Research and Innovation Portfolio Positioning for Growth: Research support services for academic staff and HDR students Alignment of Research Support Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCSC History. UCSC: A brief history 60s University Placement Committee A lot of field trips/interaction with employers.
Advertisements

Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Oregon State Library Transformation Project Launch
1 The CMO – One Size Fits All? Jake Julia, Ph.D.Brenda Sprite Northwestern UniversityNavigator Management Partners Session Presented at the Inaugural Global.
AACE Goals Goals as identified by AACE’s Board of Directors for
Human Resources Office of 1 Classification and Compensation Redesign Job Family Studies Project Overview.
Introduction to Postgraduate Candidature in the College of Science, Engineering and Technology Professor Felicity Roddick Associate Dean (Research and.
No 1 REVIEW OF ACADEMIC STRUCTURE PROPOSED GENERAL STAFF STRUCTURE 3 June 2008.
Welcome & Introduction HDR Student Induction & Research Culture Session College of Science, Engineering and Health Professor Irena Cosic Associate PVC.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
Twenty Years Later ICPD Beyond 2014 A Briefing on the ICPD Beyond 2014 Review Process 2012.
AACSB Update SBAA Summer Meeting 2014 Robert Reid EVP & Chief Accreditation Officer.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
Project Human Resource Management
Research and Innovation Portfolio Research Support & Performance Team – Implementing Positioning for Growth Recommendations – Response to Staff Feedback.
Using the NAR Association Models Tool Facilitator Guide NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® 1.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
Partnerships for the Future Implementing a sustainable framework of partnership working with service users and other partners Thursday 2 May 2013 Giving.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
Outcomes of the 16 th Regional Disaster Managers Meeting held from 9 th – 11 th August 2010 Presentation to the Pacific Humanitarian Team Monday 6 th December.
BC NSQIP SITE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FINDINGS SURGICAL QUALITY ACTION NETWORK MEETING FEBRUARY 18 TH 2015.
VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Funded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting Public Television Major Giving Initiative MGI: Lessons Learned 22 March 2007.
University of Massachusetts Boston FY11 Budget Process February 25, 2010.
”Out with the Old, In with the New” Ward Manager/Team Leader Regional Initative Carolyn Kerr Deputy Director of Nursing, Northern HSC Trust.
By Bankole Ebisemiju At an Intensive & Interactive workshop on Techniques for Effective & Result Oriented Annual Operation Plan November 24th 2010 Annual.
Society of College, National and University Libraries Overview of, and update on the current SCONUL strategy review process CAUL Brisbane September 2005.
Dolina Dowling December 2010 Presentations 2, 3 1
STUDENT SERVICES REVIEW January 8, Context – Administrative Unit Reviews Objectives Roles Unit Self-Study Internal Review Committee External Reviewers.
1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Administrative Support for Large- Scale Funding Applications – Session.
Administrative Review & Restructuring. 1 The President’s Charge Review administrative organization and delivery of administrative services at all levels.
1 Free Help: State Support Team Technical Assistance Services 2012 MIS Conference February 15, 2012 Corey Chatis, State Support Team Jan Petro, CO Department.
FCA Sport-Specific Overview Regional Meeting GA/SC Region January 29, 2007 Sport-Specific Ministries.
This presentation:  is “ready-to-use” for presentations to school division administrators, board members, library personnel, teachers, etc.  incorporates.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
AACP Admissions Workshop Understanding ACPE Standards and Guidelines Pertaining to Admissions Robert Beardsley, PhD University of Maryland School of Pharmacy.
Helen Johnson Head of Study Abroad, Office for Global Engagement Assessing and Managing Risk for Study Abroad.
Eight Schools Information Security Policies: The Process at Hotchkiss.
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update January 14, NSDI Strategic Plan High-level Timeline 2 Timeframe Activity Dec - Feb Project Start-up – COMPLETED Feb -
Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
R&D Annual Report SLaM Board, Sept 2004 Graham Thornicroft Gill Dale.
CONTEXT FOR ACADEMIC STRATEGIC PLANNING AT UM Foundation for upcoming Accreditation process Identify key issues and opportunities to address over the next.
Board Chair Responsibilities As a partner to the chief executive officer (CEO) and other board members, the Board Chair will provide leadership to Kindah.
PDR 2016 A Guide for Professional Staff 1. Plan 2. Progress 3. Review.
In the Framework of: Financed by: Developed by: Business Planning for Water Associations Prepared by Water Supply and Sewerage Association of Albania SHUKALB.
November | 1 CONTINUING CARE COUNCIL Report to Forum Year
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Shared Services Initiative Summary of Findings and Next Steps.
Policies & Procedures 10/23/2012. Background:  To match with new strategic plan and based on the recommendations of the midterm evaluation.
The Lead Agency Council Sports Trust (Sport Otago) Cluster of clubs Interested parties / other.
Community of Practice K Lead Project Team: الالتزامالتحفيز التفكير المؤسسي المرونةالتميزالشراكةالاستقامة.
Project Human Resource Management
A Guide for Managers for Professional Staff
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
Central / Mother Lode Regional Consortium Planning Conference
Project Roles and Responsibilities
Human Services Integration Project
A Guide for Professional Staff
A Guide for Professional Staff
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Presentation transcript:

Research and Innovation Portfolio Positioning for Growth: Research support services for academic staff and HDR students Alignment of Research Support Services Project 22 February 2012

© RMIT University Research & Innovation Plan Our Vision – “RMIT research and research training is global, partnered, embedded in the urban environment and making an impact on the world” RMIT has committed to significantly growing the scale and quality of research and research training over the next five years.

© RMIT University Project summary to date Project launch – Sept 2011 Collection of information – Sept/Oct –Feedback from staff –Information regarding roles and responsibilities –Feedback from stakeholders Communication to staff and stakeholders - Sept/Nov –Website –Newsletters, s & Articles Development of ideas – Oct/Nov –Working Group meetings –Steering Committee meetings Decision making – Jan/Feb 2012

© RMIT University Feedback Staff and stakeholder consultation and feedback identified the following: Issues lack of clarity relating to process Processes too complicated or layered unsure where they can get assistance inequity between what is support is provided academic leadership management of research Positives dedicated staff initiatives eg HDR Conference & travel funds, workshops support for writing funding applications increased awareness of ethics approval requirements

© RMIT University Intended outcomes of this project Objectives To provide high quality, streamlined and efficient research support to staff and HDR students. To provide a high quality research services structure to professional staff. Outcomes Define and implement: standard business processes for research support services research support service level standards; and clear and standardised research support staffing structure.

© RMIT University Key decisions Research and research training related administrative processes owned by Research Office and SGR Research Office to: identify best practice administrative business processes for research services support clearly define, document and communicate central processes and service levels Resource appropriately SGR to: identify best practice administrative business processes for research training support Clearly define, document and implement processes and service levels in conjunction with Colleges and Schools Resource appropriately

© RMIT University Key decisions Colleges will: articulate their administrative support processes and service levels in response to the central processes support the research leadership of Colleges Deputy PVCs (R&) through an administrative team HR will: support the implementation of consistent accountabilities and classification where staff are undertaking similar functions. Research Office, SGR and Colleges together will: implement a new Management Committee strengthen/develop new informal networks

© RMIT University What does this mean? Lots of work identifying good practice, documenting and communicating business processes Meeting with your colleagues to discuss and resolve shared issues Review of Team structures Review and update of position descriptions to ensure consistency and match to role requirements Potential for a small number of changes in reporting line Support for professional development Any changes to staffing will be made in accordance to HR policy

© RMIT University Timelines DATEPROCESS DATEPROCESS Sept 2011Project launch with staff Sept – NovService and process review Consultation with stakeholders Late NovProposed structure and service levels presented to Steering Committee Feb 2012Communicate changes to staff Feb–JuneDocument Research Office business processes and review staffing structure Feb-DecDocument SGR business processes and review staffing structure June-DecDocument College Research Office business process Feb-DecHR to review and update PD’s

© RMIT University Project governance Steering Committee DVC R&I and Vice-President, Daine Alcorn (chair) College Deputy PVCs R&I, Brian Corbitt, Denise Meredyth, Irena Cosic (Felicity Roddick) Dean SGR, Denise Cuthbert Executive Director – RO, Lois Fitz-Gerald Project Working Group Executive Director – RO, Lois Fitz-Gerald (chair) Director Research Support and Performance Adela McMurray College Senior Managers Research Tania Tambiah, Lorraine Bridger, Caroline Northwood Senior Manager, SGR, Susanne Tzamouranis Senior Advisor - Planning June Anderson

© RMIT University Resources For information about the Project go to: For more information about change processes go to: Managing Major Change Policy