1 Purview & Roles of IRBs NAS Workshop on Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule in Relation to the Behavioral and Social Sciences Cheryl Crawford Watson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

HIPAA Privacy Practices. Notice A copy of the current DMH Notice must be posted at each service site where persons seeking DMH services will be able to.
FERPA - Sharing Student Information
Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
HIPAA PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS Dana L. Thrasher Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC (205) ; Victoria Nemerson.
Ethics, Confidentiality, and HIPAA! 2006 ASAC Drug Court Confidentiality FMJ Multi- County November 8, 2006.
What is HIPAA? This presentation was created by The University of Arizona Privacy Office, The Office for the Responsible Conduct of Research on March 5,
Reporting Requirements and Procedures. Trafficking in Persons Reporting Requirements FAR Combating Trafficking in Persons* –Contractors shall.
Award Notification and Acceptance (ANA)  The ANA module deployed through the Grants Management System (GMS) will electronically issue an award instead.
Silicon Valley Apps for Kids Meetup Laura D. Berger October 22, 2012 The views expressed herein are those of the speaker, and do not represent the views.
FAR P ART 24. This part prescribes policies and procedures that apply requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) (the Act) and OMB Circular.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES PRIVACY ACT (PA) SYSTEMS OF RECORDS MANAGERS.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Data Bigger Picture Updated 5/22/14.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42, Chapter 1, Subchapter A Part 2 – CONFIDENTIALITY OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE PATIENTS BRYANT D. MILLER CAC II, MAC,
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Ethics in Social Science Research Special difficulties in Criminal Justice & Criminology.
Mission The Mission of OJP is to increase public safety and improve the fair administration of justice across America through innovative leadership and.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
HIPAA Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996.
Data Protection Paul Veysey & Bethan Walsh. Introduction Data Protection is about protecting people by responsibly managing their data in ways they expect.
Pennsylvania Child Protective Services Law: Module 4: Reporting and the Role of the Child Welfare Professional Transfer of Learning The Pennsylvania Child.
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Help us Help you: IRB Policy Updates Susan Bankowski, MS, JD IRB Chair.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
HIPAA and Research Basics for IRB Tim Atkinson Director, Research and Sponsored Programs Director, Institutional Review Board Research Privacy Officer.
1 Investigating Fraud & Abuse Violations in Medical Research Janet Rehnquist, Esq. Venable LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
Privacy and the Civil Commitment Process Allyson K. Tysinger Assistant Attorney General June 4-5, 2008.
Medical Law and Ethics, Third Edition Bonnie F. Fremgen Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) CCAC.
Understanding HIPAA (Health Insurandce Portability and Accountability Act)
The right item, right place, right time. DLA Privacy Act Code of Fair Information Principles.
FAMIS CONFERENCE Mari M. Presley, Assistant General Counsel Florida Department of Education June 12, 2012.
Ethics & Research Dr. Guerette. Defining Ethics Deal with matters of right and wrong. Deal with matters of right and wrong. May be defined as behavior.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
A Road Map to Research at Jefferson: HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules for Researchers Presented By: Privacy Officer/Office of Legal Counsel October 2015.
School District Records Lindsay Hale David Wheelus Assistant Attorneys General Open Records Division Views expressed are those of the presenter, do not.
Configuring Electronic Health Records Privacy and Security in the US Lecture b This material (Comp11_Unit7b) was developed by Oregon Health & Science University.
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
Privacy/Confidentiality – Principles and Regulations in the Social Sciences and Behavioral Research Moira Keane, MA, CIP University of Minnesota May 4,
VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SLIDE 0 New Requirements for VA ORD Investigators: Implementation of Data Management and Access Plans.
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
FERPA for the Financial Aid Office NCASFAA Fall Conference November 2012.
Human Subjects Update E. Wethington, Chair, UCHS.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Nassau Association of School Technologists
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
Conditional IRB Approval
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Upcoming Changes to the Common Rule
Privacy & Access to Information
Changes to Exempt Categories
Disability Services Agencies Briefing On HIPAA
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Presentation transcript:

1 Purview & Roles of IRBs NAS Workshop on Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule in Relation to the Behavioral and Social Sciences Cheryl Crawford Watson Human Subjects Protection Officer, NIJ

NIJ’s Mission The National Institute of Justice — the research, development and evaluation agency of the U.S. Department of Justice — is dedicated to improving knowledge and understanding of crime and justice issues through science. 2

NIJ’s Location Within the Department Office of Justice Programs 3

Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Office for Victims of Crime Bureau of Justice Assistance Bureau of Justice Statistics Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention Office of Sex Offender Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering & Tracking 4

OJP Funding Over the past 10 years, OJP has provided 52,000 funding awards to the criminal justice community totaling more than $26 billion. In Fiscal Year (FY) 2009, OJP awarded 4,900 grants totaling more than $2.5 billion. In FY 2009, OJP also awarded an additional 3,883 Recovery Act grants totaling more than $2.74 billion to state and local and tribal law enforcement and community organizations. Most of OJP’s funding programs are highly competitive; hundreds of grant proposals are received & processed for the same funding opportunities 5

Where do IRBs come in? Through grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts, NIJ/OJP funds: Extramural research – reviewed by a grantee’s own IRB or commercial IRB Intramural research – reviewed by OJP IRB 6

Duties of NIJ HSPO To review research awards, adding & removing special withholding conditions to ensure compliance To train/educate in-house research staff To consult with NIJ-funded researchers & IRBs To serve as co-chair on OJP IRB Plus a myriad of other things HSP-related! 7

8 Laws and Regs. re: DOJ-funded Research Confidentiality of Information (42 USC §3789g) Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Statistical Information (28 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 22) Protection of Human Subjects (28 CFR Part 46) [The Common Rule] –DOJ adopted only the Common Rule, not Subparts

9 CONGRATULATIONS! You’ve received and accepted an award from NIJ. Now what? Read all of the award conditions. If the award has special conditions for human subjects protection and/or privacy, please note that these conditions withhold funds until regulatory compliance is achieved.

10 To get the funds released, you must submit the following to NIJ for approval: 1.Human Subjects Protection Form IRB Approval, if applicable –IRB-approved informed consent docs –IRB-approved instruments 2.DOJ Privacy Certificate **Cite the DOJ regulatory citations in your IRB application & ask IRB to use them!

Common issues in HSPO review of Grantee HSP-related documents Forms not signed or dated, nor proof-read PI’s attempt to self-exempt –(ANPRM “excused” as new category) IRBs unaware of DOJ regulations 11

Common issues, continued IRBs confused by DOJ regulations PI’s anxious to start HS research; must wait for funds release Complexity of consent process 12

13 FAQs by PIs & IRBs Can I get a CoC from DOJ? What is the difference between CoCs & PCs? Are there exceptions to confidentiality? What about mandatory reporting?

14 Department of Justice Confidentiality Statute (42 USC §3789g) “No officer or employee of the Federal Government, and no recipient of assistance…shall use or reveal any research or statistical information furnished…by any person and identifiable to any specific private person other than the purpose for which it was obtained. Such information …shall be immune from legal process, and shall not, without the consent of the person furnishing such information, be admitted as evidence or used for any purpose in any…judicial, legislative or administrative proceedings.”

15 All DOJ awardees collecting PII must submit a Privacy Certificate (PC): describing the research, assuring that the applicant will comply with the requirements, and describing the procedures that will be used to protect the confidentiality of the identifiable information collected as part of the research. Privacy/Confidentiality Regs (28 CFR Part 22)

16 Elements of the Privacy Certificate (28 CFR §22.23) Brief description of project Procedures to notify subjects (informed consent) Justification for the collection and maintenance of identifiable information and assurance to preserve confidentiality Administrative and physical security of identifiable data, to include removal of identifiers, locked file cabinets, password protection, etc. Access to data limited to persons w/ need-to- know and who agree to comply Information transfer agreements - limitations and authority Final disposition of data in identified form & data archiving

17 Notification (Inform + Consent) All research subjects must give their consent to participate and be told: –the information they provide will be used for research and statistical purposes only; –compliance with the request for information is voluntary and can be terminated at any time; –study risks and benefits; –how the data will be securely maintained; and –how data will be archived/disposed of post-study. Study funder should be identified.

Are there exceptions to confidentiality? No. Confidentiality can only be broken with the subject’s consent. Identifiable data collected can only be used for research purposes and no other purpose without the subject’s consent. 28 CFR Part (c): The regulations do not apply to information gained regarding future criminal conduct. 18

CoC vs. PC Both allow voluntary disclosure by subjects. Both protect against compelling disclosure. –They allow the researcher to refuse to disclose identifying information in any civil, criminal, administrative, legislative, or other proceeding, whether at the federal, state, or local level. They differ with respect to other voluntary disclosures. 19

20 What About Mandatory Reporting? CoCs do not prevent researchers from the voluntary disclosure of matters such as child abuse, reportable communicable diseases, or subject's threatened harm to self or others, while DOJ confidentiality statute & regs. do. Federal law supersedes State law, thus need for 2 consent forms: consent to participate & consent to allow reporting Self-report is strongly encouraged and resources can be provided to all study subjects.

Bright Line of Confidentiality Researchers using DOJ funds cannot report suspected abuse of subjects, unless they obtain subjects assent/consent to 1) participate in the research AND 2) allow the PI to report if abuse alleged or suspected DOJ is le agency; few would participate in DOJ- funded research without protections on identifiable data 21

If NIJ-funded PI or their IRB needs or wants to report: Flexibility to use combined form or two forms If combined form, must clearly state and subject must sign to participate & to allow mandatory reporting Subject must be fully informed of & acknowledge awareness of circumstances when confidentiality can be broken. Subject should be encouraged to self-report. 22

23 Penalties Any person violating the provisions of 42 USC §3789g or 28CFR Part 22 is subject to a fine of $10,000 in addition to any other penalties imposed by law. DOJ has the right to terminate funding and initiate appropriate legal action for violations of the statute or the regulation.

24 Resources NIJ on the Web at NIJ.GOV NIJ Webpages on Human Subjects Protection Contact:Cheryl Crawford Watson Human Subjects Protection Officer National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice