Where the Rubber Hits the Road – Next Generation Assessments Susan Gendron, Senior Fellow International Center for Leadership in Education October 3, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
Advertisements

Bloom's Taxonomy.
What do you know about the Rigor/Relevance framework?
The Rigor and Relevance Framework: A lesson
Rigor/Relevance/Relationships Working in Quadrant D.
? Tulsa Community College- Engaged Student Programming.
? freely adapted from Tulsa Community College- Engaged Student Programming.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Nevada Joint Union High School District Nevada Union High School September 23, 2013 Louise Johnson, Ed.D. Superintendent.
Creating an SLO or PLO Statement Presented by ORIE Team Summer 2013 Academy for Planning, Assessment, and Research.
Learning Taxonomies Bloom’s Taxonomy
1 Implementing the standards cannot simply mean informing teachers about what the designers of the standards intended or providing them with videos of.
Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning (Cognitive domain)
Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Development
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Creating: can the student create new product or point of view?
Teaching for Rigor and Relevance Why, What, How? Dr. Kelly Gillespie SWPRSC.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
Lesson Planning. Teachers Need Lesson Plans So that they know that they are teaching the curriculum standards required by the county and state So that.
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
“In years to come, your students may forget what you taught them
Bloom’s Taxonomy Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Student Learning Outcomes
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
Writing Student-Centered Learning Objectives Please see Reference Document for references used in this presentation.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Version. Bloom’s Taxonomy of Instructional Activities ( REVISED VERSION – PAGE 52) Create Evaluate Analyze Apply Understand Remember.
Implementing the Common Core State Standards The Role of the School Counselor.
Blooms Taxonomy Margaret Gessler Werts Department of Language, Reading, and Exceptionalities.
A Decision-Making Tool.  Goal  Educational Objectives  Student Learning Outcomes  Performance Indicators or Criteria  Learning Activities or Strategies.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Bloom’s Critical Thinking Questioning Strategies A Guide to Higher Level Thinking Adapted from Ruth Sunda and Kyrene de las Brisas.
Common Core State Standards An overview for Professional Development Leads March 8, 2010 Mary Russell, Region 3 Joyce Gardner, Region 8.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Mrs. Eagen A, A. Bloom identified six levels within the cognitive domain, from the simple recall or recognition of facts,
Bloom’s Taxonomy A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills.
1xx K K K Program Level Student Learning Outcomes K= Knowledge/Comprehension; A= Application / Analysis; S= Synthesis /Evaluation 1xx S K.
COMPREHENSION ANALYSIS EVALUATION APPLICATION SYNTHESIS KNOWLEDGE
If you want better answers, ask better questions.
Unit 5 Seminar D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
Assessing General Education Presentation by: Rich Leiby, Co-Chair All-College Assessment Committee October 18, 2011.
St. Louis Area Curriculum Coordinator’s Association.
Teaching and Thinking According to Blooms Taxonomy human thinking can be broken down into six categories.
D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING Unit 5 Seminar. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
Maximizing Instructional Time Student Engagement through Questioning.
Teaching for Rigor and Relevance Why, What, How? Dr. Kelly Gillespie SWPRSC.
Building in the Three R’s An Introduction to Rigor, Relevance, and Relationship Edited from a PLS presentation for Lenoir County Public Schools Presented.
Bloom’s Taxonomy How to Create REALLY good questions!!
Building a System-Wide Focus On Student Achievement Joe Shannon September 30, 2011.
BLOOM'S TAXONOMY OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES From: Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Rigor/Relevance For All Students Common CORE January, 2013
Bloom's Taxonomy Verbs Just as students need to understand how to gain access to the class, they need to understand what teachers are asking of them.
Coventry Public Schools
Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Evaluation Making critical judgments
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Evaluating Classroom assignments: Planning for Grading
Author: Brenda Stephenson The University of Tennessee
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Levels
Bloom’s Taxonomy: Six Levels for Understanding
Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) Evaluation Making critical judgments
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
What you assess makes a statement about what you value
A Focus on Higher-Order Thinking Skills
Costa’s Levels of Questioning
Our goal is to be thinking at a higher level.
? INQUIRY to question is to learn.
Presentation transcript:

Where the Rubber Hits the Road – Next Generation Assessments Susan Gendron, Senior Fellow International Center for Leadership in Education October 3, 2011

Rigor/Relevance For All Students 2 AB DC

1.Awareness 2.Comprehension 3.Application 4.Analysis 5.Synthesis 6.Evaluation Knowledge Taxonomy Knowledge Taxonomy 3

Application Model 1. Knowledge in one discipline 2. Application within one discipline 3. Application across disciplines 4. Application to real-world predictable situations 5. Application to real-world unpredictable situations 4

Levels CDCDABABCDCDABAB Bloom’s Application 5 Knowledge

Awareness 1 Comprehension 2 Application 3 1 Knowledge in one discipline 2 Apply knowledge in one discipline A Acquisition Students gather and store bits of knowledge/information and are expected to remember or understand this acquired knowledge. Low-level Knowledge 6

Awareness 1 Comprehension 2 Application 3 B Application 3 Apply knowledge across disciplines 4 Apply to real-world predictable situation 5 Apply to real-world unpredictable situation Students use acquired knowledge to solve problems, design solutions, and complete work. Low-level Application 7

Application 3 Analysis 4 Synthesis 5 Evaluation 6 1 Knowledge in one discipline 2 Apply knowledge in one discipline C Assimilation Students extend and refine their knowledge so that they can use it automatically and routinely to analyze and solve problems and create solutions. High-level Knowledge 8

3 Apply knowledge across disciplines 4 Apply to real-world predictable situation 5 Apply to real-world unpredictable situation Application 3 Analysis 4 Synthesis 5 Evaluation 6 D Adaptation Students think in complex ways and apply acquired knowledge and skills, even when confronted with perplexing unknowns, to find creative solutions and take action that further develops their skills and knowledge. High-level Application 9

Rigor/Relevance Framework © International Center for Leadership in Education Application Model Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge/ Awareness Knowledge in one discipline Apply in one discipline Apply Across disciplines Apply to real-world predictable situations Apply to real-world unpredictable situations A: Acquisition Count, define, describe, draw, find, identify, label, list, match, name, quote, recall, recite, sequence, tell, write, conclude, discuss, explain, generalize, illustrate, tell, review C: Assimilation Analyze, appraise, characterize, classify, compare, contrast, choose, construct, deduce, diagram, distinguish, examine, organize, outline, relate, research, rewrite, separate D: Adaptation Assess, argue, debate, design, develop, differentiate, discriminate, integrate, invent, judge, justify, make, perform, plan, predict, prioritize, produce, propose, prove, rank, rate, select B: Application Conclude, demonstrate, discuss, explain, generalize, interpret, paraphrase, predict, report, restate, summarize, tell, apply, change, compute, dramatize, interview, prepare, produce, role- play, select, show, transfer, use 10

A B D C Standards

A B D C Assessments

PARCC Assessment Priorities Comprehending complex text: –grade- level-appropriate short texts of sufficient complexity –Informational text in elementary and non-fiction in secondary –Vocabulary assessed within reading  International Center for Leadership in Education

PARCC Assessment Priorities Analyzing sources in writing : Writing routinely in response to complex text An emphasis on analytic writing that increases through the grades Writing under a range of conditions and within set parameters Use of technology to produce, edit, and distribute writing Writing expectations  International Center for Leadership in Education

PARCC Assessment Priorities Conducting and reporting on research students’ abilities to gather resource evaluate their relevance report on information and ideas they have investigated  International Center for Leadership in Education

PARCC Assessment Priorities Speaking and listening: range of interactive oral communication and interpersonal skills skills necessary to present formal presentations, working collaboratively, sharing findings, listening to others  International Center for Leadership in Education

PARCC Assessment Priorities Reading and Writing: Cite Evidence and Analyze Content Understand and apply grammar Understand and apply vocabulary Speak and Listen Effectively  International Center for Leadership in Education

PARCC Assessment Priorities Mathematics: Will measure the knowledge, skills, and understanding essential to achieving college and career readiness conceptual understanding procedural skill and fluency application and problem solving tasks that require students to connect mathematical content and mathematical practices.  International Center for Leadership in Education

PARCC Assessment Undergoing research to develop exemplary assessment types: Short- and extended- response items Performance tasks Computer-based selected-response items Questions asked would measure student learning across various mathematical domains and practices  International Center for Leadership in Education

Sample Items PISA rs.asp rs.asp MARS b/MARS/tasks/ SBAC Resources.aspx Resources.aspx  International Center for Leadership in Education

22 There is not necessarily a simple correspondence between standards, claims, and tasks. Some items will assess student understanding of particular content-related standards. For example, the task “If x and y are positive integers, and 3x + 2y = 13, what could be the value of y? Write all possible answers” addresses Content Standard EE-8.1 and Claim #1. But, consider the following problem, “Hurdles Race.”

23

24 Interpreting distance-time graphs in a real- world context Realizing “to the left” is faster Understanding points of intersection in that context (they’re tied at the moment) Interpreting the horizontal line segment Putting all this together in an explanation

25 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. Construct viable arguments… Model with mathematics. Use appropriate tools strategically. Attend to Precision. Look for and make use of structure. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.

Your State Standards  CCSS

Route 146 Rexford, NY Phone (518) Fax (518)