W. Dean Hively 1, Ali Sadeghi* 1, Megan Lang 1, Varaprasad Bandaru 2, and Greg McCarty 1 * (301) 504-6693; 1 USDA-ARS Hydrology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling Dept. of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, NTU Satellite Remote Sensing for Land-Use/Land-Cover.
Advertisements

E-Agri Project Kick-off Meeting, Mol, 24-25, 2011 Remote Sensing of Crop Acreage and Crop Mapping in the E-Agri Project Chen Zhongxin Institute of Agricultural.
Selected results of FoodSat research … Food: what’s where and how much is there? 2 Topics: Exploring a New Approach to Prepare Small-Scale Land Use Maps.
September 5, 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University.
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Change Detection. Digital Change Detection Biophysical materials and human-made features are dynamic, changing rapidly. It is believed that land-use/land-cover.
Watershed-Scale Airborne Remote Sensing Land Use and Conservation Practices Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, AL October 14, 2005 Mark H.
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
Wetland and Riparian Mapping in Montana Karen Newlon, Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT Montana Wetland Council University of Montana-Missoula.
Development of Remote Sensing-based Predictive Models for the Management of Taste and Odor Events in Kansas Reservoirs Dr. Mark Jakubauskas Kansas Biological.
Improved Assessment of Floodplain Location and Function Megan Lang USDA Forest Service Beltsville, MD.
Application of Remote Sensing in Washington Wine Grapes E.M. Perry 1, Jenn Smithyman 2, Russ Smithyman 2, Kevin Corliss 2, Urs Schulthess 3 1 WSU Center.
Data Merging and GIS Integration
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Real-World Stepwise Spectral Unmixing Daniel Newland Dr. John Schott Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory.
Published in Remote Sensing of the Environment in May 2008.
DROUGHT MONITORING THROUGH THE USE OF MODIS SATELLITE Amy Anderson, Curt Johnson, Dave Prevedel, & Russ Reading.
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior GFSAD30m Global Cropland Extent Products of Nominal 250 m (GCE V2.0) Updates Pardhasaradhi.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Ten State Mid-Atlantic Cropland Data Layer Project Rick Mueller Program Manager USDA/National Agricultural Statistics Service Remote Sensing Across the.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.
The Use of AVHRR NDVI in Environmental Applications Contact: Elizabeth R. McDonald ERIN Remote Sensing Coordinator Department of the Environment and Heritage.
By: GeoTrek. Hunter Krenek: Remote Sensing analyst & GIS analyst Joe Dowling: Assistant Project Manager & GIS analyst Peter Vogt: Website Designer & GIS.
Land Cover Classification, Deforestation Patterns Analysis and Field Survey - Deforestation Patterns Analysis of the Baekdudaegan Mountain Range.
A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Assessment of Regional Vegetation Productivity: Using NDVI Temporal Profile Metrics Background NOAA satellite AVHRR data archive NDVI temporal profile.
Operational Agriculture Monitoring System Using Remote Sensing Pei Zhiyuan Center for Remote Sensing Applacation, Ministry of Agriculture, China.
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
Consideration of Drainage Ditches and Sediment Rating Curve on SWAT Model Performance A.M. Sadeghi *1, A.M. Sexton 1, G.W. McCarty 1, M.W. Lang 3,1, W.D.
Ground-Truthing the Habitat Inventory for the Fraser River: Status Report and Lessons Learned March 2007 Fraser River Estuary Management Program.
By: Linda Kpormone Buame Department of Oceanography and Fisheries Date: 18 th January,2011.
Chapter 4. Remote Sensing Information Process. n Remote sensing can provide fundamental biophysical information, including x,y location, z elevation or.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Land Cover Change Monitoring change over time Ned Horning Director of Applied Biodiversity Informatics
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of.
Crop Mapping in Stanislaus County using GIS and Remote Sensing Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of.
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion
SATELLITE AND AERIAL IMAGE DATA, MOBILE COMPUTING, GIS, AND GPS FOR INTEGRATED CROP MANAGEMENT (ICM) Chuck O’Hara, Dan Reynolds, Roger King John Cartwright,
How to Map Irrigated and Non-Irrigated Land on the Eastern Snake Plain Aquifer Quickly, Easily, and Well How to Map Irrigated and Non-Irrigated Land on.
Object-oriented Land Cover Classification in an Urbanizing Watershed Erik Nordman, Lindi Quackenbush, and Lee Herrington SUNY College of Environmental.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
Updated Cover Type Map of Cloquet Forestry Center For Continuous Forest Inventory.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
REMOTE SENSING INDICATORS FOR CROP GROWTH MONITORING AT DIFFERENT SCALES Zongnan Li 1, 2 and Zhongxin Chen 1, 2* 1 Key Laboratory of Resources Remote Sensing.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
Assessing the Tree Canopy in Jefferson County, WV Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Laboratory.
LANDSAT EVALUATION OF TRUMPETER SWAN (CYGNUS BUCCINATOR) HISTORICAL NESTING SITES IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK Laura Cockrell and Dr. Robert B. Frederick.
US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.
Mapping Variations in Crop Growth Using Satellite Data
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Factsheet # 12 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution.
RSA: Crop Estimates Overview AfriGEOSS-EOPower-GEOGLAM
Infrastructure Identification near Island Park Reservoir, Idaho
Evaluating Land-Use Classification Methodology Using Landsat Imagery
Hands on Satellite Data to Monitor Biomass
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
Land cover data: a short theoretical introduction
Supervised Classification
National Forest Inventory for Great Britain
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Image Information Extraction
Intro to Precision Agriculture
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
(Presented at SCGIS Conference, Monterey, US, 2016)
Calculating land use change in west linn from
National Agricultural Statistics Service
Presentation transcript:

W. Dean Hively 1, Ali Sadeghi* 1, Megan Lang 1, Varaprasad Bandaru 2, and Greg McCarty 1 * (301) ; 1 USDA-ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, BARC-W, Beltsville, MD University of Maryland, College Park MD The Choptank River Watershed under the Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) has now accumulated a four-year set of quarterly SPOT satellite images that we are using to monitor agricultural practices on farms within the study area on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. The imagery is also useful for developing high resolution distributed input datasets for water quality modeling. Models such as AnnAGNPS and SWAT are often run on input data layers that derive topographic features from high resolution landscape maps (such as LIDAR), but land use coverage is often derived only from aggregated county-level statistics that are translated into landscape maps in a semi-random fashion. Through image classification we are able to identify crop types in the landscape (maize; soybean; wheat/soybean double crop; vegetated fallow; bare fallow) with an initial classification accuracy of 77%. As the project advances, methods will be developed to improve classification accuracy and map classifications to known field boundaries. Resulting geospatial coverages can be used to provide realistic, distributed input data layers that are expected to improve the accuracy of water quality models through the incorporation of spatially-precise landscape metrics particular to individual crop types, such as erodibility and application and loss of nutrients and pesticides. We are also using the data to investigate regional patterns of crop rotation and the temporal niches that farmers find suitable for growing winter cover crops. OBJECTIVES CLASSIFICATION OF SATELLITE IMAGERY Overall, ANTICIPATED DELIVERABLES  Spatially distributed INTERPRETATION  Classification of SPOT satellite imagery based on spectral signatures derived from windshield surveys was successful (R 2 ~77%) in accurately classifying crop type in the Choptank River watershed  This methodology can now be applied to a three-year quarterly archive of satellite images collected in the study area to derive information on crop rotation, distribution of cover crop niches, and additional environmental and agronomic factors that will assist with watershed modeling and implementation of effective conservation practices Deriving Satellite Crop Rotation Maps for Distributed Modeling of Water Quality in the Choptank River watershed Natural Resources Conservation Service August 2007 classification of agricultural landuse in the Choptank and Corsica River watersheds: Blue = corn Green = full season soybean Brown = small grain –double crop soybean Orange = fallow (includes non-cropped, CREP, pasture, etc…) Output of unsupervised classification (left) and NDVI (right) for various example corn fields. Each of six classes of corn is represented by a different color (Green, Blue, Red, Cyan, Yellow, Pink). Individual corn fields varied in the number of classes needed to characterize pixels. Field 1 and Field 2 contained pixels in five of the six classes available. Field 4 contained pixels classified in two of the six classes available. For Field 3, a majority of pixels fell in the cyan class, with the exception of a small area that was classified in the yellow class. Comparison of the images reveals areas of decreased vegetation (low NDVI) correlating with the blue and green classes, and robust vegetation correlating with the cyan class. August 2007 windshield survey data (left) and supervised classification (right); 8 of 12 of these example fields were correctly classified, with misidentification perhaps arising from A) robust growth in soybean intercrop resulting from early planting following barley harvest, and B) poor crop growth and/or high weed density resulting in classification as fallow. OBSTACLES ABSTRACT The authors would like to thank contributors from the University of Maryland Department of Geography, as well as ongoing collaborations with the Maryland Department of Agriculture and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, as part of the ongoing Choptank River CEAP project. This project was funded in part by the USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) and by a Chesapeake Bay 2006 Targeted Watersheds grant administered by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation and the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.  SPOT satellite imagery will be used to classify agricultural land use and crop rotations in the Choptank River CEAP study watershed  Methodologies will be developed to accurately produce semi-annual agricultural land use classification maps  Data will be adapted for incorporation into watershed hydrologic models to provide improved, spatially distributed input data layers  Information on crop rotations will assist investigation of cover crop niches, biomass production, carbon sequestration, and other CEAP project objectives CROP ROTATIONS WINDSHIELD SURVEYS STUDY AREA August 2006August 2007May 2008 This project builds upon the resources collected by the Choptank River CEAP project, including quarterly collection of satellite imagery (see SPOT image below), remote sensing of cover crop biomass, and distributed on-farm sampling. Windshield survey data are collected every March and August, on approximately 300 fields in the Choptank and Corsica River watersheds, on Maryland’s Eastern Shore. Monochromatic background imagery is derived from 2005 National Aerial Imagery Program ortho-photos. Field boundaries for the windshield survey sampling areas are digitized using ArcMap, and are subsequently associated with observed crop type PARTNERS 1. SPOT 5 satellite images (4-band, 10m resolution) are collected four times per year (March, May, August, December) on an ongoing basis 2. Windshield surveys are conducted in May and August, and observed crop type is linked to digitized field boundaries 3. 2/3 of windshield survey data within each image are used to derive six spectral endmembers for each crop type, based on unsupervised classification using ENVI 4. Satellite imagery is masked to agricultural areas based on USDA Common Land Use (CLU) data layer 5. Agricultural land use is predicted on a pixel-by-pixel basis using ENVI supervised classification and spectral endmembers for each crop type 6. Results are grouped within each CLU-defined field, based on dominant classification group (majority pixel count) 7. Remaining 1/3 of windshield survey data are used to evaluate classification accuracy blue = corn green = full season soybean brown = small grain – soybean double crop orange = fallow white = windshield survey field boundaries red = corn light blue = soybean green = fallow red = corn light blue = soybean green = fallow red = corn yellow = winter small grains green = fallow August 2006August 2007May 2008 A: continuous corn B: corn – wheat – double crop soybean rotation C: continuous fallow (CREP or pasture) A A B B B A C C C  Need to fully integrate CLU data layer into digitization of windshield survey field boundaries  Determine of minimum needed windshield survey and inter-image compatability of endmembers  Address misclassification and handling of weeds  Increase sophistication of fallow areas analysis  Automate classification within CLU field boundaries  Allocate staff time to processing of multiple images and compilation of results  Semi-annual agricultural land use classification for the Choptank, Corsica, and Chester River watersheds  Distributed input data for watershed models  Contributions to landscape analysis of integrated watershed monitoring data  Interpretation of temporal niches for cover crops within the predominant crop rotations