1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, 12-13 October 2009 Sampling and small populations Ljubljana,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls
Advertisements

Hypothesis Testing making decisions using sample data.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Draft information note on the Annual.
Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions Chapter 15.
Business 205. Review Sampling Continuous Random Variables Central Limit Theorem Z-test.
The standard error of the sample mean and confidence intervals
Audit Sampling. Definition: Audit Sampling Audit sampling is the application of an audit procedure to less than 100 percent of the items within an account.
Chapter 6 Hypotheses texts. Central Limit Theorem Hypotheses and statistics are dependent upon this theorem.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
The standard error of the sample mean and confidence intervals How far is the average sample mean from the population mean? In what interval around mu.
11-1 Copyright  2006 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd Revised PPTs t/a Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia 3e by Grant Gay and Roger Simnett Slides.
S S (5.1) RTI, JAIPUR1 STATISTICAL SAMPLING Presented By RTI, JAIPUR.
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls
1 The Sample Mean rule Recall we learned a variable could have a normal distribution? This was useful because then we could say approximately.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 7th Edition
BA 427 – Assurance and Attestation Services
Learning Objectives LO1 Explain the role of professional judgment in audit sampling decisions. LO2 Distinguish audit sampling work from nonsampling work.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 12: Audit Sampling Concepts.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 8-1 Chapter 8 CHAPTER 8 AUDIT SAMPLING: AN OVERVIEW AND APPLICATION TO TESTS.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling – Part b.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Introduction to IT audits PART II IT.
Hypothesis Testing Section 8.2. Statistical hypothesis testing is a decision- making process for evaluating claims about a population. In hypothesis testing,
©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances Chapter 17.
Introduction to Statistical Sampling and Sampling Designs in Audit.
Part Six Audit Sampling.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens//Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances Chapter 17.
©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances Chapter 17.
1 Today Null and alternative hypotheses 1- and 2-tailed tests Regions of rejection Sampling distributions The Central Limit Theorem Standard errors z-tests.
Charteredaccountants.com.au/training Fundamentals of Auditing in 2007 Chartered Accountants Audit Conference ASA 530 – Audit Sampling and Other Means of.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 System evaluation and sampling – first.
A Sampling Distribution
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Implementation of Article 73 Ljubljana,
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Simplification Task Force Results for Audit Authorities Ljubljana,
Say not, „I have found the truth," but rather, „I have found a truth.„ Kahlin Gibran “The Prophet” Hypothesis testing.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Risk of Error on Closure Ljubljana,
1 Statistics 300: Elementary Statistics Section 8-2.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 9-1 Chapter Nine Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Internal Quality Assessment Process Internal.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Chapter 8 Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 8-1 Chapter Eight Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application.
Auditing: The Art and Science of Assurance Engagements Chapter 13: Audit Sampling Concepts Copyright © 2011 Pearson Canada Inc.
Measuring change in sample survey data. Underlying Concept A sample statistic is our best estimate of a population parameter If we took 100 different.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling – Part a.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies 2010 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances Chapter Nine.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Report from Workshop No. 1 Systems evaluations.
The accuracy of averages We learned how to make inference from the sample to the population: Counting the percentages. Here we begin to learn how to make.
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 8&9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms variance and standard error of a sample mean, Null Hypothesis,
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests of Transactions.
 Confidence Intervals  Around a proportion  Significance Tests  Not Every Difference Counts  Difference in Proportions  Difference in Means.
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances Chapter 17.
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application
Audit Sampling: An Overview and Application to Tests of Controls
©2005 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved.
Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances
Audit Sampling for Tests of Details of Balances
Chapter 11 Audit sampling
STATISTICAL TOOLS FOR AUDITING
Chapter 9 Audit Sampling: An Application to Substantive Tests of Account Balances McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
©2005 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Statistics 300: Elementary Statistics
Presentation transcript:

1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Sampling and small populations Ljubljana, October 2009 Henk W. H. Geilen RE RA CISA Senior auditmanager Dutch Audit Authority Henk W. H. Geilen RE RA CISA Senior auditmanager Dutch Audit Authority

2 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Outline 1.Introduction 2.Why Sampling 3.What is Sampling 4.“Small populations” 5.Conclusion

3 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Why sampling ? A true Story A long time ago……….

4 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009

5 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 What’s the problem ? Situation A (no errors) What to do? Stop? Seen Enough?

6 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 What is Sampling (2) Situation B (errors found) What to do? Take more items? Correcting only the errors found? ……

7 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 So….. You never know whether you have seen enough items So did you do “enough” work? “Enough” means: Not to few Not to much

8 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Mathematics ? Total number of balls Number of red balls Chance : Red /total Number of draws If you put the balls back after drawing Multiply chances for each draw

9 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Mathematics/Formula Red/(Red + White) * Red/( Red + White)… Number of draws: n Red / (Red +White) = Red / Total = p Chance: ß ß = p n

10 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 So What ? Audit We know “total” We don’t know “error” p We don’t want to know “Chance” ß …..

11 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Audit The “object” is good We mean the “object" is good ENOUGH So there can be a little error Let’s call it MATERIALITY Hé isn’t that p

12 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Chance 100% assurance Is this possible ? Is this necessary ? The auditor defines his risk This means: the chance that he accepts the population while the error is higher than acceptable

13 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Where are we ? We have a formula ß = p n Let’s say ß = 0,05 So the risk is 5% or the Probability = 95 % Say the materiality = 1 % (0,01) Then we can calculate n = the number of samples 0,05 = (1 - 0,01) n N = 300

14 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 This means If you want to accept 1 percent errors (max) You sample 300 times You find zero errors The risk is (less than) 5 % or If you take a sample of 300 items and find 0 errors you know 95 % sure that the maximum error in the population is 1 percent.

15 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Playing with n Different materiality: f.e. 2 percent n = 300/ 2 = 150 f.e. 0,5 percent n = 300 / 0,5 =600 Different risk: 10 percent : n * p = percent : n * p = 190

16 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Based on 0 errors Risk 5 percent 1 error : n * p = errors : n * p = errors : n * p = errors : n * p = errors : n * p = 1052

17 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Risk ß (Beta) Risk : The risk that you accept the population on the basis that the error is less or equal than the materiality α (Alpha) Risk : The risk that you don’t accept the population while in fact there is no error

18 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 What is important Random / A-select Meaning : each element has an equal change of being sampled The sampled set has the same characteristics as the population

19 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 First Conclusions Sampling : A method to calculate how much work to do Parameters : Materiality Confidence level Not size of the population

20 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Back to small populations The questions are/stay: How many items (operations) to audit What items (operations) to audit How to audit an item (operation) Non statistical sample

21 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 How can we do it (how much)? Step 1: Audit all “big” items (big means > materiality) Step 2: Calculate sample size for other items based on results system audit This defines the confidence level

22 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 In detail Total population (all operations) Minus Big operations Is Population to Sample Multiply Confidence Level Is “ temp result ” Devide (Population to sample) multiply Materiality Is Sample Size

23 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Assurance level from systems audit ReliabilityConfidence Level Factor Only minor improvements High60 %0,92 Some improvements Average70 %1,21 Substantial improvements Average80 %1,61 Does not workLow90 %2,31

24 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Example (393 operations) Minus ( 4 operations) Is Multiply 1,21 (70 %) Is Divide (0.02 * ) Is 60 Sample Size (plus 4)

25 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Which items (1) Random Verify Has sample same characteristics as population Average.. MA, Region etc Looks like risk model Commission

26 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 What items (2) Not the same characteristics = Draw again After a few draws …. Expand sample

27 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 After the audit Total error fractions Divide sample size Is average error fraction Multiply population to sample Is projected error Plus error in big operations Is Total error

28 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Evaluation Calculate materiality Compare with total error Example 0,02 * = Vs

29 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 What can you influence ? (393 operations) Minus ( 4 operations) Is Multiply 1,21 (70 %) Is Divide (0.02 * ) Is 60 Sample Size (plus 4)

30 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Reminder What was the goal? Sample? Audit? Audit Opinion?

31 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Conclusions No miracle solutions (Mathematic not Magic) basic principles equal to statistic sampling definition of the audit objective definition of the population definition of the characteristics to test define confidence level, materiality random selection

32 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 More conclusions non-statistical sample size rather large to support audit judgment consider increasing tests of controls to determine confidence level for sampling difficult to determine precision of error projection representativeness of the sample needs to be evaluated

33 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 Thank you for your attention! Henk Geilen