War Profiteering: Proposed Legislation 2007 NDIA Educational Seminar San Antonio, TX March 12, 2007 Mark S. Dostal PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chicago,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 UAA – ACCT 316 – Fall 2003 Accounting Information Systems Dr. Fred Barbee.
Advertisements

Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) Overview
Chapter Twelve Financial Reporting and the Securities and Exchange Commission Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
John Palatiello, MAPPS Executive Director Kevin Pomfret, Centre for Spatial Law and Policy presentation to NGAC December 7, Washington, DC.
1 Legal Framework for the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (SACHDNC) Legal Framework for the Secretary’s.
1 Case Title: Combating Trafficking in Persons ( Implementation of Section 3(b) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2003) (FAR.
Regulatory Paralysis after Business Roundtable A preview of the impact of “regulatory reform” legislation?
8 - 1 ©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures Chapter 8.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
Introducing Transparency in Corporate Groups : Korean Context Introducing Transparency in Corporate Groups : Korean Context Introducing Transparency in.
© 2007 by West Legal Studies in Business / A Division of Thomson Learning CHAPTER 20 Promoting Competition.
GAO and the Federal Procurement System Presentation to the Department of Commerce 4 May 2011 For more information, contact Bill Woods,
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission Acts and How They Can Be Improved.
Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures Chapter 8.
E-Commerce: Legal and Practical Issues Legal Issues: Security – December 2, 2005 Stephen M. Foxman Philadelphia.
WELCOME Annual Meeting & Compliance Seminar. Code of Conduct - Impact on Corporate Culture by Andy Greenstein Knight Capital Group, Inc.
Chapter 10 White-Collar and Organized Crime. Introduction ► White-collar crimes – criminal offenses committed by people in upper socioeconomic strata.
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
1 FAA Reform: Congressional Staff Briefing January 24, 1996.
Introduction to Financial Statements and Other Financial Reporting Topics COPYRIGHT ©2007 Thomson South-Western, a part of the Thomson Corporation. Thomson,
New York Stock Exchange Enron was a publicly traded company whose shares were listed on the New York Stock Exchange and were bought, held and sold by individuals.
Auditing II Unit 1 : Audit Procedures Unit 2: Audit of Limited Companies Unit 3: Audit of Government Companies.
Ethics in Finance PGDM-Session 7.
BIOTECH SUPPLY October 8-9, 2012 Crowne Plaza, Foster City, CA California Transparency in Supply Chain Act, SB 657, Chapter 556, Statutes of 2010 David.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Other Laws (Primarily for E-Government) COEN 351.
© 2013 South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 | Slide 1 Being Ethical and Socially Responsible Chapter2.
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT Alan Chvotkin Senior Vice President and Counsel Professional Services Council DEFENSE ACQUISITION.
2 Breakout Session # Presented by Dr. Tomi Bryan, President & General Counsel FedLinx, Inc. Date April 15, 2008 Time3:20p.m. – 4:20 p.m. A Blueprint for.
Implementation Issues of Sarbanes-Oxley CASE Presentation September 23, 2004 By Denise Farnan.
©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures Chapter 8.
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Legal, Regulatory, and Political Issues
Recent Developments In Federal Procurement Ed Kinberg Fellow, NCMA Kinberg & Associates, LLC Melbourne, Florida.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures Chapter 8.
NDIA Small Business Division Subcommittee on Improving IP Protection for Small Businesses Mission Statement Overview Alison Brown.
The AIRCRAFT SAFETY ACT of 2000 H.R Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century.
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures Chapter 8.
Ethics in Finance.
JFS 3/31/08 COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCUREMENT NDIA Educational Seminar March 31, 2008.
Work Session on Ombudsman ordinance and Proposed Changes to the Local Code of Ethics Board of County Commissioners April 26, 2011.
Ensuring the Integrity of Financial Information Ensuring the Integrity of Financial Information C H A P T E R 5.
SEC -is the primary regulatory over the capital markets and their participants.
CURRENT TRANSFER PRICING SITUATION IN ARGENTINA Mexico D.F., December 1, 1999.
FY-07 Emergency Supplemental $93.4 Billion –Continuing the Fight $68.6 Billion –Reconstructing the Force $13.9 –Enhancing US/Iraq Forces.
Confidentiality of Government Records and Reasons for Refusal Presentation to Boards and Committees 18 th November 2008 Carole Excell FOI Unit.
Integrity: Vendor’s Role Christian Laverdure Senior Director Policy, Risk, Integrity and Strategic Management Sector Acquisitions Branch Public Works and.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.17-1 Chapter 17 Investor Protection and E- Securities Transactions.
SEC. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND BANKING ACT Max, Alex, Carly.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INDUSTRY COMPANIES BILL [B ] 13 August 2008 By: Bernard Peter Agulhas – Acting Chief Executive.
1 Satellite Export Control Policy: Current Status and Prospects for Reform Patricia Cooper President, Satellite Industry Association.
Internal Audit & Internal Controls Companies Act 2013.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act a.k.a. “SOX” Georgia CTAE Resource Network Curriculum Office, February 2009 To accompany curriculum for the Georgia Peach State Career.
Chapter-1 Introduction to Tax Accounting Purpose of Tax Accounting: The primary purpose of tax accounting is to determine taxable income, preparation of.
Marketing Principles CHAPTER 6 SECTION 1.  Government actions have a great impact on business and its operations.  The US Government has three branches:
Warren Reeve Duchac Corporate Financial Accounting 14e Chapter 1 Introduction to Adjusting and Business.
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 10/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures Chapter.
Provisions Regarding Economic Development  Title IV, Section 409: Congressional Task Force on Economic Growth in Puerto Rico  Title V: Puerto Rico Infrastructure.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures Chapter 8.
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Chapter 22 Promoting Competition.
Congress and the Committees System
Value Creation and Successful Management
Audit Planning and Analytical Procedures
Government.
4th Quarter 2016 Earnings Call
Corporations: Organization, Stock Transactions, and Dividends
Presentation transcript:

War Profiteering: Proposed Legislation 2007 NDIA Educational Seminar San Antonio, TX March 12, 2007 Mark S. Dostal PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chicago, IL

Definitions Background – Excessive Profits Proposed Legislation

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary Main Entry: prof·i·teer Pronunciation: \prä-fə-tir\ Function: noun Date: 1912 one who makes what is considered an unreasonable profit especially on the sale of essential goods during times of emergency — profiteer intransitive verb

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia A war profiteer is any person or organization that improperly profits from warfare or by selling weapons and other goods to parties at war. The term has strong negative connotations. Currently, most established arms manufacturers, defense contractors, and other companies doing business with Western militaries enjoy good reputations. Many are publicly traded entities who proudly brandish their government contracts as evidence of financial strength. A company whose products are "in the fight" often advertises the fact as proof of their quality, or simply out of patriotic pride. Civilian-legal versions of certain items, such as personal firearms, knives, boots, and even vehicles are openly sought after on the legitimate market. The positions of cooks, technicians, truck drivers, and others who support military operations are increasingly becoming privatized. In this environment, simply making money from war is hardly a punishable crime. Nevertheless, those at intersection of military power and profitable business have drawn heavy criticism on moral grounds. A company seen as overstepping its bounds by putting its own bottom line ahead of the war effort or the welfare of soldiers can come in for serious attacks.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Background: Excessive Profits Under the Renegotiation Acts The Renegotiation Act, which was enacted on April 28, 1942, required contractors to provide written consent to compulsory renegotiation of contracts issued before December 31, 1945 for war goods and made express provision for a redetermination of excessive profits, as determined by the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board. In the Renegotiation Act of 1951, 50 U.S.C et seq., which amended previous versions of the Renegotiation Act, Congress set forth the means of determining the existence and extent of excessive profits in a series of guidelines known as “statutory factors.” See 50 U.S.C. App. § 1213(e). –Statutory factors required the consideration of the character of the renegotiated contractor’s business, the net worth and capital employed, and the reasonableness of the contractor’s costs and profits that were to be assembled in order to construct a reasonably accurate comparison of the contractor’s performance in the fiscal year under renegotiation with the performance of similar firms. –Statutory factors used to provide the means of identifying contractors sufficiently similar to the renegotiated contractor that were considered to be a part of the renegotiated contractor’s industry, and to determine the pricing policy and profit structure of that industry. –Reviewing authority would consider the renegotiated contractor’s efficiency, the business risks assumed by that contractor, and that contractor’s contribution to the defense effort, to ascertain how well the contractor fared against other firms in its industry on points affecting profitability in a competitive market.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Background: Excessive Profits Under the Renegotiation Acts (con’t) Pursuant to Public Law , Title V, § 501, Oct. 10, 1978 (92 Stat. 1043), the Renegotiation Act of 1951 became inapplicable to contracts performed after September 30, H.R 3020, the “War Profiteering Prohibition Act of 1985”, a bill to revise and reinstate the Renegotiation Act of Statement of Paul Math, Associate Director National Security and International Affairs Division, GAO, before the Subcommittee on General Oversight and Investigations of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs (10/30/85): –Concern about increase in defense spending and ability of DoD to ensure contractor profit levels are fair and equitable. –Clear understanding that contractors must anticipate earning an adequate profit before they will invest shareholder resources to perform government contracts; significant effect on industrial base. –Profit ’76 study: low levels of profit in the 1970s believed to result in low levels of contractor investment; develop policy to encourage capital investment to reduce production costs. –Defense Financial and Investment Review (DFAIR): along the line of Profit ’76, but examined DoD financing and pricing policies as well as integration with profit policy. –GAO Recommendation: rather than reestablish the Renegotiation Board, enact legislation to provide a systematic procedure to periodically review DoD’s profit policy. GAO “Proposal for Program to Study the Profitability of Government Contractors” (11/86)

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress S. 119 – “War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007”, Introduced January 4, 2007 H. R. 400 – “War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007”, Introduced January 11, 2007 S. 606 – “Honest Leadership and Accountability in Contracting Act of 2007”, Introduced February 15, 2007

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress S.119 – War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007 Introduced by Senator Leahy (D-VT) and joined by Senators Bingaman (D-NM), Harkin (D-IA), Kerry (D- MA), Lautenberg (D-LA), Rockefeller (D-WV), Dorgan (D- ND), Schumer (D-NY), Wyden (D-OR), Cantwell (D-WA), Clinton (D-NY), Menendez (D-NJ), and Nelson (D-NE). SEC. 2 Prohibition of Profiteering amends 18 U.S.C. Chapter 47 by adding at the end the following: §1039. War profiteering and fraud relating to military action, relief, and reconstruction efforts.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress S.119 – War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007 (con’t) (a) Prohibition- (1)IN GENERAL- Whoever, in any matter involving a contract or the provision of goods or services, directly or indirectly, in connection with a war or military action or relief or reconstruction activities within the jurisdiction of the United States Government, knowingly and willfully— (A)(ii) materially overvalues any good or service with the specific intent to defraud and excessively profit from the war, military action, or relief or reconstruction activities; shall be fined under paragraph (2), imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both;...

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress S.119 – War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007 (con’t) (a) Prohibition- (2)FINE- A person convicted of an offense under paragraph (1) may be fined the greater of-- (A) $1,000,000; or (B) if such person derives profits or other proceeds from the offense, not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress H. R War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007 Introduced by Representative Abercrombie (D-HI). SEC. 2 Prohibition of Profiteering amends 18 U.S.C. Chapter 47 by adding at the end the following: §1039. War profiteering and fraud relating to military action, relief, and reconstruction efforts.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress H. R War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007 (con’t) (a) Prohibition- (1)IN GENERAL- Whoever, in any matter involving a contract or the provision of goods or services, directly or indirectly, in connection with a war or military action or relief or reconstruction activities within the jurisdiction of the United States Government, knowingly and willfully— (A)(ii) materially overvalues any good or service with the specific intent to defraud and excessively profit from the war, military action, or relief or reconstruction activities; shall be fined under paragraph (2), imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress H. R War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007 (con’t) (a) Prohibition- (2)FINE- A person convicted of an offense under paragraph (1) may be fined the greater of-- (A) $1,000,000; or (B) if such person derives profits or other proceeds from the offense, not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress S.606 – Honest Leadership and Accountability in Contracting Act of 2007 Introduced by Senator Dorgan (D-ND) and joined by Senators Bayh (D-IN), Bingaman (D-NM), Boxer (D-CA), Brown (D-OH), Clinton (D-NY), Conrad (D-ND), Durbin (D-IL), Feingold (D-WI), Feinstein (D-CA), Harkin (D-IA), Kennedy (D-MA), Kerry (D-MA), Landrieu (D-NJ), Lautenberg (D-LA), Leahy (D-VT), Menendez (D-NJ), Mikulski (D-MD), Nelson (D-NE), Obama (D-IL), Pryor (D-AR), Reid (D-NV), and Wyden (D-OR). SEC. 101 Prohibition of War Profiteering and Fraud SEC. 102 Suspension and Debarment of Unethical Contractors

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress S.606 – Honest Leadership and Accountability in Contracting Act of 2007 (con’t) SEC. 101 Prohibition of War Profiteering and Fraud amends 18 U.S.C. Chapter 47 by adding to §1039. War profiteering and fraud. (a) Prohibition- (1)IN GENERAL- Whoever, in any matter involving a contract or the provision of goods or services, directly or indirectly, in connection with a war or military action knowingly and willfully-- (D) materially overvalues any good or service with the specific intent to defraud and excessively profit from the war or military action; shall be fined under paragraph (2), imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress S.606 – Honest Leadership and Accountability in Contracting Act of 2007 (con’t) SEC. 101 Prohibition of War Profiteering and Fraud amends 18 U.S.C. Chapter 47 by adding to §1039. War profiteering and fraud. (a) Prohibition- (2)FINE- A person convicted of an offense under paragraph (1) may be fined the greater of-- (A) $1,000,000; or (B) if such person derives profits or other proceeds from the offense, not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Proposed War Profiteering Legislation, 110 th Congress S.606 – Honest Leadership and Accountability in Contracting Act of 2007 (con’t) SEC Suspension and Debarment of Unethical Contractors (a) In General- Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Acquisition Regulation issued pursuant to section 25 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act (41 U.S.C. 421) shall be revised to provide that no prospective contractor shall be considered to have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics if it-- (1)Has exhibited a pattern of overcharging the Government under Federal contracts; or (2)Has exhibited a pattern of failing to comply with the law, including tax, labor and employment, environmental, antitrust, and consumer protection laws.

Profitability and Risk Panel Page NDIA Educational Seminar Other Proposed Legislation, 110 th Congress S. 274 – “Federal Employee Protection of Disclosures Act”, Introduced January 11, 2007 S. 680 – “Accountability in Government Contracting Act of 2007”, Introduced February 17, 2007 H. R. 984 – “Executive Branch Reform Act of 2007”, Introduced February 12, 2007 H. R. 985 – “Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2007”, Introduced February 12, 2007

Profitability and Risk Panel 2007 NDIA Educational Seminar San Antonio, TX