Overview of NPG Social Responsibility Audit Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) 1 Roles & Responsibilities San Diego, California January 20, 2011 R. Darrell Taylor Raytheon.
Responding to Record Requests. TYPE OF REQUEST Public Information Act (PIA) Request otherwise known as an Open Records Request Inactive Student Record.
Enabling Responsible International Workplaces New FFC Partnership Model.
Discover ACP It's Easier than Ever to Hire Temp Labor.
Time Sensitive Standards Presented by RPM Vince Dauro.
Presented By: John D. Miller
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
Samuel Steel Safety Group Meeting Four November 14, 2013 Samuel Safety Systems.
STUDENT ORGANIZATION Returning Organization Recognition Packet Please review these guidelines to assist organization officers in completing the requirements.
September D.I.S.H Director Information Share Hub Verification 2014 Katie Embree-Cleveland September 11, 2014.
An Overview of the Accreditation Process and Important Policies Megan Scanlan, Director of Accreditation, Stacy Wright, Site Visit.
Scheme SHARE Safety & Health Audit Recognition and Evaluation Scheme Scheme.
ETravel Authorization / Reimbursement Overview SOLAR Financials x 6685 July 8, 2014.
The Federal Regulator’s Perspective Industrial Railway Safety Conference Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta April 28, 2015.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
ASPEC Internal Auditor Training Version
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
RJC Certification - (COP 9) Bribery and Facilitation Payments Training Module – March 2014.
Hiring Manager/Supervisor Training Offer Letters.
1 Addendum Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP Detailed Instructions for Bidder Registration and Proposal Submission ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. September 11, 2006.
National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Presents… John Kolotos Carney McCullough US Department of Education CASH MANAGEMENT Current.
1 Internal Controls. 2 Example Internal Control Manual  Focused Assessment Exhibit 4A  /trade/trade_programs/audits/focused.
Commissioning of Federal Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPC) May 20, 2003 Doug Dahle National Renewable Energy Lab.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
Verification. What is Verification? Verification is confirmation of eligibility for free and reduced price meals under NSLP and SBP. -Verification is.
DISPLAY FIREWORKS SEMINAR PARIS LAS VEGAS HOTEL February 21,
Program Compliance Review Overview IFTA Annual Business Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada July 21-22, 2006 Presented by Dick Beckner Debora Meise Jay Starling.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
Soft Tech Development Inc. 1 Software Project Tracking A CMM Level 2 Key Process Area Soft Tech Development Inc.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Managed by the International Fuel Tax Association, Inc.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Procedures and Forms 2008 FRCC Compliance Workshop April 8-9, 2008.
Best Practices for Banking MSBs
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Legal framework:
Advice for Internal Compliance Programmes Billy Au Principal Trade Officer Head of Strategic Trade Controls Branch Trade and Industry Department The Government.
Travel Update and Review Controller’s Office October 26, 2011.
Monitoring IRB Monitoring of Clinical Trials. Types of Monitoring Internally Internally Externally Externally.
July 2013 What you need to know about procuring suppliers Deborah Ramshaw and Lois Shield.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
Supervision SICOR Securities, Inc.. Why? NASD 3110 requires the firm to “…establish and maintain a system to supervise the activities of each registered.
BRP Program Compliance and Reporting November 18, 2015.
IRBNet The implementation of IRBNet will assist the UTEP community to comply with UT System Policy UTS 108 on Affiliation Agreements. IRBNet will provide.
Overview of Grant Agreements - Agreement Process - Roadmap to the Agreement Document - Agreement Requirements/ Compliance Issues - Timelines for Reporting.
Focused Monitoring SPR & I Training October 2009.
Fully accredited since 2006 Tom Conquergood, CIP Working with Quorum October 13, 2015 Thomas Jefferson University.
Trusted to deliver excellence © 2016 Rolls-Royce plc and/or its subsidiaries The information in this document is the property of Rolls-Royce plc and/or.
California Department of Public Health Domain Team Orientation
0 Vendorization Process HABILITATION SERVICES. 1 Title 17 Requirements  All existing Title 17 vendorization regulations that apply to regional center.
UnionPay Card Manufacturer Certification Introduction.
2016 NSF Large Facilities Workshop New Initiatives Business Roundtable II-III May 25-26, 2016 Jeff Lupis, Division Director, Division of Acquisition and.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
INSETA LEARNERSHIPS. 2 Background INSETA is working on an exit strategy towards completion and NSDS 2 and preparation for the QCTO and NSDS 3. The success.
Businessolver Implementation & Customer Service Plan
Washington State Auditor’s Office Third Party Receipting Presented to Washington Public Ports Association June 2016 Peg Bodin, CISA.
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Purchase order management process
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
ExhibitorLive 2018 IFES Global Village
George Mason University
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
ENTERGY SERVICES, INC. February 23, 2006
Diversity management system (DMS)
Client Process Pack.
Presentation transcript:

Overview of NPG Social Responsibility Audit Process 2015 Overview of NPG Social Responsibility Audit Process May 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE(S) Table of Contents 2 Social Responsibility Contact Information 3 NPG Social Responsibility 4 Program Components Factory Approval Process 5 Audit Process 6 Remediation Process 7 Peer Collaboration 8 Appendix 9 Letter of Confirmation and Commitment I Nordstrom’s Guidelines for Photographic and Written Documentation II

Social Responsibility Contact information All communication should be sent to npgsc@nordstrom.com only, unless otherwise requested.   TITLE NAME CONTACT INFO. Social Responsibility Support npgsc@nordstrom.com Social Responsibility Specialist Motthida Chin Arielle Kohr Senior Manager of Social Responsibility, Quality, and Product Integrity Kaleene Kenning Kaleene.D.Kenning@nordstrom.com Director of Operational Support Group Abby Bueler Abby.L.Bueler@nordstrom.com

Program components Monitoring means collection of information related to factory operation via the Nordstrom Supplier Questionnaire (NSQ) and Partnership Guidelines (PG). Auditing means the assessment of factory compliance with local law and Nordstrom expectations via a Nordstrom or third-party visit. An audit includes a factory tour, full records review, in addition to management and employee interviews.

Factory Approval Process NPG defines a new factory as any factory that is not currently in Nordstrom Product Group’s (NPG) system (deactivated) or has never produced orders bearing a Nordstrom-owned brand name or logo. There are three steps in the new factory approval process: The factory and manufacturer must complete the Nordstrom Supplier Questionnaire (NSQ), sign the Partnership Guidelines (PG) and sign the Letter of Confirmation and Commitment (Appendix I) All factories producing for NPG are required to schedule, complete and pay for in advance, a comprehensive audit performed by our third party monitor (TPM) as determined by Nordstrom. New factories must complete the audit prior to being approved for production Providing the audit does not reveal high-risk non-compliance issues, NPG’s Social Responsibility will approve the factory for order placement  

Audit Process All facilities that produce Nordstrom Product Group (NPG) products must be audited. New and existing factories follow the same audit process: When requested to do so by an NPG contact, a factory will complete an Assessment Request Form and schedule a comprehensive factory audit with our TPM Factory shall sign and return a copy of Nordstrom’s Letter of Confirmation and Commitment. This letter indicates the factory will comply with Nordstrom’s Corrective Action Plan (CAP) and remediate all findings discovered during an audit Factory should inform TPM as soon as possible of any closures or time conflicts due to peak production and/or holidays, etc. Denying access to execute a scheduled audit will result in a a Demands Immediate Action rating and cancellation fee charged to the factory in the approximate amount of $1400 USD (+ travel costs). This incurred cost will be in addition to the factory audit fee, in the approximate amount of $1400 USD (+ travel costs) Pay for audit directly to TPM prior to audit execution. If payment is not received, the audit will not be conducted Once the audit is conducted, and the signed Letter of Confirmation and Commitment has been received, NPG’s Social Responsibility team will review the report and inform brand of production approval status Factory will be informed by NPG’s brand contact when they are approved for production and orders can proceed

Remediation Process Remediation means addressing non-compliance issues identified in a social compliance audit. There are three steps in the remediation process: NPG’s Social Responsibility team reviews the audit results, provides the factory a Corrective Action Plan (CAP), and requests factory input. The CAP outlines findings according to risk level The factory reviews the CAP, provides comments, and begins to remediate the non-compliance issues. The factory e-mails photos and other electronic documentation, per Nordstrom’s Guidelines for Photographic and Written Documentation (Appendix II), to NPG’s Social Responsibility team for verification that corrective actions have been completed Any Zero Tolerance (ZT) or Demands Immediate Action (DIA) issues found must be remediated immediately. Other issues are remediated according to CAP timelines If necessary, the NPG Social Responsibility team will schedule a follow-up audit to verify that corrective action have been remediated  

Peer Collaboration All new factory audits and every 3rd annual audit must be an NPG audit. These audits can still be shared with peers but need to be in NPG’s template and conducted by NPG’s designated TPM. Peer Audits Peer collaboration means working with other retailers (“peer companies”) to streamline the social compliance process at shared facilities. Peer collaboration may include shared audits, remediation, training, and projects. Annual audits may be conducted as peer audits at NPG’s discretion. There are three steps in the peer collaboration process: NPG’s Social Responsibility team identifies a shared facility and proposes a joint social compliance activity with facility consent NPG’s Social Responsibility team and the peer company conduct the activity and communicate results internally. Only social responsibility-related information is discussed, and all information remains confidential NPG’s Social Responsibility team, the peer company, and the facility determine applicable next steps to remediate any issues found Audit Sharing In order to further reduce audit fatigue, NPG may elect to accept an audit conducted by another retailer or brand, at the discretion of the Social Responsibility team. To be considered for review, the audit must have been conducted within the last six months. The factory shall submit the full audit report (not a corrective action plan, CAP) to NPG. Once reviewed against our standards we may choose to accept the alternative audit in lieu of conducting our own.

Appendix

Appendix I.

Appendix II.