Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager Radford University.
Human Subjects & Research Understanding the protection of human subjects, HSRC, and the nature of the process.
DO NO HARM IRRB Presentation Purposes Responsibilities Processes NLU IRRB Home page.
 Daylene Meuschke, Ed.D Barry Gribbons, Ph.D RP Conference: April 2, 2013.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
Human Subject Protection Judith Birk IRB Health / Behavioral Sciences.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 06/18/2015 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.
Protecting Human Participants in Your Research and Classroom Projects NAU Institutional Review Board
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Human Subject Research View from the IRB Anthony J. Filipovitch Minnesota State University Mankato.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Privacy vs. Confidentiality.  IRB review of privacy and confidentiality protections is required under the Common Rule and the FDA regulations, as well.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Ethics Ethics Applied to Research Back to Class 2.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA.
Human Subjects Research Nellie Quezada-Aragon, Director Office of Compliance Dr. Luis A. Vazquez, Chair NMSU Institutional Review Board
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Paul Hryvniak MS, CIP Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP September 30, 2014 Student Human Research Education Session Tel:
Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
COCE Institutional Review Board Academic Spotlight
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Introduction to IRB (Institutional Review Board)
Mary Travis Director of Research Compliance
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
SOU Institutional Review Board
The Institutional Review Board: Who, What, When, Where, Why, and How
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Conducting Human Subjects Research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
SOU Institutional Review Board
Conducting Human Subjects Research
What Every Harvard LMA Student Investigator Should Know
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Human Participants Research
Research with Human Subjects
Research Compliance: Protections for Research Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Laura Noll Research Compliance Manager College of Graduate and Professional Studies Radford University, Radford, VA

Brief Overview of the IRB Brief Overview of the IRB Overview of the IRB Website Overview of the IRB Website IRB Review Categories IRB Review Categories Forms Locations Forms Locations IRB Training Requirements IRB Training Requirements Protocol Submission Process Protocol Submission Process Tips and Checklists Tips and Checklists Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification De-Identification

The Nuremberg Code (Post-WWII) The Nuremberg Code (Post-WWII) Tuskegee Study of Untreated Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male Syphilis in the Negro Male ( ) ( ) Stanford Prison Stanford Prison Experiment (1971) Experiment (1971) Beecher Report (1966) Beecher Report (1966)

Respect Respect Ensuring that individuals can make informed choices about their participation in research, and protecting those individuals with diminished autonomy Ensuring that individuals can make informed choices about their participation in research, and protecting those individuals with diminished autonomy Beneficence Beneficence Ensuring that the potential risks of a study are minimal, or are justified by the potential benefits Ensuring that the potential risks of a study are minimal, or are justified by the potential benefits Justice Justice Ensuring that the selection of research participants is fair, and not based simply on their easy availability, their willingness to participate, or other considerations not directly related to the problem being studied Ensuring that the selection of research participants is fair, and not based simply on their easy availability, their willingness to participate, or other considerations not directly related to the problem being studied

Federal Definition of “Research”: Federal Definition of “Research”: A systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge A systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge

Federal Definition of a “Human Subject”: Federal Definition of a “Human Subject”: A living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains: A living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting research obtains: Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or, Data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or, Identifiable private information. Identifiable private information. RU’s definition of whether human subjects are involved may be more stringent in some cases and require greater protection of privacy. RU’s definition of whether human subjects are involved may be more stringent in some cases and require greater protection of privacy. This is determined in the review process. This is determined in the review process.

What is clearly NOT Research? What is clearly NOT Research? Classroom or other programmatic evaluations for the sake of curriculum or other program improvements, but not for use in later publication Classroom or other programmatic evaluations for the sake of curriculum or other program improvements, but not for use in later publication Retrospective studies may be an option for future use of data for publication in some cases. Retrospective studies may be an option for future use of data for publication in some cases. Data collected from students within a class used for demonstration/learning purposes only Data collected from students within a class used for demonstration/learning purposes only Data collected by students purely for the purpose of learning research methodology that will not be published. Data collected by students purely for the purpose of learning research methodology that will not be published.

Inconvenience Inconvenience Physical Risk Physical Risk Psychological Risk Psychological Risk Social Risk Social Risk Economic Risk Economic Risk Legal Risk Legal Risk Types of Participant Risk to Consider:

In short: In short:  It’s federal law  Bottom Line:  Because you have to  If you don’t, you place your institution at risk of federal sanction and the loss of federal funding

Brief Overview of the IRB Brief Overview of the IRB Overview of the IRB Website Overview of the IRB Website IRB Review Categories IRB Review Categories Forms Locations Forms Locations IRB Training Requirements IRB Training Requirements Protocol Submission Process Protocol Submission Process Tips and Checklists Tips and Checklists Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification

Brief Overview of the IRB Brief Overview of the IRB Overview of the IRB Website Overview of the IRB Website IRB Review Categories IRB Review Categories Forms Locations Forms Locations IRB Training Requirements IRB Training Requirements Protocol Submission Process Protocol Submission Process Tips and Checklists Tips and Checklists Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification

Faculty: “Social and Behavioral Research Investigators Basic/Refresher, Basic Course” Students projects involving greater than minimal risk: Same course as Faculty – see above Students projects involving only Minimal Risk projects: “Students conducting no more than minimal risk research”; “Students – Class projects, Basic Course” Tutorials available on RU IRB website to help guide you to the correct courses

Brief Overview of the IRB Brief Overview of the IRB Overview of the IRB Website Overview of the IRB Website IRB Review Categories IRB Review Categories Forms Locations Forms Locations IRB Training Requirements IRB Training Requirements Protocol Submission Process Protocol Submission Process Tips and Checklists Tips and Checklists Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification

Brief Overview of the IRB Brief Overview of the IRB Overview of the IRB Website Overview of the IRB Website IRB Review Categories IRB Review Categories Forms Locations Forms Locations IRB Training Requirements IRB Training Requirements Protocol Submission Process Protocol Submission Process Tips and Checklists Tips and Checklists Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification Confidentiality, Anonymity, Privacy, and De-Identification

Check for completeness and accuracy Check for completeness and accuracy If information is missing, the proposal will be returned. If information is missing, the proposal will be returned. Grammar and spelling MUST be correct on every document that will be seen by participants. Grammar and spelling MUST be correct on every document that will be seen by participants. Consent form must be on RU Letterhead unless provided online. Consent form must be on RU Letterhead unless provided online. Online consents should have RU logo. Online consents should have RU logo. Write at an appropriate reading level for participants Write at an appropriate reading level for participants This is especially important for consent and assent forms. This is especially important for consent and assent forms. Proofread carefully Proofread carefully Avoid discipline-specific jargon Avoid discipline-specific jargon If the proposal can’t be easily understood, the IRB can’t adequately assess it, and your participants can’t provide truly informed consent for their participation. If the proposal can’t be easily understood, the IRB can’t adequately assess it, and your participants can’t provide truly informed consent for their participation.

The IRB Administrator is available to provide IRB presentations to your classes to facilitate the submission process. The IRB Administrator is available to provide IRB presentations to your classes to facilitate the submission process. Please plan ahead when planning courses that include IRB reviews of student submissions. Please plan ahead when planning courses that include IRB reviews of student submissions. IRB reviews take approximately 3-4 weeks for Exempt and Expedited reviews. IRB reviews take approximately 3-4 weeks for Exempt and Expedited reviews. Please allow adequate time for review for semester-based projects. Please allow adequate time for review for semester-based projects. Please contact the IRB Office prior to, or at the time of, submitting semester-based protocols so that we can do our best to facilitate their processing. Please contact the IRB Office prior to, or at the time of, submitting semester-based protocols so that we can do our best to facilitate their processing.

Student Investigators may not be PI. Student Investigators may not be PI. They must share their project in IRBNet with their Faculty Mentor. They must share their project in IRBNet with their Faculty Mentor. The Mentor must electronically “sign” the package prior to submission to indicate their approval of the submission for review by the IRB. The Mentor must electronically “sign” the package prior to submission to indicate their approval of the submission for review by the IRB. Completed Student and Faculty Investigator Agreement forms are to be uploaded to IRBNet. Completed Student and Faculty Investigator Agreement forms are to be uploaded to IRBNet. They no longer need to be sent to the IRB Office in hardcopy with original signature. They no longer need to be sent to the IRB Office in hardcopy with original signature.

It is important that your submission is as complete as possible to minimize lost time in the review process. It is important that your submission is as complete as possible to minimize lost time in the review process. Available resources include: Available resources include: README file, located in the IRBNet Forms Library, addresses elements to be included and final steps to submit a package properly within IRBNet README file, located in the IRBNet Forms Library, addresses elements to be included and final steps to submit a package properly within IRBNet RU IRB New Submission Checklist, in the Resources section of the website Forms page, provides more detail about the flow and content of preparing an IRB submission RU IRB New Submission Checklist, in the Resources section of the website Forms page, provides more detail about the flow and content of preparing an IRB submission

Privacy can be defined in terms of having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally, or intellectually) with others Privacy can be defined in terms of having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally, or intellectually) with others

Confidentiality pertains to the treatment of information that an individual has disclosed in a relationship of trust and with the expectation that it will not be divulged to others in ways that are inconsistent with the understanding of the original disclosure without permission Confidentiality pertains to the treatment of information that an individual has disclosed in a relationship of trust and with the expectation that it will not be divulged to others in ways that are inconsistent with the understanding of the original disclosure without permission

Webster defines it as the quality or state of being anonymous: Webster defines it as the quality or state of being anonymous: 1: not named or identified 2: of unknown authorship or origin 3: lacking individuality, distinction, or recognizability Additionally, for IRB purposes, we need to: Additionally, for IRB purposes, we need to: avoid the risk of deductive disclosure or other accidental disclosures by incomplete de-identification, especially in qualitative data avoid the risk of deductive disclosure or other accidental disclosures by incomplete de-identification, especially in qualitative data

Webster threw up its hands at this word Webster threw up its hands at this word It means what it sounds like, the removal of identifying information from the subject’s data It means what it sounds like, the removal of identifying information from the subject’s data However, you must keep in mind the risk of deductive disclosure or other accidental disclosures by incomplete de-identification, especially in qualitative data However, you must keep in mind the risk of deductive disclosure or other accidental disclosures by incomplete de-identification, especially in qualitative data

Please feel free to contact me at or x5290 or