District-level Adoption: The Engine to Drive Sustainable Change Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org Missouri SW-PBS Summer Institute June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Advertisements

C3 – Applying Implementation Science to State & District Level PBIS Systems Steve Goodman, Michigan's Integrated Behavior & Learning Support Initiative.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
April 10, 2013 SPDG Implementation Science Webinar #3: Organization Drivers.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Kalamazoo Regional Educational Service Agency 2012 Administrator Academy June , 2012 Steve Goodman
Coaching PBIS Implementation Coaching PBIS Implementation Rob Horner org.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Welcome! October VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM
MTSS Maryland: Shift Happens Creating Positive Conditions for Learning through Coordinated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support Maryland State Department of.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Professional Development and Technical Assistance: The National Blueprint for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
A District Model for Integrated RtI Systems Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Shawnee Mission, KS Steve Goodman Michigan’s.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Kim St. Martin March, 2013.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Implementation Science Vision 21: Linking Systems of Care June 2015 Lyman Legters.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
SYSTEMS COACHING AND BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports SPDG, 2014.
1 Development of Local Implementation Teams Kim St. Martin Assistant Director, MiBLSi Steve Goodman Director, MiBLSi
Implementation Drivers March 23, 2012
MiBLSi Systems of Support for Training October 9,
Coaching for Competence Margie McGlinchey SPDG Regional Mtg. October 1, 2009 Steve Goodman Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Co-Directors.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.
Unpacking the Infrastructures and Roles for Effective MTSS Implementation Ingham ISD September, 2012.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Using the WIKI to Support Training and Technical Assistance October 27, 2011 Susan Barrett Implementer Partner, Center on PBIS Sheppard Pratt Health System.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Implementation Conversations Jennifer Coffey Audrey Desjarlais Steve Goodman.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Science of Implementation & The Stages of Implementation
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: District Coaches’ Meeting Donna Morelli Cynthia Zingler Education Specialists Positive Behavioral.
State and District-level Role in Implementation, Scaling and Sustaining PBIS Session A-3 Washington Leadership Discussion Rob Horner University of Oregon.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
Coaching Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org December 6, 2010.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
BoQ Critical Element: Faculty Commitment. Critical Element: Faculty Commitment 4. Faculty are aware of behavior problems across campus (regular data sharing)
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Coaching at the District Level “Paving the Road for Smooth Implementation ” MiBLSi Coaches’ Conference November 2013.
Exploration and Readiness Work for a Collaborative Partnership: Session 3 Trainer Name January, 2013.
Min.cenmi.org Michigan Implementation Network Providing Support through District Leadership and Implementation Team April 29, 2010 Michigan Implementation.
Stages of Implementation: Initial Implementation
RtI Coordination to Support Coaching Kim St. Martin November 3, 2011
Coaching PLC April 5, 2011 Pat Mueller
1 Steve Goodman Director, MiBLSi July 2015
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.
Application to Participate Webinar February 2012
RDQ 5 District Coaching Capacity Discussion Leader: George Sugai, University of Connecticut.
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
District Leadership Team Sustainability Susan Barrett Director, Mid-Atlantic PBIS Network Sheppard Pratt Health.
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
RtI Innovations: Evaluation Anna Harms & Jose Castillo
State and District Role in
Miblsi.cenmi.org Helping Students Become Better Readers with Social Skills Necessary for Success Steve Goodman Funded through OSEP.
RtI Coordination: Supporting Training
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS)
Presentation transcript:

District-level Adoption: The Engine to Drive Sustainable Change Steve Goodman miblsi.cenmi.org Missouri SW-PBS Summer Institute June 19, 2012

Three Main Concepts District approach has advantages over building based approach We need to consider stages of Implementation to move forward though process We need to consider implementation drivers to better support school/district implementation efforts

Why a District Approach? Unit of implementation is at the building level Unit of support is at the district level (to develop local implementation support capacity)

Create Host Environments for the Practices you want Implemented Goal is to establish host environments that support adoption, sustained use, & expansion of evidence-based practices (Zins & Ponti, 1990)

What happens when a staff member gets excited about a new practice?

What happens when others back at school may not be as enthusiastic about the practice?

When we implemented a building-based model… Schools do not always get to criteria for fidelity of implementation Schools do not always maintain implementation efforts

System Change “For every increment of performance I demand from you, I have an equal responsibility to provide you with the capacity to meet that expectation” (R. Elmore, 2002)

Cascading System of SupportStudentsStudents Building Staff Grade Level Team Building Leadership Team District/Regional Leadership Team Multiple schools w/in district All staff All students Grade Level Teams, Core Teams, Departments, and all staff Who is supported? How is support provided? Provides guidance and manages implementation Provides guidance, visibility, funding, political support Provides guidance and manages implementation Provides effective practices to support students Improved student behavior

Two Categories of Work Access to Effective Practices –Ensuring that students (staff) have access to effective practices in an integrated behavior and reading Multi-Tiered System of Supports –Practices are selected based on: Need, Fit, Resource Availability, Evidence, Readiness for Replication, Capacity to Implement Support for the Practices –Ensuring that the interventions are implemented correctly with the “right people”, at the “right time”, in the “right amounts” (Implementation Fidelity)

Framework for Addressing Practice and Supports

Cabinet Team Implementation Support Team Vision Policy Priority Providing for implementation supports (coaching, training, evaluation) Barrier busting Create materials Collect and summarize data Identify barriers to implementation Coordination Implementation Supports Direction Training Coaching Content Expertise Materials Evaluation Implementation Supports Direction Training Coaching Content Expertise Materials Evaluation Schools MTSS Coordinator Liaison MiBLSi District Model

Leadership Function AND Implementation Supports Function Leadership Provides the foundations needed for practice(s) to “foster and grow” Implementation Support Provides the support to ensure practice(s) are implemented with fidelity

Stages of Implementation Applied at District Level Implementation is not an event A mission-oriented process involving multiple decisions, actions, and corrections

An analogy of implementation stages

Stages of ImplementationFocusStageDescription Exploration/Ado ption Decision regarding commitment to adopting the program/practices and supporting successful implementation. InstallationSet up infrastructure so that successful implementation can take place and be supported. Establish team and data systems, conduct audit, develop plan. Initial Implementation Try out the practices, work out details, learn and improve before expanding to other contexts. ElaborationExpand the program/practices to other locations, individuals, times- adjust from learning in initial implementation. Continuous Improvement/R egeneration Make it easier, more efficient. Embed within current practices. Work to do it right! Work to do it better! Should we do it!

Exploration/Adoption Big Ideas Districts apply for implementation at a district level District will be responsible for implementation supports (e.g., coaching, training) Not all schools need to ultimately implement (but plan for over 60% in district) Consensus/commitment from central administration Agreements Work with MiBLSi to develop implementation plan Develop leadership/implementation support teams Large districts will invest in model demonstrations

Exploration/Adoption Is MTSS the right thing for us to do? Identifying Need Determining Fit Examining Evidence Can we do it the right way? Resource Availability Assessing Readiness Capacity to Implement

Exploration/Adoption Outcomes Central level administration can identify the critical features of the program (e.g., creating a district implementation plan, regularly scheduled meetings to review progress and adjust plan accordingly, provide for coaching/training) A district exploration team which includes cabinet level administrators investigates whether the district has the capacity to support implementation (funding, resources, time, skills) 100% of district staff responsible for overseeing educational program within district are committed to supporting and implementing the program

Cabinet Team Vision Policy Priority Providing for implementation supports (coaching, training, evaluation) Barrier busting MiBLSi District Model

Cabinet Leadership Team Purpose: provide direction/vision for the practices and allocation of resources to enable the Capacity and Competency drivers to be in place. The term leadership refers to the function of leadership rather than an individual’s position within the organization. Membership: Superintendent, Assistant Superintendents, Directors, (those responsible for programming at the building level)

Guided Notes for District Meeting

Installation Big Ideas Develop implementation team Conduct district capacity audit Develop district implementation plan Arrange for coaching and training Develop district data systems Make “room” for the initiative

Cabinet Team Implementation Support Team Vision Policy Priority Providing for implementation supports (coaching, training, evaluation) Barrier busting Create materials Collect and summarize data Identify barriers to implementation Coordination Implementation Supports Direction Training Coaching Content Expertise Materials Evaluation Implementation Supports Direction Training Coaching Content Expertise Materials Evaluation MTSS Coordinator Liaison MiBLSi District Model

Implementation Support Team Purpose: The purpose of the Implementation Support Team is to plan for conditions that make implementation of effective practices with fidelity both easy and durable. Membership: Cabinet Liaison, MTSS coordinator, other members who have knowledge and skillsets in both the MTSS practices and implementation supports.

Implementation Team Activities Develop implementation support plan (for districts/schools) Help to “make room” for the practices through braiding of initiatives Coordinate and monitor implementation of plan Create implementation materials Collect and summarize data (share with cabinet team) Identify barriers to implementation (share with cabinet team)

Making Room for the Initiative through Braiding MTSS with District Strategic Goals Successful Student Outcomes Student Achievement PBIS Diversity Safety & Discipline Accountability Parent/Community Involvement Healthy Youth Development

Braiding means Consider the core features of an initiative, what other current initiatives share these features and may be combined to –Share resources –Share activities (e.g., Professional Development) –Share information (e.g., data collection) 28

Consideration of non-negotiables when braiding Funding requirements –Features that must be in place to receive funding Mandatory program requirements –Features that are mandated for implementation of the program Critical features that define practice –Features that are critical to fidelity of implementation

Worksheet for Braiding District Initiatives: Braiding Around Multi-tiered System of Support (MTSS)

Staff competency to support students/families with the selected practices Adapted from Fixsen & Blase, 2008 Successful Student Outcomes Program/Initiative (set of practices that are implemented with Fidelity) Organizational capacity to support staff in implementing practices with fidelity Ability to provide direction/vision of process Implementation Drivers 31

Leadership Functions Set Vision –Defines the desired or intended future state of the program in terms of its fundamental objective and/or strategy Provide Management and Coordination –Planning, managing and monitoring around Capacity and Competency development Provide Facilitative Administration –Creates a “hospitable environment” by identifying barriers and facilitators to support Capacity and Competency development 32 Leadership

Developing Organizational Capacity Decision Support Data Systems Providing information to implementers –Guidelines –Feedback Providing resources and material to implementers –Tools –Time Providing incentives to the implementers –Providing acknowledgement –Removing barriers Organization

Implementation Manuals 34

Developing Capacity Through “Practice Profiles” (Implementation Guides) Implementation Guides have been Developed for –Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports at the Building Level –Reading Supports at the Building Level –Building Leadership Team –District Leadership Team Quick Guides have been developed for –Principals –Coaches 35 Organization

Practice Profiles Each critical component is a heading Each level of implementation becomes a dimension on the rubric associated with that critical component. The conversations around the Profile serve to provide guidance and also for feedback Adapted from work of the Heartland Area Education Agency 11, Iowa 36

Practice Profile: Building Leadership Team Example 37

Critical Features of Building Administrator Support “Quick Guide” 38

Data-Based Decision Making: Facilitator Guide Guiding Questions for Team Guiding Questions for Facilitator 39 Organization

Example Page for Team Members 40

Example Page for Facilitator 41

Developing Individual Competencies 42 Individual Training –Specific sessions with formal activities designed for skill development Coaching –Ensuring transfer from training to practice –On-site skill development, enhancing the skills through prompting and reinforcement Technical Assistance –An expert with specific technical/content knowledge provides information to address an identified need with customized solutions.

Installation Outcomes A district implementation team is identified with representative membership of the school including building administrator A data system is set up or modified to provide information on (student outcome, progress monitoring, fidelity of implementation and program quality) Implementation drivers are develop at district level to support model demonstration schools (leadership, capacity, competency) and are aligned with building leadership team development of implementation drivers

Installation Outcomes (cont.) District-level training and implementation support plan (that is aligned with the buildings) for reading and PBIS is developed including adequate time for staff knowledge and skill- building, access to materials &fidelity tools, coaching/ implementation support, and data review.

Installation Outcomes (cont.) A district-wide audit is conducted that examines: Current status of student performance (DIBELS/AIMSweb, MEAP, etc.) aggregated at building and district level Current program/practices at district level to address each tier of support Current status of implementation fidelity around practices (e.g., team Implementation Checklist Current status of program quality (e.g., PBIS Self- Assessment Survey) Available resources to support implementation efforts (e.g., coaching, training) The braiding of building committees

Initial Implementation Big Ideas Conduct exploration/adoption for demonstration schools Develop building leadership teams Conduct building audit Develop building implementation plan (for model demonstration schools) Develop building data systems Progress monitoring implementation efforts and student outcomes Develop Policy Enable Practice/Practice Informed Policy cycles with district leadership team

Initial Implementation Survive the Awkward Stage: An analogy Apply for PBIS New District Initiative Today is a book study? “We already do that.” Violate Norms Vote coach off Be on time Go to a PLC Ignore s Go to Book Study Dominate conversation Snow Day! Late for meeting Attend District PD Ignore Data File Grievance Change Practice Have a “AHA!” Prep for Meeting Setbacks may move us back to the previous stage from Bruce Smith, ViiM

Intensity of Supports Skills NewEstablished Context New High Level Intensity Mid-level Intensity Familiar Mid-level Intensity Low Level Intensity from K. Blase,

Initial Implementation Outcomes Model Demonstration schools go through implementation process (Exploration, Installation, Initial Implementation, Elaboration) District Leadership Team collects information from implementation efforts and adjust supports accordingly (learn from initial implementation) Two-way communication is initiated with stakeholders (to receive feedback and generate support) Implementation drivers are “tried out” with the model demonstration schools to support implementation efforts.

Support Plan for Three Different Categories of Schools These categories describe the general work that takes place in the school and is based on the stages of implementation: “Should we do it?” (Exploration/Adoption Stage) “Work to do it right” (Installation and Initial Implementation Stages) “Work to do it better” (Elaboration and Continuous Improvement/Regeneration Stages)

Cabinet Team Implementation Support Team Vision Policy Priority Providing for implementation supports (coaching, training, evaluation) Barrier busting Create materials Collect and summarize data Identify barriers to implementation Coordination Implementation Supports Direction Training Coaching Content Expertise Materials Evaluation Implementation Supports Direction Training Coaching Content Expertise Materials Evaluation Schools MTSS Coordinator Liaison MiBLSi District Model

Stages of ImplementationFocusStageDescription Exploration/Ado ption Decision regarding commitment to adopting the program/practices and supporting successful implementation. InstallationSet up infrastructure so that successful implementation can take place and be supported. Establish team and data systems, conduct audit, develop plan. Initial Implementation Try out the practices, work out details, learn and improve before expanding to other contexts. ElaborationExpand the program/practices to other locations, individuals, times- adjust from learning in initial implementation. Continuous Improvement/R egeneration Make it easier, more efficient. Embed within current practices. Work to do it right! Work to do it better! Should we do it?

Process for “Quick Sorting” Schools into Categories of Support

Criteria for identifying completion of the stages of Implementation

Elaboration Big Idea I: Replication Expand the program/practices to other locations, individuals, times- adjust from learning in initial implementation Policy Enable Practice/Practice Informed Policy cycles with district leadership teams

Elaboration Through each replication, we become more clear in our implementation efforts

Elaboration Big Idea II: Scaling-Up Leverage past learning and existing resources to facilitate transformation Learn from these transformations to develop structures for effectiveness and efficiency Expand implementation within these structures to address implementation in <60% schools/districts

Elaboration Outcomes Model demonstration schools are supported as they go through the elaboration state Scale-Up schools go through the implementation process (Exploration, Installation, Initial Implementation, Elaboration) District Leadership Team collects information from implementation efforts and adjust supports accordingly (learn from initial implementation)

Elaboration Outcomes (cont.) Model Demonstration schools within district have achieved criteria on fidelity and program quality measures Implementation drivers are fully functioning to support all model demonstration sites with implementation of MTSS practices. Implementation drivers are applied to “scale- up” schools (those being added after model demonstrations schools have met success with Universal support practices

Exploration Adoption Installation Initial Implementation Elaboration Continuous Improvement District Exploration Adoption Installation Initial Implementation Elaboration Continuous Improvement Model Schools Universal Supports Exploration Adoption Installation Initial Implementation Elaboration Continuous Improvement Model Schools Targeted/Intensive Supports Exploration Adoption Installation Initial Implementation Elaboration Continuous Improvement Scale-Up Schools Targeted/Intensive Supports Continuous Improvement Exploration Adoption Installation Initial Implementation Elaboration Scale-Up Schools Universal Supports Embedded Stages within District Implementation of MTSS

Continuous Regeneration Big Ideas Systems adoptions within district New staff/new year orientation process Policy Enable Practice/Practice Informed Policy cycles with district leadership teams Efficiency adoption from continuous learning

Continuous Regeneration First do it “right” (fidelity) and then do it “better” (innovate) Feedback loops are important Consultation with: Experts Trainers Coaches Implement and evaluation “adjustments” with fidelity across system Systems adoptions within district New staff orientation process Beginning of school year orientation process

Continuous Regeneration Outcomes There is institutionalized memory through manualization, documentation and a system for storing information There is an on-going rhythm for reviewing and acting upon MTSS data (student outcome, progress monitoring, fidelity of implementation and program quality) aggregated for district use There is on-going professional development allocated through district leadership team involving coaching, training, technical assistance, etc. to increase the competence of existing staff as well as orient new staff

Continuous Regeneration Outcomes A process is utilized for removing barriers to implementation with Policy Enable Practice- Practice Informed Policy (PEP-PIP) cycles within the building and with district administration Schools are supported differentially with implementation drivers based on stage of implementation Scale-Up Demonstration schools within district have achieved criteria on fidelity and program quality measures Implementation drivers are fully integrated with on-going practice of the district

Three Main Concepts District approach has advantages over building based approach We need to consider stages of Implementation to move forward though process We need to consider implementation drivers to better support school/district implementation efforts

District-wide Approach Efficiently organize/distribute resources, technical assistance, & professional development opportunities Establish district-wide policy to guide efforts & increase accountability Centralize & streamline action planning and decision making

Allow district administrators to provide reminders and acknowledgements to maintain school efforts Collect, summarize, and analyze information/data on-going basis to guide decision making Invest in and establish behavioral/reading expertise and competence District-wide Approach (cont.)

Give priority to identification, adoption, and sustained use of evidenced-based practices Focus their attention on prevention-based approaches to behavior and reading Provide opportunities for school to learn from and support each other’s successes and challenges District-wide Approach (cont.)