ICEDD E-PRTR: Point of view and questions of the extractive sector about the Guidance Document FORTEA + MRW: DGRNE + ICEDD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pollutant Emissions to Water E-PRTR Reporting requirements Thematic Eionet Workshop 11 September 2008.
Advertisements

Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen SoE meeting 12 June 2007, Copenhagen.
Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants Peter Kristensen, EEA Joint Eionet NRC Freshwater and Drafting group State of the Environment and Trends meeting.
European Commission DG Environment Implementation of the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (European PRTR, E-PRTR) Namur, 7 February 2007.
EU FORMAL REGULATION – TYPES OF STANDARDS ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY STANDARDS.
BULGARIAN COMPETENT AUTHORITIES IN THE FIELD OF IPPC Kalin Iliev Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria.
Consolidation of he Environmental Monitoring System in Albania (CEMSA) An EU-funded project managed by the Delegation of the European Commission to Albania.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Offset Protocols and Florida’s Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program Kelly Stevens Meteorologist Division.
Estonian Environment Information Centre The FINAL SEMINAR OF PROJECT LIFETCY98/CY/167 “Integrated Control of Industrial Pollution and Chemical Substances.
Hellenic Ministry for the Environment, Spatial Planning and Public Works Greek Experience on the Implementation of EPER REPORTING IN GREECE Η ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ.
Maricopa County Air Quality Department 1001 North Central Ave. Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa County Air Quality Department Protecting and improving our.
NCMA Workshop March 19 and 24, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
The Scottish Pollutant Release Inventory (SPRI) Bob Boyce - SEPA Senior Environmental Assessment Officer.
Workshop Inspire MIG-P/MSCPs and Reporting under environmental aquis January 2015 JRC Ispra Andreas Grangler DG Environment Unit C.3 – Air & Industrial.
The IPPC Directive and EPER Iksan van der Putte. Objectives of IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) To prevent or minimise emissions To.
1 Inspection of LCPs: System for Inspection. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
Scope of the Protocol on PRTR Jan Maršák, Ph.D. IPPC and PRTR Unit Ministry of the Environment Czech Republic Regional UN ECE Workshop Minsk, Belarus,
Reporting to the EPRTR in the UK Alex Hole Assessment & Reporting Advisor.
PRTR-online survey. Questions – Items Question 3 – Item 2.
1 The European Pollutant Emission Register 4th WHO Ministerial Conference Budapest 23 June 2004 Andreas Barkman European Environment Agency.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
NATO-CCMS Pilot Study Tour de Table - Greece Recent Developments on Contaminated Land in Greece Anthimos Xenidis Laboratory of Metallurgy National Technical.
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
EPER reporting process in Hungary with emphasis on the experiences Edina Gampel Counsellor National Inspectorate for Environment, Nature and Water Budapest,
From EPER to E-PRTR EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
Compilation of emission inventories The situation in the Netherlands Special Session of the UNCEEA on Climate Change (New York, 25 June afternoon)
Access to Information and Public Participation in Developing and Operating PRTR Systems Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15-16, 2007.
Pollutants in Europe: what, where and how much European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Data 11 th May 2010.
1 Permitting of LCPs, Reporting Obligations on LCPs. ECENA Training Workshop Bristol, March 2008.
Precipitation in North America Figure 9.5. Potential Evapotranspiration Figure 9.6.
Hosgeldiniz!. TAIEX RTP 34163: "Workshop on the IPPC Directive (96/61/EC)", Ankara, Turkey, Nov 2009 Dr. Meinolf Drüeke: "Reporting obligations.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Current situation concerning national inventory system in Ukraine 1. Previous national inventories Up to date 3 national inventories were prepared and.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Emissions Calculations 101 Tim Trumbull Iowa Air Emissions Assistance Program Iowa Waste Reduction Center University of Northern Iowa.
EI Resources Angelique Luedeker, ITEP. 2 Guidance Documents EPA’s AP-42: Read the sections for your sources! ◦
UNECE PRTR Protocol EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
The legal background for implementing the IPPC, EPER, and PRTR Protocol Requirements Orsolya Adamovics Department for Conservation of Environment Ministry.
Iuliana CHIDU European integration counsellor Ministry of Environment and Water Management Prague - CZECH REPUBLIC April 2005 DIRECTIVE 96/61/EC.
E-PRTR dataflow management Introduction and informal review process Eva Goossens Head of Industrial Pollution Group Air and Climate Change Programme.
| Folie | Folie 2 Reporting according to pollution registers Experiences in Austria Mag. Daniela Wappel.
Developing PRTR Systems in Europe : EPER, E-PRTR and the PRTR Protocol Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Programme October 15, 2007.
E-PRTR Refit evaluation and Article 17 official data review 1 2 nd Global Round Table on PRTRs 25 November 2015 Andreas Grangler.
ECENA Training on LCP, Seveso II and E- PRTR, March, 2008, Bristol, UK Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development National Environmental.
Calculating Emissions Using AP-42 Emission Factors Marti Blad, PhD.
1 Emissions Inventory Overview–Part 2 Melinda Ronca-Battista, ITEP.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN An overview on SwissPRTR Pollutant.
1 Elements of EI Data Management Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP/TAMS Center.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
Workshop on the Criteria to establish projections scenarios Sectoral projection guidance: Residential and services Mario Contaldi, TASK-GHG Emanuele Peschi,
Gordon McInnes, Deputy Director
The Italian PRTR Andrea Gagna
MONITORING Mr. Jan Prášek IPPC Agency.
BAT - BREF Their scope Rob Kramers Senior advisor InfoMil.
Mr. Nepimach Czech Ecological Institute
Croatian Environment Agency, CEA
Preliminary results of the data collection 2009
Stormwater Control Transfer Program Overview January 31, 2018
Experience in the UK in implementing E-PRTR and Data Validation
E-PRTR Regulation PRTR Protocol
Reporting sheet no.4 Emissions of pollutants
Background document: How to build the Inventory of Emissions, Discharges and Losses: main elements and compilation of existing datasets (2007) DG on inventory.
Reduction of total releases from unintentional production of POPs
EPER European Pollutant Emission Register
Quality aspects of EPER
PRTRs building on existing reporting structures: The French PRTR
Benoît FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW
Data specifications for IED Annex II Module 4
Emissions to surface waters
Presentation transcript:

ICEDD E-PRTR: Point of view and questions of the extractive sector about the Guidance Document FORTEA + MRW: DGRNE + ICEDD

2 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register  European Pollutant Emission Register familiar to cement and lime producers but new to quarries  2007 first year of monitoring for quarries  First reporting: January 2008  Collaboration Walloon Region Authorities with FORTEA to clarify some items related to PRTR declaration Background Quarry specific issues Next actions

3 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Area effectively under extractive operations Background Quarry specific issues Next actions  E-PRTR Annex I includes at Opencast mining and quarrying where the surface of the area under extractive operations equals 25 ha.  Guidance document clarify this surface

4 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Area effectively under extractive operations Background Quarry specific issues Next actions Reserves Rehabilitated area Under extractive operations

5 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Area effectively under extractive operations Background Quarry specific issues Next actions Starts with: top soil stripping Ends with: rehabilitation according to permit To be approved by competent authorities

6 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Area effectively under extractive operations Background Quarry specific issues Next actions 1site, 4 installations, 4 operators, 1reporting

7 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Area effectively under extractive operations Background Quarry specific issues Next actions 2 sites, 2 facilities, 2operators, 2 reporting

8 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Area effectively under extractive operations Background Quarry specific issues Next actions 2 sites, 2 installations, 1 operator, 2 reporting

9 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Release to air, water and land  No land released known Background Quarry specific issues Next actions  How to monitor releases into air?

10 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Release to air  Method suggested:  Measurement if single point of emission  Calculation for diffuse emissions (majority of case) -Process description with emissions sources Background Quarry specific issues Next actions

11 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Release to air Background Quarry specific issues Next actions  Emission = Activity Data * Emission Factor * Attenuation factor (E=AD*EF*AF)  E= emission to air to report  AD = activity data measures the activity of the facility e.g. –For PM 10, quantity of product processed per year –For other pollutant: annual fuel consumption or annual working time  EF = emission factors as listed in approved reference list  AD = attenuation factor as listed in approved reference list e.g. –Use of water spray during production decrease the amount of PM 10 emitted.

12 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Release to air Background Quarry specific issues Next actions Source: process. Use EF in g/t produced e.g. AP42 from US EPA or other approved reference Sources: engines (dumper, loader), heating device,... Use EF given by the constructor in g/working hour or g/l of fuel

13 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Release to water  Method suggested:  Sampling of releases of waste water and analysis of pollutants content. Compute annual load by multiplying analysis results by annual flow. -Describe hydro- geological conditions and water flows to qualify dewatering outlet water Background Quarry specific issues Next actions

14 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Release to water Background Quarry specific issues Next actions Aquifer Perched water table River Surface water Meteoric precipitation Quarry Subtract background load Don’t subtract background load Water flow

15 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Site transfers Background Quarry specific issues Next actions Not a specific issue for quarry Mining Waste Directive doesn’t change the issue

16 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD E-PRTR for Quarries in a nutshell Background Quarry specific issues Next actions  Producer propose a technical file containing:  Site description with specification of the area under effective exploitation and operators  Facility description including flow-sheet and describing air emissions sources  Calculations principles: description of AD, EF and AF  Hydro geological scheme with water inlet and oulet releases description  Water pollutant sampling plan and annual flow measurement  List of off-site transfer wastes  Technical file submitted to competent authority for approval

17 JmV E-PRTR FORTEA + MRW:DGRNE + ICEDD Work programme Background Quarry specific issues Next actions  Complete guidance to the Guidance Document with Regions Administrations:  Acceptance of principles.  Choice of EF and AF for PM 10 and other air pollutant  Diffusion of the document through FORTEA  Workshop with authorities and producers  Review of the document for 2009 declaration