1 Wildcat Venture Management Technology Transfer Tactics Audio Panel September 30, 2008 Chicago, IL Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Company Name Sample Template Presenter Name
Advertisements

Summary Slide Management of Intellectual Property Rights Enterprises, R&D Organizations and Universities Wayne H. Watkins - University of Akron.
Creation of Pilot IP Fund Liis Käosaar-Sasi Dorel Tamm.
Technology Commercialization Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. ( Vice President for Affiliate Members Association.
ScreenACT INFORMATION SESSION. On the Agenda ACT Screen Development Fund Cannes 2015 Screen Industry Pod.
2nd Panel, Best Practices: “ IPR in Successful University-Industry Collaborations” Dr. Tamar Raz, CEO Hadasit, the Technology Transfer Company of Hadassah.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Office of Economic Development University of South Carolina Taking a leading role in Economic Development.
Building on Research Innovation A new resource in the Faculty of Science since Spring 2006.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
North Carolina State University © 2014 Technology Transfer Outcomes February 27, 2014 Research Retreat Kelly B. Sexton, Ph.D. Director Office of Technology.
LOWER SHORE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM Bringing the Benefits of Discovery to the World MAY 23, 2012 Wesley D. Blakeslee Executive Director Johns Hopkins.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
1 Marketing of Licensing-Out Opportunities FPTT Conference Halifax, June 2004 Dave Tyrrell, Vertex Intellectual Property Strategies Inc.
EXPRESS LICENSE AGREEMENTS Ted Hagelin Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Kauffman Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Director, NY Science & Technology.
Entrepreneurship I Class #8 VOSG I Business Plan and Finances.
Welcome and Introduction: Market Timing and Licensing Options
Technology Transfer at UIC © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Presentation to the Software Commercialization Symposium April.
WSU Technology Commercialization and TechTown WSU PAD SEMINAR March 6, 2009.
Welcome P&P Topics for GFY 2002 Patent Awards Tech Transfer Cycle: Part III FOOD!!!! PATENTS & PIZZA June 4, 2001.
Commercialization of University Technology Innovation, Technology Transfer and Licensing Jack Turner, Associate Director M.I.T. Technology Licensing Office.
Technology Transfer Commercial Opportunities in Research J. Heidjer Staecker Partner.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. (ISURF) and the Office of Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer (OIPTT) Kenneth Kirkland, Executive.
Innovations at U of T the business of ideas Presentation to the Institute for Optical Sciences December 1 st, 2006 Dr. Cyril Gibbons Director, Commercialization.
Iowa State University Technology Protection and Licensing.
Joint Business Plan Madhurjya K. Dutta 1mk_dutta Sept 2010.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
The use of patents by a university spin-off. Sub-module BThe use of patents by a university spin-off 2/21 Structure of the case study University technology.
Venture and Growth Capital. Equity Investments  Holding on to ‘what you’ve got’  Equity investments are a ‘trade-off’ game…
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Technology Transfer and Assessment of Intellectual Assets Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. ( Vice President.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
+ Faculty Orientation UAMS BioVentures September 23, 2015 Christopher A. Fasel Associate Director of Licensing Patent Attorney UAMS BioVentures.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
Navigating the University Technology Transfer August 23, 2012 Christopher Moulding Sr. Manager, Technology Advancement and Licensing I’ve got an idea…now.
SPI USA, Inc. 4,5/4,5 CM Introducing a Way of Thinking About the Process of Partnering Asking the right questions By Elia Cossis Your Partner for Innovation.
03/10/2008 Terese Rakow, PhD. Postdoctoral Career Development Course March 10, 2008.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
Life of a Stanford Invention. Functional Antibodies FM Sound Synthesis Recombinant DNA Google Notable Stanford Inventions.
Successful Outsourcing for Tech Transfer Organizations Amber Dean Associate Managing Director Office of Technology Commercialization Newton F. Hamlin Chairman.
Market Assessment FITT (Fostering Interregional Exchange in ICT Technology Transfer)
Technology Licensing at Stanford University
Michigan Business Brokers Association The Venture Capital Process December 8, 2015 Presented by TGap Ventures General Partner: Jack Ahrens.
University Licensing Dominique Kleyn 27 th June 2003.
1 Robert Morrison Executive Director Desert Angels Tucson, AZ.
1Technology Transfer Tactics
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Business Description Provide a short executive summary of your company (2 slides max.- inc. Short history, Key products, Investors, Funding, Awards)
1 Extending the Wisconsin Idea UW Funding Opportunities for Technologies with Promising Potential.
So you’ve invented something?
Five Steps To Effective Research Proposals
Cleantech to Market Technology Transfer at Berkeley Lab
Foresight Science & Technology, Inc.
Universities and the Commercial World
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Stanford University Office of Technology Licensing (OTL)
I have an idea, now what! What’s the process?
Gestora brasileiro focada exclusivamente na área da saúde.
Private Equity – Venture Capital Partnership for Success
Transfer of Medical Devices Manufacturing Technology
Application and Presentation to the
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
2019 Hagerstown Technology Showcase March 21, 2019
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System
Presentation transcript:

1 Wildcat Venture Management Technology Transfer Tactics Audio Panel September 30, 2008 Chicago, IL Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc. 2 About Wildcat Venture Management Established in 2006 Regional Presence in New York, Houston, Chicago and Los Angeles Develops university bio-technologies into commercially viable life science startup ventures Holds relationships with 20+ major academic institutions and affiliates Dedicated team of business and technical experts with significant experience in the commercialization of pharmaceuticals and medical devices Contact: Eric Nicolaides Managing Partner Phone: (630)

3 Determining Value Required Elements for Intellectual Property –Filing before disclosures –International rights –Some analysis of freedom to operate Market Potential Validation of Technology Time to Market Length of Patent Life Rapport with/Reputation of Faculty Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

4 De-risking Technology Investments Patent before publishing or giving talks –Make sure your PI’s know this!!! Encourage commercially oriented proof-of-concept studies Engage industry/investors earlier and not later Determine the best commercial application for the technology –Figure out what will sell and what won’t Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

5 Investment Turn-Ons and Turn-Offs Turn Ons: First looks at technology Well thought out proposals with clear starting point for commercialization Complete technology portfolio Turn Offs: High upfronts (license initiation fees, other non-patent-related upfront cash payments) Very short or very expensive option agreements Limited patent coverage, missing patent rights Patent portfolios divided amongst several licensees Demand for big equity position in addition to fees Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

6 What You Should Expect to Give Up (for early stage deals) Reasonable low-cost period of exclusivity to complete diligence Low-cost license initiation fees Low-cost EARLY milestone payments Royalties that are stage appropriate Terms for late stage deals are completely different—and are more easily defined, valued and determined by the market Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

7 Why Attitude Matters—How Best to Work Together A good relationship with clear communication, honesty and upfront understanding will result in a good deal for everyone The key is to find common ground between the parties –Negotiation isn’t a zero sum game! –Win-win’s are possible if both sides want to make a deal Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

8 How Investors Can Help -- or Hurt Investors Can Help By: Providing commercial vision to the technology Bringing in outside expertise to evaluate and guide technology Allowing inventors to focus on the science, while we focus on the business Investors Can Hurt By: Narrowly focusing on one application, when a portfolio may have multiple platform opportunities Focusing on the wrong element of the portfolio to develop Failing to prosecute or protect IP vigorously enough Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

9 Effective Preparation Guidelines Understand as well as possible the: –Key data that is available –Stage of the technology –Patent portfolio-- its strengths limitations, what needs to be done Provide the key information in the appropriate format to make information gathering as simple as possible Provide three sets of descriptions in increasing detail and confidentiality: –A one-page summary to outline the key features and stage –A non-confidential package –A confidential package Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

10 Latest Trends in Start-ups and VC Joint Ventures In general: Shifting focus away from early stage technologies –Clinical trial data increasingly important Investment modes: –$250k or $25million – and nowhere in between Limited interaction with TTOs –Industry becoming very regionalized –“Waiting for the technology to come to me” How we are trying to buck the trend: National presence (7 partners in 4 cities) Frequent visits to TTOs, projects nationwide Building technology commercialization partnership with several high profile institutions to support early through late stage work –$100m dedicate fund to invest in partner institutions –Infrastructure investment and dedicate staff to be positioned at institutions –Still opportunities for other universities to join in Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

11 Why “Less is more” when pitching to Investors Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.

12 Best Practices in Making the Case Describe the opportunity as simply as possible: –The inventors/institutions involved –Work done to date and technology stage –Work that still needs to be done Estimate investment required and time to market, if known –Existing patent portfolio Tell us why you think it is a good fit for us: –Try to learn about our past deals –Try to learn about our investment preferences ahead of time –Give us an incentive to take a longer look Informal exclusivity (first look) Reasonable option period (if there is enough interest on both sides) Copyright © 2008 Wildcat Venture Management, Inc.