Reforming Transportation Finance: Needs, Opportunities, Constraints Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies UC-Berkeley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
Advertisements

1 This document and its contents are the property of The University of Iowa’s Public Policy Center National Evaluation of a Mileage- Based Road User Charge.
County Transportation Systems Association of MN Counties, MN County Engineers Association, MN Inter-County Association Presentation to MN Senate Transportation.
October 10, 2013 Federal Transportation Revenue Options Discussion.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
Colorado Transportation Finance and Implementation Panel Overview Fort Morgan,Colorado September 13, 2007.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Dukakis Center For Urban and Regional Policy Northeastern University School of Public Policy & Urban Affairs A “Think.
CHAPTER 26: LOCAL GOVERNMENT
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
Funding the Gap: Making the Beneficiaries Pay 1 4th June, 2008 Steer Davies Gleave Upper Ground London, SE1 9PD +44 (0)
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation Research Board Executive Committee June 17, 2005 TOLL: The Four.
Value Pricing for Transportation in Washington, D.C. Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley.
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT STUDY COMMITTEE ON CRITICAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING Trucking in Georgia: Big Numbers, Big Impact October 1, 2015.
State Funding of Transportation Tom Howells Wisconsin Motor Carriers Association.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
Revenue Options for Canadian Municipalities Enid Slack Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance Presentation to Canadian National Summit on Municipal.
Urban Transport in the Developing World. Elements of Urban Transport Sector Urban public transport: Urban public transport: On-street systems (for buses,
IBTTA Washington Briefing Washington, D.C. March 30, 2015 Jonathan L. Gifford, Ph.D. George Mason University / Research.
New Revenue Subcommittee Recommendations. Criteria Elasticity Elasticity Ability to phase in Ability to phase in User-based User-based Yield Yield Ease.
International Partnership Meeting Thursday, January 17, 2013 Washington D.C. 1.
The Future of California Transportation Finance Martin Wachs University of California, Berkeley.
Rural Counties Task Force Meeting – October 2005 Martin Wachs University of California, Berkeley.
MPOAC TRANSPORTATION REVENUE STUDY Prepared for Florida’s Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council by Center for Urban Transportation Research.
CLOSING THE GAP: Financing The Region’s Transportation Needs NYU Wagner - The Rudin Center -June 4, 2008 Martin Wachs, Ph.D., Director Transportation,
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE How Do We Adequately Finance Our System?
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Introduction to Government Finance
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
MPACT64 Transportation Infrastructure for Colorado Matt Appelbaum 36 Commuting Solutions Membership Meeting.
SPECULATING ABOUT THE FUTURE OF SURFACE TRANSPORTATION Presentation by C. Kenneth Orski Editor/Publisher of Innovation Briefs New York Metropolitan Transportation.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
Public Finance (MPA405) Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal. Lecture 22: Introduction to Government Finance Public Finance.
Two Major Commissions, No Major Law Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission November 16, 2010 ITS California Annual Meeting.
Authorization of a New Federal Transportation Program AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley Subcommittee on Design Albuquerque, New Mexico July 15, 2008.
Prepared for Transportation Planning Board presented by Arlee Reno Cambridge Systematics, Inc. in cooperation with K.T. Analytics November 16, 2005 Status.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
Mileage based user fees and sustainable transportation funding Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Finance and Infrastructure Subcommittee Financing Recommendations.
Division of Budgets July 6, 2011 Transportation Funding in California.
National Survey of Likely Voters April AHUA National Survey of Likely Voters - April Methodology Universe: Likely Voters Sample Size: 1,000.
Transportation leadership you can trust. Electronic Tolls and Congestion Pricing Study Phase Two Interim Report – Implementation Considerations presented.
Kathy Ruffalo Ruffalo and Associates, LLC. TOPICS Status of Highway Trust Fund – short and long term Interim report of Financing Commission Status of.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
Then and Now The Evolution of Congestion Pricing in Transportation Where We Stand Today Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies University.
Impacts of Rising Gasoline Prices: The Public Finance Issue Presented by Charles E. Olson Visiting Associate Professor Robert H. Smith School of Business.
THE PUBLIC FINANCE DEBATES: “It’s time…New Zealand extended charging for public infrastructure” Opponent: Peter Conway.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
An Optimal Economic Growth Strategy for Alabama Dr. Sam Addy Associate Dean for Economic Development Outreach & Senior Research Economist Montgomery, AlabamaJanuary.
TALKING FREIGHT SEMINAR: Truck Separated Lanes/Truck Tolling MARCH 16, 2005 DARRIN ROTH DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAY OPERATIONS AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS.
Resolving Regional Challenges SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION GOVERNMENTS of Resolving Regional Challenges.
Revenues Sources for Transportation Financing Jeffery A. Richard Foster Pepper & Shefelman.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
THE CONDITION OF OUR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE
John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer
The California Gas Tax Swap Learning from a Failed Experiment
Persian Highway Trust Fund
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Transportation Funding
Joint Committee Meeting: Highway and Finance & Budget
Presentation transcript:

Reforming Transportation Finance: Needs, Opportunities, Constraints Martin Wachs, Director Institute of Transportation Studies UC-Berkeley

Overview of my talk  Review of Current Needs; Summarizing Points Made by Earlier Speakers  Criteria by Which to Evaluate Policy Responses to Needs  Review of Current Opportunities  Review of Constraints….Mostly Political

History of Transportation Finance  Motor fuel taxes enormously popular  Supported by wide variety of constituencies  Adopted in every state by 1940  Federal motor fuel tax in thirties  Fundamental finance mechanism for Interstate System in fifties

History of Transportation Finance  User fees in USA became associated with “trust funds” and non-diversion constitutional provisions in many states  Elastic definition of user fees allowed expansion to transit and to environmental mitigation in many states  “Hypothecation not common worldwide, but key to popularity in USA

Motor Fuel Taxes  Usually Expressed as “Cents per Gallon”  Must be Raised by Act of Legislature  Revenue Does Not Rise Automatically with Inflation as Does Income Tax or Sales Tax  Improving Fuel Economy Lowers Revenue per Mile of Driving  Revenue Declining Precipitously in Relation to VMT

Fuel Tax Changes,  Average of Fifty States  State Fuel Tax in 1957: 5.7¢/gal  If adjusted for Inflation in 2002: 31.0¢/gal  Actual Current Fuel Tax: 20.3¢/gal  Difference 10.7¢/gal

Fuel Tax Changes,  California  State Fuel Tax in 1957: 6.0¢/gal  If adjusted for Inflation in 2002: 32.5¢/gal  Actual Current Fuel Tax: 18.0¢/gal  Difference 14.5¢/gal

Eroding Buying Power of Fuel Taxes  Only Three States Have Raised Fuel Taxes Sufficiently Since 1992 to Keep Even with Inflation  Improved Fuel Economy Lessens Revenue Per Gallon  California Would Have to Triple its Motor Fuel Tax to Restore Buying Power Per VMT to the Level of 1957

Changes in State & Local Transportation Revenue, (National Totals) Billion$/Year % Change State User Fees % Local Property Taxes % Local General Funds % Other State Taxes % Other Local Taxes % State Borrowing %

Criteria by Which to Judge Alternative Approaches  Revenue Production  Equity  Political Acceptability  Contribution to Operational Efficiency  The measures may differ short term versus long term with respect to these criteria

Review of Current Opportunities Reassert Reliance on User Fees Raise Fuel Taxes Indexing the Fuel Taxes Shift to More Direct User Fees: tolls/congestion pricing/hot lanes/ VMT Fees Increase Borrowing….defer user fees Continue to Increase Local Sales Taxes (via Voter Approved Measures)

Raising the Fuel Tax  Has Been Popular in the Past  Increases Small in Comparison with Market Fluctuations  Easy and Cheap to Administer  Encourages Increased Fuel Economy  Regressivity Tempered by Limiting Incidence  Has Obvious Limit in Long Term as we Transition to Alternative Energy Sources

Indexing the Fuel Tax  Has Been Done Dozens of Times in States and Often Retracted  What should be the Basis of Indexing….Fuel Price, CPI, Highway Cost Index, Expenditures?  If Not Done Right Can Add to Price Volatility

Shift to More Direct User Fees  Tolls  Difficult to Implement on Existing Toll-Free Roads  Greatly Aided by Widespread Acceptance of Electronic Toll Collection  HOT Lanes  Incremental Toll Increases on Existing Roads and Bridges  Toll Financing of New Capacity

VMT Road User Charges  Technology getting Closer  GPS Measurement of Use  Unit Price Charged Based on Time of Day and Particular Facility and Particular Class of Vehicle  Very Promising for Longer Range – 20+ Years for Cars, sooner for Trucks

Increased Borrowing  Borrowing Used Less in Transportation than Other Infrastructure Programs  Interest is an Operating Cost That Can be Substantial; But Often Warranted  Borrowing Can be Justified by Timing of Flow of Costs and Benefits  Borrowing More Easily Justified for Capital Costs than Operating Costs

Local Option Transportation Taxes---Already Growing Quickly  44 Transportation Finance Ballot Measures in US in 2002  32 Local/Regional in Nature  9 Statewide  20 Dealt with sales taxes  5 Property taxes  1 Gasoline tax 9 Bond issues

Major Features of LOTTs Majority vote or supermajority Project lists/categories Sunset dates/reauthorization Implemented by local govts.

Issues Raised by LOTTs  Move Away from User Fee Philosophy  Sales Tax is Broad Based Tax  Regressive  Consistency with Regional Transportation Plans  Project Delivery  Local Authority and Responsibility  Flexibility versus Specificity  Salience of Issue of “Trust”

Issues Raised by LOTTs  Christmas Tree Measures  Pay to Play Measures may be Even Worse (California Proposition 51)  Dissociation between projects and efficiency of system

A Mixed Strategy Most Likely  Local Measures Appropriate for Local Serving Facilities (Including Transit), NOT for Major Interstates, for Example.  Local Measures Will Be a Major Transitional Finance Mechanism, but Should Not be Centerpiece of our Strategy  There is a Limit to Local Financing Capacity  Transportation Competes with Other Local Needs in Post-Proposition 13 World

Increasing Use of Tolls  New Capacity Expansion/Toll Roads  Specialized Toll Roads: Truck Only Lanes, Hot Lanes/ Electronic Tolling  Congestion Pricing in Particular Locations but Growing Gradually  Truck User Fees Before Widespread VMT Applications  A Year Transition  The Need for Revenue Will Dominate Over Reluctance to Use Toll Mechanisms

Borrowing  Some Uses, Facility Specific Focus on New Capital Expansions, Not on Operating Costs, Rehabilitation, Maintenance

Interim Bridging Measures  Fuel Tax Increases and/or Indexing Appropriate Now for Short Term Transition  Effectiveness Significant in Short Term, Weakening in a Decade or Two  Probably Devolving to States and Even to Regional Fuel Taxes More than Relying Upon National Fuel Taxes to Grow as Rapidly

Political Considerations  Reluctance of Elected Officials to Raise New Taxes is Greater than Unwillingness of Constituents to Have them  Related to Trust of Elected Officials By Citizens  Tolls: Paying Twice for Same Roads  Tolls: A Tax on Foreigners Living Abroad  Sales Taxes: Concentration Versus Dispersion  Privacy Threats Inherent in Some Approaches

That’s What I See Coming How About You? Thanks for your attention