One Voice Conference: Gender Attitudes Towards School Board Governance: Professional Leadership and Policy Orientation Patricia Neville, Michael Rubino,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

TRUMANSBURG CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT’S ENTRY PLAN
Clover Park School District Board of Directors 1.
Urban Youth: Their School, Community and Perceived Education Sara Adan New York University.
Roger S. Baskin, Sr. George Mason University April 21, 2010 Perceptions of Central Office Administrators Regarding the Achievement Gap.
Pursuing Effective Governance in Canada’s National Sport Community June 2011.
The Research Process.
May 2012 Board Self Assessment Highlights Riverside CCD Board of Trustees.
Campus Improvement Plans
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Becoming a High Impact Board Susan Salter Director of Board Development Alabama Association of School Boards.
Attitudes of Community Members Toward Preschool Programs Aimee Marquez Modified by Dr. Carol Albrecht.
THE CBA ASSESSMENT CULTURE SURVEY The most important reason for the emphasis on assessment in the college is to meet AACSB and CSU requirements.
Accreditation Climate Survey MC GAP May 1, Overview  Administered Fall 2012 via  Directly linked to the Accreditation Standards  Modeled.
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Leader of the band or interested bystander? Elaine Hines – Manager Professional Development NZSTA.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
THE MULTICULTURAL CHALLENGE AND PACE UNIVERSITY Becoming a Multicultural University May 16, 2005.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Business and Operations Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Paper Title: “The influence of gender in the relation between Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation, and Citizen Empowerment” Conference Paper by: Kennedy.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
The Effect of Quality Matters™ on Faculty’s Online Self-efficacy DLA Conference 2010 Jim Wright, Ed.S. June 9, 2010.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
The Impact of CReSIS Summer Research Programs that Influence Students’ Choice of a STEM Related Major in College By: Alica Reynolds, Jessica.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
MARTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ACHIEVING THE DREAM COMMUNITY COLLEGES COUNT IIPS Conference Charlotte, North Carolina July 24-26, 2006 Session: AtD – Use of.
Feb. 20, LMU Mission Survey Overview February 20, 2007.
SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International Center for Leadership in Education SAM Administrative Institute Supported by the International.
Day 3/Session 2 Civil Society Participation in Engaging with Sub-National Councils 1.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Comparative Alumni Research: What Matters in College AFTER College.
Empowering volunteers to perform smoking- cessation service with a workshop training program using participatory action research Presenter: I-chuan Li.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
Tonya Filz & Regan A.R. Gurung University of Wisconsin – Green Bay Abstract As class sizes increase due to stagnating budgets, and as colleges and universities.
The Importance of SCANNING World Service Conference April 2010.
Transforming Elementary Education Management : a perspective on institutional development Dr Pramila Menon NUEPA, New Delhi.
Educators’ Attitudes about the Accessibility and Integration of Technology into the Secondary Curriculum Dr. Christal C. Pritchett Auburn University
Cultural Voices: Perceptions of Faculty, Staff and Students A Cultural Study funded by the Equal Opportunity Panel University of Kentucky.
CHAPTER 5 ADMINISTERING THE PROGRAM. BOARD OF EDUCATION RESPONSIBILITIES Public Opinion Is An Intangible, But Powerful, Force In America Public Opinion.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
Lighthouse Junior Our School Metaphor. Governance Curriculum Climate Staffing WE WILL EXAMINE THE FOLLOWING TOPICS:
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
Board-Superintendent Relations The School Governance Team.
SUSTAINABLE EDUCATION By CHARBAJI Consultants. What is Sustainability?  In the current literature, sustainability has been defined rather narrowly by.
Attitudes of qualified vs student mental health nurses towards an individual diagnosed with schizophrenia Rory Kavanagh.
Teacher Survey Highlights R&E/LWW May2014.
VSBA 5K Walk/Run The New VSBA Master Training Program Dr. Brenda Tanner.
SADDLEBACK COLLEGE COMMUNITY BENCHMARK REPORT PRESENTATION Saddleback College Onsite Meeting November 2013, Mission Viejo, CA Pam Cox-Otto, Ph.D. - Interact.
2015 SAA Board Survey. Raw Board Survey ResultsStrongly Agree AgreeDisagreeStrongly Disagree Don't Know Total Points Responses minus DKs Average Score.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Superintendent’s Entry & Learning Plan Jeremy Ray.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
Page 1 Working Effectively With Your Board. Page 2 Relationships Communications Expectations Trust.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
1 School Board and Superintendent Continuous Improvement and Evaluation Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
 Continue the role of our Bullying Prevention Coordinating Committee and program coordinator  Maintain an ongoing relationship with your certified Olweus.
We thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs for supporting this research, and Learning & Technology Services for printing this poster. Introduction.
HLC Criterion One Primer Criterion One. Mission August 27, 2015.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
South Dakota Public School Superintendents’ Perceptions of Innovation Region 3 Area Superintendent Meeting Timothy M Mitchell.
Evidence for gender bias in interpreting online professor ratings
Asist. Prof. Dr. Duygu FIRAT Asist. Prof.. Dr. Şenol HACIEFENDİOĞLU
Roles, Goals & Performance Expectations
Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts and implications for policy and decision-making 16th- 17th.
Presentation transcript:

One Voice Conference: Gender Attitudes Towards School Board Governance: Professional Leadership and Policy Orientation Patricia Neville, Michael Rubino, Caroline Burns, Dr. Elsa-Sofia Morote, Dr. Richard Hawkins, and Dr. Robert Manley Dowling College

Purpose of the Study The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of gender and school board members’ perceptions towards both policy orientation and professional leadership on their school board. This study was done in the framework of selected school boards of education in Suffolk County, New York.

Background For this study 45 board of education members from Suffolk County, New York responded to a survey that examined several components of governance: Policy Orientation and Professional leadership. Of the participating board members 33.3% of the respondents were female. The response differences between male and females board members were examined on two variables: Policy Orientation and Professional Leadership.

Gender in School Boards At the beginning of the 20 th Century in United States history women were under-represented on local school boards (Blanchard, 1977). However, recent research conducted has shown a vast improvement on the number of women seeking election and playing a role on their local school boards. The recent research proposed that gender attitudes and philosophical differences were significant. Tallerico’s research in 1992 indicated that female board members’ were generally more interested in curriculum, programs, and humanistic issues. While equivalent male school board members’ exhibited a greater interest in school finance, facilities, control and efficiency.

Definition of Terms School Board Member: A member of an elected body whose primary function is to govern a school consistent with the roles and responsibilities outlined in New York State Education Law Policy Orientation: Policy Orientation is the process utilized by the school board to guide the actions of others, the extent to which the board examines alternative courses of action, selects system-wide objectives aligned with the mission of the schools, and anticipates or evaluates outcomes of their policies on a regular basis. Professional Leadership: Professional Leadership is the extent to which the school board has respectful communications with the superintendent and the extent to which the members exhibit respect for each other as well as focus their efforts on the school district’s mission, goals, and regard for community values.

Methods Data was collected from a 2002 study conducted by Hawkins, which was divided into three parts. The demographic of gender was extracted from the first part of the survey. School board member respondents were asked to identify their level of participation using a five-point Likert scale of (1) strongly disagree, (2) disagree, (3) slightly agree, (4) agree, (5) strongly agree. A complete survey can be seen in Hawkins 2002, page 151.

Policy Orientation Items Policy Orientation Items (Reliability =.87) 1. Our board considers current research during the process of decision making. 2. Our board members evaluate policies about the hiring of staff. 3. Our board has a common understanding of the purpose of education. 4. Our board matches district wide policies with the mission and objectives of the district. 5. Our board is attentive to the ethnic and multicultural needs of the district. 6. Our board focuses on its role in policy making. 7. Our board provides leadership in developing the districts mission statement.

Professional Leadership Professional Leadership Items (Reliability =.86) Our board has respectful communications with the Superintendent. During periods of adversity our board considers its mission and objectives when making decisions. Our board encourages trustees to achieve consensus on board decisions. In public sessions, our board members exhibit respect for each other. Our board represents the interests of the entire district rather than individual interest groups.

Results for Policy Orientation 33.3% of males compared to 13.3% of females slightly agree with “Our board considers current research during the process of decision making.” 13.3% of males compared to 6.7% of females strongly disagree and disagree to “Our board members evaluate policies about the hiring of staff.” 3.3% of males compared to 0% of females strongly disagree and disagree with “Our board has a common understanding of the purpose of education.” 30% of males compared to 20% slightly agree to “Our board matches district wide policies with the mission and objectives of the district.”

Policy Orientation..results 16.7% males compared to 6.7% of females strongly disagree and disagree with “Our board is attentive to the ethnic and multicultural needs of the district.” Question 16 had no significant percent differential in any of the categories. 43.3% of men compared to 14.3% of females slightly agree with “Our board provides leadership in developing the districts mission statement.” 46.6% of men and 71.5% of females agree and strongly agree with “Our board provides leadership in developing the districts mission statement.”

Results for Professional Leadership An analysis of the Professional Leadership Items (Table 3) concluded that: 3.3% of males compared to 6.7% of females strongly disagree and disagree with, “Our board has respectful communications with the Superintendent.” 10% of males compared to 20% of females strongly disagree and disagree with “During periods of adversity our board considers its mission and objectives when making decisions.”

Professional Leadership..results 6.7% of males compared to 26% of females slightly agree with “Our board encourages trustees to achieve consensus on board decisions.” 3.3% of males compared to 20% of females strongly disagree and disagree with “In public sessions, our board members exhibit respect for each other.” 23.3% of males compared to 6.7% females strongly disagree to disagree with “Our board represents the interests of the entire district rather than individual interest groups.”

Conclusions In conclusion, this data supports the idea that men and women serving on a Suffolk County, New York Board of Education have different viewpoints and ideas regarding their roles as members of the school board. Females tend to be more in agreement with questions related to policy orientation. On the other hand, females tend to be more in disagreement in items related to professional leadership.

Conclusions In addition, it would also be beneficial for school board members to attend workshops provided by the New York State School Board Association educating school board members’ role on policy orientation and professional leadership. This would provide school board members with a clear vision of their purpose which in turn provides the school district with a more focused Mission Statement.