October 28, 2010 Hanover Room How can data impact system growth?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BC Core Competencies BCSSA November 21, CurriculumAssessment Graduation Requirements Communicating Student Learning Trades/SkillsReadingStudent.
Advertisements

The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Welcome Introduction Parking lot Etc.
RAD ASSESSMENT TRAINING GRADES 4 & 5 September 17 & 18, 2012.
Administrative Council January 17, Big idea Why are learning strategies so important?
The Concept Anchoring Routine The Content Enhancement Series 2002 The University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.
How Young Children Learn
Supporting Teachers to make Overall Teacher Judgments The Consortium for Professional Learning.
Consistency of Assessment
Learning Goals, Scales and Learning Activities
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Section VI: Comprehension Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
Combined Grades Making Them Work Fall 2007 Building Classes of Combined Grades “In successful schools, classrooms are organized to meet the learning.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Common Core Orientation Transforming Teaching & Learning DELCAC Session March 20, 2013.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Early Math Matters! October 14, 2010 Laurie Sjolund.
ESSENTIAL LEARNING EXPERIENCES October 16, Today’s Agenda  Round Table – Celebration  Ministry Update  What is Using & Understanding Language?
The DATA WISE Process and Data- Driven Dialogue Presented by: Lori DeForest (315)
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Using a teacher identifier to improve student achievement and instruction Elliott Asp Cherry Creek Schools February 2009.
Early Learning Strategy NESD Strategic Plan: Responsive to Individual Student Needs Data Collection: COR – Pre-Kindergarten & Kindergarten * RAD – Grades.
Is today’s math preparing your child for tomorrow’s world? November 19,2014.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
© 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. Planning for Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum Chapter 3.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Leading improvement using the Primary Framework. Keys to further improvement A growing body of research identifies important and interrelated keys to.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage II: Understanding Data Purposes & Uses.
1 Text User: Understanding Purpose and Form SESSION 4 Thinking about Thinking: Setting the Stage for Independent Reading.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
Chapter 1 –organizing principle
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
The PYP Exhibition Mentor Information. What is it?  The Exhibition is:  An individual, group or whole class inquiry  An inquiry that starts from personal.
1 Leadership Module 3: Introduction to Content Alignment.
1 Using the Learning Progression Framework (LPF) to Enhance the Learning, Teaching and Assessment of English Language at Primary Level 8 & 10 December.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
Rivera Elementary Mr. Trujillo’s Kindergarten class.
The Interactive Strategies Approach to Early Literacy Intervention (ISA) Michelle Eackles RDG 692 Best Practices in Early Literacy Instruction Diane M.
The Journey: Common Core State Standards Principals’ Meeting September 20, 2012.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
CMSP: Finding our Mathematical Roots Lee Ann Pruske Beth Schefelker MTL Meeting October 18, 2011.
Observing and Assessing Young Children
Stage 1 – Desired Results Level I – Quarter 1 – Art History Established Goals Enduring Understanding: The Elements & Principles of Design are found throughout.
March, 2016 SLO End of Course Command Levels. OUTCOMES Teachers will… be prepared to determine end of course command levels for each student. be prepared.
 The area of focus consists of teachers creating an environment to help express how children learn through play.  The purpose of this study is to.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Reading Procedures: MODELLED READING
Reading, Writing & Math at Grade Level
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
The New Illinois Learning Standards
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
Developmental Reading Assessment
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Section VI: Comprehension
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Our Leadership Journey
Approaches to Learning (ATL)
Presentation transcript:

October 28, 2010 Hanover Room How can data impact system growth?

 Model ◦ Year Plan ◦ Big Ideas ◦ Essential Questions  Model the Expectations Document ◦ Strategies Highlighted  Flexible Groupings  B, D, A strategies  Focus on the NESD Goals and their Pillars

NESD Systemic Goals Our students are provided quality curriculum, instruction, and assessment responsive to individual needs. Our school division and its schools use data and information to measure, monitor and report continuous improvement. Our facilities accommodate learning to prepare students for life in the 21 st Century. Our school division maintains positive “North East” culture.

Create Engaging Learning Experiences through Renewed Curricula Promote New Media Literacies and Digital Citizenship Response to Individual Student Needs Engage in Authentic Assessment NESD Pillars NESD Pillars Construct and Sustain Effective Schools

Administrative Council Professional Development ( ) October: Data Collection December: New Media Literacies January: Learning Strategies February: Response to Intervention March: Assessment April: FNMI

 Introductions & Overview  NESD Rubric Revisited  Child Observation Record (COR) Refreshment Break  Reading Assessment District (RAD)  Assessment For Learning (AFL)

Essential Questions  What do we mean by Synthesis within the NESD Rubric?  How can we utilize data to improve student learning?  How can we use data to inform our practice?  How can data assist teacher leaders with the identification and mobilization of supports?

 Uncertainties with this data 1.The data from Admin Council did not strongly identify areas of weakness or strength within the group. 2.Overall results lead us to believe that the supporting document may not have been fully utilized or understood. 3.Individual results suggest that with some, the tool may have been used as a rating scale as opposed to a rubric.

 Individually read the descriptors within the pillar you have been assigned in the supporting document of the NESD Rubric.  Use each descriptor in your pillar to identify how leaders can, within a school context, provide support to those who are not at the Synthesis Level. (Ensure your team has a common understanding of each descriptor).  Record your supports for a document we will share with everyone (this is for you, as a group).

Orange(Curricula) Ken OkaneeDean Armstrong Rocky Chysyk Shelley Pierlot Randy KerrJill Clapson Jerry HeffernanYvonne Day Red (NML) Blue (Response) Green (Assess) Brian Anderson Cory Froehlich Neil Finch Kelly Christopherson Rodney White Trevor Norum Randy Steciuk Wade Rolles Trevor McIntyre Eric Hufnagel Trevor Wasilow Bryan Young Brenda Gabriel Perry Mamer

NESD Strategic Plan: Responsive to Individual Student Needs Data Collection:  COR – Pre-Kindergarten & Kindergarten  RAD – Grades 1-3 Collection Dates:  COR – data submitted daily – collated in January 21 & May 20  RAD – October 8 & May 13

 Child Observation Record  Online COR – software database which houses documentation (anecdotal notes, photos, videos, student work).  Documentation is used to match key dimensions of child development.  COR Items are reflective in Kindergarten Curriculum Outcomes, however are not conclusive to achieving Curriculum outcomes.

Score 2 Unscored 4 Unscored 3 Anecdote List

Tally Sheet

Growth Profile

Rob, John, Ron, Mark, Don Katie Reanne

 To gather data to ensure that students are growing in all of the key dimensions of child development.  COR measures 6 categories of child development. 1. Initiative 2. Social Relations 3. Creative Representation 4. Music and Movement 5. Language & Literacy 6. Mathematics and Science

 To ensure teachers are evolving in the role of an “Early Learning” teacher, where they allow play to be children’s work and that they begin to follow the principles of early learning in their daily practices.

 It will tell us what children are doing.  It will tell us more about them.  It will guide us in the types of materials, interactions, and experiences we need to provide to assist in their development.

Early Learning Teachers will need to allow their students to play. Early Learning Teachers will need to become observers, listeners, and documenters. Early Learning Teachers will need to become reflective and prepare environments, materials, conversations, invitations, so children can further develop their learning.

 Believe and promote that all children are competent and have the capacity to learn.  Encourage and model for teachers how to be active observers of what and how children learn.  Ensure teachers are reflecting and making educational decisions that affect the child.  Ensure that teachers are developing relationships by revealing the uniqueness of every child.

 Reading Assessment District  Assesses students’ reading skills and comprehension.  Utilizes BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER strategies.  RAD can be administered up to grade 9.

 The data provides a summary of student’s ability to use BEFORE, DURING, and AFTER strategies for Comprehending and Responding to text.

STRATEGIES Before During COMPREHENSION During After ANALYSIS During After

Look at your school data.  What does the data tell us? Strengths? Concerns?  What instructional focus do your teachers need to develop further?  How can you support your ELA teachers?

Strategies STRESSED in RAD BEFORE Prediction Text Features DURING Comprehension (Retrieving Information and Recognizing Meaning)  Accuracy and completeness  Main Ideas/Details  Information/Organization AFTER Comprehension (Interpreting Text)  Inferences Analysis (Analyzing Text)  Connections  Opinions Comprehension Strategies  Identifying use and articulation  Word Skills Strategies STRESSED in ELA Curriculum BEFORE  Activate and build upon prior knowledge & experience  Preview text  Set a purpose  Anticipate the author’s intention DURING  Making connections to personal knowledge and experience  Using the cueing systems to construct meaning from the text  Making, confirming, and adjusting predictions and inferences  Constructing mental images  Interpreting visuals (e.g., illustrations, graphs, tables)  Identifying key ideas and supporting details  Drawing conclusions  Adjusting rate or strategy to purpose or difficulty of text AFTER  Recalling, paraphrasing, and synthesizing  Interpreting (identifying new knowledge and insights)  Evaluating author’s message  Evaluating author’s craft and technique  Responding personally, giving support from text  View, listen, read again, and speak, write, and use other forms of representing to deepen understanding and pleasure.

If students are to be successful at READING, they need to learn and use thinking and learning skills and strategies on their own. In order to help students gain control over a repertoire of key skills and strategies, the skills and strategies need to be explicitly taught and practiced using a model such as the following: Introduce and explain the purpose of the skill or strategy. Demonstrate and model its use. Provide guided practice for students to apply the skill or strategy with feedback. Allow students to apply the skill or strategy independently and in teams. Reflect regularly on the appropriate uses of the skills or strategies and their effectiveness. Assess the students’ ability to transfer the repertoire of skills or strategies with less and less teacher prompting over time. (Wiggins & McTighe, 2007, quoted in Saskatchewan Ministry of Education ELA document, 2010)

 Reading 2009, 2007  Mathematics 2009, 2007, 2005  Writing 2010, 2008  Treaty Essential Learnings (TELs) 2010, 2009  With each of the above two categories emerge: ◦ Performance Data ◦ Opportunity-to-Learn Data

 Two sets for each subject/grade level 1.Teacher Questionnaire Data 2.Student Questionnaire Data Are there surprises within data? (Either teacher and student surveys.) Are there specific data pieces within OTL that, when shared with teachers, would be beneficial for them?

 Reading (4)Reading (7)Reading (10) Perry MamerCory FroehlichBrian Anderson Shelly PierlotJill ClapsonEric Hufnagel Rodney WhiteKelly Christopherson  Writing (5)Writing (8)Writing (11) Randy KerrNeil FinchDean Armstrong Brenda GabrielKen OkaneeYvonne Day Trevor Norum  Math (5)Math (8)Math (20) Randy SteciukRocky ChysyckJerry Heffernan Trevor WasilowTrevor McIntyreBryan Young Wade Rolles

 Critique the following statement: “The data discussed today and the NESD Rubric are mutually exclusive.”

Essential Questions  What do we mean by Synthesis within the NESD Rubric?  How can we utilize data to improve student learning?  How can we use data to inform our practice?  How can data assist teacher leaders with the identification and mobilization of supports?

 Where did we hit the target?  Where did we miss the mark?