Latin America opportunities and challenges Latin American and Argentina Development: opportunities and challenges 2008 Presentation For the University of North Florida Professors R. Feeney and M. Rossi Austral University, Argentina
Some facts about Latin America 44 countries 550 million people live in this region (50% more than the US, 8% of world population) It produces 7% of the world GDP (one third of the US) Its territory is 21 million square kms (double than de US) Major world provider of soja, copper, sugar, beef, etc. and many other raw materials 25 uninterrupted years of democratic regimes in most of the countries
Evolution of the world GDP per Capita (PPP) World LA US, Can, NZ, Au Western Europe Africa
World Capita GDP by Region In 1990 US International dollars (Maddison, 2006) Region/ Year Growth 1950 to 2003 Annual Growth Latin America %1.59% Africa %1.05% Western Europe ,912334%2.81% US, Canada, Au, NZ %2.11% Asia %3.49% World %2.14%
GDP Per Capita Annual % Growth Rate (Maddison, 2006 and 2007) 1913–501950–731973– Latin America United States Japan Western Europe Africa World
GDP Per Capita Growth Rate (Maddison, 2006, p. 153, 2007) Argentina Brazil Chile Mexico Total Latin America
Latin American Nations Ranked by Gross Domestic Product ( GDP- (PPP)) in 2006 Millions of International Dollars, CIA World RankNation GDP (PPP) in millions US dollar 10 Brazil1,838,000 12Mexico1,353, Argentina 621, Colombia 378, Chile 212, Venezuela 193, Peru 185, Ecuador 64, Uruguay 37, Paraguay 31, Bolivia 27,892
GDP per capita (PPP) 2005, CIA Rank in worldCountry GDP per capita 50Argentina14,109 56Chile12,983 60Mexico10,600 65Uruguay10,028 68Brazil$9,108 81Colombia7,565 96Venezuela6,186 97Peru5,983 99Ecuador5, Paraguay4, Bolivia2,817
Inflation Annual average compound (Maddison, 2006, p. 153, author’s estimate) Argentina Brazil Chile Mexico Average main Latin America countries
Poverty Line (lowest to highest) Source: CIA World Factbook[5CIA World Factbook[5 Year of estimate CountryPopulation below poverty line (%) 2005Chile Argentina Uruguay Brazil Paraguay Venezuela Ecuador Mexico Colombia Peru Bolivia64
Unemployment Rate (lowest to highest) Source: CIA World FactbookCIA World Factbook Rank in worldCountryUnemployment rate (%) 80Peru Bolivia Chile Argentina Venezuela Paraguay Brazil Ecuador Uruguay Colombia11.10
A key Variable: the Socio-Economic Conditions in Latin America
The Gini Index The Gini coefficient is often used to measure income inequality.income Here, 0 corresponds to perfect income equality (i.e. everyone has the same income) and 1 corresponds to perfect income inequality (i.e. one person has all the income, while everyone else has zero income).
USA Latin America Income Inequality in Latin America
CountryUN Richest 10% to poorest 10% Haiti71.7 Colombia63.8 Brazil57.8 Chile40.6 Argentina34.5 United States15.9 Australia12.5 Canada9.4 France9.1 Income Inequality Indexes Comparison
The Human Development Index (HDI) It is a comparative measure of life expectancy, literacy, education, and standard of living for countries worldwide. It is a standard means of measuring well-being, especially child welfare.life expectancy literacyeducationstandard of living measuring well-beingwelfare An HDI below 0.5 is considered to represent low development An HDI of 0.8 or more is considered to represent high development.
CountryHDI Argentina0.863 Chile0.859 Uruguay0.851 Costa Rica0.841 Mexico0.821 Panama0.809 Brazil0.792 Colombia0.790 Venezuela0.784 Peru0.767 Ecuador0.765 Paraguay0.757 Dominican Republic0.751 El Salvador0.729 Nicaragua0.698 Bolivia0.692 Honduras0.683 Guatemala0.673 Haiti0.482 The Human Development Index (HDI) Ranking for Latin America
Central Questions about Latin America Why Latin America has not improved more rapidly after all? Why being rich in natural resources yet it is relative poor? The relationship of the US with Latin America Is Latin America ready for change, especially for regional free trade (FTAA)? Is the business environment the same across Latin America?
Business Realities in Latin America the hard way… Significant differences by country and by region More than economics, institutional capacity is critical ..and accountability and transparency ..and also, the Rule of Law National cultures vs Corporate cultures Is NAFTA-Mexico a good example?…well
North American Free Trade Agreement –2006 Results 2006 Total Value $868 billion Increase in the last 5 years by 32% Trade with Canada equals $533 billion, increase by 15% Trade with Mexico equals $335 billion increase by 60% Trade with Canada and Mexico accounts for almost 45% of the total U.S. trade U.S. corporations seeking to export to EU through Mexico 2005 Security and prosperity agenda (logistics, logistics, and logistics) Data: U.S. Dept. of Commerce and U.S. Trade Authority Office
Brazil and Mercosur, or how Americas trade is difficult Brazil control on trade in South America strong internal fiscal control (conservative members of cabinet) strong control of currency volatility strong attraction of foreign direct investment strong opposition to U.S. subsidies strong opposition to free trade USA style Production of ethanol
What variables have a critical role for the U.S. to induce FTAA? AAddition of Eastern European countries to EU NNational security in the continent–a premium variable for the U.S. PPolitical stability in the continent SSustainable economic growth BBut, is the U.S. Congress ready?
What are the regional political variables that collide with U.S. interests? VVenezuela –the expansion of the Chavez model CCuba -the transition to democracy TThe political left expansion: Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, Chile, Nicaragua. LLack of real economic improvement (per capita) due to trade
Yet, the U.S. Dept. of Commerce is seeking to reactivate negotiations by: sparking and sustaining innovation creating solutions in education and workforce development designing successful global supply chain strategies fostering small business development and growth
Argentina Basic Briefing Population 2008: 41,000,000 Capital (population): Buenos Aires (12,000,000) Life expectancy at birth: 76.32, Male: 72.6 Female: Total surface 2,766,891 km²
Where we come from? Rosario: The Center of the Agribusiness Production Area in Argentina Rosario
Argentina’s GDP in constant prices of 1993 pesos Hundred of millions of pesos Year
Devaluation of the Real I/99 Arg Vice-Pres resigns X/2000 External Credit CutVII/01 III/2001 Finance Secretaries (2) Resign XII/01 Financial Bolt Recovery Hyperinflation Argentina’s GDP in constant prices of 1993 pesos
By now (2007) Argentina’s per capita GDP is higher than the pre-crisis level
The Horror Story: Inflation in Argentina (INDEC) Year Total Acumulative Inflation Index Inflation Index 5 Years Accumulative prices: 27 thousand billions times 1970
Inflation in Argentina (INDEC) Year Annual Inflation Devaluation Recession Pegged currency Recovery with increasing inflation pressure
Balance of Non-Financial Public Sector, in Argentina From Deficit to Suplus
Balance of Non-Financial Public Sector, in Argentina
mill US dollars Argentina’s Central Bank Reserves million U$ dollars
Millions USD 107 Billion USD= 55% /ARG GDP Argentina’s Total Foreign Debt
International Commerce
Argentina´s Unemployement Rate
Infrastructure and Investment: Public and Private Investment in millions of 1993 pesos
Industrial activity Industry was growing year by year, after the 2001 crisis
Currency The last years were characterized by a relative high peso-dollar real exchange rate
Exports are mostly based on commodities with low value added Exports
Domestic demand feels strong and sustained Internal environment
After many years of sustained demand, the industry is close to full capacity Energy demand is climbing to a maximum, without enough investment to expand the offer Threats
Domestic energy prices were kept artificially low (electricity, natural gas, gasoline, etc.) creating an adverse scenario for private investment in those areas Inflation: growing fast, being not recognized by official indexes Threats
Emerging markets grew aggressively in 2007 Emerging Markets
Since Argentine domestic markets are mostly driven by food commodities’ prices, there is a good perspective for sustain Merval index vs. DJI
Summary of Argentina’s Macro Situation + Strong short term growth Good Fiscal performance Positive foreign trade exchange Foreign debt reduction Higher employment - ↓ Still a risky country ↓ Potential Inflationary risk ↓ Strongly dependent on commodity prices ↓ Poverty: 30% of the population has serious problems ↓ Weak capital and financial system ↓ Low competitiveness in many industries ↓ Weak Infrastructure ↓ Low foreign Investment
Since Argentine domestic markets are mostly driven by food commodities’ prices, there is a good perspective for sustained consumption, at least for the next 5 years If a global recession occurs, Argentina should not have problems due to: Historical high level of reserves The Banking sector is totally recovered from the 2001 crisis The sovereign debt was restructured Business Environment
Inflation pressures: both internal and external Labor costs: unions do not follow official indexes Energy costs: will tend to reach international prices In such an environment, companies should be more competitive improving productivity and value added Next short-term challenges for companies in Argentina
Brazil Basic Briefing Population 2005: 175,468,575 Capital (population): Brasilia (1,600,000) Life expectancy at birth: male years, female years (2001 est.) Physicians per 1000 people: 1.47 Rural/urban population ratio: 21/79 GDP per capita: U $9,100
Brazil Economic development based in central economy Foreign investment first country in the world third place after Mexico and China Crisis of Confidence Crash of Stocks 3% increase in base rate since October 14 Leading MERCOSUR
Chile Basic Briefing Population 2005: 16,598,074 Capital (population): Santiago de Chile City (6,000,000 metropolitan) Life expectancy at birth: male years, female years (2001 est.) Total surface: 756,950 km²
Chile’s Economic Miracle (chart in terms of GDP per capita) Chile’s per capita GDP Average LA GDP per cap
Chile multiplied its GDP by 3 in 25 years Evolution of Chile’s GDP in 25 Year (in US constant dollars
Competitivity Ranking and Technological Innovation Latinamerican countries 2005 CountryCompetitivity Technological Innovation Chile2335 Uruguay5463 Mexico5557 El Salvador5670 Colombia5774 Costa Rica6456 Brasil6550 Peru6875 Argentina7259 Competitivity and Innovation in Latinamerican countries Source: World Economic Forum 2005
Mexico Basic Briefing Population 2005: 105,879,171 Capital (population): Mexico City (18,000,000) Life expectancy at birth: male years, female years (2001 est.) Physicians per 1000 people: 1.73/1,000 Rural/urban population ratio: 26/74 GDP per capita: $10,600 (2005)
Mexico Economic Development based in open economy since1988 GATT Open Economy, export oriented and Foreign investment NAFTA Interdependence, Rules of Origin and National Content Free Trade Agreements (14) European Union, Central America, Chile, Israel, Japan, S. Korea, and Australia.
What is the future Latin American economic scenario? a. Speed of second generation reforms b. From internal producing and consuming market to an international, regional and global economy c. US is a regional leader in the marketplace and that is not going to change d. Rule of law, accountability and transparency e. Paradox of social inequality (human capital investments)
Working force development requires to add International Education and Skills (+) Working Knowledge in: Language skills – functional level Culture at the exchange level Political, economic, and social systems. National cultures Corporate cultures abroad