Today’s Speakers The State of State Authorization: Regulations and Reciprocity OCICU Conference March 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 2 - Working in Health Care McGraw-Hill © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved 2-1.
Advertisements

Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.
State Authorization Program Integrity Final Rule.
Starting an ESC Chapter in Your State. Energy Services Coalition Mission To promote the benefits of, provide education on, and serve as an advocate for.
Electronic Campus The Approval Process April 24, 2013.
UPDATE ON STATE AUTHORIZATION FOR DISTANCE EDUCATION: REGULATIONS & RECIPROCITY Legal Issues in Higher Education December 12, 2013 WICHE Cooperative for.
Today’s Speakers The State of State Authorization: Regulations and Reciprocity Council of College and Military Educators January 29, 2015.
Presenters Marshall A. Hill Executive Director National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements 3005 Center Green Drive, Suite 130 Boulder,
SREB State Authorization Advisory Committee Meeting April 30-May 1, 2013 Atlanta.
Electronic Campus Process & Procedures April 22, 2013.
Southern Regional Education Board Corpus Christi, Texas April 3, 2014 State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) A Regional and National View Texas.
State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement - What Now? - Why Now? - How? Now? David Longanecker, WICHE President Jere Mock, Vice President of Programs &
Presenters Marshall A. Hill Executive Director National Council for State Authorization Reciprocity Agreements 3005 Center Green Drive, Suite 130 Boulder,
Surviving the State Authorization Roller Coaster Ride DETC Fall Workshop October 16, 2012.
State Authorization of Distance Learning CE Council Briefing November 29, 2011.
Tracking SARA: An Update on the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement November 14, 2012.
SARA: New Jersey Update. What is SARA  A uniform method across the nation which establishes a state-level reciprocity process to serve all interested.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
Past, Present & Likely Future of State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) March 2, 2015.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Adding Value to Educational Programs IEEE Educational Activities Board CEU Program 2004.
Session #34 Program Integrity: Institutional and Program Eligibility: State Authorization Sophia McArdle Fred Sellers U.S. Department of Education Note:
Emerging Policy Issues in Distance Learning SHEEO Annual Meeting July, Seattle, Washington Marshall A. Hill Executive Director, Nebraska Coordinating.
Maxim Healthcare Services. Health Care Services Medical Staffing- providing personnel to service medical facilities Medical Staffing- providing personnel.
Mosby items and derived items © 2011, 2008 by Mosby Inc., an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 4 Nursing Licensure and Certification.
Southern Regional Education Board SREB State Authorization Regional Reciprocity (S-SARA) Regional Forum January 21, 2014.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Higher Education Web Portals: Serving State and Student Transfer Needs “If you build it, will they come?” Russell Poulin, Deputy Director WICHE Cooperative.
UMassOnline HEA Debriefing April 19, Introduction Background Why We are Doing This What We Hope to Achieve 2.
Who is SARA? And should I know her?. SARA  S tate A uthorization R eciprocity A greement  Establishes comparable national standards for interstate offering.
STATE AUTHORIZATION REGULATION: UPDATE AND STATE EXAMPLES Jeannie Yockey-Fine, Dow Lohnes PLLC Marianne Boeke, National Center for Higher Education Management.
July 18, 2014 Jenny Parks, Director, M-SARA, Midwestern Higher Education Compact (MHEC) 1.
Establishing SARA, the State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement WCET State Authorization Network November 13-14, 2013 Denver, CO.
Primary Functions of Program Directors Leadership Curriculum Management and Coordination Coordinate Program Assessment Marketing, Recruitment and Admissions.
Adult Student Success Linking Learning and Work. CAEL’s Overarching Goal: Meaningful Learning, Credentials, and Work for Every Adult For more than 40.
“SARA:” State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement A Process To Make State Authorization More Uniform, Effective and Efficient April, 2012.
The State of State Authorization: Results of a National Inventory Marianne Boeke National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS) DETC.
“State Authorization” of Distance Education Challenges/Barriers/Opportunities Shellie L. Haut September 16, 2015.
October 14, 2015 Michigan Workshop on the Midwestern State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (M-SARA) University Club, Michigan State University 1.
October 14, 2015 Michigan Workshop on the Midwestern State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (M-SARA) University Club, Michigan State University 1.
A Thorny Process with Prickly Repercussions Martha Ellis, Ph.D. University of Texas System.
State Authorization Monday, April 11, 2011 Tuesday, April 12, 2011.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Mosby items and derived items © 2011, 2008 by Mosby Inc., an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Mosby items and derived items © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 4 Nursing Licensure and Certification.
SREB Educational Technology Cooperative 2015 Spring Workshop Series State Authorization Update Wanda Barker – Director Educational Technology Cooperative.
1 U.S. Government role in higher education and accreditation BACKGROUNDGROWTH SITUATION TODAY.
An Overview of State Authorization and SARA An MCCA Webinar Wednesday, November 4, 2015.
Michael Keeling, PE, Esq. Partner Keeling Law Offices, PC NOTE: Information contained in this presentation is intended for informational.
CONNECT Events and Groups LEARN News and Views ADVANCE Policies and Practices New Federal Regulations on State Authorization of Distance Education Distance.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Todd Digby Minnesota State Colleges & Universities.
State Authorization Updates on Regulations, Reciprocity, and Complaint Notifications Council of College and Military Educators – February 2016.
SECRRA and SARA Updates March 4,
North Carolina Community College System 2016 DL Directors Institute March 14, 2016.
Pennsylvania SARA Meeting
SARA Gets You Out of Jeopardy!
STATE to STATE Distance Education Compliance
Private Institution Regulation by SCHEV
SARA State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement for Distance Education
State Authorization and SARA: How Did We Get Here?
State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) Participation
DE Coordinator’s November 2012 Telephone Meeting
MoKanSAN Summit Kansas City, Missouri January 8, 2018.
Facilities Forum State-by-State Analysis of Demographics, Affordability, and Appropriations.
Legal Issues in Higher Education December 12, 2013 Russ Poulin
Taxonomy of higher education governance structures
Florida Association of Veteran Education Specialists (FAVES 2016)
Mary Larson Director, Student Access Programs and Services
Welcome to the NC-SARA Webcast SARA Notification Requirements
Chancellor Glen D. Johnson
Presentation transcript:

Today’s Speakers The State of State Authorization: Regulations and Reciprocity OCICU Conference March 2015

Agenda  Basic Principles  State Regulations  Federal Regulations  Reciprocity and SARA  Questions and Answers 2

State Authorization – Basic Principles Basic Principle 1: If you are crossing a state line to serve a student, check if you need to seek authorization. 3

State Authorization – Basic Principles Basic Principle 2: Two types of authorization in each state: 1) Institutional – all activities you do in a state. 2) Licensure – professional programs. 4

State Authorization – Basic Principles Basic Principle 3: The states view this as Consumer Protection. 5

State Authorization – Basic Principles Basic Principle 4: The answer to nearly every question is: IT DEPENDS!!!!! 6

State Regulations States expect institutions to follow their laws and regulations.  Use SHEEO Web Surveys:  There is no list of “easy” or “hard” states in terms of state authorization:  For profit / not-for profit / public / private  Offering distance education vs. clinicals/internships vs. on the ground facilities  Number of students (Maryland Example) 7

State Regulations A public institution offering only distance education in another state:  9 states require approval of public degree- granting institutions (100% online programs): Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Utah, and Wyoming  A few others require you to register or apply for an exemption. 8

State Regulations Triggers of physical presence: Physical Location Administrative Office Direct Marketing Localized Advertising Required Proctoring Contracted Services Practical Experiences (clinical, student teaching) Having an Employee in a State 9

State Regulations Licensure programs 10 Nursing Teacher Education Psychology Medical Technician Funeral Services Physician Assistants

State Regulations – Military Students  Most states do not distinguish between enrolling or recruiting students on military bases versus enrolling or recruiting others residing in a state.  Currently only a handful of states expressly exempt institutions operating on military bases (Arkansas, Georgia, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and West Virginia).  What about State of Residence? 11

State Regulations – Consequences What can happen to an institution that does not comply with state laws?  Cease and desist orders.  Possible fines and institutional sanctions, etc.  Lawsuits.  Domino effect with accreditors and US ED.  Damaged reputation! 12

Federal Regulation – Chapter 34, §600.9(c) “If an institution is offering postsecondary education through distance or correspondence education to students in a State in which it is not physically located or in which it is otherwise subject to State jurisdiction as determined by the State…” 13

Federal Regulation – Chapter 34, §600.9(c) “…the institution must meet any State requirements for it to be legally offering distance or correspondence education in that State. An institution must be able to document to the Secretary the State’s approval upon request.” 14

Federal Regulation – Chapter 34, §600.9(c) “…the institution must meet any State requirements for it to be legally offering distance or correspondence education in that State. An institution must be able to document to the Secretary the State’s approval upon request.”

Federal Regulation Negotiated Rulemaking The Bottom Line  Department “pauses” on state authorization. (  NO federal regulation.  NO federal deadline. 16 For more information:

Federal Regulations  Representative Foxx Bill.  New DoD MOU expects you to comply with state regulations.  States STILL EXPECT YOU TO COMPLY and their deadline is NOW. 17 For more information:

Federal Regulations Complaint Process: Institutions must provide current and prospective students with contact information for filing complaints with their accrediting agency and with the appropriate state agencies. Deadline was July 1,

Federal Regulations These four items should be easily found on your institution’s website: 1. Information about your institution’s complaint process. 2. Accreditation information (including their complaint processes). 3. State agency complaint web links. 4. State authorization information. 19

20 There has to be a better way!

Reciprocity 21 State Authorization Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) The Current Process: Institutions seek authorization from every state or territory where they hope to serve students. The SARA Process: Institutions seek approval from their home states which have joined SARA and the state agency then regulates those institutions with regard to the export of online education across state lines to host states. SARA Will Help Reduce Costs To Institutions and Students

Reciprocity 22 Basic Principles  State-to-state agreement  Voluntary  States may join (voluntary). A state applies through its regional compact. If state does not join, its institutions are ineligible.  Institutions may join (voluntary). States review and approve institutions within their own state. Institutions must be accredited and degree-granting. Open to all sectors: public institutions, independent institutions, non-profit and for-profit.

Reciprocity 23 Basic Principles  Sets a uniform set of “triggers” for physical presence.  Marketing and recruiting.  Servers and instructors in other SARA states.  Proctored exams.  Class field trips across state lines among SARA states.  More clinical and experiential learning.  Some limited on-the-ground learning.

Reciprocity 24 Basic Principles  Preserves state oversight of on-the-ground activities.  SARA states agree to impose no additional fees or requirements on institutions from other SARA states.  Shifts principal oversight responsibility to the “home state.”

Reciprocity 25 Structure of SARA  Regional compacts work with their states.  Midwestern Higher Education Compact.  New England Board of Higher Education.  Southern Regional Education Board.  Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.  National Council for SARA (NC-SARA) works with all states.  Comprehensive national coverage.  Financial plan to support operations.

Regional Compacts Reciprocity Agreement (SARA) WICHE MHEC NEBHE SREB

Reciprocity – As of March 17, SARA Progress 20 States

Reciprocity 28 Institutional Costs  Cost to get approved by the state, if any.  Yearly fees to SARA:  $2,000 – FTE LT 2,500.  $4,000 – FTE of 2,501 to 9,999.  $6,000 – FTE 10,000 or greater.

Reciprocity 29 SARA Important Points:  SARA has no effect on state professional licensing requirements.  SARA has no effect on a state’s requirement for out-of-state colleges to register with the secretary of state or other state registry.  SARA allows for non-credit activities.

What Should Your Institution Be Doing? 30  Proceed – don’t wait!  Know where you students are – Have a process and follow it.  Know what your institution is doing in other states.  Communication is a two-way street!

31  Make strategic decisions.  Prioritize which states to seek authorization in.  Assess your adversity to risk.  Include key personnel (president, provost, counsel, department heads) in key decisions.  Stay up to date on SARA.  Will your state join?  Will other states where you have students join?  Will your institution join?

Today’s Speakers Marianne Boeke, Ph.D. Senior Research Associate National Center for Higher Education Management Systems Questions???

Resources  WCET state authorization website  WCET State Authorization Network  WCET Frontiers Blog:  SHEEO (list of state regulations) 33

Resources 34  10 Steps You Can Take to Begin the State Authorization Process  Federal Regulation 600.9(c)  Military Students and State Authorization WCETTalkingPoints-State-Auth-Military-Nov2013.pdf  National Council of State Boards of Nursing Welcome to New York Photo: