GEO Course Mapping Dr. Mary Menzel - Germanson Director 520-494-5215 Myna Frestedt Support Analyst 520-494-5593

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Advertisements

As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Collaborative Assessment: A Strategy to Relate, Reflect, and React Leah Barrett, Assistant Vice President, Student Affairs Matt Barone, Assistant Director,
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
Chronology of the History and Social Science Standards of Learning.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
What’s in the works for General Education Assessment? Dan McCollum, Ph.D. Associate Director of Academic Assessment.
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
1 MBA Learning Assurance Committee Progress Report to the ZSB Faculty September 20, 2007.
Presenters: Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Tracy Schneider, Solano College Facilitator: Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest.
The BVSD Curriculum Essentials Document. Drama & Theatre Arts Essential Questions: 1.How were the Drama & Theater Arts Curriculum Essentials Documents.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
1 The Journey to Reaffirmation “Systematic Based Evaluation” Spring 2009 Faculty/Staff Conference Southern University at Shreveport January 12, 2009 Planning,
Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
How to GEO Map A Course November 2011 Dr. Mary Menzel-Germanson Director Myna Frestedt Support Analyst
Core Curriculum and Transfer Students Summer 2015.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
PEGGY MAKI, PH.D. EDUCATION CONSULTANT IN ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING PRESENTED AT CCRI SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 Assessment at Three Levels: Institution, Program,
Undergraduate Core at Doane March 14, Overview of Undergraduate Core at Doane Philosophy of the Undergraduate Core at Doane (aligned with mission)
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Computing and Technology Department School of Science and Technology BS in Information Technology CIP Code Program Code 414 Fall 2010 Program Quality.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
Institutional Outcomes and their Implications for Student Learning by John C. Savagian History Department Alverno C O L L E G E.
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Student learning outcomes Training Subcommittee University Assessment Committee University of Toledo
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
 Integrate the Bacc Core category learning outcomes into the course.  Clarify for students how they will achieve and demonstrate the learning outcomes.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Assessment 101: A Review of the Basics Jill Allison Kern, PhD Director of Assessment Christopher Newport University January 2013.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Presentation by: Carol Mattson, Dean of Academic Services, Fullerton College Nancy Deutsch, Reading Faculty/Staff Development Coordinator, Cypress College.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Module 4—Literacy Strands Arts Education. Learning Outcomes Participants will: explore the relationship between the new Essential Standards and the Common.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Orange Coast College Office of Institutional Effectiveness ISLO Update to Institutional Effectiveness Committee 4/25/2014 ISLO GE SLO Local AA/AS.
Conversation with the SLOA&C March 20, 2015 Professional Development Day SJCC Presenters: C. Cruz-Johnson, S. Datta, and R. Gamez Paving the Way for Student.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Closing the Assessment Loop
Effective Outcomes Assessment
The General Education Core in CLAS
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
Curriculum and Accreditation
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment
The General Education CLAS Core
The BVSD Curriculum Essentials Document
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
General Education Redesign Task Force
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Presentation transcript:

GEO Course Mapping Dr. Mary Menzel - Germanson Director Myna Frestedt Support Analyst Jennie Lee Voyce Program Assistant GEO Training Series: 4 of 5 Spring 2012 February 23, 2012

To achieve CAC’s Strategic and AQIP Goal of Helping Students Learn, we identify those course student learning outcomes which align with each of the GEO Standards. Assessment of Student Learning from the institutional level in select courses across the curriculum provide the snapshot of our students’ GEO abilities/knowledge/skills. The Purpose of GEO Mapping

CAC General Education Outcomes and Commitment to Students and Stakeholders All CAC graduates will possess the skills, knowledge, and abilities to be successful in the following General Education Outcomes: Communication: reading, speaking, listening, and writing Critical Thinking and Analytical Reasoning: analysis of issues, development and evaluation of solutions, and assessment conclusion/implications Cultural and Artistic Heritage: cultural literacy, global perspective and artistic heritage appreciation Individual and Social Responsibility: personal integrity and core values, personal well-being, value perspectives of others and contribute to a larger community Informational and Technological Literacy: access, evaluate and use information; use technology, understand impact and systems Mathematical/Scientific Inquiry and Analysis: models, computation and interpretation; science concepts, methods and principles

GEO Course Mapping: Step 1 Every CAC Division maps their credit courses by aligning the Measureable Student Learning Outcomes (MSLOs) to CAC General Education Outcomes and Standards. See the CAC Institutional GEO Rubric on the Curriculum/Student Learning Assessment website at: nt_Learning_Assessment_Tools_and_Forms.htm

All courses submitted through the Five-Year Curriculum Review Cycle are now required by the Curriculum Committee and the Student Learning Outcomes Committee to create GEO Maps. In addition, new and modified programs are also required to submit a GEO Program Map.

GEO Maps inform CAC of the GEO Standards which are assessed or are assessable in each course. GEO Program Maps identify the courses in the degree sequence where students are introduced to the various GEOs, receive opportunities to develop/apply their skills/knowledge/abilities and the point where she are expected to achieve proficiency.

ACRES: Expedited GEO Map April 1, 2012, all Arizona General Education Curriculum (AGEC) courses, the high enrollment gatekeeper courses to degrees and the AGEC Certificate, have GEO Maps due. ACRES users select the Expedited GEO Map in ACRES. See ACRES at: Expedited GEO Map Attachment

ACRES

Fall 2013 Curriculum Proposers Curriculum submitted for inclusion in the CAC Catalog is due September 1 st. All courses and programs require a GEO Map downloadable within the ACRES proposal form by clicking the link.

Institutional GEO Rubric

THE 116 Student Learning Outcomes

THE 116 Standards/Assessments

GEO Standards 1A-1E align with THE116 MSLOs 1-7 and THE116 Standards S4 and S5. 1.Discuss the socio-political influences contemporary films may have over today’s society. [write, read, listen] 2.Explain the influence society and contemporary events have over the creation of films. [write] 3.Describe the potential value of various genres of film making. [write] S4. Produce a carefully documented, quality product that identifies, outlines, evaluates, analyzes and articulates the contributions made by film in comparison or concert with other art forms. S5. Produce a carefully documented, quality product that identifies, outlines, evaluates, analyzes and articulates the contributions and expectations of actors, directors and cinematographers.

GEO Standards 2A-1C align with MSLOs 1-7 and Standards S4 and S5. 4. (Comprehension) Discuss film as a major art form and its relationship to drama, literature, and the visual arts. 5. (Knowledge) Identify filmmaking techniques and expectations of actors, directors and cinematographers. 6. (Comprehension) Compare and contrast movie making techniques both before and after (Application) Classify a number of contemporary films by genre and cinematography.

GEO Standard 3C align with MSLOs 1-5 and Standards S4 and S5. 1. (Comprehension) Discuss the socio- political influences contemporary films may have over today's society. 2. (Comprehension) Explain the influence society and contemporary events have over the creation of films. 3. (Knowledge) Describe the potential value of various genres of film making. 4. (Comprehension) Discuss film as a major art form and its relationship to drama, literature, and the visual arts.

GEO Standards 4A aligns with MSLO 3; 4C-D align with MSLO4; 4D aligns with MSLOs 1-2, (Comprehension) Discuss film as a major art form and its relationship to drama, literature, and the visual arts.

GEO Standard 4A-D align with MSLOs 1-7 and Standards S4 and S5. 1. (Comprehension) Discuss the socio- political influences contemporary films may have over today's society. 2. (Comprehension) Explain the influence society and contemporary events have over the creation of films. 3. (Knowledge) Describe the potential value of various genres of film making. 4. (Comprehension) Discuss film as a major art form and its relationship to drama, literature, and the visual arts. Students must access, evaluate and use information for MSLOs 1-7.

Institutional GEO Rubric

Next Step: April 2, 2012 GEO Mapping aligned to student progress to attaining a associates degree or AGEC Certificate. Over two years of matriculation, instructors Introduce the concepts, provide opportunities for students to Develop/Apply those skills/knowledge/abilities and help students achieve Proficiency, our Level 2 on the Institutional GEO Rubric.

New I, D, P Coding

Collect Student Success Data to Help Students Learn How to Identify GEOs in Measurable Student Learning Outcomes (MSLOs) within Courses 1. Compare each MSLO to the GEO Objectives and their Standards on the Institutional GEO Rubric. 2. Mark each Standard which is measurable in the course with an “I” for Introductory, “D” for Developing or “P” for Proficient.

GEO Map Instructions

I = Introduced, D = Developing, P = Proficient

Institutional GEO Rubric Critical Thinking:

ACRES: Attach GEO Map

Curriculum Committee Proposers plan to attend the Curriculum Committee to provide their rationale for their GEO Map to the Committee. If the MSLO does not explicitly align with the GEO Standard, additional explanation will be required. This rationale may be provided in the ACRES “Notes” field before clicking “Final Submit, or in the “Comment” field in ACRES after submission.

At Faculty Development Day Fall 2011 Valerie Jensen presented a PPt on the Layers of CAC Student Learning Assessment. She wrote: GEO/Institutional level assessment seeks to discover how well students have achieved the General Education Outcomes for CAC.

Data Driven Decisions: How Evidence of Student Learning will be used: Improve Student Learning Pedagogy Modification Student Service enhancements Curriculum Modification: courses/degrees/certificates New Course Development New Program Development Continuous Quality Improvements (CQIs) to processes, instructions and forms Accreditation Evidence Inform Advising Boards initiatives

Thank You. Our scholarly assessment of student learning contributes to the selection and implementation of initiatives to Help Students Learn and contributes to the long-term success of all our graduates!

Questions? We’re here to assist you…