Career and Technical Education Monitoring for Compliance Monday, July 13, 2015 CTE Summer Conference CTE Administrators Ted W. Summey, Regional Coordinator,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Advertisements

1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs.
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
Title I Compliance Federal and State Programs. Goal of Title I To help ensure that all children have the opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Fiscal Monitoring Fiscal Monitoring. Agenda I. Fiscal Monitoring I. Fiscal Monitoring II. Follow-up II. Follow-up III. Correction Action Plan III. Correction.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Division of Special Education
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Implementing Effective Contractor Compliance Programs.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Business and Industry Certification Overview and Notebook Pages  The following is an overview of the required documentation for BIC. The following is.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
BRIDGET BULLARD PROGRAM ADVISOR, CENTRAL ARKANSAS REGION REGINIA S. KIMBROUGH PROGRAM ADVISOR, NORTHWEST ARKANSAS REGION Adult Education Program Reviews.
IDEA EC Grant Application & Fiscal Accountability New Charter Leaders Institute June 16-17, 2015 Valencia W. Davis, Consultant IDEA, Part B Programs NCDPI.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Monitoring Schedule David Chappell, or
NEW START-UP APPLICATION  Deadline to submit application is October 1 year prior to implementation  If proposal is ed, submit cover page.
SPECIAL EDUCATION MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT (MOE). MOE REQUIREMENT Federal law requires that each local education agency (LEA) receiving federal funds pursuant.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Preparing.
PREPARING FOR A COMPLIANCE REVIEW PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Fiscal Responsibility Webinar Title III Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
Chapter 21 Internal, Operational, and Compliance Auditing McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
1 Palo Verde Unified School District Curriculum & Instruction Department Malcolm Butler, Director of Curriculum & Instruction Single Plans for Student.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
1 THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
New Title I Designee Training September 17,
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
School Site Council (SSC) Essentials in brief An overview of SSC roles and responsibilities Prepared and Presented by Wanda Chang Shironaka San Juan Unified.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. WHAT IS A SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL, AND WHO ARE MEMBERS? The School Site Council (SSC) is an elected or selected group representative.
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 Purpose: School Site Council The organization by which the school community comes together to chart the school’s path to improvement.
Leading Your District To Be All That It Can Be David Williams, Deputy Director Div. of Soil & Water Conservation 2016 Spring Area Meetings.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
BASIC FISCAL REQUIREMENTS DAVID MARX TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©
Advisory Committees for Educator Preparation Programs
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program (CTEIG)
IDEA EC Grant Application & Fiscal Accountability
School Site Councils & Site Governance Teams
SMAA SMAA 101 What is SMAA?.
Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources July 18, 2018
School Site council 101.
The School Site Council
Managing Federal grants
CTE Federal Program Monitoring Review Process
THE SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Advisory Committees for Educator Preparation Programs
SMAA SMAA 101 What is SMAA?.
Presentation transcript:

Career and Technical Education Monitoring for Compliance Monday, July 13, 2015 CTE Summer Conference CTE Administrators Ted W. Summey, Regional Coordinator, NCDPI Christy Harris, Regional Coordinator, NCDPI

History of the Monitoring for Compliance Effort Six years ago, the State Auditor’s Office began to audit the Career and Technical Education Division’s compliance with state and federal law. One of the items the Assistant State Auditor identified was that CTE was not monitoring LEA compliance at a sufficient level. The Regional Services staff began developing a monitoring process that would address the audit findings AND strengthen CTE across the state.

Purposes of the Monitoring for Compliance Effort Improve the quality of state and local CTE programs Ensure that CTE Administrators know and understand the compliance requirements AND have the local authority to guide the district to meet the compliance requirements. Ensure that districts meet the expected compliance requirements.

What are the Compliance Requirements? The compliance requirements are the Assurances outlined in the CTE Local Plan. The Assurances constitute the “contract” between the local board of education/district and NCDPI for state and federal CTE funding. Because the local board approves the Assurances and agrees to comply with them as a condition for funding, the Assurances are binding.

What Documentation Do I Need? The CTE Division has created a Blueprint for CTE Monitoring for Compliance as a guide for local compliance. Monitoring for Compliance Blueprint iAuditor Application on the iPad – Search for the Template using Education as the Industry and CTE Monitoring as keywords iAuditor ReportiAuditor Report In the Blueprint the necessary documentation or other evidence of compliance is listed under the Verification Method column. The Fiscal and Policy Guide also has a reference list (Appendix N)

New Processes Started Risk-based Targeting - Risk-based MeasuresRisk-based Measures Two types of Visits – “Desk Audit” - Includes review of the Local Plan and central office interviews and record review –“On-Site Visit” with a team that visits schools, reviews the Local Plan and conducts central office record review and interviews.

Examples of Documentation for both On Site and Desk Audits Purchase Orders – PRC 014 and 017 (two years) Expenditure Report – PRC 014 and 017 (current year) CTE Equipment Inventory – Middle and High Schools CTE Non Discrimination Statement Student Course Registration Materials , CTE Staff Development – Agendas, Attendance Reports CTE Advisory Council – Agendas, Minutes

Who Will be Conducting the ONSITE Monitoring Visit A team of Regional Coordinators will lead the visit. Dependent upon the size of the school district – two to as many as six may be involved in the visit In some cases, experienced CTE Administrators from other districts may conduct specific parts of the monitoring under the direction of the Regional Coordinators.

How Long do On Site Visits Take? A complete monitoring for compliance audit may take several days to complete – start to finish. The onsite visit will take 2 to 5 days. These may or may not be consecutive days. This will depend upon how the RC schedules the visit and what findings may there are during the visit as well as the size of the district. There is a “desk audit” of selected Assurances that will be conducted by the Regional Coordinator for that district.

What Happens During the Onsite Visit? At least one Regional Coordinator will review the documentation listed previously At least one Regional Coordinator will visit the schools in your district

School Visits School Visits will involve: –Observing CTE Classrooms/Instruction –Capstone CTE Courses – Interview Students –Cooperative CTE Courses – Interview Students –Articulation Courses – Interview Instructors and Students –Interview Principal and CTE Teachers –Other - Interview with CCP instructors, interview with counselors, other interviews and records review dependent upon the findings during the school visits

What Does “Desk Audit” Look Like? The Desk Audit will be conducted by one or two Regional Coordinators dependent upon the size of the district The Desk Audit will cover the Local Plan Review and Records Review The Desk Audit may take one to three days dependent upon the size of the district

What Outcomes Should I Expect? A Letter of Findings (or non-findings) A Summary of Findings Report –Commendations – Things we find that represent excellent practices/innovation or unique programming –Findings of Non-Compliance –Program Improvement Recommendations

What Should I Do to “Fix Things” Before the Visit? NOTHING – Band Aids only hide what needs to be seen! If you are scheduled for a visit……………As much as you may want to try to “fix” everything before the visit, it is a much healthier process to allow the team to find things as they are. If you are not scheduled for a visit this year, it is wise to review the Blueprint and address non-compliance issues with “fixes” that will be lasting – no band aids

What are the “Typical” Non-Compliance Findings –Improper coding of personnel positions (assigned to non-CTE duties) –Use of CTE funds for prohibited purposes (Capital improvements) –Lack of an Advisory Board for formal documented input to the Local Plan as outlined in Part I of the LPS –Miscoded expenditures. Most are corrected during visit. –Out-of-Field assignments for teachers –Certification of Time and Effort – not recorded properly/dates incorrect/cost objective not identified

Questions and Discussion All Things “Monitoring” Considered