Maaori Responsive Research Perspectives from Counties Manukau.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AN EXPLORATION OF THE END OF LIFE CARE NEEDS OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES: DEVELOPING A MODEL OF SERVICE DELIVERY– A PROTOCOL Mr. Kumaresan.
Advertisements

Implementing NICE guidance
Diversity Issues in Research Charlotte Brown, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychiatry Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic PMBC Summer Institute, Pittsburgh,
Bridging the gap between good practice principles and research study realities. Using case studies to build descriptors of the public involvement role.
CENTRE FOR EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Ka Hikitia – Implications and Implementation Facilitator: Colleen Douglas
An Introduction to the Ethics Review Procedure Lindsay Unwin: Research & Innovation Services, UREC Secretary.
Experiences of Patient and Public involvement in the Research Process Roma Maguire Senior Research Fellow Cancer Care Research Team School of Nursing and.
NMAHP – Readiness for eHealth Heather Strachan NMAHP eHealth Lead eHealth Directorate Scottish Government.
Ahakoa Akina a tai, Akina a hau Pērā ki te toka! He toka tū, toka ahuru Toka Tū - Standing strong and finding ways to ensure Māori participation in an.
Health Disparities and the Intercultural Cancer Council (ICC) Pamela K. Brown, Associate Director Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center Chair, ICC.
Psychiatry Victorian Transcultural Psychiatry Unit Harry Minas Victorian Transcultural Psychiatry Unit Centre for International Mental.
Ethical Principles and the Practice of Qualitative Research: Insights from a social science research project Professor Lindsay Prior School of Sociology,
Evaluation of the NZGG Suicide and Self-Harm Prevention Collaborative Julian King and Michelle Moss 10 September 2010 Julian King & Associates Limited.
Clinician’s Impression of Clinical Governance
Shared decision making and Australian general practitioner training Dr Ronald McCoy, Education Strategy Senior Advisor, Royal Australian College of General.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.
Assessing methods of community engagement in health care Professor Jonathan Tritter Special Advisor on Involvement Managing Resources and Engaging Users.
CORE COMPETENCIES IN CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH: The Child Health Perspective I. Clinical & Translational Research Questions: Extract information.
Kupu Taurangi Hauora o Aotearoa
The Research Project: ethical approval process
Kupu Taurangi Hauora o Aotearoa. Health and Disability Consumer Representative Training MODULE ONE The New Zealand health and disability context.
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Development Cooperation Training course Brussels, 29 th + 30 th November 2012 Module 7: Implementation of disability.
Engaging Service Users – Resources for Qualitative Research (CRSI Workshop 10 th June 2009) An example of qualitative research Helena O Connor.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
Patient Information Recall Systems. Learning objectives Understand the link between population health data and chronic disease care Know what information.
Ethics and Regulatory Approvals Alison Robertson CMDHB Research Officer.
AHPs an integral part of the public health workforce Linda Hindle, Allied Health Professions Lead.
Perioperative fasting guideline Getting it into practice Getting started.
The challenge and promise of community based participatory research 1.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
The work of the Research Ethics Committee Dr Carol Chu.
Supporting Adults with Learning Disabilities who Present with Dementia Collaborative project between:  Gwent Healthcare NHS Trust  Monmouthshire Local.
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) Information Resource Center (IRC) Planning for a Service Program Evaluation - Case Study Public Administration 522 Presented.
Workshop 6 - How do you measure Outcomes?
ENHANCING PATHWAYS INTO CARE MANCHESTER. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FROM MANCHESTER MENTAL HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE TRUST Data collection: – ensure consistency.
Module 5: Data Collection. This training session contains information regarding: Audit Cycle Begins Audit Cycle Begins Questionnaire Administration Questionnaire.
Swiss Re – Pandemic Risk Talk Ethical issues in palliative care for patients with M/XDR-TB Geneva, 19 November 2010 Palliative Care and M/XDR-TB meeting.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Detecting Diabetes Tools for better care. Diabetes in New Zealand people with diabetes – type 2, type 1 Ethnic differences –European.
Partnership, Voice & Excellence Te Ao Māramatanga (College of Mental Health Nurses) Māori Caucus Te Rau Matatini- National Māori Health Workforce Development.
Horizon Scanning: future skills and competences of the health workforce in Europe MATT EDWARDS and JOHN FELLOWS WP6, EU JA on Health Workforce Planning.
1 Canadian Working Group on HIV and Rehabilitation (CWGHR) Improving Equitable Access to Rehabilitation Canadian Home Care Association Summit October 25,
Māori Board Members and the District Health Board Model: Experiences, Issues and Challenges Te Mata o Te Tau Weekly Seminar Series 27 July 2006 Dr Amohia.
CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rationale, Process & Agenda 4 December 2010, Harataunga Marae.
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
ESRC Research Methods Festival st July 2008 Exploring service user participation in the systematic review process Sarah Carr, Research Analyst,
Needs Assessment Instrument Purpose & Elements of Design.
Find out more online: NHS Worcestershire – Local Picture Sandra Rote Director of Clinical Development and Executive Lead Nurse.
Pediatric Regional Integrated Services Model. Purpose The purpose of the Pediatric Regional Integrated Service Model (PRISM) is to provide streamlined.
Conducting a research project. Clarify Aims and Research Questions Conduct Literature Review Describe methodology Design Research Collect DataAnalyse.
The research ethics review process Hazel Abbott, Chair University Research Ethics Committee.
Evaluation Planning Checklist (1 of 2) Planning Checklist Planning is a crucial part of the evaluation process. The following checklist (based on the original.
Application for Ethics Approval for MSocScP(SCS) Research Projects Tianyuan Li, Chairperson of the PS Departmental Ethics Committee (May 2015)
Certificates of Confidentiality:
AES 2012 Kate McKegg and Syd King (for Nan Wehipeihana)
Strengthening Māori research ethics through NEAC’s ethical guidelines
Leigh E. Tenkku, PhD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine
Research Ethics: a short guide for Staff 2017/18
Participatory Action Research
Jason Gerson, PhD Clinical Effectiveness and Decision Science
Supporting health promotion in primary care
Research benefits of NHS IT Programmes
R. Raghavan, A.Farooqi, K.Jutlla, B.Desai, N. Patel, A.Wilson
Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,
Pūtaiora Writing Group
The perception and operation of cancer rehabilitation services in South Wales from healthcare professionals’ perspective: a qualitative study Judit Csontos,
Levels of involvement Consultation Collaboration User control
The practicalities of PPI
Presentation transcript:

Maaori Responsive Research Perspectives from Counties Manukau

Subtitles Why the ‘who’ (your participants) are as important as the ‘how’ (or its not just about: are you taking blood samples and what will happen to them)

We need to think about… 1.Why you need to get your research approved by the Maaori Research Review Committee 2.Importance of context information - who 3.Research content - how

Process The CM Maaori Research Review Committee (MRRC): Meets monthly to review research applications Applications need to be in 6 days prior to allow time for processing and pre-meeting review Applicants may be asked to clarify points or give further information by letter MRRC try to make it a constructive process, not a tick box or a barrier Usually get a response the following week

Need MRRC approval? Role of MRRC is to provide an institutional response to the need for Maaori consultation on all research that is undertaken under the auspices and within the services provided by Counties Maunkau DHB Required under the NZ National Ethic’s Committee process for all health research conducted in Aotearoa New Zealand

CM MRRC Membership Kaumatua CM MMRC Chair/Secretary, TKO PM Community Advisor (1-2) Mana whenua (1-2) Clinical advisor (1-2)

Context Outlining the context and the relevance of the research to Maaori (e.g. data about incidence of research issue for Maaori) helps to determine the scope of the consultation required

Example A new drug for treating gout How common is gout in Maaori? What is known about outcomes for Maaori who do have gout (are there disparities)? Is there any Counties specific data? But also is this drug specific to the disease process of gout or is it an anti-inflammatory that might be useful for other arthritis?

Content: How many Maaori? How many Maaori do you expect to be recruiting? What do you know about the ethnicity mix of population you are drawing participants from? e.g. 32% of Stage 4 renal patients in 05/06 seen in CMDHB were Maaori If you were the researcher, how would you try to ensure that at least 10 of your 30 patients were Maaori?

Content: Issues pertaining to ethnicity Collecting ethnicity – NZ Health and Disability Sector standards (MoH website) What might ‘being Maaori’ mean in relation to this study Engaging whaanau Wairua, whaanau and mental health Te Reo Maaori

Content: Being Maaori in CM?

Subtitles Why the ‘who’ (your participants) are as important as the ‘how’ (or its not just about: are you taking blood samples and what will happen to them)

Cultural implications of the methodology A study which involves interviewing kuia and kaumatua in their homes, about living with diabetes Vs Clinical measurements in a routine clinic appointment for new antihypertensive

Cultural appropriateness of the tools A UK tool for assessing language acquisition and development to be used in study which may involve children & whaanau immersed in Koohanga Reo ?

Content: Genetic analysis Ensure participants are fully informed of the consequences of consenting to genetic analysis (given collective implications) – we like to see the Participant Information Sheet reassurance that samples will be destroyed on completion of the research if not consented to be kept for further studies

Diversity of Maaori perspectives E.g. Xenotransplantation: an area where generically, there is a diversity of opinion of Maaori participation : There is no tikanga and so Maaori cannot be involved in this type of research until such tikanga is developed Maaori have the right to benefit from such technological advancements both as individuals, and collectives “Conservative”“Liberal”

Dissemination Reciprocity – those taking part should have opportunity to get results Sending a copy to the Maaori Research Review Committee is not dissemination to the Maaori community! We need to work together on better ways to get information back to the community

Maaori Research Review – added value Promoting research processes (planning, recruitment, consent processes, interviews, interventions, dissemination of results) that are culturally responsive Ensure the potential for equitable Maaori participation The Goal Research that contributes to a Quality System of health care that ensures equitable access to (based on need) and utilisation of services by Maori