Current Trends in Federal Bid Protests National 8(a) Association Meeting October 30, 2013 Rick Oehler Lee Curtis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP The Basics of Bid Protests on Federal and California State Procurements Christopher R. Rodriguez.
Advertisements

1 Providing CMMI® Process-Based Solutions Protests A Contractors Perspective Cheryl L. Nilsson Vice President, Contracts.
Determining Responsive Bids and Responsible Bidders and Offerors Presenter: J. Peter Stamps, CPPO, VCO VA Dept of General Services.
Are you Sure About That? Pete Stamps CPPO, VCO Paul Higgins VCO.
Presented by: Kathryn Hodges, NH
Gene Shawcroft, P.E. Central Utah Water Conservancy District April 29-30, 2013.
Source Selection and Contract Award
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 5 CONS – Minot AFB, North Dakota 1 Protest Procedures.
WHAT IS HIPAA? The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) provides certain protections for any of your health information.
FIVE RULES FOR EFFECTIVE DEBRIEFINGS NCMA WINTER EDUCATION CONFERENCE MARCH 1, 2O12.
Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) Overview
772 ESS Lesson Learned Briefing
AILEEN A. PISCIOTTA, ESQ. EXECUTIVE COUNSEL, PLC THE ASBC AIMS WORKING GROUP JULY 7, 2010 Major Issues in Teaming Agreements.
1 Basics of Government Contracting. Federal Procurement Background The U.S. Government is the world’s largest purchaser of goods and services 2.
Business Entities for Federal Contracting Joint Ventures, Teaming Agreements, and Mentor/Protégé James E. Krause, Attorney 219 N. Newnan St., 4 th Floor,
GAO’s Role in Bid Protests September 23, 2014 Ralph O. White Managing Associate General Counsel APMP Capture and Business.
Affiliation Issues in Small Business Contracting: Structure Your Proposal and Relationships for Success National 8(a) Association 2014 Summer Conference.
GAO Bid Protests For Contractor Personnel Breakout Session #406 Name:Richard B. Oliver, Esq. John G. Horan, Esq.
AVOIDING THEM WHERE POSSIBLE, DEALING WITH THEM WHEN THEY ARRIVE PROTESTS.
Affiliation Issues in Small Business Contracting FEBRUARY 3, 2015 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 1 Affiliation Issues in Small Business Contracting: Structure Your Proposal.
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
Blueprint of a Bid Protest. …well, more of a thumbnail of a bid protest.
Vendor Engagement Tips. Pre-solicitation Discussion 2  Review Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart ” Exchanges with industry before receipt of.
Learn. Perform. Succeed. Protest, Claims, Disputes and Appeals Chapter 7.
Washington Metropolitan Area District Office SBA.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
NAICS Solicitation Classifications & Size Protests.
3/2/00JSC Procurement Forum1 Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Contracting Overview to Multiple Award Contracting.
February 2006 The Importance of Subcontract Management to Program Success.
U.S. Small Business Administration
Handling Procurement Complaints: Issues & Challenges Regional Public Procurement Forum Tirana, Albania May 2012 Daniel I. Gordon Associate Dean for Government.
School District Purchasing. Purchasing Authority Arizona Statutes Arizona Statutes Arizona Administrative Code Arizona Administrative Code  Primary source.
1 Debriefings for Competitive Acquisitions October 19 NCMA Boston Chapter Dick Bean Associate General Counsel General Dynamics C4 Systems.
Contractual Assistance Procurement Methods 4 Set-aside awards 4 Sole source awards 4 Awards through full and open competition using the price preference.
FAR Part 33 Protests, Disputes and Appeals (GAO rules and Regs
GWAC Ordering Procedures Overview
1 Debriefings for Competitive Acquisitions Boston Chapter NCMA Workshop 10 March 2010.
New FAR Ethics Requirements Richard W. Oehler Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue Suite 4800 Seattle, WA (206)
APMP BID & PROPOSAL CON 2015 | PAGE 1 The Sixty-Minute Guide to Government Protests May 27, 2015 Richard P. Rector.
COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
87th Air Base Wing Ms. Karen Thorngren Flight Chief, 87 CONS Business Processes.
Overview Lifting the Curtain - Debriefings FAI Acquisition Seminar.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Don Mansfield Professor of Contract Management Defense Acquisition University.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
Of XX Competition and Bid Protests Panel Richard Rector, Partner, DLA Piper LLP (US) ©2015 PubKLearning. All rights reserved.1 Tinton Falls Lodging Realty,
Bid Protests In Brief Mark D. Colley Arnold & Porter LLP NCMA Boston Chapter November 18, 2015.
2.6 Protests Don Shannon. What is a Protest? Discussed in FAR Part 33.1 Is “a written objection by an interested party” to (1) a solicitation or other.
NAVAIR Patuxent River Services Contracting February 2008 Pam Gray.
1 Timothy Sullivan Thompson Coburn LLP 1909 K Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC (202)
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Procurement Planning: Choosing a Contracting Method Unit 2.
Regulation Highlights Kimberly Heifetz May 15, 2012.
Contract Formation and Source Selection Tim Sullivan.
Elevating the Quality of Life in the District. Debriefing Procedures Department of General Services Contracting and Procurement Division Policy, Research,
1 Consent to Subcontract Breakout Session # D12 Name: Rita Wells Daniel Johnson Anthony Simmons Date:July 12, 2011 Time:11:15 – 12:30.
Small Business and Subcontracting. Subcontracting for Small Business 6 steps to successful subcontracting 6. Report Contractor performance 1. Consider.
We Build Our Relationships One Client at a Time Presented by: David A. Rose Principal Attorney Moser Rose Law Firm Moser Rose Law Firm - specializing in.
1 WARFIGHTER SUPPORT STEWARDSHIP EXCELLENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WARFIGHTER-FOCUSED, GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY CHAIN LEADERSHIP.
1 Changes to Regulations Governing Personal Conflicts of Interest and Organizational Conflicts of Interest Breakout Session # C08 Name: Barbara S. Kinosky,
Managing the Protest Process
Evaluating Small Business Participation
“An Opportunity to Communicate”
Consent to Subcontract
Making the Most of Your Debriefing
CDBG Procurement Date of Session, 2017 Washington, DC Brian Delvaux
Small Business and Subcontracting.
Contract Formulation and Administration
Presentation transcript:

Current Trends in Federal Bid Protests National 8(a) Association Meeting October 30, 2013 Rick Oehler Lee Curtis

2 Perkins Coie  Offices: 19 across the United States and China, including Anchorage, Seattle and D.C.  Perkins has represented ANCs for well over 30 years  Perkins has a strong Government Contracts practice  web based resources for government contractors 

3 Current Trends In Federal Bid Protests  Part I  Overview  Debriefings  Part II  Small Business Issues  Part III  Alternative Forums  Standing and Typical Bid Protest Issues

44 GAO: Cases Filed -9% -2% +6% +17% +20% +16% +2% +5%

5 Bid Protests – Overview CHARACTERISTICS OF FEDERAL PROCUREMENT PROCESS  Generally competitively awarded  Governed by numerous statutes and regulations  Government officials are required to comply with those statutes and regulations, but also have significant discretion

6 Bid Protests – Overview WHAT IS A BID PROTEST?  A formal complaint against some aspect of a federal procurement process which asserts either  A violation of law; or  A decision that lacks any rational basis

7 Bid Protests – Overview VIOLATION OF LAW  Generally only federal procurement law  Statutes (like Competition in Contracting Act or Procurement Integrity Act)  Regulations (like FAR, DFARS or SBA regulations)

8 Bid Protests – Overview DECISION LACKING A RATIONAL BASIS?  A decision or action that lacks any logical support at all  A decision based on materially mistaken or erroneous facts  A decision contrary to the solicitation  A decision based on improper motives

9 Bid Protests – Overview PROTESTS CAN BE MADE AT MANY DIFFERENT POINTS IN THE PROCESS  Prior to the solicitation (example: synopsis of sole-source contract)  After solicitation, but prior to award (example: solicitation with objectionable terms)  After award (disappointed offeror)

10 Bid Protests – Overview REALITY NO. 1 – A FORMAL PROTEST IS NOT THE PREFERRED APPROACH TO MOST ISSUES  This is business and the government procuring agency is your customer  The customer may not always be right, but good relations must be maintained  Evaluate if there are alternative ways to be persuasive

11 Bid Protests – Overview ALTERNATIVE – Letter to Contracting Officer  Lowest cost, but may not get review beyond CO's team; may result in review by agency counsel  Still need to identify a legally and factually sound basis for change in agency course  Prior to agency protest, all parties shall attempt to resolve "concerns" at the CO level. FAR (b)  Responses to notice of proposed sole-source award  Pre-solicitation and post-solicitation conferences  Q & A process regarding solicitations  Take advantage of opportunities to address inappropriate restrictions and evaluation schemes

12 Bid Protests – Overview REALITY NO. 2 – SOMETIMES A FORMAL PROTEST IS THE ONLY WAY TO PROTECT YOUR INTERESTS  When competition is not being permitted  When the Government fails to follow the RFP rules  When a new perspective will help ensure a fair result  When a final decision is dead wrong

13 Bid Protests – Overview REALITY NO. 3 – TO MAKE INTELLIGENT DECISIONS ABOUT WHETHER TO FILE A PROTEST, YOU HAVE TO KNOW –  Federal procurement process rules  Bid protest process rules  Deadlines are VERY TIGHT!  Your own objectives in filing a protest

14 Bid Protests – Overview OBJECTIVES IN FILING A PROTEST  Gaining an opportunity to compete at all  Gaining an opportunity to compete on a level playing field  Gaining an opportunity for a second look in an evaluation  Sending a message to shape a procuring agency's future actions

15 Bid Protests – Overview DECISION TO ESCALATE TO PROTEST  May be forced by timing  Action against non-competitive process  Action against overly restrictive RFP terms  Action against perceived violation of Procurement Integrity Act

16 Bid Protests – Debriefings WHAT ARE DEBRIEFINGS?  Informative exchanges required by regulation after exclusion or contract award (FAR and )  Can be face-to-face meeting, telephonic conference or in writing

17 Bid Protests – Debriefings WHO IS ENTITLED?  Offerors excluded from a competitive range  All offerors after an award selection is made  Mandatory only for FAR Part 15 procurements  Not necessarily required for formally advertised (Part 14) or simplified acquisitions

18 Bid Protests – Debriefings WHAT IS A DEBRIEFING AND HOW CAN YOU USE IT?  To help make an informed and intelligent decisions regarding whether to protest  To help obtain information to use in pursuing a successful protest  To obtain additional insights for future competitions  To help position you (as successful contract awardee) to defend against a protest

19 Bid Protests – Debriefings PRE-AWARD DEBRIEFINGS  Offered to offerors excluded from competitive range or otherwise excluded (FAR )  Make a written request within 3 days of notice  Government to debrief "as soon as practicable" - compelling circumstances can delay until after award

20 Bid Protests – Debriefings PRE-AWARD DEBRIEFINGS  At a minimum pre-award debriefing includes:  Agency evaluation of significant elements of proposal  Summary of rationale for exclusion  Reasonable responses to relevant questions about compliance with procedures and regulations  Other information may be requested  Certain types of information will not be disclosed

21 Bid Protests – Debriefings POST-AWARD DEBRIEFINGS (FAR )  Offered to offerors after contract award  Make a written request within 3 days of notice  "To maximum practicable extent" held within 5 days of written request  Government can accommodate an untimely request for a debriefing

22 Bid Protests – Debriefings POST-AWARD DEBRIEFINGS (con't)  At a minimum, includes  Government's evaluation of requestor's weaknesses and deficiencies  Overall evaluated cost or price and technical rating of the awardee and the debriefed offeror  Past performance of debriefed offeror  Make and model of successful offeror  Overall rankings of offerors  Summary of rationale for award  Reasonable responses regarding procedures

23 Bid Protests – Debriefings GOVERNMENT IS NOT TO DISCLOSE  Point by point comparisons  Trade secrets or confidential processes/techniques  Confidential commercial or financial information  Names of references providing past performance information

24 Bid Protests – Debriefings EFFECTIVE DEBRIEFING TECHNIQUES  Be fully prepared (evaluation criteria, process, focus areas)  Listen closely and read between lines  Ask follow-up questions  Agree in advance on how far to push  Possibly caucus to evaluate how to proceed  Agree to accept additional information  Face-to-face is preferred if possible

25 Bid Protests – Debriefings DEBRIEFINGS OF THE AWARDEE  Authorized by regulation  Potentially useful to –  learn how to improve proposal/ratings  help defend against a protest

26 Bid Protests – Debriefings TIGHT GAO PROTEST TIMELINES  Lee will discuss the timeline to file a protest at GAO after a debriefing  However, the timelines are tight  GAO enforces timelines strictly

27 Bid Protests – Small Business Types covered:  Size Protests  Affiliation/Ostensible Subcontractor  Area Office Determinations and OHA Appeals

28 SIZE PROTEST  The SBA Area Director for Government Contracting (or designee) will notify the following that protest received:  CO  Protested concern  Protestor  If HUBZone, then AA/HUB will be notified  If SDB, the AA/8(a) BD will be notified  SBA has 10 working days (if possible) to make a formal size determination

29  The Size determination will be based on the evidence presented in the protest, but the SBA may use outside information  SBA will give greater weight to supported factual information than unsupported allegations SIZE PROTEST (cont'd)

30 Bid Protests – Small Business Response  The concern whose size is at issue must complete SBA Form 355 within 3 working days from the date of receipt from SBA  If the concern fails to respond, SBA may presume that the concern is other than a small business  A concern whose size status is at issue must furnish information about its alleged affiliates to SBA, despite any third party claims of privacy or confidentiality, because SBA will not disclose information obtained in the course of a size determination except as permitted by Federal law  The concern whose size is under consideration has the burden of establishing its small business size

31 Bid Protests – Small Business Time limits  Non-negotiated procurements: 5 days after bid or proposal opening  Negotiated procurements: 5 days after the CO has notified the protestor of the identity of the prospective awardee  Electronic notification of award: 5 days after the electronic posting  Multiple award schedule: any time prior to the expiration of the contract period (including renewals)

32 Bid Protests – Small Business Affiliation  Concerns and entities are "affiliates" of each other when one controls or has the power to control the other. 13 CFR § (a)(1).  SBA considers factors such as ownership, management, previous relationships with or ties to another concern, and contractual relationships. 13 CFR § (a)(2).

33 Affiliation  Determined under 13 CFR 121 and 134  Factors weighed:  Identity of Interest  Common Management  Totality of Circumstances: SBA will consider the totality of the circumstances, and may find affiliation even though no single factor is sufficient to constitute affiliation. 13 CFR (a)(5).

34 Ostensible Subcontractor Rule 13 CFR  A contractor and its ostensible subcontractor are treated as joint venturers, and therefore affiliates, for size determination purposes  An ostensible subcontractor is a subcontractor that performs primary and vital requirements of a contract, or of an order under a multiple award contract, or a subcontractor upon which the prime contractor is unusually reliant

35 Ostensible Subcontractor Rule 13 CFR  All aspects of the relationship are considered  "Team" experience  Intent: prevent other than small firms from circumventing the size regulations.  Appeals are intensively fact specific  Relate to specific requirements of each solicitation

36 Area Office Determination/OHA  If an Area Office determines affiliation/ostensible subcontractor rule was violated, person losing that decision "appellant" may appeal the ruling to OHA.  Appeals are intensively fact specific because they are based upon the specific requirements of each solicitation. "All aspects of the relationship" must be evaluated. 13 CFR

37 Affiliation: OHA Appeal  Appellant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not) all elements of the appeal.  Appellant must prove the Size Determination is based on a clear error of fact or law. 13 CFR  This is not de novo review, but based on the record established.

38 Bid Protests – Alternatives PROTESTS CAN BE PURSUED WITH –  Contracting Officer  Procuring Agency  Government Accountability Office (GAO)  Court of Federal Claims (CFC)

39 Interested Parties Interested Parties Agency GAO Court of Federal Claims Court of Federal Claims Court of Appeals for Fed Circuit Court of Appeals for Fed Circuit Bid Protests – Alternative Forums

40 Bid Protests – Alternatives PROCURING AGENCY (FAR )  Interested party may request an independent review by procurement professionals at levels above the CO  Some agencies take more seriously than others  Can be most effective on pre-award issues (overly restrictive; exclusions; PIA)  Unusual to gain satisfaction in post-award protests  Quick resolution; decision encouraged in 35 days

41 Bid Protests – Alternatives PROCURING AGENCY FILING DEADLINES  Same as GAO – discussed later  Check individual agency rules

42 Bid Protests – Alternatives GAO  Provides true outside expertise (80+ years)  Automatic stay with a timely protest filing  Substantial opportunities to develop facts regarding evaluations and other proposals  Full report  Document requests  Hearings (at GAO's discretion)  Opportunities maximized through protective order; requires legal counsel not involved in competitive process  Recovery of protest costs  Agencies almost always follow recommendation

43 Bid Protests – Alternatives GAO –Protest Deadline  Protests alleging a solicitation defect must be filed before bid opening or the time set for receipt of initial proposals if the improprieties were apparent prior to that time. 4 C.F.R. § 21.2(a)(1).  Other protests, including post-award protests, must be filed not later than 10 days after the basis of the protest is known or should have been known or within 10 days of debriefing. 4 C.F.R. § 21.2(a)(2).  If protester timely filed agency-level protest, within 10 days of actual or constructive knowledge of adverse agency action. 4 C.F.R. § 21.2(a)(3).

44 Bid Protests – Alternatives CICA Stay, 31 U.S.C. 3553(c) and (d)  Stay is crucial in order to obtain meaningful relief  By law, an Agency may not award a contract after notice of pending protest  GAO must notify agency within the required time limits CICA Override  Head of Procuring agency must make finding  GAO must be notified

45 CICA Stay - FAR (c)(1) Contract Award Notice to Agency by the GAO 10 days or 5 days Offered Debrief Date and Debrief is required

46 Basis known or should have known or debrief date Protest Filed at GAO, § 21.2(a)(2) Protester Comments § 21.3(i); Supplemental Grounds? GAO Decision § 21.9 Agency Document List § 21.3(c) Agency Report § 21.3(c) Agency Response to Supplemental § 21.3(c) 10 days GAO Notice 10 days 5 days Debrief Date Offered to Protestor Contract Award, or Timeline: GAO Post-Award Protest and Agency CICA Stay GAO AGENCY - CICA Potential for Hearing 70

47 GAO: Merit Decisions and Protests Sustained 18.6% 23% 29% 27% 21% 18% 19% 16%

48 Bid Protests – Alternatives COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS  Court process – opportunity for discovery  GAO deadlines do not apply  No automatic stay; agency may stop voluntarily and may also be enjoined  Process more expensive and can be more complicated than GAO  Decisions are appealable to Federal Circuit  Can challenge agency override of stay

49 Bid Protests – Alternatives THE OPTIMAL FORUM – WILL VARY DEPENDING ON STAGE IN PROCESS, TYPE OF ISSUE INVOLVED, GOALS AND RESOURCES TO BE COMMITTED  Early in process  Contracting officer or agency  Need access to evaluations/other proposals  GAO or Court to use protective order  Goal is to ensure status quo during protest  GAO or Court to achieve effective stay

50  A GAO protest must be filed by an "interested party," which means an actual or prospective bidder or offeror with a direct economic interest in the procurement. 4 C.F.R. § 21.0(a).  Generally means an offeror that would potentially be in line for award if the protest were sustained.  For agency protests, essentially the same standard as GAO  At COFC, two-part test applies to determine an "interested party" Bid Protests – Standing

51 Bid Protests – Standing  Interested parties do not include subcontractors except where the awarding agency has requested in writing that a subcontract protest be decided pursuant to 4 C.F.R. §

52 Bid Protests – Typical Issues  Source selection decisions  Past performance evaluations  Discussions  Conflicts of interest

53 Bid Protests – Typical Issues Source Selection  Source selection decisions must be rational and consistent with the solicitation's evaluation criteria  Reasonableness/rationality:  GAO will not "reevaluate" the proposals  Protester's "mere disagreement" with the evaluation is not sufficient to render it unreasonable

54 Bid Protests – Typical Issues Past Performance issues include—  Similarity of past performance  Agency required to follow solicitation requirements  Agency must consider past performance information "too close at hand" to ignore

55 Bid Protests – Typical Issues Discussions  When an agency engages in discussions, it must afford offerors in the competitive range an opportunity to engage in meaningful discussions. FAR (d)(1)  At minimum, COs must discuss with each offeror considered for award "deficiencies, significant weaknesses, and adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not yet had an opportunity to respond." FAR (d)(3)

56 Bid Protests – Typical Issues Conflicts of Interest issues include—  Agency must reasonably consider potential conflicts of interest created by awardee's involvement in certain activities  Conflict of interest mitigation plans

57 Bid Protests – Intervening Why the awardee may want to intervene  To protect its interests  To obtain access to information subject to a protective order  Generally, only outside counsel can obtain access to information subject to a protective order

58 Bid Protests – Recap  Protests are sometimes required to protect your interests  Protests move very quickly  Imperative to know the rules to meet deadlines  Counsel should be involved as early as possible  Spot and evaluate potential protestable issues

59 Hot Topics/Trends ● Possible requirement to choose between GAO or COFC ● Discussion of GAO filing fee ● Dan Gordon commentary on the utility of bid protests ● Trend toward agency corrective actions

60 Questions or comments, please write, call or Rick Oehler Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, 40 th Fl. Seattle, WA (206) (202) Lee Curtis Perkins Coie LLP th Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, D.C (202)