Impact of the cohesion policy on employment in the Czech Republic Budapest, 6th May 2010 Jana Váňová National Training Fund, Prague.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring social added value A model for public authorities
Advertisements

Integra Consulting Services Ltd. Implementing the SEA Directive: Experience from the new EU Member States Martin Smutny.
Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Implementation of Transnational cooperation in the Czech Republic in Markéta Pěchoučková
1 Evaluating Communication Plans Cvetina Yocheva Evaluation Unit DG REGIO 02/12/2009.
WP3. Evaluation, Monitoring and Quality Plan Dr. Luis Sobrado 27 th May 2011.
Evaluating administrative and institutional capacity building
Dorotea Daniele, Facilitator. The members Polish Ministry of Regional Development ESF Council in Sweden Lombardy Region Ministry of Labour and Social.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
HR 08 IB SPP 02 TWINNING PROJECT “ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF EU COHESION POLICY FUNDS” 1 The most significant results of Component.
V4 Expert Group V4 Expert Group Partnership Agreement and programmes Czech Republic 16 – 17 June 2014 Budapest.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Impact of the cohesion policy on the level and quality of employment in Poland Project co-financed from financial means of the European Union within the.
Training of National Judges INFO DAY Introduction to the new Call for Proposals 2014 Raffaella Battella - DG Competition.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON TOURISM STATISTICS UN Statistics Division.
Defining CENTRAL EUROPE 2020: state of play Stakeholder dialogue Ljubljana, 25 April 2013 Mirjana Dominovic – Joint Technical Secretariat.
TEMPUS IV- SIXTH CALL FOR PROPOSALS 1 TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
VET/HRD research and development initiatives in ROMANIA Magdalena BALICA, Liliana VOICU ECER, University College Dublin 07 –10 September 2005.
Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic MEETING OF DIRECTORS GENERAL “Territorial Cohesion” The Implementation of Action 1.1a (Urban –
October 17, 2011 Innovation strategy and its implementation in the Czech Republic.
Regional innovation policy in the Czech Republic Vladislav Čadil.
1 Ongoing activities in the Czech Republic Jana Chladná National Coordination Authority The Ministry for Regional Development 7. May 2010, Budapest.
Evaluation Units Open Days Some experience of Implementing Agency in evaluating Pre-Accession Entrepreneurship Development Programmes Polish Agency for.
Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic International conference CZ PRES – Tourism Industry Employment and Labour market challenges
EEA Grants Norway Grants Annual Programme Report Template Brussels, 20 November
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE MANAGING AUTHORITY CSF Promoting Regional Partnership, Networking and Cooperation between Greece & Czech Republic.
Promotion of Community initiatives and territorial pacts in Czech Republic - Real Partnership in Operational Programmes ? 2012, EP, Brussels.
Community planning of social services in the Czech Republic February 10, 2006 Prague Mgr. Tereza Kloučková Social Services Department, MoLSA.
LEADER+ STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING LEADER+ OBSERVATORY SEMINAR JUNE 2006 IN BRUSSELS/BELGIUM Salla Rossi European Commission.
WP8 – Innovation Support Kelly Vavasi General Secretariat for Research and Technology (GSRT) 1 st Innovation Dialogue Forum Becici, 8-9 November 2010.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
Mainstreaming Migration into National Development Planning The case of Tunisia Lorena Lando Chief of Mission IOM Tunisia Regional Consultative Meeting.
Evaluation Capacity building in Lithuania Presentation for Presentation for Evaluation Units Open days by Mrs. Ana Stankaitienė EU Programmes Management.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
ICPE, Ljubljana 2 nd Special Session of the ICPE Council 28 March 2012.
The RDI Governance System Vasileios Pitsinigkos Head of Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia - Thrace Region.
Peer Learning Event on national Lifelong Guidance Policy Forums 4th-5th of June 2008, Thessaloniki With the support of the Lifelong Learning Programme.
Future of EUPAN in the point of view of the Czech Presidency Ministry of Interior of the Czech Republic náměstí Hrdinů 1643/ Prague 4.
1 Tempus Information Day First Call for Proposals Tempus IV Novi Sad, 19 March 2008 European Commission.
Vanguard meeting 18 July 2014 Ministry od Labour and Social Affairs.
Structural Funds Managing Authority – Ministry of Finance 1 Technical Assistance Ilze Aleksandroviča Head of Control and Development Division EU Funds.
MINISTRY OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION General Directorate for Regional Development Regional Policy and Pogramming Directorate REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 3: Mid-Term Evaluation.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Social inclusion of excluded young people and prevention of re-offending behavior
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME 2007 – 2013.
Landscape of social innovation in Poland Brussels, May 2014.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
Consultant: CMDC Joint Venture Czech experience - Use of BREFs and national BAT notes, role of IPPC Agency, Czech TWG Multi-Country Workshop June 8th,
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
Czech Republic: Implementation of Transnational cooperation October 8, 2008 Open days, Brussels.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
EU Cohesion Policy and its implementation in the Czech Republic Zuzana Kasáková Department of W European Studies Charles University in Prague.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
1 Towards Excellence: Research, Development and Innovation Policy Measures of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports Dalibor Štys Minister of Education,
Supporting cooperation of education and business – the case of vocational education in Poland Agnieszka Rybińska Educational Research Institute, Warsaw.
EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY MAKING IN EDUCATION REGIONAL CLUSTER OF KNOWLEDGE.
Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 4: Final (Update) Evaluation.
TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY NEDAL JAYOUSI/Ph.d. NTO PALESITNE TEMPUS IV- FIFTH CALL FOR PROPOSALS.
Role of non-state actors in the implementation of Czech Republic 2030
CZ Evaluation - state of play
Preparatory Action 2011 European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps Call for proposal
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
ESF in the Czech Republic
Menedék’s Approach in Budapest – Let’s involve the private sector
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Technical Working Group meeting 21 March 2012 Brussels
Counterfactual impact evaluations - experience of EFS Managing Authority in Poland Expert hearing on MS experiences on using control groups in ESF evaluations.
Presentation transcript:

Impact of the cohesion policy on employment in the Czech Republic Budapest, 6th May 2010 Jana Váňová National Training Fund, Prague

Structure 1.Introduction of involved institutions 2.Methodological approach in the Czech Republic (incl. main focus of evaluation and main interventions covered by evaluation) 3.Expected output/results

Introduction Ministry for Regional Development (MfRD) published Call for tender (23rd March 2010) Bids submited (15th April 2010) The best bid selected (23rd April 2010) Selected bid proposed by the consortium consisted of the NTF and HOPE-ES

National Training Fund Leader of the consortium National Training Fund in Prague public benefit organisation private, non-governmental organisation focus: human resources development, employment support about 40 experts

National Training Fund Involvement in transnational, national and regional projects Main transnational clients/partners: EC, OECD, CEDEFOP, ETF Main national clients/partners: MoLSA, MoE, MfRD, universities Main regional clients/partners: regional authorities in 14 Czech regions

HOPE-ES HOPE-ES in Prague and Brno: Public benefit organisation Focus: consulting and training, preparation, management and evaluation of programmes and projects About experts

HOPE-ES Main clients/partners: MoI - training of civil servants and representatives of regions and municipalities MoE – analysis of project promoters MfRD – evaluation of implementation of regional programmes

Methodological approach Methodology influenced by the Call of the MfRD the methodological report published by the Polish MoRD and PAG Unicosult the available data the limited time

Methodological approach Main objective: to determine the role and impact of the European cohesion policy on improving the level and quality of employment in the CZ Maximum comparability with the „Polish“ methodology Specific aspects/features of the Czech Republic

Interventions Period : Phare, EQUAL Period 2004 – 2008: : –Cohesion Fund –OP HRD, SPD Objective 3, OP Industry and Enterprise –OP HR and Employment (2007 – 2008), OP Prague Adaptability ( ) –Specific (also regional) programmes

Methodological aproach Acceptation of 4 evaluation criteria: utility, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability Two main levels of analysis: top-down, bottom-up Use of comparable indicators: e. g. number of jobs created, number of beneficiaries who increased their qualification as result of intervention

Methodological approach Use of several methods: desk research interviews with entrepreneurs (and other stakeholders) questionnaires/surveys Focus on two selected periods: 1999 – 2003 and 2004 – 2008

Methodological approach Examples of positive features: data on employment (and its structure) several previous evaluation reports/studies cooperation with MoLSA – databases of projects research on employment trends

Methodological approach Negative features: not all data available – e. g. on sustainability of new jobs specific national methodology in the field of employment statistics higher number of interventions short period – about 8 weeks

Expected outputs/results Final report Its core: 12 sections corresponding with 12 questions presented in the Polish methodological report Extent: about 100 pages in EN Deadline: 30th June 2010

Expected outputs/results Current situation: data gathering preparatory analyses selection of appropriate studies preparation of questionnaires & interviews negotiations with Ministries and other relevant institutions

Thank you for your attention Jana Váňová