Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements Notice of Proposed Rulemaking What NCBFAA and NEI Members Need to Know January 31, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome To Academy Sports + Outdoors Vendor Seminar NYK Logistics Session June 08 & 09, 2009.
Advertisements

10+2 Importer Security Filing Brought To the Importer By
Importer Security Filing Program 1. Background on ISF Advance Trade Data Initiative (June 2004) CBP Targeting Taskforce (March – May 2006) SAFE.
Importer Security Filing We’ll Make It Work For You.
1 Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements “10+2” Trade Outreach Webinar Spring 2010.
On January 26, 2009, a new rule titled Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier requirements went into effect. This rule is known as because.
Vision Importer Security Filing Software Training Seller Module Training V3_0214 English.
© 2009 Transmodal Corporation 1 Overview of ISF Presented By Chris Peterson, Vice President Customs & Compliance.
 Long Island Import Export Association Impact of Trade Compliance on Importers & Exporters *connectedthinking.
In-Bonds (CBP 7512) Mercancia bajo finanza Aduanero
January 16, 2008 Moderated by Mary Jo Muoio, NCBFAA President Peter H. Powell, Sr., NCBFAA Senior Counselor Alan R. Klestadt, NCBFAA Customs Counsel Importer.
10+2 Importer Security Filing Brought To the Importer By.
CONECT Northeast Trade & Transportation Conference AES & CBP Enforcement March 18, 2009 Roland Shrull, Esq. Middleton & Shrull (781) www. middleton-shrull.com.
Simplified Trade Processes CBP Trade Integrated Planning and Coordination Cell Initiative COAC Trade Facilitation Subcommittee October 4, 2011.
1 CHAPTER XV DRAWBACK  Types of Drawback  Manufacturing Drawback Direct Identification Drawback Substitution Drawback  Rejected Merchandise Drawback.
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements “10+2” Program Update March 10, 2010.
Importing Updates to the Trade 2009
5/24/20151 Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements “10+2” Program Last Updated: February 12, 2009.
2000 U.S. Census Bureau Foreign Trade Statistics Regulations 15 CFR Part 30 **** U.S. Principal Party in Interest and Forwarding Agent Responsibilities,
Bill Delansky, Product Owner, Manifest and Exports ACE Business Office
1 CHAPTER XIII CUSTOMS CLEARANCE  Entry Process of Goods, Types of Entry  Evidence of Right to Make Entry  Entry Documents, Surety  Entry Summary &
Globalization of Container Security Its Origins, Its Transition, and Its Current Status Dr. Jim Giermanski Powers International.
Importer Security Filing AKA Background The ISF and Additional Carrier Requirements were borne out of the Security and Accountability For Every.
Required Advance Electronic Presentation of Cargo Information - Air; Final Rule US Customs and Border Protection JANUARY 2004.
April CBP Initiative: Advance Trade Data Elements Advance Trade Data Elements “Security Filing”
8/25/ REMOTE LOCATION FILING RLF PRESENTED BY CBFFFAC SPEAKERS: MERIT TREMPER RIM LOGISTICS PHYLLIS RUBENSTEIN CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION.
SBS Group of Companies Welcome SBS Group of Companies Neville Peterson LLP Customs Regulatory Review November 6, 2008.
1 ACE Overview and the Periodic Monthly Statement Process.
1 RBNA/ITR3 | 11/17/2009 | © 2009 Robert Bosch LLC and affiliates. All rights reserved. Update on the Importer Security Filing ITA/GC Arthur O’Meara Robert.
NCBFAA WEBINAR ADVANCE TRADE DATA ELEMENTS March 1, 2007 Moderated by Mary Jo Muoio and Alan R. Klestadt.
Foreign Trade Division Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee 1 September 2012.
1 Omari Wooden Trade Ombudsman U.S. Census Bureau Foreign Trade Division Foreign Trade Regulations & Automated Export System.
1 1 Web-based Self-filing of Customs Entries & ISF.
Trade Act of 2002 Office of Field Operations Kimberly Nott, Chief Manifest and Conveyance Branch September 2004.
Unrestricted CBP ITDS CONOPS Trans Border Working Group Boston April 13, 2010.
© 2009 Center for Global Trade Education and Compliance Inc. LEGAL UPDATE: Importer Security Filing (aka ) International Transportation Management.
Importer Security Filing “10 + 2”. What is it? Required electronic filing of certain data elements 24 hours prior to the vessel loading in the foreign.
Challenges of the ISF: Customs Brokers’ Perspective Challenges of the ISF: Customs Brokers’ Perspective Mary Jo Muoio, LCB, CCS Senior Vice President Barthco.
is intended to improve the ability of Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”)to identify high-risk shipments to the United States will require.
2000 U.S. Census Bureau Regulations Update Foreign Trade Division September 2000.
Trade Security Importer Security Filing We’ll Make It Work For You Mary Jo Muoio Senior Vice President Barthco Trade Services, division OHL President.
ISF 10+2: How to Make it Add Up for You questions to: July 22, 2008 WEBCAST.
1 Foreign Trade Regulations Highlights Texas Brokers Association, Inc. Jerry Greenwell September 24-27, 2008.
Implementation of Prior Notice. Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (Bioterrorism Act-BTA) Public Law
March 7, Trade Software Developer Technical Seminar March 7, 2012 Cargo Release Scope and Functionality  Steven Lubel, CBP, ACE Program, Technical.
Importer Security Filing (“ISF”).  Required by § 203 of SAFE Port Act of 2006  Also known as “10 + 2”  Consists of 10 pieces of information filed by.
PROGRAM Importer Security Filing. 10 Additional Elements 1. Seller name and address 2. Consolidator name and address 3. Container stuffing location.
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements “10+2” Program.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Customs and Border Protection.
Kelly Global Logistics Inc.. The “REAL” 10+2 /ISF Is Almost Here Will You Be Ready?
SCRLC Regulatory/Security Track. Topics Proposed SOW for Regulatory/Security Track Summary report : Annual Customs and Border Protection C-TPAT Seminar.
PROPOSED NEW DATA ELEMENTS 24 Hours Prior to Lading.
Required Advance Electronic Presentation of Cargo Information Summary of Inbound Vessel Cargo Provisions March 18, 2004.
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements Data, Dates and Decisions.
Rules for Improving Cargo Security The Maritime 24 Hour Rule The Trade Act of 2002 The Automated Manifest System (AMS)
1 CHAPTER XIII CUSTOMS CLEARANCE  Entry Process of Goods, Types of Entry  Evidence of Right to Make Entry  Entry Documents, Surety  Entry Summary &
Routed Export Transactions
Automated Manifest System (“AMS”) C. Jonathan Benner Troutman Sanders LLP Washington, D.C. 22 March 2004 Stamford, Connecticut.
Supply Chain Security Programs: Challenges and Effects - An Ocean Carrier Export View Tradewatch 2011 Andy Lumley OOCL (USA) Inc. February 17, 2011.
UNECE – United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UN/CEFACT – UN Centre for Trade Facilitation and e-Business Session 6B Business Process Analysis.
Tablet Press & Capsule Filling Machine Transaction Regulations
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements
Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements
Tablet Press & Capsule Filling Machine Transaction Regulations (March 2019)
eBooking Supplementary User Guide - ISF
Presentation transcript:

Importer Security Filing and Additional Carrier Requirements Notice of Proposed Rulemaking What NCBFAA and NEI Members Need to Know January 31, 2008

Presenters:  Mr. Richard DiNucci Director, Secure Freight Initiative Customs and Border Protection  Ms. Mary Jo Muoio President, National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of America, Inc

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking  Published in the FEDERAL REGISTER January 2, 2008 Volume 73, No. 1 Pages  CBP authority for proposed rule 24-hour rule Trade Act Regulations SAFE Port Act

Proposed Importer Requirements  Definition of Importer for Purposes of Rule The party causing the goods to arrive within the limits of a port in the United States For FROB the importer is construed as the carrier For IE/TE and FTZ cargo the importer is construed as the party filing the in-bond or FTZ documentation

Proposed Importer Requirements Data 1.Manufacturer (or seller) name and address Name and address of the entity that last manufacturers, assembles, produces, or grows the commodity or name and address of the supplier of the finished goods in the country from which the goods are leaving. Alternative—provide the name and address of party currently reported with a MID on the entry as the manufacturer

Data 2.Seller name and address Name and address of the last known entity by whom the goods are sold or agreed to be sold. If non-purchase, report the name and address of the owner of the goods.

Data 3.Buyer name and address Name and address of the last known entity to whom the goods are sold or agreed to be sold. If non-purchase, report the name and address of the owner of the goods.

Data 4.Ship to name and address Name and address of the first deliver-to party scheduled to physically receive the goods after they have been released from customs custody.

Data 5.Container stuffing location Name and address(es) of the physical location(s) where the goods were stuffed into the container. For break bulk cargo, report the name and address the physical location where the goods were made ‘ship ready’

Data 6.Consolidator (stuffer) name and address Name and address of the party who stuffed the container or arranged for the stuffing For break bulk cargo, report the name and address of the party who made the goods ‘ship ready’ or who arranged for the goods to be made ‘ship ready’

Data 7.Importer of Record Number FTZ applicant identification number IRS, EIN, SSN or CBP assigned number of the entity liable for payment of all duties and responsible for meeting all statutory and regulatory requirements incurred as a result of importation For goods intended to be delivered to a FTZ, report the IRS, EIN, SSN or CBP assigned number of the party filing the FTZ documentation

Data 8.Consignee number(s) IRS, EIN, SSN or CBP assigned number of the individual(s) or firm(s) in the US on whose account the merchandise is shipped

Data 9.Country of Origin Country of manufacture, production, or growth of the article based upon the import laws, rules and regulations of the US

Data 10. Commodity HTSUS number tariff number under which the article is classified in the HTSUS required up to the 6-digit level

Compatibility of Definition with Entry Requirements 1.Manufacturer—can use party used for MID purposes; consistent with CBP Form Seller—consistent with invoice requirement 3.Buyer—consistent with invoice requirement 4.Ship to--unique 5.Container stuffing location—unique 6.Consolidator—unique 7.Importer of record—consistent with CBP Form Consignee—consistent with CBP Form Country of origin—consistent with CBP Form Commodity HTSUS no—consistent with CBP Form 3461

The Link  Manufacturer (or supplier) name and address, country of origin, and commodity HTSUS number must be linked to one another at the line-item level

FROB, IE, TE Data 1.Booking party name and address 2.Foreign port of unlading 3.Place of delivery 4.Ship to name and address 5.Commodity HTSUS number

That Was the Ten, This is the Two  Vessel Stow Plan no later than 48 hours after departure from the last foreign port Prior to arrival for voyages under 48 hours  Standard vessel information 1.Vessel name 2.Vessel operator 3.Voyage number  Per container or unit of break bulk cargo 1.Container operator 2.Equipment number 3.Equipment size and type 4.Stow position 5.Hazmat UN code 6.Port of lading 7.port of discharge

That Was the Ten, This is the Two  Container Status Message Proposal for carrier to submit a CSM when any of the required events occurs if the carrier creates or collects a CSM in its equipment tracking system Information to be included 1.Event code being reported 2.Container number 3.Date and time of the event being reported 4.Status of the container 5.Location where the event took place 6.Vessel identification associated with the message

Electronic Data Interchange System  The current approved electronic data interchange systems for the ISF are ABI AMS  Proposal to permit any ISF filer to gain access to ABI for the purpose of transmitting the ISF, bond required

The Missing Link  CBP is proposing that the Importer Security Filing be submitted at the lowest bill level, down to the house bill  Bill be the one under which the cargo is brought to the United States  CBP is proposing that the bill of lading be reported

Timing is Everything  ISF for FROB—transmitted anytime prior to lading  Break bulk—transmitted 24 hours prior to arrival  ISF for all other covered cargo-- transmitted no later than 24 hours prior to lading

Importer or Their Agent  The importer is ultimately responsible of the timely accurate and complete submission of the ISF  One party to aggregate and submit all required ISF elements  Importer may designate an agent to submit the filings

Authorized Agents  Eligibility participation in the approved data interchange system Basic importation and entry bond  Power of Attorney Retain and make available to CBP upon request

Planes, Trains and Automobiles  This rulemaking specifically applies to all cargo arriving to the US by vessel Included—containerized and break bulk cargo Included—RoRo Excluded—bulk  CBP will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of this rule and will consider additional steps, including expanding the advance data requirements of other transportation modes.

Regulatory Compliance  Additional exemptions to be determined via ruling process  Permission to change port of destination or export for IE/TE must be requested  Permission to change an in-bond to consumption entry must be requested  Updated—by party who submitted, after filing and before the goods enter the limits of a port  Withdrawal—by party who submitted, include reason for withdrawal

Regulatory Compliance  Verification of Information Where the party electronically presenting to CBP the ISF receives any of this information from anther party, CBP will take into consideration how, in accordance wit ordinary commercial practices, the presenting party acquired such information, and whether and how the presenting party is able to verify this information. Where the presenting party is not reasonably able to verify such information, CBP will permit the party to electronically present the information on the basis of what the party reasonably believes to be true.

Regulatory Compliance Bonds and Damages  CBP is proposing to amend the basic importation and entry bond Agreement to comply with ISF  Liquidated damages equal to the value of the goods  CBP is proposing to amend the international carrier bond If carrier files ISF, agreement to comply with ISF  Liquidated damages equal to the value of the goods Agreement to comply with vessel stow plan requirements  Liquidated damages equal to $50,000 for each vessel arrival Agreement to comply with CSM requirement  Liquidated damages of $5,000 per violation, max $100,000

Points to Ponder  Proposed data interchange systems  Proposed access to ABI  Bond requirement  Liability and Liquidated damages  Customs business  Notification and query capabilities  Confidentiality

Comment Period and Process Substance of the Proposal  Written comments must be submitted to CBP on or before March 3, 2008 Possible extension  Via portal or mail

Comment Period and Process Collection of Information  Within the time frame that comments are due regarding the substance of the proposal  Addressed to OMB with copy to CBP

Comments to NCBFAA   Reference “ISF”