The Revised CDER Regional Center Train-The-Trainers 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What It Means for HCS Participants & Their Families Hill Country Community MHMR Center March 23, 2010 Changing from HCS Case Management to Service Coordination.
Advertisements

Development of School Mental Health Programs Sheldon D. Glass, M.Ed, M.D. Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Member, National.
Autism Waiver. Approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and became effective Includes 8 services; services are available.
Physical Disabilities Waiver – Resource Utilization Improvement Mandatory Information Sessions for Targeted Case Managers: April 11, 13, 17 or 19, 2012.
NECTAC Webinar Series on Early Identification and Part C Eligibility Session 2: A Rigorous Definition of Developmental Delay March 10, 2010 Steven Rosenberg,
Pervasive Level Training. Background and Scope Approved 11/4/2004 State of Arkansas lost $ because pervasive level wasn’t prior approved Major oversight.
Infant AND TODDLER SENSORY PROFILE
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Project Aim To provide training for Early Childhood Care Providers (ECCPs) on Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) principles within the EIBI autism classroom,
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition – DSM-5 Substance Use Disorders and American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM)
Redesigned Nurse Residency Program & Nurse Residency Program Study
What School Nurses Need to Know Karen Erwin, RN, MSN Education School Nurse Consultant July, 2014.
Comparison: Traditional vs. Outcome Project Evaluative Processes Craig McClure, MD Educational Outcomes Service Group University of Arizona December 2004.
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
Assessment of Special Education Students
Survey Designs EDUC 640- Dr. William M. Bauer
The Eligibility Determination Process Kathleen Murphy, Ph.D. Director of Eligibility Connecticut Department of Developmental Services 1.
Where do we go from here????. First – a Little History.
The Education Adjustment Program Profile – Revised.
VANCE-GRANVILLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISABILITY SERVICES VGCC Disability Services Presented by Cathy A. Davis, VGCC Disability Counselor.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Questionnaires and Interviews
Adolescent Sexual Health Work Group (ASHWG)
T HE I NTERGENERATIONAL O BSERVATION S CALE : P ROCESS, P ROCEDURES, AND O UTCOMES Background Shannon Jarrott, Ph.D., Cynthia L. Smith, Ph.D., & Aaron.
Assessment with Children Chapter 1. Overview of Assessment with Children Multiple Informants – Child, parents, other family, teachers – Necessary for.
Quality Assurance: Looking for Quality Data 1 I know it is in here somewhere Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.
Summary of Assessment Reports and Gap Analysis
Outcome Assessment Reporting for Undergraduate Programs Stefani Dawn and Bill Bogley Office of Academic Programs, Assessment & Accreditation Faculty Senate,
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
10/7/20151 CT Level of Need Assessment and Screening Tool.
Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Chapter Seven Individuals With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5-1 ADHD.
Chapter 1 What is Psychology?. Psychologists are interested in studying people’s emotions, or feelings, because they can affect both behavior and mental.
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
The Transition Process “ BRIDGING THE GAP” ECI Project TYKE to KATY ISD (Revised 12-12)
Arbitre Consulting, Inc.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Adult Ambulatory.
DDS Consumer Advisory Committee Learn About National Core Indicators © 2010 Board Resource Center.
UBC Dietetics Major FEED Teleconference session: Modules/Forms update & Preceptor Orientation Wednesday, September 2, 2015 from h Call into the.
The CICC Discovery Tool and Referral System Description of The CICC Discovery Tool and Referral System DESC1.
Guidance Training CFR §483.75(i) F501 Medical Director.
FAQs Individual Activity Applications Continuing Nursing Education (CNE) 2015.
1 A QTS Web Training Writing Consumer Education & Referral Outcomes.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Group members Gurpreet kaur Amritpal kaur Arshdeep singh uppal Sandeep kaur bhullar.
Crisis Stabilization under the ID Waiver Division of Developmental Services Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services 2013 Provider Training.
Employee Development Human Resource Management. Employee Training: Trends n Four economic and demographic trends u Unskilled and undereducated youth u.
February 2010 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education 1 School Test Coordinator Training February 15, 2010 Special Populations.
Implementation and Sustainability in the US National EBP Project Gary R. Bond Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center Lebanon, NH, USA May 27, 2014 CORE.
Communicating for Persons Centered, Relationship Oriented Counseling.
Learning today. Transforming tomorrow. REED: Review Existing Evaluation Data 55 slides.
Universal Design for Learning in Public Policy. The National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard NIMAS (2006) A harbinger of the future.
From Program Theory to Systems Theory: Using Logic Analysis to Re- conceptualize an Evaluation Lori L. Bakken, PhD; Jonathan M. Ross, MD; Curtis A. Olson,
UBC Dietetics Major Modules and Forms Update
The CRİTERİON-RELATED VALIDITY of the TURKISH VINELAND – II on CLINICAL GROUPS (Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified - PDD.
School Problems in Children & Adolescents Patricia McGuire, M.D. September 16, 2006.
Presentation by ET Marchak Consulting November 30, :45 pm – 3:00 pm.
Job Task Analysis for the Certified Pediatric Nurse (CPN®) Exam
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
PSY 450 OUTLET Lessons in Excellence- -psy450outlet.com.
Made for individuals ages birth to 89 years
G0507 Care Management Services for Behavioral Health Conditions
Assessment Chapter 3.
Classification and Treatment Plans
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12
Presentation transcript:

The Revised CDER Regional Center Train-The-Trainers 2007

Today’s Training Objectives Train-the-trainer’s session to provide: Training resources Background on revision process Details about the new CDER Instructions for completing the new CDER

Presentation Order 1. Revised Evaluation Element and New Personal Outcomes Element 2. Waiver Level of Care Eligibility 3. Revisions to the Diagnostic Element

Evaluation and Personal Outcomes Elements Assessing Consumer Abilities and Outcomes

Background and Development Evaluation and Personal Outcomes Elements

Background and Development Issues with Original CDER Resulting in inaccurate and/or incomplete data Outdated Focus on disabilities rather than abilities Not useful to IPP process Doesn’t assess health & safety, quality of life or outcomes

Background and Development Project Consultants Dr. Jamie McCreary Dr. Harold Stanislaw Department of Psychology California State University, Stanislaus

Goals for revision Requirements for the New CDER Focus on consumer abilities Useful for program planning Shorter and easier to use Continuity with existing CDER data Improve ability to provide reliable data

Background and Development Revision Process User Surveys  Identified items to retain, delete, add and reword Analysis of Data Requests  Identified type of information most frequently requested to ensure continued availability of data

Background and Development Revision Process Scientific Literature Review  Identified published studies based on CDER data to ensure continued availability of data needed for scientific research Field Testing  To confirm the validity and reliability of the new CDER

Evaluation and Personal Outcomes Elements Comparison of “Old CDER” to “New CDER”

The Revised CDER Evaluation and Personal Outcomes Elements New CDER: 46 Items 2 Major Sections  Evaluation Element  Personal Outcomes Element Consistent Number of Response Options Per Section Original CDER: 66 Items 7 Domains Responses Range From 3 to 9 Options Throughout

Rate consumer abilities vs. categorizing them Use of informed sources to obtain information Snapshot at a particular point in time Items applicable to all consumers regardless of age or challenges Response options to address when a question can’t be answered Highlights The Revised CDER Evaluation Element

Revised Evaluation Element Content

The Evaluation Element: Provides information for identifying services and supports 2 Sections  Skills Demonstrated in Living (14 items)  Challenging Behaviors (6 items ) The Revised CDER Evaluation Element

The Evaluation Element Information provided by a person directly involved with consumer on a daily basis during a specified time period  Skills Demonstrated in Daily Living At least 1 week of the preceding 6 months  Challenging Behaviors At least 2 months of the preceding 12 months The Revised CDER Evaluation Element

New Personal Outcomes Element Content

The Personal Outcomes Element: Provides information about quality of life and well being 3 Sections  Physical and Social Environment (13 items)  Health and Safety (3 items)  Consumer Survey (10 items) The New CDER Personal Outcomes Element

The Personal Outcomes Element Information provided by knowledgeable person involved with the consumer  Physical & Social Environment = Sufficiently knowledgeable to provide accurate, unbiased picture of consumer’s current situation  Health & Safety = Sufficiently knowledgeable to provide accurate, unbiased picture of consumer’s situation during the preceding 12 months The New CDER Personal Outcomes Element

The Personal Outcomes Element  Consumer Quality of Life Survey = Only the consumer can respond to these items Items designed to capture consumers own feelings Consumers provide the information without someone else interpreting responses The New CDER Personal Outcomes Element

Completing the New CDER Evaluation and Personal Outcomes Elements

Conducting Interviews Present items conversationally Do not read response items Change order of items as needed Completing the New CDER

Consumer Survey Interviews Build rapport and create neutral environment Paraphrase and personalize items Use the keywords or phrases included in the items Translation vs. Interpretation of responses

Completing the New CDER Choosing Response Options Consistent number of options in each section 4 or 5 point scales Select options that best describe typical behavior Additional options when items cannot be answered

Completing the New CDER The Consumer Survey 3 point scale  Negative Response  Ambivalent Response  Positive Response Additional options when any item cannot be answered Special options when entire survey cannot be completed

Training Resources Evaluation and Personal Outcomes Elements

Training Resources DVD  Tutorial for group or individualized training  Review questions and quizzes  Designed for both initial and periodic refresher training Training Manual (available at  Review questions and quizzes  Glossary  FAQs

Waiver Level of Care Eligibility Evaluation and Personal Outcomes Elements

Background and Development Revised CDER Diagnostic Element

Background and Development Issues Resulting in inaccurate and/or incomplete data Outdated Terminology Does Not Reflect Current Medical Knowledge and Practices

Background and Development Goals for Revision Revise in Phases Prioritize Items For Revision Ensure Applicability For Both RCs and DCs

Background and Development Revision Process Participants: ARCA physicians and chief counselors DC Physicians and Clinical Staff DDS clinical staff The Wellness Advisory Committee

Revised Diagnostic Element Content

Cerebral Palsy Item 17: Presence of Cerebral Palsy Item 19: Severity of Motor Dysfunction Item 20: Type of Motor Dysfunction Item 22: Condition Impact

Autism Item 23a: Presence of Autistic Disorder Item 23b: Presence of Other PDD Item 26: Condition Impact

Epilepsy/Seizure Disorder Items 27a - 29a: Type of Seizure Items 27c - 29c: Condition Impact

Psychiatric Disorders (Previously Mental Disorders) Specifies the use of the DSM-IV rather than the DSM-III Items 50c - 53c: Condition Impact

Chronic Major Medical Conditions Items 54b – 59b: Condition Impact Multiple Conditions: Only Top 6 Transmit to DDS

Other Developmental Disability Adds Item 33: Other Disability (Y/N)

Resources Diagnostic Element

Resources Available at Revised Form Revised Manual Sections Under Development DSM Crosswalk

The Revised CDER Next Steps For Regional Centers

The Revised CDER Questions?

Contact Information CDER: Waiver Sue Boucher Jim Knight (916) (916)