The Power of Collaboration: How a Jurisdiction Reduced School Arrests National Juvenile Justice Network Annual Forum Washington, D.C. July 27, 2011 Judge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Power of Collaboration: How a Jurisdiction Reduced School Arrests, Improved Safety and Improved Outcomes for Students Judge Steve Teske Clayton County.
Advertisements

WHEN DID MAKING ADULTS MAD BECOME A CRIME A Collaborative Approach to Reducing School Arrests and Improving Outcomes.
Truancy Court Of Randolph County
WHEN DID MAKING ADULTS MAD BECOME A CRIME? The Role of the Bench, Bar, Police, and Schools in Dismantling the School-to- Prison Pipeline.
A system of laws, policies, and practices that pushes students out of schools and into the juvenile and criminal systems An over-reliance on school.
BEST PRACTICES: IMPLEMENTATION OF PREA IN THE MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF YOUTH SERVICES Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice April 6, 2008 Washington,
As many as 70% of the youth involved At least 20% of youth in the juvenile 32% of children with learning disabilities Only 35% of students identified.
SCHOOL REFERRAL REDUCTION PROGRAM: Reducing Racial Disparities and the Criminalization of Low Risk Youth Center for Children’s Law & Policy Third Annual.
It’s Our Problem: Examining the Impact of the School-to-Prison Pipeline through a Local Lens Elissa Johnson, Esq. Discipline in Schools: Moving Beyond.
Partnering to Reduce School Crime Collaborative Efforts to Reduce School Crime Referrals in Hennepin County.
Disproportionality & Producing Better Outcomes June 14, 2013.
The Juvenile Justice System
Chapter 15: Part 3 Young People and the Law ©2005 Clairmont Press Georgia and the American Experience.
Disciplining Students with Disabilities Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Law Enforcement Response. Historically ● Beating one’s wife was not a crime ● Police were not allowed to make arrests in misdemeanor cases - - UNLESS.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Juvenile Delinquency November 14, Daily Agenda  Review Section 2 Assessment  Section 16-3 Juvenile Delinquency  Chapter Review on page 380. 
Reporting Requirements for School Staff Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011 Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011.
Give Your Assessment of the philosophy behind your state’s approach to Judicial Waiver “To provide a program of supervision, care and rehabilitation.
Criminal Law and Young People
Campus Safety The Sullivan University System There were no hate crimes reported that fit any reportable crime bias categories. In accordance with the Crime.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
CHILDREN’S HEARING SYSTEM. CHILDREN’S HEARINGS Need to know: Why a child may appear before a hearing How the hearings system works Actions that can be.
Policy Academy-Action Network Initiative: Overview of State Proposal and Goals April 17, 2015 Tom Andriola: Chief of Policy and Implementation, DCJS.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Juvenile Justice System. The Juvenile Justice System, 6 th ed. Dean J. Champion Presented by: D. Romeo 2 The Juvenile Justice System CRCT pp 193 The Juvenile.
Chapter 16: Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Justice A special category in the justice system created for youth—that is, in most U.S. jurisdictions, persons between the ages of 7 and 18.
The Annie E. Casey Foundation Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative JDAI Council of State Governments May 17, 2009 Rand Young, WA State JDAI Coordinator.
The Juvenile Justice System
Georgia and the American Experience
Truancy Program Overview Lompoc Valley Middle School in conjunction with the Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
Steps in the Adult Criminal Justice Process
Combating Truancy Knox County Truancy Initiative and the
Clackamas County Juvenile Drug Court Enhancement Evaluation (OR) NPC Research Outcome and Cost Evaluation Results.
Chapter 16.3 Young People and the Courts. Causes of Juvenile Delinquency In most states, anyone under age 18 is considered a juvenile – not yet legally.
Jenna’s Law House Bill 1041 Jenna’s Law  What is sexual abuse? Any sexual act between an adult and a minor ▪OR between two minors when one has “POWER”
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
Understanding Disproportionate Minority Contact in Onondaga County A project to reduce racial disparities in Onondaga County’s Juvenile Justice System.
Student Conduct and Discipline Meeting 10/06/09. New PPS Discipline Policy.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Alternatives to Arrest for School Based Law Enforcement Instructor.
Georgia and the American Experience Chapter 15: Government of the Empire State Section 3 Judicial Branch ©2005 Clairmont Press.
School Discipline Communication Plan Kierstyn Johnson ADMS 626 Summer 2015.
“Schoolhouse to the Jailhouse” 1 “Public School Prison Pipeline” The Interaction between Public Schools and the Juvenile Justice System.
Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.
BREAKING THE SCHOOL TO PRISON PIPELINE J. Corpening.
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
Unit 6: The American Legal System BY: Yaira Peaks.
Children’s Policy Conference Keeping Kids Closer to Home Peter Selby, PhD -- February 24, 2016.
Title IX: Our Community’s Responsibility for a Safer SEU.
Juvenile Justice. Certification Certification – the proceeding in juvenile court in which the court determines if a juvenile will stand trial as an adult.
Juvenile Justice Explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders.
Virginia RULES Teens Learn & Live the Law Virginia’s Judicial System.
Criminal Justice BHS Law Related Education Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles LESSON OBJECTIVES 4-1 Analyze and define the legal doctrine of parens.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
RETHINK DISCIPLINE #RETHINKDISCIPLINE WHITE HOUSE CONVENING 2015 KIM STEVENSON, DISTRICT DISCIPLINE ADMINISTRATOR HEATHER LANCASTER, COMMUNICATION DIRECTOR.
STANDARDS: SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders. a. Explain the difference between delinquent behavior.
AJS101 (40384) Monday, October 3, 2016 Time Keeper.
R.A.C.C.E. Radical Advocates for Cross Cultural Education
SCHOOL-JUSTICE PARTNERSHIPS AND THE SCHOOL-TO-PRISON PIPELINE
Student Discipline.
School Justice Partnership Project
Sexual Orientation in Education
Juvenile vs. Adult Differences in the Criminal Justice System
Juvenile Offenders Delinquent acts and unruly acts are legal terms for behavior in minors under the age of 16. Delinquent behavior is an act committed.
Raise the Age Implementation
Juvenile Justice.
Juvenile Justice It’s all about you!.
Presentation transcript:

The Power of Collaboration: How a Jurisdiction Reduced School Arrests National Juvenile Justice Network Annual Forum Washington, D.C. July 27, 2011 Judge Brian Huff Jefferson County Family Court Birmingham, Alabama

Problem? United States has the highest rate of incarceration of any country on earth. Too many children being referred to the juvenile justice system. Most children are being referred for minor misdemeanor offenses. Most children being referred are African American.

Reform Begins at Intake Jefferson County Family Court Intake Initiatives include: Children in Need of Supervision Policy Diversion through Counsel and Advise The School Offense Protocol Intake Detention Probation

Importance of Diversion Court can’t be all things to all people Limited resources should be focused on kids who warrant court involvement Research has shown that court involvement can do more harm than good Resources can be provided outside of court (but the court should strive to coordinate resources)

Juvenile Justice Reform is Philosophy OLD PHILOSOPHY Court as a “savior” Probation Supervision Counseling Incarceration NEW PHILOSOPHY Court as a resource “identifier” Court as a referral source Court as a Collaborator

Zero Tolerance EQUALS Zero Intelligence

DEFINITION “A philosophy or policy that mandates the application of pre-determined consequences, most often severe and punitive in nature, that are intended to be applied regardless of the seriousness of behavior, mitigating circumstances, or situational context.” Skiba et al. 2006

HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT 80’s War on Drugs Later applied to combat pollution, trespassing, sexual trespassing, & sexual harrassment Attributed to “Broken Windows” theory of crime (Kelling, George & Coles, 1997) School Systems begin adopting in early 90’s Suspensions nearly doubled from 1.7 million in 74 to 3.1 million in 01. Assumes that removal of disruptive students deters others from similar conduct while enhancing classroom

EFFECTS OF ZERO TOLERANCE Suspension rates have increased School Code violations result in court referrals Increase in police on school campus Increase in suspensions and referrals has significantly increased racial & ethnic disparities Drop-out rates increase Juvenile crime increases

SCHOOL CONNECTEDNESS School connectedness is a strong protective factor against delinquency. US Surgeon General. (2001). Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General. School connectedness is linked to lower levels of substance abuse, violence, suicide attempts, pregnancy, & emotional distress. Journal of School Health 72 (4). OSS of elementary & middle school students contributes to drop-out rates. Predictors of Suspension & Negative School Outcomes: A Longitudinal Investigation (2003)

Research shows a strong link between court referrals and dropout rates A student arrested in high school is twice as likely to drop out A student who appears in court during high school is four times as likely to drop out Sweeten, Gary, Who Will Graduate? Disruption of High School Education by Arrest and Court Involvement. 24.4, Justice Quarterly, (December 2006).

Birmingham educated only 25% of the county’s public school students, but accounted for 83% of school referrals in Jefferson County Birmingham 10 additional school systems SCHOOL REFERRALS TO JEFFERSON COUNTY FAMILY COURT, SCHOOL YEAR 83%

Birmingham students referred to family court in 2007/08 – by offense

Added to the disproportionate minority contact with the juvenile justice system…… The Birmingham system educates only 25% of students in the county, but produces more than 66% of school referrals to Family Court 99% of students arrested in the Birmingham schools are African American

Racial Disparities in Detention

Solicit media support Meet with the media at regular intervals. Foster good relations. Provide reliable data. Work with the media on continued messaging.

Form Your Team Jefferson County Family Court Birmingham City Schools Jefferson County District Attorney Birmingham Police Department NAACP Southern Poverty Law Center Department of Human Resources

MULTI-INTEGRATED SYSTEM THEORY OUTPUTS Education Social Services Mental Health Law Enforcement INPUTS

Admitted that we had been doing something wrong…

21 Trying to fit in Dating Short attention span Identity Some adult responsibilities Independence/Dependence Moody Withdrawn New emotions Normal Adolescence

“Our” Kids Broken families Dysfunctional families Drug/alcohol abuse in families Criminal behavior “normal” in their families Learning disabilities Mental health issues Abuse victims 8/26/201522

Decide which “offenses” to include. Affray (fighting) Disorderly conduct Harassment Assault 3 (no weapon) Menacing (no weapon) Criminal Trespass 3 Theft 3

Build Consensus If “Columbine” happens in my jurisdiction, I want the police at the school protecting the children and not at the family court over a school yard fight.

Honig v. Doe We think it clear, however, that Congress very much meant to strip school systems of the unilateral authority they had traditionally employed to exclude disabled students, particularly emotionally disturbed students, from school. In so doing, Congress did not leave school administrators powerless to deal with dangerous students; it did, however, deny school officials their former right to “self-help,” and directed that in the future the removal of disabled students could be accomplished only with the permission of the parents or, as a last resort, the courts.. at 323– 24. Justice Brennan

The Case of Chris L. Morgan v. Chris L., 927 F. Supp. 267 (E.D. Tenn. 1994), aff ’d, 106 F.3d 401 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 520 U.S (1997). Middle School Student ADHD School’s Failure to work IEP Juvenile Complaint Referral Due Process Hearing Litigation

Federal District Court The court relied in part on a Tennessee IDEA due process opinion that ordered a school system “to do everything it can” to dismiss a juvenile court petition.

U.S. Court of Appeals The court stated that, “pursuant to the IDEA’s procedural safeguards... the school system must adopt its own plan and institute an M-team meeting before initiating a juvenile court petition for this purpose.”

ALLEGORY OF THE SCHOOL BY OFFICER ROBERT GARDNER Clayton County Police LAMBS SHEEP WOLVES THE SCHOOL

Decide which “offenses” to include. Affray (fighting) Disorderly conduct Harassment Assault 3 (no weapon) Menacing (no weapon) Criminal Trespass 3 Theft 3

Decide upon a better way of discipline. First “offense” – warning/written citation Second “offense” – Attend “School Offense Workshop Referral to court

SRO’s after periodic reviews requested a “Level” box to reflect the use of their discretion to issue another warning or referral in lieu of the next step. SRO’s also requested the discretion to make a variety of referral, or take other action

Get it in writing!

Birmingham educates only 25% of the county’s public school students, but now accounts for 66% of school referrals Jefferson County Birmingham 10 additional school systems SCHOOL REFERRALS TO JEFFERSON COUNTY FAMILY COURT, SCHOOL YEAR 66%

COURT REFERRALS FROM BHAM SCHOOLS, BY SEMESTER Discussion alone produced a big drop in referrals, but a written document is critical for sustained results.

Despite a 50% drop from to , misdemeanors and violations still accounted for more than 90% of arrests

The average detention population is down 72%

Commitments to Juvenile Prison are down by 73% DYS ADMISSIONS FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY,

Replication Tips: the negotiation process Knowledge and data = Power Be prepared to counter horror stories with data Choose reps carefully Nodding and smiling is not enough Consider engaging an independent facilitator Media can be a blessing and a curse Set timelines and stick to them

It takes more than a meeting to build a collaborative Raise awareness – share numbers, legal background, research Share stories – not just about statistics! Listen to your partners and consider their interests and motivations – be flexible with messaging Set goals and timelines for the group’s work Frame the issues carefully and repeat constantly

Replication Tips: Implementation Don’t assume the protocol will enforce itself – appoint a watchdog Be deliberate and explicit about how each leader will get the word out to staff Training Back it up with policy – what will the court do if a referral comes in that violates the protocol? Invite the community/the media to hold the collaborative accountable for results

For more information: Brian Huff Presiding Judge Jefferson County Family Court