1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute Technical Assistance to North Carolinas Health & Wellness Trust Funds TUPC.
Advertisements

Northern Kentucky Health District Northern Kentucky Planning Process.
Sources of Substance Use Prevalence, Risk and Protective Factor, and Community Resource Data Matthew J. Cook University of Connecticut Health Center Governor’s.
Community Health Assessment San Joaquin County.
Community Resources Assessment Training 1-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 1-3.
© 2005 The Finance Project Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Oregon 21 st Century Community Learning Center Programs October 2011.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Incorporating Data into a Needs Assessment Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Office of Planning Office of Research.
Outreach Evaluation Series: Community Assessment Susan Barnes and Alan Carr National Network of Libraries of Medicine Outreach Evaluation Resource Center.
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 3-1.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Steve Delaronde, MSW, MPH University of Connecticut Health Center The Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth July 16, 1999 Identifying Community Resources.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 2-1.
Ontario’s Special Needs Strategy Spring The Vision “An Ontario where children and youth with special needs get the timely and effective services.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 4-1.
Community Assessment Training 3- Click to edit Master title style Community Assessment Training 4-1.
Children’s Mental Health: An Urgent Priority for Illinois.
National Prevention Strategy 1. National Prevention Council Bureau of Indian AffairsDepartment of Labor Corporation for National and Community Service.
Program Collaboration and Service Integration: An NCHHSTP Green paper Kevin Fenton, M.D., Ph.D., F.F.P.H. Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Community Planning Training 3-1. Community Plan Implementation Training Community Planning Training.
Community Assessment Training 3- Click to edit Master title style Community Assessment Training 3-1.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Overview June,  Sub-recipients grant applications will go to ADAMHS/ADAS Boards only.  ADAMHS/ADAS Boards will be expected to identify a primary.
The Indiana Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
Community Assessment Training 2- Community Assessment Training 2-1.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training Community Planning Training 1-2.
Community Resources Assessment Training 3-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 3-2.
Community Resources Assessment Training Community Resources Assessment Training.
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
Community Plan Implementation Training 5-1 Community Plan Implementation Training 5-1.
The Community Collaboration Coaches Roles, Strategies, and Tools.
One Department Vision Mission Core Set of Values Washington State Department of Social & Health Services Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery Building.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
► Collected data from regular/expected sources:  California Health Kids Survey (CHKS)  California Health Information Survey (CHIS)  CalOMS Pv/CalOMS.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
State of California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs State Incentive Grant Project Overview Michael Cunningham Deputy Director, Program Services.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
Loudoun County Public Schools 2010 Communities That Care Survey.
CSEFEL State Planning Rob Corso. CSEFEL  National Center focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children.
Community Plan Implementation Training 2-1 Community Plan Implementation Training 2-1.
Community Planning 101 Disability Preparedness Summit Nebraska Volunteer Service Commission Laurie Barger Sutter November 5, 2007.
Community Assessment Training 3- Community Assessment Training 6-1.
Community Assessment Training 1- Community Assessment Training 1-1.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Community Planning Training 8-1. Community Planning Training 8- Community Planning Training 8-2.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators To learn how to explain the Communities That Care process and the research.
Key Leader Orientation 3- Key Leader Orientation 3-1.
Community Resources Assessment Training 2- Community Resources Assessment Training 2-1 Community Resources Assessment Training 2-1.
2016 Utah Transition Institute Developing Improvement Strategies.
Community Planning Training 2-1. Community Plan Implementation Training Community Planning Training.
Training of Process Facilitators 1- Training of Process Facilitators 5-1.
Connecticut Department of Public Health - Keeping Connecticut Healthy Connecticut Department of Public Health PHABuloCiTy! Public Health Accreditation.
Community Analyses or Needs Assessment HS 638: Lusine Nahapetyan.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 7-1.
Strategic Prevention Framework - Assessment Program Title Here date.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Training of Process Facilitators
The Communities That Care System
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Presentation transcript:

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Coordinate and support the efforts of the Key Leader Board and Community Board through Phases Three, Four and Five of the Communities That Care effort. Training of Coordinators 5-2

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Participants will be able to: 1.Carry out the responsibilities of the Coordinator through Phase Three. 2.Carry out the responsibilities of the Coordinator through Phase Four. 3.Carry out the responsibilities of the Coordinator through Phase Five. Training of Coordinators 5-3

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Community Assessment Training (CAT) Community Resources Assessment Training (CRAT) Training of Coordinators 5-4

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators The goal of the Community Assessment Training is to build the Community Board’s capacity to conduct a community risk- and protective-factor assessment. Training of Coordinators 5-5

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators The Communities That Care Youth Survey Archival data Training of Coordinators 5-6

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Getting support for the survey early on is important. Training of Coordinators 5-7

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Develop a focus for planning. Establish baseline data and expected outcomes. Conduct public relations and outreach. Support fund development. Training of Coordinators 5-8

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Was developed from solid research Uses valid and reliable measures Is valid across gender and age groups Is valid across racial and ethnic groups. Training of Coordinators 5-9

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-10

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Appendix B: Additional Prevention Planning Data…………………. Introduction…………………………………………………………… Age of Onset ………………………………………………………… Risk of Harm………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… Section 1: The Survey Introduction Summary of results Survey methodology Demographic profile TABLE OF CONTEN Section 1: The Survey……………….……………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Summary of Results……………………………………………………………..……… Survey Methodology……………………………………………………………………. Demographic Profile of Surveyed Youth………………………………………………. Section 2: Risk and Protective Factors…………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Overall Results…………………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results………………………………………………………………… Protective Factors…………………………………………………………………… Risk Factors…………………………………………………………………………… Section 3: Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use………………………..……… Measurement…………………………………………………………….………. Overall Results…………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………….…….. Section 4: Other Antisocial Behaviors………………………..…………………… Introduction…………………………………………………………….………… Overall Results……………………………………………………………………. Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………………... References………………………..……………………..…………………… Appendix A: Other Resources…………………..……………………..…… Web Sites…………………………………………………………….……. Prevention Planning ……………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results………………………………………………………. Training of Coordinators 5-11

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Appendix B: Additional Prevention Planning Data…………………. Introduction…………………………………………………………… Age of Onset …………………………………………………………. Risk of Harm…………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………… Section 2: Risk and Protective Factors Section 3: Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use Section 4: Other Antisocial Behaviors References Appendices TABLE OF CONTEN Section 1: The Survey……………….……………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Summary of Results……………………………………………………………..……… Survey Methodology……………………………………………………………………. Demographic Profile of Surveyed Youth………………………………………………. Section 2: Risk and Protective Factors…………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Overall Results…………………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results………………………………………………………………… Protective Factors…………………………………………………………………… Risk Factors…………………………………………………………………………… Section 3: Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use………………………..……… Measurement…………………………………………………………….………. Overall Results…………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………….……. Section 4: Other Antisocial Behaviors………………………..…………………. Introduction…………………………………………………………….………. Overall Results…………………………………………………………………. Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………………. References………………………..……………………..…………………… Appendix A: Other Resources…………………..……………………..…. Web Sites…………………………………………………………….….. Prevention Planning …………………………………………………….. Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………… Training of Coordinators 5-12

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Appendix B: Additional Prevention Planning Data…………………. Introduction…………………………………………………………… Age of Onset …………………………………………………………. Risk of Harm…………………………………………………………. …………………………………………………… Introduction Overall results Grade-level results Protective factors Risk factors TABLE OF CONTEN Section 1: The Survey……………….……………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Summary of Results……………………………………………………………..……… Survey Methodology……………………………………………………………………. Demographic Profile of Surveyed Youth………………………………………………. Section 2: Risk and Protective Factors…………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Overall Results…………………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results………………………………………………………………… Protective Factors…………………………………………………………………… Risk Factors…………………………………………………………………………… Section 3: Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use………………………..……… Measurement…………………………………………………………….……… Overall Results…………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………….……. Section 4: Other Antisocial Behaviors………………………..…………………. Introduction…………………………………………………………….………. Overall Results………………………………………………………………….. Grade-Level Results…………………………………………………………….. References………………………..……………………..……………………. Appendix A: Other Resources…………………..……………………..…. Web Sites…………………………………………………………….…. Prevention Planning ……………………………………………………. Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………… Training of Coordinators 5-13

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 50=Normative score Risk factors: the lower the better Protective factors: the higher the better Training of Coordinators 5-14

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-15 Community Rewards for Prosocial Involvement Family Attachment Family Opportunities for Prosocial Involvement Family Rewards for Prosocial Involvement School Opportunities for Prosocial Involvement School Rewards for Prosocial Involvement Religiosity Social Skills Belief in Moral Order Average

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-16

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Appendix B: Additional Prevention Planning Data…………………. Introduction…………………………………………………………… Age of Onset ………………………………………………………… Risk of Harm………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………… Measurement Overall results Grade-level results compared: — across grade levels — with Monitoring the Future. TABLE OF CONTEN Section 1: The Survey……………….……………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Summary of Results……………………………………………………………..……… Survey Methodology……………………………………………………………………. Demographic Profile of Surveyed Youth………………………………………………. Section 2: Risk and Protective Factors…………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Overall Results…………………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results………………………………………………………………… Protective Factors…………………………………………………………………… Risk Factors…………………………………………………………………………… Section 3: Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use………………………..……… Measurement…………………………………………………………….……… Overall Results…………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………….……. Section 4: Other Antisocial Behaviors………………………..…………………. Introduction…………………………………………………………….……….. Overall Results…………………………………………………………………. Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………………. References………………………..……………………..…………………… Appendix A: Other Resources…………………..……………………..…. Web Sites…………………………………………………………….…. Prevention Planning ……………………………………………………. Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………… Training of Coordinators 5-17

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Appendix B: Additional Prevention Planning Data………………… Introduction…………………………………………………………… Age of Onset ………………………………………………………… Risk of Harm……………………………………………………….. …………………………………………………… Violence Delinquency TABLE OF CONTEN Section 1: The Survey……………….……………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Summary of Results……………………………………………………………..……… Survey Methodology……………………………………………………………………. Demographic Profile of Surveyed Youth………………………………………………. Section 2: Risk and Protective Factors…………………………………………………… Introduction……………………………………………………………………………… Overall Results…………………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results………………………………………………………………… Protective Factors…………………………………………………………………… Risk Factors…………………………………………………………………………… Section 3: Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use………………………..……… Measurement…………………………………………………………….………. Overall Results…………………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………….……. Section 4: Other Antisocial Behaviors………………………..……………… Introduction…………………………………………………………….…… Overall Results……………………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results………………………………………………………… References………………………..……………………..…………………… Appendix A: Other Resources…………………..……………………..… Web Sites…………………………………………………………….… Prevention Planning …………………………………………………… Grade-Level Results……………………………………………………… Training of Coordinators 5-18

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Turn to the Survey Review Worksheet in your Participant’s Guide. Answer the questions on the Survey Review Worksheet using the Anytown County Youth Survey Report. After ten minutes, share your answers. Training of Coordinators 5-19

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-20 Some sites where archival data can be found include: National Center for Health Statistics U.S. Census Bureau’s Statistical Abstract of the United States Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-21 The Data Manager ensures that the priority risk- and protective-factor data and archival data information are compiled for writing the Community Assessment Report.

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators The report: highlights the priorities and strengths identified in the assessment process serves as a resource document for communicating the assessment results to different stakeholders. Training of Coordinators 5-22

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Distribute the report to Key Leaders and/or the Community Board for them to: offer suggestions for fine-tuning the report prepare for the public’s response to the assessment. Training of Coordinators 5-23

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-24 The goal of the Community Resources Assessment Training is to help the Community Board identify and collect relevant and useful information about the community’s current prevention effort.

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Your responsibility is to collect a variety of guides and directories that identify the community’s current resources. Training of Coordinators 5-25

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Form groups based on similar geographical locations. Brainstorm specific resources in your communities. List where these resources can be found. After ten minutes, share answers. Training of Coordinators 5-26

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-27 Distributing the survey may be done by: mailing the survey, or sending it by having board members conduct survey interviews finding the information on a resource’s Web site.

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators CRAT participants analyze survey results in order to identify: tested, effective resources currently serving the community gaps in community resources issues and barriers related to resource delivery and access ways to expand tested, effective resources to better address the community’s priority risk and protective factors. Training of Coordinators 5-28

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Distribute a draft of the report to Key Leaders and/or the Community Board for final approval before releasing it to the general public. Distribute the information in a format appropriate for each target audience. Training of Coordinators 5-29

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators the community vision outcomes tested, effective programs to address priority risk factors Training of Coordinators 5-30

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators The Coordinator: uses the newsprint copy to create a typed master copy of the Strategic Planning Worksheet distributes copies to participants after the training. Training of Coordinators 5-31

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators For example, an effective evaluation can help: determine if a program is having the desired effects identify problems with program design or selection inform the community about progress being made demonstrate the success of prevention efforts to funders determine if the program’s results are worth the cost. Training of Coordinators 5-32

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators An expert evaluator can help: select an evaluation design develop valid, reliable evaluation measures analyze statistical information determine why desired outcomes were not achieved, and find solutions. Training of Coordinators 5-33

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators The Community Action Plan is the end result of the work done in CPT. Training of Coordinators 5-34

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Confirm all milestones and benchmarks through Phase Four have been met. Provide the Community Action Plan to Community Plan Implementation Training (CPIT) participants and the trainer. Invite the Community Board Chair to open the CPIT. Invite the evaluation expert to the CPIT. Complete the Implementing Agencies Matrix worksheet. Training of Coordinators 5-35

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators CPIT participants: develop strategies for funding the Community Action Plan cover steps to ensure high-fidelity implementation make further evaluation plans develop a work plan and confirm steps for moving forward with implementation. Training of Coordinators 5-36

1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-37 CPIT represents the final step for a community before: programs, policies and practices identified in Phase Four are implemented evaluation of the results can begin.

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators List each program, policy or practice identified in the Community Action Plan. List each agency that will be involved in implementing the Community Action Plan. For each program, check off which agencies will be involved in implementing it. Training of Coordinators 5-38

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators The following worksheets are used in CPIT: The Collaborative Agreement Worksheet The Agency Resources Allocation Worksheet, Maximizing Agency Resources Worksheet and Coordinating Resources Worksheet The Readiness for Decategorization Worksheet The Meeting Planning Worksheet The Training Planning Worksheet The Evaluation Planning Worksheet The Potential Task Forces Worksheet Training of Coordinators 5-39

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Future community assessments may reveal new priorities for the community to focus on. In other words, the process is cyclical. Training of Coordinators 5-40

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators What is the goal of the Community Assessment Training? What document will be the result of this training? What is the goal of the Community Resources Assessment Training? What document will be the result of this training? What does the Community Action Plan report? Training of Coordinators 5-41

1-2 Training of Process Facilitators Developing effective skills and techniques that a Coordinator can use: in meetings when collecting and cataloging information. Training of Coordinators 5-42