The Guidelines WP Webinar 04/09/2014

THE GUIDELINES REVISION PROCESS

Part A: General Rules Sophia Bonne Knowledge Circle Proceedings Webinar. 04/09/2014

OVERVIEW 1.INTRODUCTION 2.PART A : GENERAL RULES - HISTORY - CONTENTS - MAIN PRACTICE CHANGES

PART A : GENERAL RULES 1. HISTORY OF THIS PART OF THE GUIDELINES 2. CONTENTS 0 General overview of the registration process of a CTM 1Means of communication, time limits 2General Principles to be respected in the proceedings 4 Language of Proceedings 6 Revocation of decisions and cancellation of entries in the Register and correction of errors 7Revision 8Restitutio in integrum

3. MAIN PRACTICE CHANGES 6 Revocation of decisions and cancellation of entries in the Register and correction of errors

THE REDTUBE JUDGMENT ( C-402/11 P)

Part A: Section 9 Enlargement Panayotis Geroulakos Knowledge Circle Webinar. 04/09/2014

OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION - Relevant provisions concerning the accession of new Member States to EU (Article 165 CTMR) - Consequences for holders of CTMs.

ABSOLUTE GROUNDS 1. RULES CONCERNING EXAMINATION 1.1 Automatic extension of CTMs to new MS 1.2 Pending CTM Applications

RELATIVE GROUNDS 2. RULES CONCERNING OPPOSITION AND CANCELLATION 2.1 Rule  A CTM application cannot be opposed or declared invalid on the basis of an earlier national right in a new MS prior to that MS’s accession date

RELATIVE GROUNDS 2. RULES CONCERNING OPPOSITION AND CANCELLATION 2.2 Transitional exception to the rule: a CTM application, filed within the six months preceding the accession date, may be challenged by an opposition based on a national right existing in a new MS, provided that this right has an earlier filing or priority date and was acquired in good faith. 2.3 The transitional exception does not include cancellations based on relative grounds

CHANGES IN PRACTICE The chapter on Enlargement is a new addition to the Guidelines.

Part B: Examination Section 1: Proceedings Sophia Bonne Knowledge Circle Proceedings Webinar. 04/09/2014

PART B: EXAMINATION SECTION 1 : PROCEEDINGS 1. HISTORY OF THIS PART OF THE DRAFT GUIDELINES 2. CONTENTS 1Introduction : General overview 2Search 3 General principles 4Publication 5Amendments to the CTM Application

3. MAIN PRACTICE CHANGES 5.Amendments to the CTM Application

THE VORTEX JUDGMENT ( T-104/12)

Part B: Examination Section 3: Classification C. Den Dekker Knowledge Circle G&S Issues Webinar 04 September 2014

Practice changes Part B.3: examination of classification

√IP Translator judgment √Convergence Programme 1: Harmonisation of classification practice √Common Communication II: 11 non-acceptable general indications √Common Communication III: common acceptability guidelines New Classification Practice: HOW?

New Classification Practice – WHAT? The general indications that were considered to lack the clarity and precision to specify the scope of protection are marked in bold in the following list: Cl. 6 – Goods of common metal not included in other classes Cl. 7 – Machines and machine tools Cl. 14 – Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes Cl. 16 – Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials [paper and cardboard], not included in other classes Cl. 17 – Rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos, mica and goods made from these materials [rubber, gutta-percha, gum, asbestos and mica] and not included in other classes Cl. 18 – Leather and imitations of leather, and goods made of these materials [leather and imitations of leather ] and not included in other classes Cl. 20 – Goods (not included in other classes) of wood, cork, reed, cane, wicker, horn, bone, ivory, whalebone, shell, amber, mother-of-pearl, meerschaum and substitutes for all these materials, or of plastics Cl. 37 – Repair Cl. 37 – Installation services Cl. 40 – Treatment of materials Cl. 45 – Personal and social services rendered by others to meet the needs of individuals

New Classification Practice – WHAT? Non-acceptable statements: ● All goods in class X ● All services in class X, ● All goods/services in this class ● All goods/services of the alphabetical list in this class or the like ● Clothing and all other goods (services) in this class ● Clothing and all goods (services) of the alphabetical list in this class or the like

New Classification Practice – WHAT? Acceptability guidelines: i.A description of goods and services is sufficiently clear and precise when its scope of protection can be understand from its natural and usual meaning ii.If this scope of protection cannot be understood, sufficient clarity and precision may be achieved by identifying factors such as characteristics, purpose and/or identifiable market sector

New Classification Practice: WHEN? CTM: 02 December 2013

Other changes - Structure - More examples - Correction of errors Part B.3: examination of classification

New Classification Practice: WHEN? IR: 01 October 2014

New Classification Practice: WHERE?

Part B: Examination Section 4: Absolute Grounds for Refusal Part D: Section 2: Substantive provisions. Revocation Oscar Mondejar Knowledge Circle Absolute Grounds Webinar. 04/09/2014

Practice changes Part B: Examination

Absolute grounds Article 7(1)(f): public order and morality Article 7(1)(g): deceptiveness Articles 7(1)(h) and (i): protected emblems Article 7(1)(j) and (k): geographical indications Collective CTMs Revocation Term becoming generic Term becoming misleading Absolute grounds for invalidity

Public policy and morality Article 7(1)(f)

Concept of ‘public policy’ → further developed in the new text Plant varieties (practice maintained) Some examples have been fine-tuned

R 2124/2011-5T-232/10

Deceptiveness Article 7(1)(g)

Protected emblems Article 7(1)(h) and (i)

Concept of ‘heraldic imitation’ Analysis step-by-step Alignment (h) and (i): Case T-3/12 ‘Member of Euro Experts’

Protected geographical indications Article 7(1)(j) and (k)

Draft based on current Manual More guidance on: -Link between CTMR and EU Regulations on PDOs/PGIs -Relevant PDOs/PGIs -Situations covered (direct use, evocations…) -Products involved -Other PDOs (national, 3rd countries)

Collective trademarks

Collective marks → Draft substantially maintained → Ownership

Revocation Generic – Misleading - Invalidity

Becoming a generic or a misleading term Onus of proof (re-worded) Relevant point in time Relevant public (Bostongurka / Kornspitz) Absolute grounds for invalidity Some parts reworded

Part C: Opposition “Other” Relative Grounds for Refusal Elisa ZAERA WEBINAR 04/09/2014

OUTLINE Article 8(3) CTMR Article 8(4) CTMR Article 8(5) CTMR

OUTLINE Article 8(3) CTMR Article 8(4) CTMR Article 8(5) CTMR

MODIFICATIONS Preliminary Remarks Entitlement of the Opponent Scope of Application (origin earlier mark) Conditions Relationship agent/proprietor (Nature of the relationship) Application agent’s name No consent by proprietor (T-537/10 and T-538/10 FAGUMIT) No justification No need for identity of signs / goods and services

OUTLINE Article 8(3) CTMR Article 8(4) CTMR Article 8(5) CTMR

MODIFICATIONS Introduction Structure of Article 8(4) CTMR Conditions Direct right conferred on the opponent Types of rights (PGIs) Use requirements Earlier right Scope of protection Evidence and Standard of Proof Annex: Table on national legislation

DIRECT RIGHT STRUCTURAL MODIFICATION NO CHANGE OF PRACTICE

TYPES OF RIGHTS STRUCTURAL CHANGES -INTRODUCTION -PASSING-OFF CHANGES OF PRACTICE -GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

TYPES OF RIGHTS: PGIs 1.WHICH PGIs 2.SUBSTANTIATION 3.SCOPE OF PROTECTION

STANDARD OF PROOF NO CHANGE OF PRACTICE BURDEN OF PROOF: STILL WITH OPPONENT TABLE WITH NATIONAL LEGISLATION

OUTLINE Article 8(3) CTMR Article 8(4) CTMR Article 8(5) CTMR

MODIFICATIONS Introduction Scope of applicability Conditions Earlier mark with reputation Similarity of the signs Link Encroachment upon reputation: dilution Use without due cause

PROOF OF DILUTION CHANGE IN ECONOMIC BEHAVIOUR OF AVERAGE CONSUMER HOW = ? C-383/12P

Part E. Register Operations Kelly-Marie BENNETT Knowledge Circle Register and Other Issues Webinar. 04/09/2014

Part E. Section 1. Changes in a registration Outline Part E. Section 3. CTMs as objects of property Brief Description Changes compared to Manual Brief Description

Part E. Section 1. Changes in a registration Outline Part E. Section 3. CTMs as objects of property Brief Description Changes compared to Manual Brief Description

Part E. Section 1. Changes in a registration Outline Part E. Section 3. CTMs as objects of property Brief Description Changes compared to Manual Brief Description

1. Surrender Part E Section 1 – Changes 2. Alteration 3. Changes of name and address 5. Division 6. Seniority 4. Changes in collective trade mark regulations 7. Replacement

Part E Section 1, 2. Alteration Amendment – Article 43 CTMR 2. In other respects, a Community trade mark application may be amended, upon request of the applicant, only by correcting the name and address of the applicant, errors of wording or of copying, or obvious mistakes, provided that such correction does not substantially change the trade mark or extend the list of goods or services. Where the amendments affect the representation of the trade mark or the list of goods or services and are made after publication of the application, the trade mark application shall be published as amended. Alteration – Article 48 CTMR 1. The Community trade mark shall not be altered in the Register during the period of registration or on renewal thereof. 2. Nevertheless, where the Community trade mark includes the name and address of the proprietor, any alteration thereof not substantially affecting the identity of the trade mark as originally registered may be registered at the request of the proprietor.

Part E Section 1, 2. Alteration Acceptable alteration: Unacceptable alteration:

1. Surrender Part E Section 1 – Changes 2. Alteration 3. Changes of name and address 5. Division 6. Seniority 4. Changes in collective trade mark regulations 7. Replacement

Part E. Section 1. Changes in a registration Outline Part E. Section 3. CTMs as objects of property Brief Description Changes compared to Manual Brief Description

Part E. Section 1. Changes in a registration Outline Part E. Section 3. CTMs as objects of property Brief Description Changes compared to Manual Brief Description

Chapter 1. Transfer Part E Section 3 – Changes Chapter 2. Licences Chapter 3. Rights in rem Chapter 4. Levy of execution Chapter 5. Insolvency

Part M: International marks Kelly-Marie BENNETT Knowledge Circle Register and Other Issues Webinar. 04/09/2014

Part M. International marks Outline Changes compared to Manual Brief Description Fast-track changes – Change in practice

Part M. International marks Outline Changes compared to Manual Brief Description Fast-track changes – Change in practice

Part M. International marks Outline Changes compared to Manual Brief Description Fast-track changes – Change in practice

Changes compared to the Manual

Basic mark Changes compared to the Manual 2.2 Subsequent designations 2.4 Forwarding of changes affecting the international mark Seniority claims 1. Introduction 2. OHIM as Office of Origin Representation of the IR holder 3.8. Limitations of the list of goods and services 3. OHIM as Designated Office 4. Conversion, Transformation, Replacement

Part M. International marks Outline Part M International marks Changes compared to Manual Brief Description Fast-track changes – Change in practice

3.3.3 Formalities examination Vague terms 3. OHIM as Designated Office Provisional refusals will now be issued for terms considered to be too broad or too vague or that lack clarity and precision. A representative must be appointed if communicating directly with the OHIM Refusla may also be overcome by limiting the specification Enters into force 01/10/2014 More information: Track change version of the Guidelines published 01/09/2014 News item on website published 01/09/2014

Part M. International marks Kelly-Marie BENNETT Knowledge Circle Register and Other Issues Webinar. 04/09/2014

Part M. International marks Outline Changes compared to Manual Brief Description Fast-track changes – Change in practice

Part M. International marks Outline Changes compared to Manual Brief Description Fast-track changes – Change in practice

Part M. International marks Outline Changes compared to Manual Brief Description Fast-track changes – Change in practice

Changes compared to the Manual

Basic mark Changes compared to the Manual 2.2 Subsequent designations 2.4 Forwarding of changes affecting the international mark Seniority claims 1. Introduction 2. OHIM as Office of Origin Representation of the IR holder 3.8. Limitations of the list of goods and services 3. OHIM as Designated Office 4. Conversion, Transformation, Replacement

Part M. International marks Outline Changes compared to Manual Brief Description Fast-track changes – Change in practice

3.3.3 Formalities examination Vague terms 3. OHIM as Designated Office Provisional refusals will now be issued for terms considered to be too broad or too vague or that lack clarity and precision. A representative must be appointed if communicating directly with the OHIM Refusla may also be overcome by limiting the specification Enters into force 01/10/2014 More information: Track change version of the Guidelines published 01/09/2014 News item on website published 01/09/2014

Examination of Applications for RCD Dimitris Andropoulous Designs Webinar. 04/09/2014

1.Priority documents: No internet search by the design examiner 2.Non-EU applicants: Obligation for appointing an EU representative Change of practice

In accordance with Article 2 of the Decision No EX-03-5 of the President of the Office of 20 January 2003 concerning the formal requirements of a priority or seniority claim, the evidence to be provided by the applicant for a Community design shall consist of a certified copy of the previous application or registration, issued by the authority which received the previous application. The copy must contain the following elements or it must be accompanied by a certificate including such elements: - the file number of the previous application - the filing date of the previous application Priority documents

Art. 77(2)CDR …natural or legal persons not having either their domicile or their principal place of business or a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the Community must be represented before the Office in accordance with Article 78(1) CDR in all proceedings before the Office established by this Regulation, other than in filing an application for a registered Community design… Non EU applicants

A natural or legal person whose domicile, principal place of business, or real and effective industrial or commercial establishment is in the European Union may act before the Office through an employee. Employees of such a legal person may also represent another legal person having neither its domicile nor its principal place of business nor a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment within the European Union, provided there exist economic connections between the two legal persons (Article 77(3) CDR). The Office may request evidence in this respect. Employees acting on behalf of natural or legal persons pursuant to Article 77(3) CDR must submit a signed authorisation for insertion in the file (Article 62(2) CDIR). Employee representatives

Renewal of RCD Dimitris Andropoulous Designs Webinar. 04/09/2014

Section 5.1 Persons who may submit a request for renewal If the Office receives fees from two different sources, the owner will be contacted in order to know which person is authorised to file the renewal request. Where no reply is received from the owner, the Office will validate the payment that reached the Office first. Section 5.4 Fees When the payment is made by transfer or payment to an Office bank account, the date on which payment is deemed to have been made is the date on which the amount is credited to the bank account of the Office. RCD renewals

LATEST MODIFICATION THANK YOU!

Thank You (+ 34) (switchboard) (+ 34) (e-business technical incidents) (+ 34) (main fax) twitter/oamitweets youtube/oamitubes CONTACT US :

Contributors Authors Approved by owner DRAFT Status Presentation Revision history 22/08/ DescriptionAuthorDate Version First draft DD/MM/YYYY0.1-- DD/MM/YYYY0.1-- Webinar WP2 04/09/2014