Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT Translating satellite images into meaningful geospatial information: The data fusion approach Mr. Amit A. Kokje PhD candidate, School.
Advertisements

Page 1 of 50 Optimization of Artificial Neural Networks in Remote Sensing Data Analysis Tiegeng Ren Dept. of Natural Resource Science in URI (401)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
September 5, 2013 Tyler Jones Research Assistant Dept. of Geology & Geography Auburn University.
Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Utilization of Remotely Sensed Data for Targeting and Evaluating Implementation of Best Management Practices within the Wister Lake Watershed, Oklahoma.
A Comparison of Pond Inventories Using Satellite and Airborne Sensors Artificial ponds exist throughout the Kansas landscape, far outnumbering natural.
Development of Remote Sensing-based Predictive Models for the Management of Taste and Odor Events in Kansas Reservoirs Dr. Mark Jakubauskas Kansas Biological.
Leila Talebi, Anika Kuczynski, Andrew Graettinger, and Robert Pitt
Urbanization and Land Cover Change in Dakota County, Minnesota Kylee Berger and Julia Vang FR 3262 Remote Sensing Section 001/002.
Application Of Remote Sensing & GIS for Effective Agricultural Management By Dr Jibanananda Roy Consultant, SkyMap Global.
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Vegetation Change in North Africa through the analysis of satellite data, Professor Stephen Young Department of Geography, Salem State College.
CHANGE DETECTION METHODS IN THE BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE AREA Thomas Juntunen.
The use of Remote Sensing in Land Cover Mapping and Change Detection in Somalia Simon Mumuli Oduori, Ronald Vargas Rojas, Ambrose Oroda and Christian Omuto.
Published in Remote Sensing of the Environment in May 2008.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
Eric Rafn and Bill Kramber Idaho Department of Water Resources
earthobs.nr.no Land cover classification of cloud- and snow-contaminated multi-temporal high-resolution satellite images Arnt-Børre Salberg and.
A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management data A comparison of remotely sensed imagery with site-specific crop management.
Investigating Land Cover Change In Crow Wing County Emily Smoter and Michael Palmer Remote Sensing of Natural Resources and the Environment University.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Conifer Health in Grand County, Colorado using Remotely Sensed Imagery Chris Cole.
Conversion of Forestland to Agriculture in Hubbard County, Minnesota By: Henry Rodman Cory Kimball 2013.
Operational Agriculture Monitoring System Using Remote Sensing Pei Zhiyuan Center for Remote Sensing Applacation, Ministry of Agriculture, China.
ASPRS Annual Conference 2005, Baltimore, March Utilizing Multi-Resolution Image data vs. Pansharpened Image data for Change Detection V. Vijayaraj,
The role of remote sensing in Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.
By: Linda Kpormone Buame Department of Oceanography and Fisheries Date: 18 th January,2011.
Selection of Multi-Temporal Scenes for the Mississippi Cropland Data Layer, 2004 Rick Mueller Research and Development Division National Agricultural Statistics.
Mapping Crops Using Hyperspectral Data Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Ramesh Gautam, Scott Hayes, Mohammad Mostafavi, Tom Hawkins Land Use Program California.
Land Use / Land Cover Change in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area Lori Krider & Melinda Kernik
Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management California Department of.
Crop Mapping in Stanislaus County using GIS and Remote Sensing Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi Land Use Section, Division of.
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Explosion
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
Assessing the Phenological Suitability of Global Landsat Data Sets for Forest Change Analysis The Global Land Cover Facility What does.
1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Open Land Without, or With Insignificant Vegetation Cover Water Presented By: Marvin Moody/Christian Windsor/Rafael Lima April 7, 2014 Land Use in Belize.
Object-oriented Land Cover Classification in an Urbanizing Watershed Erik Nordman, Lindi Quackenbush, and Lee Herrington SUNY College of Environmental.
An Analysis of Land Use/Land Cover Changes and Population Growth in the Pedernales River Basin Kelly Blanton-Project Manager Paul Starkel-Analyst Erica.
Updated Cover Type Map of Cloquet Forestry Center For Continuous Forest Inventory.
Land Cover Classification and Monitoring Case Studies: Twin Cities Metropolitan Area –Multi-temporal Landsat Image Classification and Change Analysis –Impervious.
Mapping Canada’s Rangeland and Forage Resources using Earth Observation Emily Lindsay MSc Candidate – Carleton University Supervisors: Doug J. King & Andrew.
GIS: The Systematic Approach to Precise Farm Management Robert Biffle Precision Agriculture April,
Estimating intra-annual changes in the surface area of Sand Mesa Reservoir #1 using multi-temporal Landsat images Cody A. Booth 1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai.
Camera Pod Mounted on Cessna 172. Using Landsat TM Imagery to Predict Wheat Yield and to Define Management Zones.
Emmalee Allen 1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai 2 1. Department of Plant Sciences/Agroecology program and 2 Department of Botany University of Wyoming.
BAND RATIOS Today, we begin to speak of the relationships between two+ bands.
LAND USE/LAND COVER CHANGE IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Maryia Bakhtsiyarava FNRM 5262.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
US Croplands Richard Massey Dr Teki Sankey. Objectives 1.Classify annual cropland extent, Rainfed-Irrigated, and crop types for the US at 250m resolution.
Christopher Steinhoff Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Wyoming Ramesh Sivanpillai Department of Botany, University of Wyoming Mapping Changes.
Kate E. Richardson 1 with Ramesh Sivanpillai 2 1.Department of Ecosystem Science and Management 2.Department of Botany University of Wyoming.
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
Mapping Variations in Crop Growth Using Satellite Data
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Term Project Presentation
CEE 6440: GIS in Water Resources Prepared by: Roula Bachour
Mapping wheat growth in dryland fields in SE Wyoming using Landsat images Matthew Thoman.
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT CROPS USING
ASTER image – one of the fastest changing places in the U.S. Where??
الدكتور: أحمد رأفت غضية صفاء عبد الجليل كامل حمادة
Paulo Gonçalves1 Hugo Carrão2 André Pinheiro2 Mário Caetano2
Today, we begin to speak of the relationships between two+ bands.
Corn and Soybean Differentiation Using Multi-Spectral Landsat Data
Image Information Extraction
GEOG-4045 Environmental Remote Sensing Larry Kiage & Naresh K. Sonti
The Pagami Creek Wildfire
Remote Sensing Section 3.
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Presentation transcript:

Ramesh Gautam, Jean Woods, Simon Eching, Mohammad Mostafavi, Scott Hayes, tom Hawkins, Jeff milliken Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management Land and Water Use Section California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California Rice Classification Using Remote Sensing and GIS

Overview of Presentation Challenges as well as Solution Approach Algorithm Development & Testing Results & Discussion Summary & Conclusion 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Challenges & Our solution Approach Timing of flooding: Timing of field flooding ranges from April through June. Approach: Decision tree based algorithm was developed to capture all fields that undergo flooding—Potentially Rice Fields Spectral similarity: Spectral patterns of rice, ponds, reservoirs and wetlands may be similar. Solution: Condition based methodology was applied to filter out spectrally similar fields. Image availability: Cloud-free and suitable temporal resolution images may not be available for the specified date. Image Substitution: Nearest date (before or after) image was considered to replace the targeted date image 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Pre-processing & field visit Cloud-free LANDSAT-5 satellite images were obtained from April to September, 2010 The field border was updated using NAIP and LANDSAT images. Crop type, field condition, percent cover and irrigation type were collected through field survey. 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Algorithm Development LANDSAT-5 Satellite Image Stack all Bands in Erdas Imagine Erdas Imagine Subset all images to Stanislaus CountyConvert all digital numbers into radiance eCognition Developer Import all images and thematic vector layersCompute EVI, LSWI, & NDVI 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Vegetation Indices: NDVI, EVI & LSWI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) NDVI = (NIR –RED)/(NIR +RED) Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) EVI = 2.5*(NIR-RED)/(NIR+6*RED-7.5*Blue+1) Land Surface Water Index (LSWI) LSWI = (NIR-SWIR)/(NIR+SWIR)

Algorithm Development LSWI+0.05>EVI or NDVI of AprilLSWI+0.05>EVI or NDVI of JuneLSWI+0.05> EVI or NDVI of May April, May or June Flooded Field

Grain/Corn Indices: EVI and LSWI

Orchards Indices: EVI and LSWI 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Alfalfa Indices: EVI and LSWI 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Rice Indices: EVI and LSWI 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Reservoir or Wetland Indices: EVI and LSWI 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Algorithm Development Cont’d… A field flooded in April Was this field also flooded in May and/or June ? A field flooded in May Was this field also flooded in April and/or June? A field flooded in June Was this field also flooded in April and/or May? 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Algorithm Development Cont’d… 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use Field A: Initially Flooded in April Flooded in May? Yes No Flooded in June? No Yes Calculate EVI after 40 days from May Image date Calculate EVI after 40 days from June Image date Calculate EVI after 40 days from April Image date [EVI> (MAX EVI/2)]? No Yes Potential Rice field

Algorithm Development Cont’d… 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use What if the fields are flooded in April, May, June, July, August, September? Reservoir, Pond, River or Lake Remove all of them

Algorithm development cont’d… 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use Group all potential rice fields Remove all fields which have NDVI higher than 0.4 in April and May Remove all fields that have high length to width ratio (L/W)>2000 Evaluate the remaining fields

Classified map: Stanislaus county 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Results & Discussions Accurately ClassifiedError of OmmissionError of commission Field ID(Acres) Field ID (Acres) Field ID(Acres) Total /19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use ERROR ANALYSIS, LANDSAT 5(April 17, 2010)

11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use ERROR ANALYSIS CONT’D…(May 19, 2010)

11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use ERROR ANALYSIS CONT’D…(June 20, 2010)

11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use ERROR ANALYSIS CONT’D…(July 6, 2010)

11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use ERROR ANALYSIS CONT’D…(August 7, 2010)

11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use ERROR ANALYSIS CONT’D…(September 24, 2010)

11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use RICE FIELD AND CONFUSED FIELD: EVI PLOT

11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use AREA MAPPED AS PASTURE IN THE LAND USE SURVEY, BUT FLOODED (June 13, 2010)

additional study Identifying Rice Fields in Glenn and Colusa Counties LANDSAT 5 satellite images of Glenn and Colusa Counties were obtained from NASA. All images were geometrically, radiometrically, and atmospherically corrected using the algorithm developed at NASA. Spectral band layers were stacked and clipped to Glenn and Colusa Counties. 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Error Matrix-Rice Classification RiceOthersTotal%Accuracy Rice 157, , , % Others 5, , , % Total 162, , , %Accuracy97%99% 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Glenn and Colusa Counties Surveyed and Classified Rice Fields in /19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Rice Classification-Error Analysis 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Rice Classification-Error Analysis 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Rice Classification-Error Analysis Cont’d… 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Rice Classification-Error Analysis Cont’d… 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Rice Classification-Error Analysis Cont’d… 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Rice Classification-Error Analysis Cont’d… 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Rice Classification-Error Analysis Cont’d… 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Conclusion A classification algorithm was developed to classify rice crop in Stanislaus County and tested in Glenn as well as Colusa Counties It was found that the rice crop can be classified with an overall accuracy of 99%. This method will be applied to other counties in order to further evaluate the consistency of the developed algorithm. 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use

Questions ? 11/19/14DWR-DSIWM-Land & Water Use