Correct atmospheric optics modelling: Theory and Experiment Irina Melnikova Observatory of Environmental Safety Resource Center, Research Park St.Petersburg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
Advertisements

Using a Radiative Transfer Model in Conjunction with UV-MFRSR Irradiance Data for Studying Aerosols in El Paso-Juarez Airshed by Richard Medina Calderón.
A thermodynamic model for estimating sea and lake ice thickness with optical satellite data Student presentation for GGS656 Sanmei Li April 17, 2012.
3D Radiative Transfer in Cloudy Atmospheres: Diffusion Approximation and Monte Carlo Simulation for Thermal Emission K. N. Liou, Y. Chen, and Y. Gu Department.
Lecture 12 Content LIDAR 4/15/2017 GEM 3366.
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
Sandy desert Modifications of the surface radiation budget.
A Dictionary of Aerosol Remote Sensing Terms Richard Kleidman SSAI/NASA Goddard Lorraine Remer UMBC / JCET Short.
Retrieval of smoke aerosol loading from remote sensing data Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trends Analysis Washington.
Cloud-Climate Feedbacks as a Result of Solar Cloud Absorption in the SKYHI General Circulation Model Carynelisa Erlick, Atmospheric Sciences, Hebrew University.
Radiative Properties of Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 3 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds Cloud microphysics.
Extracting Atmospheric and Surface Information from AVIRIS Spectra Vijay Natraj, Daniel Feldman, Xun Jiang, Jack Margolis and Yuk Yung California Institute.
Study of the Aerosol Influence on Errors in Retrieving the CO 2 Total Column Amount Yu. M. Timofeyev*, Ya.A. Virolainen, A.V. Polyakov Research Institute.
Radiative Properties of Clouds ENVI3410 : Lecture 9 Ken Carslaw Lecture 3 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
METO 621 Lesson 27. Albedo 200 – 400 nm Solar Backscatter Ultraviolet (SBUV) The previous slide shows the albedo of the earth viewed from the nadir.
Module 1: Themes in Physical Geography Topic 3: Weather Unit A : Atmospheric heating, motion (winds) and moisture Unit B : Weather systems (air masses,
Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009 LIDAR. What is LIDAR? Stands for LIght Detection And Ranging Micropulse LASERs Measurements of (usually) backscatter from.
Earth-Atmosphere Energy Balance Earth's surface absorbs the 51 units of shortwave and 96 more of longwave energy units from atmospheric gases and clouds.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Lidar remote sensing for the characterization of the atmospheric aerosol on local and large spatial scale.
LIDAR: Introduction to selected topics

EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
Applications and Limitations of Satellite Data Professor Ming-Dah Chou January 3, 2005 Department of Atmospheric Sciences National Taiwan University.
Determination of the optical thickness and effective radius from reflected solar radiation measurements David Painemal MPO531.
Problems and Future Directions in Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Troposphere Dahai Jeong AMP.
Introduction Invisible clouds in this study mean super-thin clouds which cannot be detected by MODIS but are classified as clouds by CALIPSO. These sub-visual.
Measurement Example III Figure 6 presents the ozone and aerosol variations under a light-aerosol sky condition. The intensity and structure of aerosol.
 Introduction  Surface Albedo  Albedo on different surfaces  Seasonal change in albedo  Aerosol radiative forcing  Spectrometer (measure the surface.
In Situ and Remote Sensing Characterization of Spectral Absorption by Black Carbon and other Aerosols J. Vanderlei Martins, Paulo Artaxo, Yoram Kaufman,
Wu Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) New York.
EARTH SCIENCE Prentice Hall EARTH SCIENCE Tarbuck Lutgens 
Monday, Oct. 2: Clear-sky radiation; solar attenuation, Thermal nomenclature.
Direct radiative forcing of aerosol 1)Model simulation: A. Rinke, K. Dethloff, M. Fortmann 2)Thermal IR forcing - FTIR: J. Notholt, C. Rathke, (C. Ritter)
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
TOPIC III THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT. SOLAR IRRADIANCE SPECTRA 1  m = 1000 nm = m Note: 1 W = 1 J s -1.
Radiative Atmospheric Divergence using ARM Mobile Facility, GERB data and AMMA stations –led by Tony Slingo, ESSC, Reading University, UK Links the ARM.
The Atmosphere Composition, Structure and Temperature.
1 PHY Lecture 5 Interaction of solar radiation and the atmosphere.
1 Atmospheric profiling to better understand fog and low level cloud life cycle ARM/EU workshop on algorithms, May 2013 J. Delanoe (LATMOS), JC.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
Numerical simulations of optical properties of nonspherical dust aerosols using the T-matrix method Hyung-Jin Choi School.
Clouds & Radiation: Climate data vs. model results A tribute to ISCCP Ehrhard Raschke, University of Hamburg Stefan Kinne, MPI-Meteorology Hamburg 25 years.
17.1 Atmosphere Characteristics
Use of Solar Reflectance Hyperspectral Data for Cloud Base Retrieval Andrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/ORA Washington D.C, USA Outline " Physical basis for.
ESTIMATION OF SOLAR RADIATIVE IMPACT DUE TO BIOMASS BURNING OVER THE AFRICAN CONTINENT Y. Govaerts (1), G. Myhre (2), J. M. Haywood (3), T. K. Berntsen.
SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING OF TERRESTRIAL CLOUDS Alexander A. Kokhanovsky Institute of Remote Sensing, Bremen University P. O. Box Bremen, Germany.
A new method for first-principles calibration
Jetstream 31 (J31) in INTEX-B/MILAGRO. Campaign Context: In March 2006, INTEX-B/MILAGRO studied pollution from Mexico City and regional biomass burning,
© Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. 1 Chapter 3 CHAPTER 3 THE GLOBAL ENERGY SYSTEM.
Within dr, L changes (dL) from… sources due to scattering & emission losses due to scattering & absorption Spectral Radiance, L(, ,  ) - W m -2 sr -1.
Airborne Sunphotometry and Closure Studies during the SAFARI-2000 Dry Season Campaign B. Schmid BAER/NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
O. Yevteev, M. Shatunova, V. Perov, L.Dmitrieva-Arrago, Hydrometeorological Center of Russia, 2010.
Matthew Lagor Remote Sensing Stability Indices and Derived Product Imagery from the GOES Sounder
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
Atmosphere-ocean interactions Exchange of energy between oceans & atmosphere affects character of each In oceans –Atmospheric processes alter salinity.
17 Chapter 17 The Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature.
number Typical aerosol size distribution area volume
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt,
What Are the Implications of Optical Closure Using Measurements from the Two Column Aerosol Project? J.D. Fast 1, L.K. Berg 1, E. Kassianov 1, D. Chand.
Atmospheric Monitoring for the MAGIC Telescopes Markus Gaug 1,2, Michele Doro 1,2,3, Daniel Garrido 1,2, Christian Fruck 4 for the MAGIC Collaboration.
Early VALIDAR Case Study Results Rod Frehlich: RAL/NCAR Grady Koch: NASA Langley.
Radiation Balance. Radiation Balance In atmosphere, radiation can be… transmitted absorbed reflected.
LIDAR Ben Kravitz November 5, 2009.
Regional Radiation Center (RRC) II (Asia)
Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
ATOC 4720 class29 1. How the energy balance is achieved in the earth-atmosphere system 2. The energy balance of the upper atmosphere 3. The energy balance.
ECV definitions Mapping of ECV product with OSCAR variables
Presentation transcript:

Correct atmospheric optics modelling: Theory and Experiment Irina Melnikova Observatory of Environmental Safety Resource Center, Research Park St.Petersburg State University St.Petersburg. Russia. 1

2 Objectives: 1. Constructing the simple optical model of homogeneous atmosphere 2. Solution of the direct problem of atmospheric optics with operative varying optical parameters for elucidating the interaction between key atmospheric parameters and radiative characteristics 3. The solution of the direct problem is calculation of radiation characteristics (radiant heat. radiation balance at the tropopause level) 4. Comparison with the results of airborne measurements

3 Optical parameters Optical thickness of the clear atmosphere : Optical thickness of the clear atmosphere :  =  a.sc +  a.ab +  R +  m.ab.  =  a.sc +  a.ab +  R +  m.ab.  a.sc – the optical thickness of aerosol scattering.  a.ab - the optical thickness of aerosol absorption.  R - the optical thickness of molecular scattering.  m.ab - the optical thickness of molecular absorption; Cloud optical thickness  0 Cloud optical thickness  0 Single scattering albedo: for clear atmosphere Single scattering albedo: for clear atmosphere  = (  a.sc +  R )/  ;  = (  a.sc +  R )/  ; For cloudy atmosphere  = (  0 +  a.sc +  R )/(  +  0 ) ; For cloudy atmosphere  = (  0 +  a.sc +  R )/(  +  0 ) ; The phase function asymmetry parameter: The phase function asymmetry parameter: g=0.0 for clear atmosphere and g=0.85 for cloud atmosphere; g=0.0 for clear atmosphere and g=0.85 for cloud atmosphere; The ground albedo A s The ground albedo A s

4 Spectral dependence of the ground albedo of different surfaces from observational data processing ( C.A. Varotsos. I.N. Melnikova. A.P. Cracknell. C. Tzanis. A.V. Vasilyev. New spectral functions of the near-ground albedo derived from aircraft diffraction spectrometer observations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. v. 13. pp )

5 Multiwavelength lidar Raman chan nels Aerosol lidar Doppler (wind) lidar Tunable titan-sapphier lasers (at the mobile complex ) Tunable titan-sapphier lasers (at the mobile complex ) 355 nm Polarization filter 355 nm Elastic channels Data of the SPSU RC lidar is used for aerosol optical thickness modelling

Stationary lidar system: A Doppler lidar for measuring the wind speed and direction up to 12 km height A Doppler lidar for measuring the wind speed and direction up to 12 km height An aerosol lidar for measuring the atmospheric aerosol parameters up to 25 km height An aerosol lidar for measuring the atmospheric aerosol parameters up to 25 km height 1. Provide regular monitoring the dynamics of an atmospheric pollution above the big city center. 2. Retrieving atmospheric dust parameters: size, extinction coefficient, backscattering coefficient, real and imagine parts of the refractive index, and content

Stationary lidar system

8 Aerosol lidar 1064 nm mJ 532 nm mJ 355 nm mJ Doppler (wind) lidar for wind velocity and direction profile Pulse repetition rate 10kHz

Screenshot of the received Lidar signal

10 The extinction coefficient above St. Petersburg 25 March The vertical profile till 4 km and 25 km during 1 hour= 532 nm The maximum of hat pollution at 0.7 km, disappeared during 45 min (15: :15) (z)0.056km -1 The stratosphere aerosol–Yunge layer at 17-22km (z)0.015km -1 = Total optical thickness is  = Lidar sounding above St. Petersburg city

11 VALUES OF OPTICAL PARAMETERS OF THE CLEAR ATMOSPHERE.  m.  m Mol scatt Mol scatt  Rel (z=0) Aer 0  a scatt  a abs Aer I  a scatt  a abs Aer III  a scatt  a abs IIII 000 IIII

Clear atmosphere 12 Thin lines –optical thickness of scattering Thick lines –optical thickness of absorption Spectral dependence of the single scattering co-albedo for 4 aerosol models

13 Clear atmosphere. Lidar sounding Dynamics of the variation of aerosol extinction from lidar observation in SPSU ( Donchenko V.K.. Samulenkov D.A.. Melnikova I.N.. Boreysho A.S.. Chugreev A.V. Laser systems of the St.Petersburg State University Resources Center. Possibilities. Problems Statement and the First Results. The contemporary problems of the Earth remote sensing form the Space. Moscow Том 10. № 3. p )

14 Wavelength. nm Experiment St. Petersburg city. Lidar sounding The Ladoga Lake Airborne observations Peterhoff city. Ground observations Experimental values of the aerosol optical thickness in St.Petersburg and suburbs

15 Calculation of radiative characteristics Clear atmosphere. Radiative divergence Simulation and airborne observation of radiative divergence for models of Aerosol 0 and 1

16 Clear atmosphere. Radiative divergence Clear atmosphere. Radiative divergence (continuation) Simulation (Aerosol 3) and airborne observation of radiative divergence after the sand storm ( Melnikova I.. Vasilyev A. Short-wave solar radiation in the Earth atmosphere. Calculation. Observation. Interpretation. Springer- Verlag. Heidelberg p.)

17 CLOUD 1  0 = 5 and 10 for all wavelength. added to the scattering optical thickness of the clear atmosphere CLOUD 2 2-layer atmosphere : cloud 1 (in layer 0-1 km) + clear layer above the cloud The partly scattered light falls to cloud top and cloud spherical albedo is assumed as ground albedo for above - cloud layer CLOUD 3  0 ( ) - Spectral dependent optical thickness

18.  m I II III   (  0 = 10 ) CLOUD I II III  0 (  0 = 10 ) CLOUD OPTICAL PARAMETERS OF THE CLOUD-1 MODEL 0 I II III   (  0 = 5 ) CLOUD I II III  0 (  0 = 5 ) CLOUD

19,  m I II III  I II III 0 OPTICAL PARAMETERS IN THE CLEAR ABOVE-CLOUD LAYER (P Z=1KM )

20,  m  scatt 0 Rel scatt  (z>0) I II III  I II III 0  OPTICAL PARAMETERS OF THE CLOUD-3 MODEL

21 Cloudy atmosphere Optical thickness of Cloud-1 model (  0 =10) (upper group of curves) and above-cloud atmosphere (lower group of curves) for 4 Aerosol models Optical thickness of Cloud-1 and Cloud 3 models

22 Single scattering co-albedo for 4 aerosol models and Cloud-1 model with optical thickness 5 and 10 and experimental data from (Melnikova I. Vasilyev A. Short-wave solar radiation in the Earth atmosphere. Calculation. Observation. Interpretation. Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg p.) Cloudy atmosphere (continuation)

23 Cloudy atmosphere. Radiative divergence Simulation for Aerosol 1. Cloud 1 (red) and 2 (green) models and results of airborne observation of the radiative divergence above the Ladoga Lake (Melnikova I.. Vasilyev A. Short-wave solar radiation in the Earth atmosphere. Calculation. Observation. Interpretation. Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg p.)

24 Cloudy atmosphere. Radiative divergence (continuation) Simulation for Aerosol 1 and 3). Cloud 1 model and results of airborne observations of radiative divergence after the sand storm (Sakhara dust) above the Atlantic Ocean and in clean atmosphere above the Ladoga Lake (Melnikova I.. Vasilyev A. Short-wave solar radiation in the Earth atmosphere. Calculation. Observation. Interpretation. Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg p.)

25 Simulation (Aerosol 1.2 and 3) for Cloud 3 model and airborne observation of relative radiative divergence in cloudy atmosphere (Melnikova I.. Vasilyev A. Short-wave solar radiation in the Earth atmosphere. Calculation. Observation. Interpretation. Springer-Verlag. Heidelberg p.) Cloudy atmosphere. Relative radiative divergence. Cloud - 3 mode l

26 Clear atmosphere Cloud 1 (Smoothed cloud) Cloud 2 (2-layer atmosphere) (1-F  ) forsing Aerosol (1-F  ) forsing Aerosol forsing cloud (1-F  ) forsing Aerosol forsing cloud Aer=0 W/m Aer=1 W/m Aer=2 W/m Aer=3 W/m Local instantaneous radiative forcing (variations of the net flux at the troposphere top) [(1-F  ) Aer 0 - (1-F  )]F 0  f aeros =[(1-F  ) Aer 0 - (1-F  )]F 0  = [(1-F  ) clear -(1-F  )]F 0  f cloud = [(1-F  ) clear -(1-F  )]F 0 

27 Estimating the heating rate of the atmospheric layer Estimating the heating rate of the atmospheric layer in the shortwave range in the shortwave range S = 1000 J/(s m 2 ) - the solar constant in shortwave range (0.3–1.0  m); r = 1 kg/m 3 - the air density at the level 800 mb; C p = 1005 J/(kg deg) - the specific heat of the dry air in clear atmosphere C p = 1952 J/(kg deg) - the specific heat of water vapor at constant pressure; C p = 4218 J/(kg deg) - the specific heat of liquid water at 0  C; The average value C p = 2392 J/(kg deg) in clouds.Model dT/dt. degree / day CLEARCLOUD A S A S Aerosol Aerosol

CONCLUSIONS: CONCLUSIONS: 1.Lidar sounding in the Research Park of SPSU provides the construction of adequate optical models of the atmosphere 2.The simplest optical model provides suitable results of radiative characteristics calculation that shows an acceptable accordance with airborne observation 3.These model allows clearly demonstrate influence of chosen optical parameter on radiative characteristics. 4.The presence of aerosols in the atmosphere greatly affects the optical and radiative properties of clouds 5.Even the simple models confirm that simulation of the atmosphere optical and radiative characteristics should accurate account for atmospheric pollution and correct forecast of global environmental changes 28

Research Park (100 MEuros, )

Research park portal

Unified electronic system for applications One time registration Possibility to work with all the centers "in one window“ The ability to track the status of requests and keep track of time of its execution Remote getting results List of publications using equipment Research park System of assessments and reviews to improve the work of the Research park

Research Park of SPSU READY FOR JOINT RESEARCH PROJECTS! ru/en

33 Thanks for your attention