Karmey Olson Education Program Consultant Career, Standards and Assessment Services Kansas State Department of Education August 31. 2011 Kansas Civil Rights.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA® English Language Proficiency Tests (IPT)
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services What happens after Focused Monitoring? -
NCLB Monitoring NCLB/ESEA Cycle Legal Requirement: EDGAR Part 80.40(a)—monitor subgrant activities to assure compliance with applicable.
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
The Monitoring Process
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Shepard Building 255 Westminster Street Providence, Rhode Island Deborah.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Surviving a FHEO Compliance Review and Complying with AFFH.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Training for Districts, Schools, and Team Members for
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education Office of Education Equity – Title III.
Who Are We? Marianna GoheenDeifi Stolz Health ScienceMethods of AdministrationProgram Supervisor.
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
Career-Technical Education and Civil Rights Carl D. Perkins Spring Informational Meeting Columbus State Community College May 15, 2013 Bob Bowermeister.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
Developing a Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plan for the Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) Adapted from the Virginia Department of Education Division.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
Enrollment Determination Colorado Charter School Institute BOOT CAMP September 1, 2015.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa. us Compliance Monitoring for Gifted Education COMPLIANCE MONITORING.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
NCLB Monitoring September 19, 2012 Webinar.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
Arizona Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition Services.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Uniform Complaint Procedure Memorandum # MEM-560 October 10, 2003 By: Jaime Morales.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring. 3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2011–2012 Federal Program Monitoring English Learner Accountability.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction English Learner Program Categorical Program Monitoring Bilingual.
January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Program.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
ADA/504 Technical Assistance Tool Ken Woodruff, Civil Rights Program Manager, FHWA.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Civil Rights Training Spring 2015
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
2011–2012 Federal Program Monitoring
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Karmey Olson Education Program Consultant Career, Standards and Assessment Services Kansas State Department of Education August Kansas Civil Rights

A Little About Myself….. BS “Home Economics” Masters in Teacher Technical Education Former Teacher at Kaw Area Technical School/Topeka – 12 ½ Years KSDE for 18 years

Selection Process Basis of selection: The analysis of career and technical education enrollment data in relation to total institution enrollment data  KIDS and CaTE Reports (Data submitted by local USD’s)  Last complete fiscal year

When Making the Selection….. Focus areas of the enrollment data: ■Underrepresented gender by enrollment; ■Disproportionate enrollment by race/ethnicity/national origin; ■Disproportionate enrollment by disability, limited English proficiency, and economic disadvantaged; and ■Date of the last on-site review;

Selection Process, continued Secondary sub-recipients are selected annually for comprehensive on-site reviews. ■The secondary sub-recipients will be ranked in the four categories as described above within the five subsets. ■The USD's with the highest score within each of the five (5) subsets will be selected for an on-site review. ■A sixth secondary sub-recipient is selected based on the highest score among all secondary sub-recipients not previously selected. ■Should two Unified School Districts within a single subset have equal scores the USD with the highest Special Populations score will be the determining factor for the on-site review site within that subset. ■If a sub-recipient, which has been selected for a comprehensive on-site review, cannot be visited in the year for which it has been selected it will be added to the sub-universe of the following year. ■The secondary sub-recipient with the next highest score within the subset will be visited as an alternative.

Example Gender Form SECONDARY Gender Educational Institution Name Percent of Female Enrollment in CTE Programs Percent of Female Enrollment in Institution Difference/ Points USD USD 001 No Data 100 USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD

Example Ethnicity Secondary Ethnicity Educational Institution Name Percent of Minority Enrollment in CTE Programs Percent of Minority Enrollment in Institution or County Difference/ Points USD USD 001No Data 100 USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD

Example Special Populations SECONDARY FORM C - Disability, Limited English Proficiency and Economic Disadvantaged CTE Enrollment Special Populations Demographics Institutional or County Special Populations Demographics Educational Institution Name LEPDisability Economic Disadvantaged TOTAL Disability LEP Economic Disadvantage d % Point s % % %% USD USD 001 No Data 100 USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD

Example Date of Last On-Site Visit SECONDARY DESK AUDIT FORM D – Date of Last On-Site Educational Institutional NameDate of last on-sitePoints USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD LEGEND Points No Record years years3 5-9 years1 1-4 years0

Example Totals SECONDARY TOTALS Educational Institution Name Form A: Gender Form B: Ethnicity Form C: Disability, LEP, Economic Disadvantaged Form D: Last on-site TOTAL USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD USD

Sites Selected for 11 – 12 School Year 6A/5A USD 261 Haysville John Burke, Superintendent 4A USD 210 Hugoton Mark Crawford, Superintendent 3A USD 246 Northeast – Arma Rhonda Fincher, Superintendent 2A USD 483 Kismet Plains Elton Argo, Superintendent 1A USD 103 Cheylin Bruce Bolen, Superintendent At-Large USD 507 Satanta Ardith Dunn, Superintendent

Date Selection On-site Visits will occur between October 1, 2011 and November 15, 2011 Week of October 3: 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 Week of October 10: 11 and 14 Week of October 17: 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21 Week of October 24: 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28 (Taken by Southwest Kansas) Week of November 7: 8 and 9 Week of November 14: 14 and 15  Call Karmey Olson to get date selected and added to the calendar!

Federal Regulations  ANSI (American National Standards Institute)  ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act)  UFAS (Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards) Civil Rights Federal Regulations for Accessibility (Resource Document)  Cites the timeframe in which each set of standards supports measures for accessibility  Cites the Legal Citation for each set of accessibility standards  Cites where and how to access each set of accessibility standards

Required Documents for On-Site Visit

2011 – 2012 Kansas Guide for Civil Rights Review  Each Equity Requirement is cited  Legal citation for each Equity Requirement is cited  Documentation to support each Equity Requirement is listed  Do not have to have copies of each piece of documentation listed  KSDE Staff will determine if each Equity Requirement has been met complete with comments of what was provided and what needs to be provided

Additional Required Documents include……. Form to Determine Applicable Accessibility Standards (Resource Document) Must include date each building was built, modified and/or altered Must include the month, date and year for each building

Form to Determine Applicable Accessibility for District Facilities

Why Specific Dates are Needed ANSI A (R1971): Construction or alteration initiated between June 4, 1977 and January 17, Available upon request – New construction: Section 504: 34 CFR UFAS: Construction or alteration initiated on or after January 18, New construction: Section 504: 34 CFR ADA or UFAS: Construction or alteration initiated on or after January 27, New construction: ADA 28 CFR

Additional Required Documentation…… Interview Questions for Administrators Interview Questions for Parents and Students Questions for Counselors and CTE-Academic Instructional Staff Questions for Title IX, Section 504 and ADA Coordinators  District personnel must respond to all 4 sets of questions. One person may have multiple roles and may respond to more than one set of questions.

Resources to Assist Districts While Preparing for the On-site Visit  Civil Rights Resources  Office of Civil Rights Reading Room  Sample Student Grievance Policy  Suggested Civil Rights On-Site Documentation

What Happens Next? KSDE will provide a Letter of Finding(s) within 30 days of the on-site visit District will complete a Voluntary Compliance Plan (VCP) within 60 days of receiving the Letter of Finding(s) KSDE will send an acceptance letter of the Letter of Finding(s)

What Happens Next? Districts may submit documentation by each established date for completion as identified in the VCP Once all Finding(s) have been completed, KSDE will conduct a follow-up visit KSDE will send letter determining status after the follow-up visit

Voluntary Compliance Plan (VCP) Three (3) Guidance Documents 1. Developing a Voluntary Compliance Plan 2.Voluntary Compliance Plan 3.Sample Voluntary Compliance Plan

Components of a Voluntary Compliance Plan (VCP)  Name of the district/institution.  Date of submission of the plan.  Identification of each non-compliance item identified in the Letter of Findings as needing corrective action.  Statement of KSDE’s recommendation(s) for compliance.

VCP  Statement of planned action to be taken in order to comply.  Identification of activities/steps, such as specific tasks that must be accomplished in order to complete the planned corrective action.  Timeline(s) including the date(s) each activity/step will begin and be completed.  Person(s)/position responsible, i.e. the specific personnel designated to initiate and monitor the implementation of the tasks/activities.

VCP  Monitoring and Evaluation -- identification of tangible examples, products or outcomes which can be examined and assessed by KSDE staff to determine whether the district/institution has made changes or provisions necessary for complying.  Signature of Superintendent.  Signature of Local Board of Education President (optional). ***A separate page must be used for each finding.

Sample of a VCP

Contact Information Karmey Olson Work: Cell: Beverly Smith, Sr. Administrative Assistant Work:

Questions

See You This Fall!