The third international stroke trial (IST-3) of rt-PA. Main Results II: IST3 in context of updated meta-analysis of the randomised trials. JM Wardlaw,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breaking news from IST-3 Peter Sandercock University of Edinburgh on behalf of the IST-3 collaborative group ESC London 29 th May 2013.
Advertisements

The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP)
Evidence for Early Supported Discharge. Peter Langhorne Professor of Stroke Care University of Glasgow.
TPA in Stroke: What's All the Fuss?. FERNE Brain Illness and Injury Course.
Thrombolysis for stroke in older people.
Update on Anti-platelets Gabriel A. Vidal, MD Vascular Neurology Ochsner Medical Center October 14 th, 2009.
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) Colin Baigent, Martin Landray on behalf of the SHARP Investigators Disclosure: SHARP was.
Keith A A Fox Royal Infirmary & University of Edinburgh CURE and PCI-CURE.
In Search of Efficiency, Consistency, Fairness, and Impact in HTA: Modelling screening and treatment pathways for diabetic retinopathy Graham Scotland.
IST-3 progress report: recruitment, baseline data and future plans Peter Sandercock on behalf of IST-3 collaborative group. UK IST-3 National Coordinators.
The third international stroke trial (IST-3) of thrombolysis main results III. Effect of iv thrombolysis with iv rt-PA on death or dependency in the 3035.
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events Purpose To assess the relative efficacy of the antiplatelet drugs clopidogrel.
TOTAL Stroke in the TOTAL trial: Randomized trial of manual aspiration Thrombectomy in STEMI TOTAL Trial Investigators.
T-PA in Treatment of Acute Stroke: What We Know From NINDS 2004 vs 2000 Sidney Starkman, MD Departments of Emergency Medicine and Neurology, UCLA UCLA.
NSF for Older People Dr. Gareth Morgan NSF for Older People Project Manager.
FERNE/MEMC Session: Treating Ischemic Stroke in the 3 – 4
Edward P. Sloan, MD, MPH FERNE/EMA Session: Treating Ischemic Stroke Patients Using a 3 to 4.5 Hour tPA Window.
Stroke Units Southern Neurology. Definition of a stroke unit A stroke unit can be defined as a unit with dedicated stroke beds and a multidisciplinary.
SYDNEY MEDICAL SCHOOL What do the IST-3 results mean for the elderly patient with acute stroke? Westmead Hospital Clinical School | George Institute for.
Supporting NHS Wales to Deliver World Class Healthcare All Wales Stroke Services Improvement Collaborative Learning Session One 21 st October 2009.
IST-3 – an imaging substudy Dr Ingrid Kane Clinical research fellow.
The Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study To reviewers and moderators: These.
The third international stroke trial (IST-3) main results: primary and secondary outcomes among 3035 patients The IST3 collaborative group hospitals.
Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre 5 July 2013 NIHR Programmes and topic identification Alison Ford, Senior Programme Manager.
Innovation Pathway AHSN Stakeholder Event Russ Watkins Assistant Director – Business Innovation & Improvement Newcastle Hospitals.
VBWG OASIS-5 The Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trial.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS AND MORTALITY FROM CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE AMONG PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES IN SCOTLAND ( ) Caroline Jackson, Jeremy Walker,
The need for trials of i.v. thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke 10 th January 2008.
Maximizing IV Thrombolytic Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Kamakshi Lakshminarayan, MD PhD Assistant Professor Neurology & Epidemiology University of.
Evidence based stroke medicine. Evaluating treatments for acute ischaemic stroke -what works and what doesn’t? Professor Peter Sandercock.
Core Outcome Domains for Eczema – Results of a Delphi Consensus Project Introduction Eczema is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disorder that affects.
Developing a National Critical Care Clinical Research Network: what’s in it for trainees? Paul Dark Associate Professor, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences,
What’s on the horizon? Peter Sandercock ESC Lisbon 23rd May 2012.
Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke – Updated Cochrane Thrombolysis metaanalysis JM Wardlaw, V Murray, PAG Sandercock University of Edinburgh and Karolinska.
Rationale: Why do we still need a large trial? IST-3 The Third International Stroke Trial: National Coordinators’ Meeting 25 May 2005, Bologna Professor.
Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group.
Evidence in the ED Byron Drumheller, MD Penn Emergency Medicine.
Evidence based stroke medicine. Evaluating treatments for acute ischaemic stroke -what works and what doesn’t? Professor Peter Sandercock.
Update on IST-3 and other trials. Or, ‘how the ECASS-3 results have helped re-launch IST-3!’ Professor Peter Sandercock, Co-chief investigator IST-3 collaborator’s.
AIRE: Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril reduces mortality in patients with evidence of heart.
S afe I mplementation of T hrombolysis in S troke Slide presentation adapted from
The third international stroke trial (IST-3) effect of thrombolysis on outcomes at 18 months in 2348 patients in long-term follow- up cohort The IST3 collaborative.
RMH Comprehensive Stroke Centre Thrombolysis and Stroke Units : The Evidence Professor Stephen Davis Royal Melbourne Hospital Comprehensive Stroke Centre.
Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatments Patrick J. Ward, PA-S.
Mr X, 79 years old Admitted on 5/5/00 to WGH stroke unit Dense (0/5) right arm and leg paresis Aphasic CT scan excluded a bleed Given trial treatment (IST-3)
* Based on post hoc analysis of individual outcome events (N=19,185). 1 Data on file, Sanofi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2 Gent M. Circulation. 1997; 96 (suppl):
ARCHIVING A COMPLEX DATASET: IST-3 A CASE STUDY by Jonathan Drever.
Thrombolysis for patients > 80 – a different view Peter Sandercock On behalf of the IST3 collaborative Group UKSF Glasgow 1 st December 2009.
Main results European Stroke Conference - London 29 May 2013 Funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia An international.
Third International Stroke Trial (IST-3): response to ECASS-3 results Professor Peter Sandercock, University of Edinburgh Collaborators Meeting Vienna.
Funding: Health Foundation, ESVS The GALA Trial General versus Local Anaesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy Michael J Gough on behalf of the GALA Trial.
C-1 Efficacy of the Combination: Meta-Analyses Donald A. Berry, Ph.D. Frank T. McGraw Memorial Chair of Cancer Research University of Texas M.D. Anderson.
Can patients be too mild, too severe or too old for thrombolysis? Professor Peter Sandercock University of Edinburgh ESC Hamburg 27 th May 2011 Disclosures.
IST-3: What are the implications for rt-PA therapy? Peter Sandercock University of Edinburgh on behalf of the IST-3 collaborative group ESC Lisbon 23rd.
Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction And Death from Cardiovascular Causes Alternative Interpretations of the Evidence George A.
IST-3: progress with the trial internationally and plans for the future Peter Sandercock Riunione Gruppo Italiano IST-3 Firenze 13 th February 2009.
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke Clinical
Thrombolysis: The Evidence Barry Moynihan Stroke Physician, St. George’s Hospital SITS/BASP Thrombolysis Nursing Training Day March 26 th 2012.
IST-3, SITS MOST ECASS-3 & DEFUSE Professor Peter Sandercock University of Edinburgh, UK ESC May 30 th 2007 Glasgow Competing interests:
Research Training Opportunities for Medical and Non-Medical Professionals NIHR Research Design Service East Midlands & University of Leicester Clinical.
SITS Monitoring Study SITS-MOST
on behalf of the TARDIS Investigators
Baseline characteristics of the 3035 patients recruited in IST3
Volume 384, Issue 9958, Pages (November 2014)
Association between risk-of-bias assessments and results of randomized trials in Cochrane reviews: the ROBES study Jelena Savović1, Becky Turner2, David.
Volume 384, Issue 9958, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 379, Issue 9834, Pages (June 2012)
Presentation transcript:

The third international stroke trial (IST-3) of rt-PA. Main Results II: IST3 in context of updated meta-analysis of the randomised trials. JM Wardlaw, V Murray, E Berge, G del Zoppo, PAG Sandercock, RI Lindley, G Cohen And the IST-3 Collaborative Group ESC Lisbon May 2012

Disclosures Cochrane review: United Kingdom Medical Research Council, Stroke Association, University of Edinburgh, National Health Service Health Technology Assessment Programme, Swedish Heart-Lung Fund, AFA Insurances Stockholm (Arbetsmarknadens Partners Forsakringsbolag), Karolinska Institutet, Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, Research Council of Norway, Oslo University Hospital. The authors of the Cochrane Review have not received financial support from any pharmaceutical company to undertake the review. Individual authors serve on trial steering and adjudication committees but have no personal financial interest or otherwise competing interests with any of the material presented.

Thrombolysis Systematic Review Continuously updated since 1990 All randomised trials of thrombolysis versus control Last update 2009, for rt-PA: 11 trials, n=3977 Remaining uncertainties –Precise estimates of effects on some outcomes Death: early, late Functional outcome Haemorrhage, infarct oedema –Time windows –Age –Aspirin, stroke severity, co-morbidities Stroke 1992; CDSR st edition – 2009; Lancet 1998; Stroke 2003, 2010; Lancet Neurology 2005; BMJ 2009; and others

Methods New trials; new data from existing trials Multiple overlapping ascertainment methods –Two independent reviewers –unadjusted Peto Odds Ratios (ORs), 95% CI, fixed effects, –tests for heterogeneity between all trials and between previous trials combined and IST-3

Methods – Outcomes Outcomes : Early, <7 days –Death –Fatal intracranial haemorrhage –Death not due to intracranial haemorrhage –Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage –Infarct swelling Late, 3 or 6 months –Deaths between early and late –Total deaths by the end of follow-up –Alive and independent (mRS 0-2) –Favourable (mRS 0-1) –Dependent (mRS 3-5) Subgroups : –Time: <3, 3-6 hours –Age <80 and  80 years, by time –Aspirin, stroke severity

12 trials in total (IST-3 is the only new trial) Previous Current Total N <3hrs hrs >80 y Follow-up 3 months 6 months New data between 2009 and 2012

Early outcomes <7days, up to 6 h

Late outcomes end of follow-up, up to 6 h

Outcomen/ %CI Early death 25 11, 39 Fatal ICH 29 23, 36 Non-ICH death SICH 58 49, 68 Total death 7 -11, 25 mRS , 66 mRS , 77 - = fewer with rt-PA Absolute effects per 1000; treated up to 6 h

Subgroups: Effect of time: <3 vs 3-6 hours

Effect of age: 80 years and time: <3 vs. 3-6 hrs

Effect of age: 80 years and time: <3, 3-6 hr Absolute effect per 1000; mRS 0-2 end of follow-up Age  80>80 yrs Time <6 hrs43 38 (16, 70)(-3, 79) <3 hrs95 96 (35, 155) (35, 157) 3-6 hrs23 -5 (-8, 54) (-61, 50) - = fewer with rt-PA;

Conclusion Effects are highly consistent across all trials despite IST-3 including a wider range of patients SICH is the single largest cause of early hazard Fewer deaths occur with rt-PA between 7 days and the end of follow-up There is no net effect of rt-PA on total death at late follow-up Benefit substantial with treatment <3 hours Benefit possible for some patients out to 6 hours Patients >80yrs have similar benefit to <80s, especially if treated <3h

Conclusion Healthcare systems should aim to treat patients as fast as possible There should be no upper age limit for rt-PA An individual patient data meta-analysis should be performed as soon as possible Trials aimed at finding ways to reduce hazard (SICH) and determine who benefits at later times should proceed as fast as possible

Acknowledgements: IST-3: The 3035 patients, the 156 hospitals in the IST-3 group, the Data Monitoring Committee, the MRC Steering Committee, Image Reading Panel, Event adjudication panel, International Advisory Board. IST-3 Funding: Medical Research Council (managed by NIHR on behalf of the MRC-NIHR partnership), Stroke Association, The Health Foundation,, The Research Council of Norway, AFA Insurances (Sweden), the Swedish Heart Lung Fund, The Foundation of Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg, Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institute Joint ALF-project grants (Sweden), the Government of Poland, the Australian Heart Foundation, Australian NHMRC, the Swiss National Research Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Foundation for health and cardio-/neurovascular research, Basel, Switzerland and the Assessorato alla Sanita, Regione dell'Umbria. Drug and placebo for the 300 patients in the double-blind component of the start-up phase were supplied by Boehringer-Ingelheim GMBh. IST-3 acknowledges the extensive support of the NIHR Stroke Research Network, NHS Research Scotland (NRS), through the Scottish Stroke Research Network, and the National Institute for Social Care and Health Research Clinical Research Centre (NISCHR CRC). The imaging work was undertaken at the Brain Imaging Research Centre, a member of the SINAPSE collaboration, at the Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh. SINAPSE is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) and the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive (CSO). Additional support was received from Chest Heart and Stroke Scotland, Desacc, University of Edinburgh, Danderyd Hospital R&D Department, Karolinska Institutet, the Dalhousie University Internal Medicine Research Fund. Cochrane Funding: MRC, Stroke Association, Univ of Edinburgh, NHS HTA Programme, Norwegian Research Council, Swedish Heart-Lungfund, AFA Insurances, Karolinska Institutet, Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation. Cochrane: K. Shuler; Lisa Blackwell; Hazel Fraser; Brenda Thomas; Mei-Chiun Tseng; Take Yamaguchi; Charles Warlow; Martin Dennis; Colin Baigent; Steve Davis.

Key methodological points Central web or phone randomisation in 2 trials (IST-3, ECASS 3); rest used sequentially numbered packs Time to treatment: <3h in 2; 3-4.5h in 1; <5h in 1, 3-6h in 1, <6h in 6 Dose: 0.6 – 1.0 mg/kg (most used 0.9) Placebo: 10 identical; 2 open control Blinded follow-up: 5 trials; rest not stated Follow-up: 6m IST-3, 3m or less in the rest

Alive and independent outcome mRS 0-2, 6 hrs Absolute effect: 42/ % CI (19, 66)

Alive and favourable outcome mRS 0-1, 6 hrs Absolute effect: 55/ % CI (33, 77)

Dependency mRS 3-5 Absolute effect: -50/ % CI (-73, -27)