Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GPS & GIS – An Introduction. Where Will This Take Us? What is GPS? What is GIS? How do GPS and GIS work? How will they help us? ? Find This!
Advertisements

Emerging Technologies… LIDAR MAPPS Summer Conference 11 July 2012.
High Accuracy Helicopter Lidar & Mapping Jeffrey B. Stroub, CP,RLS,PPS,SP Vice President Business Development September 9, 2014 Jeff Stroub CP, RLS, PPS,
Lecture 6 Data entry. Getting the Map into the Computer Get data in finished form Analog-to-Digital maps Digitizing Data Entry Editing and validation.
NVC0901 Maritime Alliance Symposium San Diego, August 2011 By: Michael Broadbent Fugro Pelagos Inc. Seafloor Mapping Technologies.
ADVANCES IN HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYING* Houston Business Roundtable Forum - May 2013 Depth Sounding Fusion with Above-Water LIDAR Sidescan Sonar Imaging Sonar.
Lecture 12 Content LIDAR 4/15/2017 GEM 3366.
Mapping and GIS Laboratory The Ohio State University
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Background The USGS is working with the U.S. Army at Fort Bragg to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWP3). The.
Introduction to LIDAR Mapping Technology
Airborne Laser Scanning: Remote Sensing with LiDAR.
Brian S. Keiling Program Head – Forest Management Dabney S.Lancaster Community College.
A Roadmap for a Seamless Elevation Surface: Benefits to Storm Surge Forecasting Lindy Dingerson NOAA Coastal Services Center.
Digital Elevation Models GLY 560: GIS and Remote Sensing for Earth Scientists Class Home Page:
Geographic Information Systems GIS Output. 1. Color Theory Additive primaries blue, green, and red Subtractive primaries yellow, cyan, and magenta.
UNIT ONE: Science Skills  Chapter 1Measurement  Chapter 2The Scientific Process  Chapter 3Mapping Earth.
Sonar Chapter 9. History Sound Navigation And Ranging (SONAR) developed during WW II –Sound pulses emitted reflected off metal objects with characteristic.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Airborne LIDAR The Technology Slides adapted from a talk given by Mike Renslow - Spencer B. Gross, Inc. Frank L.Scarpace Professor Environmental Remote.
Comparison of LIDAR Derived Data to Traditional Photogrammetric Mapping David Veneziano Dr. Reginald Souleyrette Dr. Shauna Hallmark GIS-T 2002 August.
An Introduction to Lidar Mark E. Meade, PE, PLS, CP Photo Science, Inc.
Hydrologic Measurement Precipitation Evaporation Streamflow Channel Properties Topography GIS datasets Reading: Applied Hydrology Chapter 6.
Acquisition and Interpretation of Water-Level Data Travis von Dessonneck.
Dave Tewksbury Department of Geosciences Hamilton College Clinton, NY On the Cutting Edge Albuquerque 2013.
UNDERSTANDING LIDAR LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING LIDAR is a remote sensing technique that can measure the distance to objects on and above the ground surface.
Geographic Information Systems
VDATUM: the Vertical Datum Transformation Tool
APPLICATION OF LIDAR IN FLOODPLAIN MAPPING Imane MRINI GIS in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Source. Optech,Inc.
DISTRIBUTION OF LIDAR DATA VIA THE INTERNET Michael Hearne and Andrew Meredith Technology Planning and Management Corporation Coastal Remote Sensing Program.
Mapping Forest Vegetation Structure in the National Capital Region using LiDAR Data and Analysis Geoff Sanders, Data Manager Mark Lehman, GIS Specialist.
Positioning with LiDAR Lucia Scimone, 31 st May 2011 GMAT9205 – Fundamentals of Geo-Positioning School of Surveying and Spatial Information Systems The.
Chapter 9 Electromagnetic Waves. 9.2 ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES.
Sea-ice freeboard heights in the Arctic Ocean from ICESat and airborne laser H. Skourup, R. Forsberg, S. M. Hvidegaard, and K. Keller, Department of Geodesy,
© Copyright Optech Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Aerial Photographs and Remote Sensing Aerial Photographs For years geographers have used aerial photographs to study the Earth’s surface. In many ways.
Expanding Our Global Opportunities Techniques for Mapping In-River Geomorphology, Sediment Transport and River Bank Structures Robert Feldpausch,
REFERENCE SURFACE LTJG Anthony Klemm and Prof. Shachak Pe’eri LAB 3.
Considerations for future remote sensing activities Edward D. Santoro, M.S. Monitoring Coordinator Delaware River Basin Commission
Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Division Civil Engineering Dr. Soumendra Nath Kuiry Assistant Professor Hurricane Gustav (2008) Simulation.
Surface Current Mapping with High Frequency RADAR.
Juan de Dios Barrios, M.S. Research Associate Nick J. Rahall Appalachian Transportation Institute and James O. Brumfield, Ph. D. College of Science Marshall.
The Texas Shoreline Change Project: The Texas Shoreline Change Project: Combining Lidar, Historical Photography, and Ground Surveys to Measure Shoreline.
Tide corrections from KGPS and a precise geoid John Brozena, Randy Herr, Vicki Childers.
Environmental Modeling Application of Suitability Index.
Lidar Bathymetry – Technology and applications Oct 24rd, Netanya, Israel Anders Ekelund Managing Director Airborne Hydrography AB.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Shallow Water Hydrographic Surveying using a High Resolution Multibeam Echosounder Richard C. Wilson,
RASTERTIN. What is LiDAR? LiDAR = Light Detection And Ranging Active form of remote sensing measuring distance to target surfaces using narrow beams of.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. Army Corps of Engineers W. Jeff Lillycrop Technical Director Engineer Research and Development Center.
Mapping the Moon: Simulating LOLA in the Classroom Introduction to LIDAR Mapping with LOLA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Why do Millimeters Matter? NOAA Models and Tools Support High Accuracy Positioning for Ecosystem Restoration and Ecological Research Surface too low: too.
1 Storms activity: wave modelling and atmospheric circulation Part 1. Wave modelling. V. Arkhipkin 1, S. Myslenkov 1 Part 2. Atmospheric circulation. A.
Tide corrections from KGPS and a precise geoid
The Integration of Bathymetry, Topography, and Shoreline and the Vertical Datum Transformations Behind it Charting and Mapping the Land-Sea Interface.
A new method for first-principles calibration
Satellite Derived Bathymetry GEBCO Cookbook
FOR 274: From Photos to Lidar Introduction to LiDAR What is it? How does it work? LiDAR Jargon and Terms Natural Resource Applications Data Acquisition.
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
HYSWEEP® SURVEY.
Engineering Surveys & KGPS. Outline Problem Example Applications / uses of KGPS Project Example.
U NIVERSITY OF J OENSUU F ACULTY OF F ORESTRY Introduction to Lidar and Airborne Laser Scanning Petteri Packalén Kärkihankkeen ”Multi-scale Geospatial.
© 2002 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. BATHYMETRY New technology, such as this bathyscaphe, allows scientists to study deep-ocean basins.
SIDE SCAN Theory and Operation
Integrated spatial data LIDAR Mapping for Coastal Monitoring Dr Alison Matthews Geomatics Manager Environment Agency Geomatics Group.
LIDAR. Light detection and ranging  Produces high resolution, accurate elevation information.
Development and Assessment of Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Products for Shoreline Mapping Shachak Pe’eri Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping, University.
LIDAR and TDS in GIS A Comparison of Channel Geometry Profiles Created from Remotely Sensed and On-the-Ground Survey Data (or..how a programmer in China.
Developments in Seabed Mapping
Results of an Airborne LiDAR survey between Teignmouth and Sidmouth
What is under there anyway?
Watershed and Stream Network Delineation using GIS
Presentation transcript:

Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.

High-Resolution Bathymetric Mapping of the Estero Bay and Caloosahatchee Estuaries Mark Hansen and Gina Peery – USGS Wayne Wright - NASA

What are MFLs? Flow or level of ground or surface water at which further withdrawals of water would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area. Flow or level of ground or surface water at which further withdrawals of water would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area. Why are MFLs being established? To maintain environmental quality. To maintain environmental quality. To protect water resources and ecology such as fish production and wetlands. To protect water resources and ecology such as fish production and wetlands. To determine water availability. To determine water availability. How does bathymetry of the estuary play a part in establishing MFLs? MFLs requires the development of hydrodynamic models. MFLs requires the development of hydrodynamic models. Models require the quantification of present day bathymetry. Models require the quantification of present day bathymetry. Present data is > 50 years old, and changes over time. FL Statute directs the District to the use best information available. WHY COLLECT NEW BATHYMETRY? Minimum Flow Levels (MFL) Support Minimum Flow Levels (MFL) studies WHY COLLECT NEW BATHYMETRY? Minimum Flow Levels (MFL) Support Minimum Flow Levels (MFL) studies

Survey Area Charlotte Harbor Matalatcha Pass Caloosahatchee River Estero Bay Offshore

USGS Boat and NASA Airborne Systems Utilizes the best of both systems NASA lidar aircraftUSGS survey boat - offshore SANDS (sonar)EAARL (lidar)

DISADVANTAGES ADVANTAGES R & D funded R & D funded Precision GPS based Precision GPS based +/- 8cm random error +/- 8cm random error Shallow to deep water (>0.3m) Shallow to deep water (>0.3m) Narrow footprint Narrow footprint Unaffected by clarity Unaffected by clarity Single beam sonar Single beam sonar Limited by waves Limited by waves SANDS EAARL R & D funded R & D funded Precision GPS based Precision GPS based +/- 15cm random error +/- 15cm random error Shallow water (>0.5m) Swath coverage Topo and bathy data Fast Depth limited (< 2.5 sechi disk) Clarity limited Limited airspace

Reference Station Position Determination SANDS and EAARL GPS Processing Tools Control Spreadsheet SCOUT (Scripps) OPUS (NOAA) GIPSY (JPL)

Survey Pattern SANDSEAARL

GPS Reference Station Ship GPS GPS NAVSTAR Constellation Pitch/Roll Sensor Fathometer Nav/Logging Computer USGS Shallow And Nearshore Depth System (SANDS)

GPS Differential Reference Station Boat roves <15 km from reference station Several sites per project Boat roves <15 km from reference station Several sites per project <15 km

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Adhere to known GPS limitiations Roving distance, atmospheric conditions, #sv’s Strict control on GPS data processing Trackline crossing differences TINs show anomalies GIS Editing

EAARL: airborne contributions (spatial) NASA Experimental Advanced Airborne Research Lidar (EAARL) NASA Experimental Advanced Airborne Research Lidar (EAARL) Precision navigation Precision navigation and position and position Digital photographic camera camera Precision attitudePrecision attitude and heading and heading

EAARL: lidar (basic characteristics) EAARL Lidar Green laser (532 nm) High pulse rate (3000 Hz) High pulse rate (3000 Hz) Low power (70  J/pulse) Low power (70  J/pulse) Raster scanning (25 rasters/sec) Small footprint (15 cm) 240 m 1 x 1 m sample spacing 1 m Shallow depth range (0.5 – 15 m)

EAARL: lidar (waveform-resolving) 43 km 2 /h 25 rasters/sec 25 rasters/sec waveform-resolving ( 1 nsec) waveform-resolving ( 1 nsec) EAARL Lidar Waveform-resolving: Top edge of canopy Lower edge of canopy Ground return Air/sea interface Scattering layer Bottom return Temporal resolution = 1 nsec Relsolve 1.5 cm in water t t I I

Lidar data before false turbidity returns have been filtered out. Lidar data after false turbidity returns have been filtered out. EAARL Data

Red lines - EARRL Blue lines- SANDS Black line- intercomparison region EAARL/SANDS Intercomparision Area Light green – shallow water Deep blue – deeper water Yellow – boat track Light green – shallow water Deep blue – deeper water Yellow – boat track

2309 comparisions. EAARL data is with 3m of SANDS data points. Overestimation between -27 and -27.5m due to the surface return pulse becoming convolved with the bottom return pulse. Will be corrected in the final data set comparisions. EAARL data is with 3m of SANDS data points. Overestimation between -27 and -27.5m due to the surface return pulse becoming convolved with the bottom return pulse. Will be corrected in the final data set. Intercomparision between the SANDS and EAARL Measurements

2309 comparisions. EAARL data is with 3m of SANDS data points. Overestimation between -27 and -27.5m due to the surface return pulse becoming convolved with the bottom return pulse. Will be corrected in the final data set comparisions. EAARL data is with 3m of SANDS data points. Overestimation between -27 and -27.5m due to the surface return pulse becoming convolved with the bottom return pulse. Will be corrected in the final data set. Intercomparision between the SANDS and EAARL Measurements

Datum Issues Horizontal WGS84(ITRF00 -> WGS84(original) WGS84(ITRF00 -> WGS84(original) WGS84(original) ~ GRS80/NAD83 WGS84(original) ~ GRS80/NAD83Vertical WGS84(ITRF00 -> WGS84(original) WGS84(ITRF00 -> WGS84(original) WGS84(original) -> NAVD88 WGS84(original) -> NAVD88 NAVD88 ~ WGS84(original) – Geoid ht NAVD88 ~ WGS84(original) – Geoid ht Using the GEOID99 model MLW = NAVD88 – (local constant) MLW = NAVD88 – (local constant) Conversion from GPS data to conventional datums NOAA Tidal Benchmark

Final Products Tabular XYZ data Tabular XYZ data Contoured data Contoured data Grids Grids USGS quadrangle style maps USGS quadrangle style maps