1 Australian Initiatives in Marine Observing Systems Ken Jarrott Australian Bureau of Meteorology DBCP XXII 2006 La Jolla USA Tech & Scientific Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John A. Orcutt Deputy Director, SIO Ocean Observations Initiative NSF MREFC Chair, NSF/CORE DEOS Comm.
Advertisements

Introduction Objective: Develop regional ocean forecasting capability AU$15M co-investment for Phase 1 Partners: Bureau, CSIRO, Navy Launched 2003, Phase1.
Global Drifter Program (GDP) Rick Lumpkin National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory (AOML)
Improving Coastal Assessment and Prediction in Australia: A Due Diligence Study John Parslow Arnold Dekker.
Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research (OAR) Richard W. Spinrad, Ph.D., CMarSci Assistant Administrator Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research National.
JCOMM in situ Observing Platform Support Centre JCOMMOPS
Parameters and instruments A. Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Science and Education Opportunities for an Arctic Cabled Seafloor Observatory.
Welcome MACOORA Annual Meeting October 22-23, 2008 Fall River, Massachusetts Carolyn Thoroughgood.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Southern Ocean Air-Sea Flux Observations Eric Schulz, CAWCR, BoM.
Abbie Harris - NOAA Ocean Acidification Think Tank #5 Current and Future Research at the Institute for Marine Remote Sensing Abbie Rae Harris Institute.
SeaDataNet, pan-European infrastructure for ocean and marine data management A key component of EMODNet A possible building block for GEOSS By Dick M.A.
Introducing an Integrated Marine Observing System for Australia (IMOS). Gary Meyers (IMOS Director) and John Middleton (SAIMOS)
User Requirements for the GLOBAL OCEAN OBSERVING SYSTEM (GOOS) Rick Bailey CSIRO/BMRC Joint Australian Facility for Ocean Observing Systems (JAFOOS)
IMOS Coastal Observations A National Perspective John Parslow.
Data Interoperability and Access Activities Prepared for the Data Archiving and Access Requirements Working Group (DAARWG) Ken McDonald, TPIO/GEO-IDE Jeff.
FP7-Infra : Design studies for European Research Infrastrutures 1st October 2011 – 30th september 2014 Duration 36 months – Periods : 2 (month.
NOAA Climate Service V. Ramaswamy and Chet Koblinski WCRP JSC-31 Antalya Turkey February 16, 2010.
Planning the infrastructure for marine monitoring and operational oceanography Lennart Funkquist Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute Figures.
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
A Survey of Existing Mid-Atlantic Regional Association Coastal Ocean Observing System MARACOOS Assets Wendell Brown UMass Dartmouth School for Marine Science.
Joint WMO-IOC Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology Contributions to WIGOS David Meldrum, vice chair, JCOMM OPA.
IMOS BlueWater Chris Sabine Bluewater Node of IMOS Susan Wijffels, Ken Ridgway, Anthony Richardson, Eric Schulz, Bronte Tilbrook and the rest of the Bluewater.
Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014 FP7-Infra : Design studies for European Research Infrastrutures 1st October 2011.
Symposium on multi-hazard early warning systems for integrated disaster risk management A JCOMM perspective Enhanced early warning for better coastal or.
Automated Weather Observations from Ships and Buoys: A Future Resource for Climatologists Shawn R. Smith Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
From Ocean Sciences at the Bedford Institute of Oceanography Temperature – Salinity for the Northwest.
Topics describe the Data Buoy Cooperation Panel (DBCP) –aims, –achievements and –Challenges network status developments of data buoy technology JCOMM.
DFO Northwest Atlantic Ocean Monitoring & Mooring Programs OSNAP Planning Meeting April 2011 BIO.
South Africa - infrastructure. Current opportunities Gough Island September Prince Edward Island April GoodHope/AX25 December – February.
Developing Marine Research Data Management Infrastructure in WA Luke Edwards WALIS Forum 11th Nov 09.
From Feely et al (2010) International Network. Diversity of Calcifiers.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Ocean.US and Coastal Ocean Applications and Science Team (COAST) Larry Atkinson September 2004 Corvallis.
MOVAR: Monitoring the Upper Ocean Thermal Variability between Rio de Janeiro and Trindade Island PRIMARY OBJECTIVE Take advantage of the Brazilian Navy.
ISABP meeting, Rio, August 2004 (1) DBCP DBCP 19 th session –Held in Angra dos Reis, October 2003 –Louis Vermaak presented report on ISABP.
Bob Keeley Marine Environmental Data Service Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans Ottawa, Canada Jun, 2006 SeaDataNet Meeting.
Future Perspectives of Ocean Observatories in Germany [Name of the infrastructure / site / time series…] Contact person: [name, ] [Institution(s)
The Mediterranen Forecasting System: 10 years of developments (and the next ten) N.Pinardi INGV, Bologna, Italy.
IndOOS—a sustained ocean observing system in the Indian Ocean for climate research Howard Cattle for Gary Meyers Co-Chair CLIVAR/GOOS Indian Ocean Panel.
Dr John Williams Commissioner Natural Resources Commission, NSW Our coasts - meeting the challenges.
NOAA’s Office of Climate Observation Presented to the JTA XXIII Angra Dos Reis Rio De Janeiro October , 2003 Sidney W. Thurston, Ph.D. National.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CONTINENTAL SHELF EMBAYMENTS OF THE EASTERN MARGIN OF THE PHILIPPINES: LAMON BAY STRATIFICATION AND CIRCULATION The research objectives of the cruise is.
Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) Initiative: A Key Component of an Ocean Observing System Shawn R. Smith Center for.
JCOMM Observations Programme Area Report to the DBCP Angra dos Reis, 20 October 2003 Observations Programme Area Coordination Group (OCG) Mike Johnson,
The Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) is envisioned as a coordinated national and international network of observations, data management and analyses.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Strategies For Permanent Access To Scientific Information In Southern Africa Focus On Health And Environmental Information For Sustainable Development.
Ice-Based Observatories network in the Arctic Ocean Andrey Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution NOAA Arctic Science Priorities Workshop,
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ® ) Z Improve safetyEnhance our economyProtect our environment CIMAR-GOMC meeting – 25 Feb 2015 Zdenka Willis.
Research Data Management Nova Southeastern University – Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography – Ocean Campus November 2015 Data Management.
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Review – Ann Arbor, MI November 15-18, 2010 Page 1 Observing Systems & Advanced Technology Steve Ruberg.
“Upwelling of south region of Gulf of California. Fluxes of CO 2 and nutrients ” Leticia Espinosa Diana Escobedo (IPN-CIIDIR SINALOA)
Future needs and plans for ocean observing in the Arctic AOOS Arctic Town Hall Futur Zdenka Willis Integrated Ocean Observing System National Program Office.
1 - What are the local, regional, and continental-scale exchanges of carbon, nitrogen, and reactive species? What are their relationships to underlying.
FY 2005 NOAA Research Budget Request Dr. Richard D. Rosen Assistant Administrator for NOAA Research March 2004.
A U.S. non-profit Corporation Recipient of NOAA planning grants and Congressionally directed funding Membership to include federal, state, provincial.
NOAA Vision and Mission Goals Pedro J. Restrepo, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Scientist, Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA/NWS First Q2 Workshop (Q2 - "Next.
Developing G7 ocean initiative Albert Fischer, GOOS, IOC/UNESCO SIT-31 Agenda Item #15 (AOB) CEOS Strategic Implementation Team ESA/ESRIN, Frascati, Italy.
Monitoring and prediction of ENSO, the Benguela Nino and other large scale phenomena; subsequent impacts upon southern African rainfall patterns; and the.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
The Peninsula Research Institute for Marine Renewable Energy
The global XBT network Gustavo Jorge Goni(1), Shenfu Dong(1,2), and Francis Bringas(1) With contributions and work of many in the XBT community (1) NOAA/AOML,
Innovate. Improve. Grow. WEAVER: HEXAPOD ROBOT WITH 5DOF LIMBS FOR NAVIGATING ON UNSTRUCTURED TERRAIN.
Candyce Clark JCOMM Observations Programme Area Coordinator
JCOMM in-situ Observations Programme Support Centre www. jcommops
Contributions to WIGOS David Meldrum, vice chair, JCOMM OCG
JCOMM in-situ Observations Programme Support Centre www. jcommops
Presentation transcript:

1 Australian Initiatives in Marine Observing Systems Ken Jarrott Australian Bureau of Meteorology DBCP XXII 2006 La Jolla USA Tech & Scientific Workshop

2 Two Unrelated, Connected Initiatives  INTEGRATED MARINE OBSERVING SYSTEM oMajor “Vision and Capability Shifting” Initiative of National Scope oMulti-discipline – large scale physical oceanography through to coastal ocean ecology and biology oWill Engage Tens of Research Agencies Across Aust and Beyond oA Capability Investment - No Direct Knowledge Targets  DRIFTING BUOY PROFILING - EAST AUSTRALIA CURRENT oResearch Proposal – Specific Knowledge Objective oSmall Discipline Base and Participant Group (Propositions)

3 National Cooperative Research Infrastructure Strategy  To fund INFRASTRUCTURE that maximises the contributions of the R&D system to economic development, national security, social wellbeing and environmental sustainability.....  Does NOT fund research. $500M – over 5 years  Infrastructure to be developed on collaborative, national, non-exclusive basis.  To serve the research and innovation system broadly, not just host institutions.  Funding to encourage co-investment.

4 “Integrated Marine Observing System” Federal Government Research Infrastructure Proposal Federal Government Research Infrastructure Proposal MARINE “IMOS” ONE OF 9 PRIORITY AREAS MARINE “IMOS” ONE OF 9 PRIORITY AREAS ~ AUS $50m ~ AUS $50m FIVE YEAR FUNDING Starting in 2007 FIVE YEAR FUNDING Starting in 2007 COMMUNAL FUNDING & GOVERNANCE MODEL COMMUNAL FUNDING & GOVERNANCE MODEL Scale: DEEP OCEAN COASTAL ECOSYSTEM Scale: DEEP OCEAN COASTAL ECOSYSTEM IN_SITU and REMOTE SENSING Elements IN_SITU and REMOTE SENSING Elements COMMUNAL DATA MANAGEMENT & ACCESS COMMUNAL DATA MANAGEMENT & ACCESS

5 IMOS Outcomes (Proposal) Proposal Development Science & natural resource management questions Wishes and hopes of proponents: * oceanographers & climate scientists * regionally focussed science institutions * governments & enterprises Major National Themes Large scale ocean structures, drivers and variability (physical and biological) Coupling / exchanges to shelves and near-coast areas, esp. boundary currents Interaction of ecosystem dynamics in relation to physical processes TIMELY ACCESS TO TRUSTED DATA SETS Funded Technologies Argo Floats Ocean and Shelf Moorings Ship Sampling Gliders and other UAVs HF Radars Acoustic Tagging & Monitoring Remote Sensing (Satellite) Distributed Sensor Nets DATA SYSTEMS & SERVICES

6 IMOS Operating Model  Some Specific Infrastructure Custodians/Operators (eg Argo)  National and Regional Infrastructure Allocation  Deployable / Rotational Resources Can be Assigned from National Pool (eg Gliders, some HF Radars)  Expertise / National Support Centres for Some Technologies, to avoid duplication, e.g: QLD – HF Radars WA – Gliders CSIRO Marine Research – Moorings...  Common “eMarine” Information Infrastructure – single distributed and federated network, covering standards, formats, QA, archiving, data portals  Governance and funding focus through single point – working with specific infrastructure networks through consortia of Operators.

7 Some IMOS Outcomes (1 – Blue Water)  Ship of Opportunity – extend existing ship observations in regional seas linking physical, chemical and biological oceanography  Argo program scale secured and extended

8 National Moorings Plan (approx) Australian Boundary Currents Reference Shelf Slope

9 Gliders National pool of ten gliders (plus existing units) Example : Perth Canyon

10 HF Coastal Ocean Radar Network Proposed Installations National pool of 4 radars – long range & medium range Phased array and direction finding units

11 IMOS HF Radars SST 29/9/91 EAC Sydney Jervis Bay Cape Byron Tasman Sea EAC Eddy Smoky Cape EAC Separation Satellite Image of Sea Surface Temperature along the east coast of Australia, 29 September 1991 showing the influence of the EAC, an EAC eddy and the Tasman Sea. Permanent HF Radar nodes. Temporary HF Radar nodes. Representative Application

12 Southern Aust Regional Node ---- Moorings: currents, T,S,DO, NH4, fluores; phyto & zooplankton; noise,benthos etc x - HF RADAR Gliders: T,S, fluor, turbidity etc NB Instrumented predators

13 Great Barrier Reef Marine Observations SEC = South Equatorial Current EAC = East Australian Current Coral Sea mooring (1) Slope moorings (4) Shelf mooring (1) Oceanographic buoys (3) Island Research Stations (4) Reef towers (3) HF Radar Temp/Salinity Flow Light & heat fluxes Chlorophyll Turbidity Particulate carbon Local variables (sensor networks)

14 Research Proposal – Drifting Buoy Profiling of East Australian Current Very influential boundary current, with high ecological and economic impact.

15 East Australian Current

16 Uncertainties in Mean Currents Derived from the Global Surface Drifter Program (courtesy Rick Lumpkin, NOAA)

17 Drifting Buoy Proposal  Research Funding Grant being sought start???  Three Year deployment of drifting buoy clusters to observe the Spring- Summer formation of the EAC and the Tasman Front.  After initial pilot deployment in Year 1, could deploy 10 buoys per month for 3 months in subsequent years. Close pairs to be used for Lagrangian drift observations.  SVP upgrades to some units possible.  Will use existing XBT SOOP vessel (monthly transects possible).