Route Topology Model – 1. Introduction Jan-Hendrik Oltmann Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration, Germany.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marine Spatial Planning in the German EEZ PlanCoast Study Tour - July 6, 2007.
Advertisements

Maritime Spatial Planning Angela Schultz-Zehden PlanCoast Coordinator sustainable projects.
Formatvorlage des Untertitelmasters durch Klicken bearbeiten
20th November 2007 / Berlin PlanCoast Handbook/ Guidelines and Key Messages Angela Schultz-Zehden.
Safer lives, safer ships, cleaner seas System Architecture Integrated Colin Brown E-Navigation.
The IHO Data Registry (S-100) Supporting e-Navigation and Maritime Spatial Planning International Hydrographic Organization.
E-navigation, and IHO’s role IHO, Monaco, October 2014 John Erik Hagen, Regional Director NCA Coordinator of the completed IMO Correspondence Group on.
Tactical Route Exchange Anders Brodje, PhLic Swedish Maritime Administration.
Navigating Risk, Challenge and Opportunity Promise of the Arctic, Seattle, WA Drummond Fraser Transport Canada, Marine Safety & Security May 29, 2013.
Setting the scene: The ACCSEAS Project Dr Alwyn I. Williams ACCSEAS Project Manager ACCSEAS Conference th February 2015.
IHO MSDI WG Open Forum, 3 March 2015, London Delivering Marine Information Infrastructure (SDI) to Ports Dr Mike Osborne OceanWise Ltd 1.
e-Navigation & MSDI: The role of IHO, IMO and Developers
On board equipment for Sea traffic Management What will be needed?
1 Spatial Databases as Models of Reality Geog 495: GIS database design Reading: NCGIA CC ’90 Unit #10.
The Legacy of the ACCSEAS project Pieter Paap NL Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment 3 rd Annual ACCSEAS Conference February 2015.
Creating a GIS from NOAA Electronic Navigational Charts
GIS in Transportation: GIS - T Prof. Yuji Murayama - Instructor Hao HOU – Teaching Assistant Division of Spatial Information Science University of Tsukuba.
Regulations & Requirements
Work package 3 Analysis of international MSP Instruments Sophie Jacques 3E Support by: WP 2: National MSP - France SEANERGY 2020 project Sophie Jacques.
NSR-RTM as an ACCSEAS legacy for Europe
CETMEF Common Shore-Based e-Navigation Architecture
Particularly Sea-Sensitive Areas and Marine Protection Zones. A Controversial Issue that needs Interpretation Dr. Aristotelis B. Alexopoulos BCA College.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Zoning in MSP – Examples from Germany and Pilot Project Pom. Bight Click to add.
1 May 7, MTS at a Glance 25,000 miles of navigable waterways 25,000 miles of navigable waterways 18,000 bridges 18,000 bridges 78 million recreational.
Børge Hetland Director Sales Digital Ship Hamburg, 19 th March 2015 e-navigation from concept to reality.
October 2009 Klaus Grensemann, Division WS 23 St. Petersburg 1 Development and Implementation of an Overall E-Navigation Strategy.
9/21/2015 UNCLASSIFIED 1 Supports: –Marine navigation –Mission planning –Geographic Information Systems Digital Nautical Chart (DNC) Relational database.
The IALA Vision for e-Navigation Nordic Navigation Conference Oslo 16 & 17 October 2007.
e-Navigation Architecture The present status and work ahead Nordic Institute of Navigation Bergen Rolf Zetterberg.
e-Navigation and it’s applicability to inland waterways
Chart 1> The on-board maritime PNT Module> R. Ziebold > IALA e-Nav 12 09/25/2012 The on-board maritime PNT Module – Concept & Status of Realization.
Knut Espen Solberg 20 October 2009 WP210 Marine Transportation.
UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL Centre for Research in Geomatics, Université Laval, Cité universitaire, Quebec, QC Canada G1K 7P4 Semantic Interoperability of Geospatial.
CBSC May 2015 (Mexico City, Mexico) Progress Report on the IHO GIS including C-55 IHB.
MSDI OPEN FORUM MSDI in the Baltic London, Tuesday 3rd March 2015 Jens Peter Hartmann Chair BSMSDIWG Denmark.
Traffic Information Analysis of Capabilities and associated Data Models.
19 th Conference of MBSHC 29 June – 3 July 2015 (Batumi, Georgia) Cooperation with the International Maritime Organization (IMO) the International Maritime.
Working Group of Transports Inter Mediterranean Commission. CPMR Working Group of Transports Declaration on the transport policy in the Mediterranean Genoa,
Baltic Master midterm conference Snekkersten, 19 – 20 October First steps towards a safer Baltic Sea WP 3 Sustainable spatial and regional.
International Hydrographic Organization MSDI OPEN FORUM IHO MSDIWG Vision and Deliverables to the IHO London, Tuesday 3rd March 2015 Jens Peter Hartmann.
Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
Baltic Master WP2 Seminar Safe Transportation at Sea Kalmar, June,2006.
ACCSEAS: e-Navigation and its benefits to the environment Dr Alwyn I. Williams ACCSEAS Project Manager BE-AWARE II Final Conference Ronneby, Sweden 18.
EfficienSea – Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea TKI –toiminnan teemapäivä Kymenlaakson ammattikorkeakoulussa
Introduction to Geographic Information Systems
Nordic Institute of Navigation E-Navigation Conference IHO and e-Nav Robert WARD Director, International Hydrographic Organization.
Maritime Cloud A technical infrastructure to support seamless information transfer in e-navigation IALA e-NAV14 – September 2013 Ole Bakman Borup Danish.
Legal base for harmonized data protection Stefan Jenner Meeting of IALA LAP 12 March 7-8, 2013.
Report to ANM 21 on the IALA Workshop on Developing IHO S-100 Product Specifications for e-Navigation Bjorn Erik Krosness Norwegian Coastal Administration.
Route Topology Model – 3. Support of Traffic Flow Jan-Hendrik Oltmann Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration, Germany.
PIANC RIS Guidelines 2011 Edition 3 Smart Rivers Conference 2011 PIANC RIS working group Cas Willems.
Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea Ómar Frits Eriksson Chairman EfficienSea Management Board Head og Innovation and Project Division Danish.
Bavarian Agency for Surveying and Geoinformation AAA - The contribution of the AdV in an increasing European Spatial Data Infrastructure - the German Way.
29 OCTOBER 20141REGULATIONS FOR OFFSHORE SERVICE VESSELS DEVELOPMENT OF REGULATIONS FOR OFFSHORE SERVICE VESSELS - FOCUS AREAS KVNR Niels van de Minkelis.
ACCSEAS: e-Navigation Test-Bed in the North Sea Region SUCG Northern Lighthouse Board 1 st November 2012.
GIS & Databases Ming-Chun Lee.
Designing Waterborne RDI Strategy e-Maritime e-Navigation
The shore based AIS Service as an e-navigation service
IHO Council – October 2017 Review of IHO Strategic Plan
Proposed IHO Work Programme for 2018
e-Navigation Overview
Portrayal in the marine domain
Regulating Arctic Shipping Unilateral, Regional and Global Approaches
Korean e-Navigation project
Hydrographic Services and Standards Committee
IHO-MSDIWG10 Busan, Republic of Korea (4-5 March 2019)
Nautical Information Provision Working Group IHO Strategic Plan
Enhancing navigational safety in shipping lanes.
Roadmap for the S-100 Implementation Decade
Presentation transcript:

Route Topology Model – 1. Introduction Jan-Hendrik Oltmann Federal Waterways and Shipping Administration, Germany

Presentation overview

The Advent of Marine Spatial Planning /1 The North Sea Region today and in Source: ACCSEAS GIS

The Advent of Marine Spatial Planning /2 Example of MSP in the German EEZ MSP is a fact, let’s face it! Source: BSH Germany “shipping lanes” with legal status

The Advent of Marine Spatial Planning /3 Mark “shipping lanes” Add junctions Add important port “nodes” Lift off RTM

What is a Route Topology Model (RTM) /1 - A Route Topology Model represents voyage/traffic relations -RTM comprises/ addresses two different domains: - A RTM is build by concatenation of legs. - An RTM is constructed by identifying and describing a network of “legs”, i.e. defined stretches of fairway/waterway between two “nodes” with defined attributes.

- The node domain What is a Route Topology Model (RTM) /2

What is a Route Topology Model (RTM) /3 - There is a generic RTM, ideally defined globally in a harmonized manner as part of the IMO envisaged Common Maritime Data Structure (CMDS) based on IHO S-100 framework; - There are many instances of RTM, one for each sea area under consideration, e.g. the North Sea Region (NSR)-RTM: NSR-RTM - Various applications build on this (once defined).

How to derive a RTM (for the NSR)? /1 IEC 62288:2013, Annex A, Table A.3.1b EU „Motorways of the Seas“ „artist‘s impression“ EU INSPIRE, “Transport Networks” Generic RTM Definition MonaLisa 2.0: Rydlinger/e-Navigation Underway 2014 SN.1/Circ.289: AIS ASM Route information IMO Res. A.893(21) „Guidelines for Voyage Planning“

How to derive a RTM (for the NSR)? /2 Use AIS footage + Marine Spatial Planning data of North Sea Region Database representation of (NSR-)RTM Source: BSH Germany Source: ACCSEAS GIS

How can a RTM be portrayed? Different users need different portrayal modes  different applications provide different portrayal modes. * IMO NAV57, WP6, Fig. 1

Portrayal modes tailored to RTM applications /1 Three fundamentally different portrayal modes have been identified: a)“ENC/ECDIS Layer Mode” a)“London Tube Map Mode” b)“Head-up Display/Augmented Reality Mode”

1. the “ENC/ECDIS Layer Mode” Chart-oriented / based; True topographical context; To be used for navigation (if based on certified ENC); Serves both tactical and strategic needs of a vessel’s voyage. Portrayal modes tailored to RTM applications /2 Source: ACCSEAS GIS The Motorways of the Sea (MoS) of the NSR

2. the “London Tube Map Mode” Portrayal modes tailored to RTM applications /3 Deliberately disregards exact topographical locations in favour of the abstraction to strategic essentials, such as “shipping lanes” => “reduce to the max” Example: Motorways of the Sea (MoS) along the German coast

3. The “Head-up Display/Augmented Reality Mode” Portrayal modes tailored to RTM applications /4 Just shows features visible/ relevant to the individual vessel in a given tactical situation; Creates awareness for up- coming situations regarding routes, such as nodes of rele- vance (bends, junctions, ports); Allows for Scheduled Time of Arrival (STA) clock display (ahead-of-time/lag-behind indi- cator);

ENC/ECDIS Layer Mode London Tube Map Mode Head-Up/Augmented Reality Mode ENC/ECDIS Layer Mode London Tube Map Mode Portrayal modes tailored to RTM applications /5 -Co-existence of different modes of portrayal for different applications (onboard and ashore) -Scalability as required by IMO’s e-Navigation strategy

All modes of portrayal / all applications are ‘driven’ by the very same database: This is harmonization in the spirit of e-Navigation! * IMO NAV57, WP6, Fig. 1 Route Topology Model ENC/ECDIS Layer Mode London Tube Map Mode Head-Up/Augmented Reality Mode ENC/ECDIS Layer Mode London Tube Map Mode Common Maritime Data Structure (CMDS) Portrayal modes tailored to RTM applications /6