George D. Kuh Council of Graduate Schools Washington, DC November 22, 2010 Learning Outcomes Assessment: A National Perspective.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Advertisements

Our Institutions CSB/SJU Two schools, one academic program Liberal Arts, Residential, Catholic, Benedictine 3,900+ undergraduates 300+ FTE faculty Distribution.
ASSESSMENT 101 Preparing Future Faculty (PFF) Workshop Spring 2011 Facilitators: Dr. Kara Penfield, Director of Academic Assessment; Isis Artze-Vega, PFF.
Organizing Assessment to Foster Students’ Best Work Council for the Advancement of Standards National Symposium November 16, 2009 Carol Geary Schneider.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
George Kuh SAIR New Orleans, LA September 26, 2010 NILOA: Tracking the Status of Outcomes Assessment in the U.S.
The Board’s Role in Accreditation Michael F. Middaugh Associate Provost for Institutional Effectiveness University of Delaware Celine R. Paquette Trustee,
Assessment of General Education Patricia E. Beeson Vice Provost for Graduate and Undergraduate Studies February 11, 2008 University of Pittsburgh.
Accountability in Higher Education Belle S. Wheelan, Ph.D. Commission on Colleges--SACS.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Effective Grading and Assessment:. Strategies to Enhance Student Learning.
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
Student Success Factors Faculty In-Service Program Tuesday, August 25.
Promoting Universal Values in the Face of Societal Change The Council of Europe Caryn McTighe Musil November 20, 2007 Association of American Colleges.
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
Welcome… The attendee will understand assessment basics with a focus on creating learning activities and identifying assessment expectations. Apply the.
Maps, Rubrics and Templates A Primer on Their Uses for Assessment in Student Affairs.
An initiative of the Research & Planning Group for California Community Colleges Assessing Institutional Effectiveness An RP Group initiative funded by.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Frequently asked questions about development, interpretation and use of rubrics on campuses 1.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
George D. Kuh Rankings and the Visibility of Quality Outcomes in the EHEA Dublin, Ireland January 31, 2013 Measuring What Matters: Forging the Right Tools.
Jeannie Couper, MSN, RN-BC Seton Hall University May 9, 2012.
Learning Outcomes and Assessment APCC Peter Wolf April
George D. Kuh Council on University Planning and Analysis
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
FACILITATING AND DOCUMENTING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Chantal Levesque-Bristol Associate Professor of Psychology Director, Faculty Center for Teaching.
Terrel L Rhodes Association of American Colleges and Universities University of South Carolina May 21, 2010.
Assessment Update Report to the University Senate 3 October 2006.
RE-ENGAGING THE CAMPUS IN DISCUSSING, DELIVERING, AND ASSESSING LEARNING OUTCOMES C. “Griff” Griffin, Director of General Education Wendy Wenner, Dean,
Liberal Education and America’s Promise: Changing the Conversation about Student Success and Institutional Accountability SHEEO—Denver, CO August 2009.
Three Decades Later: A Day With Peter Ewell Peter T. Ewell National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS) WASC Assessment Institute June.
Creating Academic Cultures of Evidence: A Perspective on Learning Outcomes Peter T. Ewell National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS)
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Presented by Dr. Debra A. Buchanan Center for Assessment of Academic and Student Service Programs* *CAASSP is funded by a U.S.
Implementing an Ability Based Education System Colleen Keyes Dean of Academic Affairs Dr. David England Director of Institutional Effectiveness.
Responding to Calls for Greater Accountability SHEEO-NCES Network Conference April 17, 2008 Christine M. Keller NASULGC The VSA Project.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
Integrating Teaching, Learning and Assessment: A Programmatic ePortfolio Process AAEEBL Conference, Boston, MA - July 28, 2011 Karen Stein, Faculty Director,
August 15th 2007 Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes by Kirby Hayes.
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
WASC “All Hands” Meeting Overview and Update November 12, 2007 D. Jonte-Pace.
Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.
Student and Faculty Perceptions of Goal Achievement in General Education Courses C. “Griff” Griffin Director, General Education Grand Valley State University,
Program Assessment: What Difference Does it Make? Ross Miller, AAC&U.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Assessment at City Tech April 17, 2015 Living Lab Associate Seminar Susan Nilsen-Kupsch RDH MPA.
A LEAP Toward an Educated Citizenry: The Role of Public Health APHA Washington, DC November 1, 2011 Susan Albertine Vice President Association of American.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Using AAC&U’s Learning Tools to Address Core Revision Terrel L. Rhodes Vice President Association of American Colleges and Universities Texas Coordinating.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Assurance of Learning “Eberly AOL” All College Meeting – January 21, 2009 Prashanth Bharadwaj, Dean’s Associate Cyndy Strittmatter, Assistant Dean.
Assessment Instruments and Rubrics Workshop Series Part 1: What is a rubric? What are the required elements? What are VALUE rubrics? February 24, 2016.
C OLLEGIATE L EARNING A SSESSMENT Dr. Pedro Reyes, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs January 2014.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Designing Valid Reliable Grading Tools Using VALUE Rubrics
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
Jillian Kinzie, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Presentation transcript:

George D. Kuh Council of Graduate Schools Washington, DC November 22, 2010 Learning Outcomes Assessment: A National Perspective

Advance Organizers  What kind of information about student learning is compelling and useful for: (a) guiding improvement efforts? (b) responding to accountability demands? use  What can be done to prepare the next generation of faculty and motivate the current generation to collect and use assessment results to enhance student learning?  And what about assessing learning in graduate school?!?

Context  Global Competitiveness in Degree Attainment  The New Majority and Demographic Gaps  Questionable Levels of Student Performance

NOLOA “Colleges… do so little to measure what students learn between freshman and senior years. So doubt lurks: how much does a college education – the actual teaching and learning that happens on campus – really matter?” David Leonhardt, NYTimes, Sept 27, 2009

Context  Global Competitiveness in Degree Attainment  The New Majority and Demographic Gaps  Questionable Levels of Student Performance  In a Most Challenging Fiscal Environment …  We Need Higher Levels of Student Achievement

Assessment 2010 Assessment 2010 Greater emphasis on student learning outcomes and evidence that student performance measures up

“It’s the Learning, Stupid”

Working Definition Assess: (v.): to examine carefully Assessment is the systematic collection, review, and use of information about educational programs undertaken for the purpose of improving student learning and development (Palomba & Banta, 1999, p. 4)

Assessment Purposes  Improvement  Accountability

Indicators learning outcomes educational attainment (persistence, graduation) course retention transfer student success success in subsequent courses degree/certificate completion graduate school employment/employer evaluations capacity for lifelong learning

Assessment Tools  Direct measures  Direct (outcomes) measures -- Evidence of what students have learned or can do  Indirect measures  Indirect (process) measures -- Evidence of effective educational activity by students and institutions -- Evidence of effective educational activity by students and institutions

Occasional Paper #1 Assessment, Accountability, and Improvement Peter T. Ewell Assessments of what students learn during college are typically used for either improvement or accountability, and occasionally both. Yet, since the early days of the “assessment movement” in the US, these two purposes of outcomes assessment have not rested comfortably together.

Continuous Improvement Continuous Improvement Accountability Accountability Strategic dimensions PurposeFormative (improvement)Summative (judgment) OrientationInternalExternal MotivationEngagementCompliance Implementation InstrumentationMultiple/triangulationStandardized Nature of evidenceQuantitative and qualitativeQuantitative Reference points Over time, comparative, established goal Comparative or fixed standard Communication of results Multiple internal channels Public communication, media Use of resultsMultiple feedback loopsReporting Two Paradigms of Assessment Ewell, Peter T. (2007). Assessment and Accountability in America Today: Background and Context. In Assessing and Accounting for Student Learning: Beyond the Spellings Commission. Victor M. H. Borden and Gary R. Pike, Eds. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.

Assessment 2010 Assessment 2010 Greater emphasis on student learning outcomes and evidence that student performance measures up Demands for comparative measures Increased calls for transparency --- public disclosure of student and institutional performance

Templates APLU/AASCU Voluntary System of Accountability NAICU’s U-CAN NAICU’s U-CAN College Navigator College Navigator (NCES) Transparency by Design/College Choices for Adults Transparency by Design/College Choices for Adults (WCET) AACC AACC (yet to be named) Degree Qualifications Inventory Degree Qualifications Inventory Alliance Guidelines Alliance Guidelines NILOA Transparency Framework NILOA Transparency Framework

Assessment 2010 Assessment 2010 Greater emphasis on student learning outcomes and evidence that student performance measures up Demands for comparative measures Increased calls for transparency ---public disclosure of student and institutional performance Assessment “technology” has improved markedly, but still is insufficient to document learning outcomes most institutions claim

Sample Data Sources Locally-developed measures National instruments –National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) –Beginning College Survey of Student Engagement (BCSSE) –Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) –Cooperative Institutional Research Program (CIRP) –Your First College Year (YFCY) –College Student Experiences Questionnaire (CSEQ) –Noel Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory –ETS MAPP and Major Field Tests –ACT Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency –Collegiate Learning Assessment (CLA) Institutional data -- GPA, financial aid, transcripts, retention, certification tests, alumni surveys, satisfaction surveys… Electronic portfolios

Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education (VALUE) Rubrics  Inquiry and analysis  Critical thinking  Creative thinking  Written communication  Oral communication  Reading  Quantitative literacy  Information literacy  Teamwork  Problem solving  Civic knowledge and engagement  Intercultural knowledge and competence  Ethical reasoning and action  Foundations and skills for lifelong learning  Integrative learning

AAC&U VALUE Project – 15 Rubrics

Measuring Quality in Higher Education ( Vic Borden & Brandi Kernel, 2010) Web-based inventory hosted by AIR of assessment resources. Key words can be used to search the four categories:  instruments (examinations, surveys, questionnaires, etc.);  software tools and platforms;  benchmarking systems and data resources;  projects, initiatives and services.

Do we measure what we value? Do we value what we measure? Do we measure what we value? or Do we value what we measure? Wise decisions are needed about what to measure in the context of campus mission, values, and desired outcomes.

Summary  Perhaps  Perhaps more assessment underway than some acknowledge or wish to believe  More attention needed to using and reporting assessment results  Involving faculty is a major challenge  More investment likely needed to move from data to improvement

According to Provosts, what is the driving force for assessment? a. Institutional Commitment to Improvement b. Accreditation c. Faculty & Staff Interest d. Governing Board Mandate “high importance” 85% Regional 80% Specialized

Summary  Perhaps more assessment underway than some acknowledge or wish to believe  More attention needed to using and reporting assessment results  Involving faculty is a major challenge  More investment likely needed to move from data to improvement  Accreditation is a major force shaping assessment

Regional accreditors cite deficiencies in student learning outcomes assessment with greater frequency Middle States - 2/3 of institutions have follow-up; number one reason being assessment NEASC - 80% of institutions asked for follow-up on student learning outcomes assessment HLC - 7 out of 10 institutions are being monitored; the vast majority for student learning outcomes assessment.

Looking Back: What’s Been Accomplished? Assessment Seen as Legitimate Goals for Learning Established A “Semi-Profession” for Assessment Much Better Instruments and Methods

Looking Back: What Remains to be Done? Authentic Faculty Ownership Assessment Still an “Add-On” Use of Information for Improvement is Underdeveloped Sincere Institutional Engagement with Accreditors in Assessment

Advance Organizers  What kind of information about student learning is compelling and useful for: (a) guiding improvement efforts? (b) responding to accountability demands? use  What can be done to prepare the next generation of faculty and motivate the current generation to collect and use assessment results to enhance student learning?  Do we care about assessing learning in graduate school?!?

Questions&Discussion