and Soybeans: Cellulose Feedstocks Marie E. Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Chad Hellwinckel, Jamey Menard, Kim Jensen, and.
Why 2g Sugar Process Should Begin with Wet Feedstock Storage Jim Hettenhaus, cea Inc ABFC New Orleans, LA June 2015.
Background Deriving fuel from biological sources is an idea that has become popular as fossil fuel supplies are diminished, atmospheric carbon dioxide.
USDA – Strategies for Promoting the Production of Advanced Biofuels Chavonda Jacobs-Young, Ph.D. Advanced Biofuels Leadership Conference April 27, 2010.
“Focus on Energy: Using Biomass for Fuel”. Making ethanol work for the world. ™ Larry Johnson Business & Project Development.
THE SUPPLY OF CORN STOVER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Richard G. Nelson 1, Marie E. Walsh 2, and John Sheehan 3 1 Kansas State University 2 University.
Estimated Impacts of Attaining 60 Billion Gallons of Ethanol by 2030 on Agriculture and the Nation’s Economy Governor’s Ethanol Coalition Kansas City,
Precision Ag in Hay Production Brian Sheffield SOIL 4213.
America’s 21st Century Transportation Fuel Ethanol From Biomass.
APCA Agricultural Policy Options for Improving Energy Crop Economics Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
An Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Corn Grain Ethanol Industry on the Agricultural Sector Western Agricultural Economics Association.
American Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EIS) and the global agriculture Yong Liu Department of Agriculture.
Bioenergy: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel.
2005 OBP Biennial Peer Review Selective Harvest Kevin L. Kenney, Christopher T. Wright Biomass Feedstock Interface Platform November 14, 2005.
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics The Potential Values and Cost of Corn Stover Corn Stover Harvest & Transport Seminar Omaha, Nebraska Sept.
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Corn Stover: Economic Considerations Iowa Corn Stover Harvest Meeting Dubuque, Iowa March 6, 2013 Chad Hart.
Department of Economics Biofuel Economics Intensive Program in Biorenewables Ames, Iowa June 9, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Biofuel Report Summary Biofuels Team - David Terry Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop Denver,
Biofuels 2.0 Sustainable Startups Jack Oswald, CEO SynGest Inc.
Biofuels CENV 110. Topics The Technology Current status around the world – Supply and trends in production Impact Benefits Costs – Carbon balance – Net.
“Stocklage Plus” Turning roughage into high quality feed By: Rosendahl Farms Seed and Feed – Columbus, NE.
Cooperation Needs and Opportunities
Logistical Efficiency with Dedicated Energy Crops
Development of Logistics Systems for Sustainable Supply of Herbaceous and Woody Feedstocks - Final Report - Vance Morey Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering.
Meeting the Realities of Corn Stover Supply Chain Operation
Second Generation Biofuels in India – Relevance and Status
Chad Hart & Bruce Babcock
Kelly Zering Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics
DuPont Biofuels: Building a Sustainable Future
Biofuels – Agricultural Issues and Outlook: Some Comments
Presentation transcript:

Kalundborg, Denmark

Crop Residues: Potential, Problems and Solutions EPAC Biofuel Summit Larry Johnson; Inbicon A/S June 7, 2011

Current Status: Potential: Why Harvest Crop Biomass? – Policies and economics Problems: Obstacles and Deterrents – History, logistics, cost and weather Solutions: Innovation and Incentives – Farmers and equipment manufacturers – Favorable economics and policies Presentation Objectives

Tons of Available Stover

2007 U.S. average yield (USDA-NASS 2008) Perlack et al Slide by INL Crop/Format Grain Yield a (bu/acre) Grain Test Weight b (lb/bu) Moisture Content of Test Weight (%) Residue-to-Grain Ratio Residue Yield (DM ton/acre) Corn Sorghum Wheat: Winter Wheat: Spring Barley Oats Soybeans Rice

Market Opportunities & Drivers BioFuels Production

Research Projects Deere. ADM, Monsanto (DAM) 3 year trials Document stover analysis and nutrient removal Document minimal soil loss to erosion Identified equipment and storage issues POET trials and commercialization Energized many equipment companies 56,000 tons commercially delivered in Utilized BCAP program AGCO. $5 million U.S. DoE biomass grant Biomass feedstock supply demonstration

1.Potential energy value of cellulose is huge 2.Domestic biomass energy vs. imported oil 3.Cellulosic ethanol benefits local economy 4.Stover removal provides agronomic benefits 5.Reduction of GHG emissions Resource Value Policy Drivers Jobs & Economy Agronomy Carbon Mgmnt. Why Will We harvest Crop Residues?

13 billion bu. Corn = 360 million tons of stover Availability = 1/3 sustainably removed – 120MM tons Combustion Potential = 7159 Btus/lb. – (3 year DAM study) Ethanol Potential = 5.7 bgy (C6) bgpy (C5) – 11 billion gallons ethanol plus 23 million tons lignin Potential Stover Value = $20 to $40 billion – Most is currently unused and undervalued Resource Value Policy Drivers Jobs & Economy Agronomy Carbon Mgmnt.

55,617,000 sm. grain acres = 116 million tons of straw Availability = 1/3 sustainably removed = 39 million tons Oats: 1,315, t/a = 2,236,000 tons Barley: 2,546, t/a = 4,837,000 tons Sp Wheat: 13,590, t/a =16,308,000 tons W. Wheat: 32,085, t/a = 69,961,000 tons D. Wheat: 2,588, t/a = 3,105,000 tons Rice: 3,493, t/a = 16,417,000 tons Ethanol Potential = 1.9 bgy (C6) bgy (C5) – 3.6 billion gallons ethanol plus 7.6 million tons lignin Resource Value Policy Drivers Jobs & Economy Agronomy Carbon Mgmnt.

Domestic, renewable energy is policy goal Energy security is a priority Economic hedge on oil prices Equipment company investment Value to agriculture and rural America Carbon Sequestration Resource Value Policy Drivers Jobs & Economy Agronomy Carbon Mgmnt.

20mgy plant will need 500,000 tons of residue > $200 million in local investment $30 million in new feedstock value 40 new ethanol plant employees Procurement co. full & part time employees Potential BCAP dollars to local economy Resource Value Policy Drivers Jobs & Economy Agronomy Carbon Mgmnt.

Facilitates residue management Complimentary to “stacked” corn hybrids Allows soil to warm up and dry out earlier Enables reduced tillage and no-till No-till increases soil carbon & organic matter Does not tie up nitrogen Will increase yield the following year Resource Value Policy Drivers Jobs & Economy Agronomy Carbon Mgmnt.

London 01 February 2008 Resource Value Policy Drivers Jobs & Economy Agronomy Carbon Mgmnt. Photo by Jim Streater, Rochester New Holland

Stover removal prevents degradation emissions Stover combustion replaces fossil fuels Stover removal reduces tillage trips Stover removal enables No Till planting No Till enhances soil carbon and organic matter * No Till reduced NOX by 57% compared to chisel plow and 40% over moldboard plow (GHG = 310x CO2) *Purdue University, Tony Vyn 12/2010 Resource Value Policy Drivers Jobs & Economy Agronomy Carbon Mgmnt.

Issues and Challenges Weather Impacts Logistics & Variables Product Specs. Agronomic Factors Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

DAM study: 3 year ave “harvest days” – Harvest Day = 3 rd day without rain. Soil conditions and product moisture Square bales do not shed rainwater Bales may be road-sided to “cure” Storage depends on % moisture and wrap Weather Impacts Logistics & Variables Product Specs. Agronomic Factors

Roadsided bales

Management and organizational skills People, equipment, fuel, maintenance Individual producer contract management Recording volumes and quality for each field Coordinate transportation and storage sites 500,000 tons = 26,042 tons/day baled Requires ~ 50 $110,000 each Weather Impacts Logistics & Variables Product Specs. Agronomic Factors

Farmers will focus on grain harvest Short harvest “window” after grain harvest Coordinate with fertilizer application & tillage Most local labor is already utilized Trucks and equipment are being utilized Procurement and harvest will be done by a third party with possible subcontracts to qualified farmers. Weather Impacts Logistics & Variables Product Specs. Agronomic Factors

Power from nature’s leftovers Ethanol made from waste Monsanto predicts ag waste will grow as traditional crop yields increase Switchgrass, blade sorghum, miscanthus crops development DONG Energy brings know-how to biomass

Inbicon Biomass Refinery: Biomass handling and preparation

Determine delivered value at the plant Moisture, cob/stalk ratio, ash, shrink, molds Develop ASTM standardized test methods Guide to harvest methods and timing – Equipment will target specific parts of corn plant Eventually stover will have commodity status Weather Impacts Logistics & Variables Product Specs. Agronomic Factors

Soil structure and organic matter (OM) Continuous corn and yield impacts Additional commercial fertilizer required Soil Compaction and seedbed preparation Soil Erosion and no-till opportunities Field slope and contours Double crop, cover crop and harvest delays Weather Impacts Logistics & Variables Product Specs. Agronomic Factors

NutrientIowa Prior work DAM Project 3 year average DAM projected for 3 tons/A Iowa 3 year average price Nutrient value removed (DAM data) N #$0.50/lb.$24.50 P #$0.62/lb$ 9.92 K #$0.50/lb$27.50 NutrientRemoved/ton low value Removed /ton high value ‘09 ISU Cost/lb ‘10 ISU Cost/lb ‘11 ISU Cost/lb Three year cost range of nutrient replacement N $0.68$0.33$0.51$4.48 to $25.16 P $0.90$0.38$0.59$1.33 to $5.31 K $0.72$0.43$0.47$8.47 to $23.76 Variation in value/ton of removed nutrients$14.28 to $ Nielson Lang NRDC 2005 Weather Impacts Logistics & Variables Product Specs. Agronomic Factors

Issues and Challenges Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing Weather Impacts Logistics & Variables Product Specs. Agronomic Factors

Single pass: baler tied to combine – Clean product, low volume, mostly cobs Two passes: windrow created by combine – Clean product but potential drying problems Multiple passes – Chopping, raking, baling is traditional method – Expensive, soil compaction, high dirt content Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Equipment Mfgrs. are investing in R&D Unique feedstock specifications will require unique equipment Product specs. will drive equipment design Prototypes and mass production take time Equipment production requires product orders Industry needs to formulate equipment orders Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Variable with variety, season and weather Bale wraps and stack wraps (anaerobic) Regional storage sites (200 total acres) Tarps or buildings needed to cover bales On farm storage - incentives and rules Monitoring and managing storage Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Guaranteed product delivery and penalties Down payment will be required Designated volume removed from each field Define harvest practices and conditions Define harvest timeline window Product specifications and price factors Storage, delivery and payment schedule Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

Equipment capital: $15-25 million – Dependent on harvest methods Inventory 500K = $25 million – $12.5 million to farmer/producers 3ton/acre x $25/ton = $75/acre - $25/A for fertilizer – $12.5 million for harvest/storage/freight $60/delivered ton provides a $10/ton profit Equipment Innovation Storage Issues Producer Contracts Business Financing

We have learned to handle 13 billion bushels of corn. We can do the same with biomass.

Conclusions 1)Crop Residue harvest will become routine 2)Biomass is an underutilized energy resource 3)We are still learning how best to collect and store large volumes of Crop residue. 4)With incentives, efficient solutions will come from farmers and equipment manufacturers 5)The greatest risk of failure is due to current uncertainty about U.S. energy policy.

Kalundborg, Denmark