Groups Involved University of Alberta, University of Texas at Arlington, University College London. Prague, Saclay, Stoneybrook, Giessen, Manchester,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T958! Fermilab Test beam experiment to study fast timing counters for FP420 MOU between UTA, Alberta, Louvain, Fermilab (Brandt spokesman) Data taking.
Advertisements

AFP QUARTIC Fast Timing System James L Pinfold University of Alberta.
QUARTIC Front-end Readout – Initial Steps James Pinfold For the QUARTIC Working Group René Magritte: Empire of Light.
Barrel PID upgrade K. Inami (Nagoya-u) and PID group - R&D status - TOP counter - iTOP - Focusing DIRC - To do, cost estimation.
QUARTZTOFMike Albrow CMS-FP420 April 28 th 2008 QUARTZTOF An isochronous & achromatic Cerenkov Counter Making Cerenkov light parallel  point focusing.
1 QUARTIC, A TOF for ATLAS/CMS Forward Protons You didn’t know that ATLAS+CMS had forward protons? FP420 = Forward Protons 420m downstream of CMS & ATLAS.
The UC Simulation of Picosecond Detectors Pico-Sec Timing Hardware Workshop November 18, 2005 Timothy Credo.
Fermilab / U. Chicago / Argonne Collaborative Initiative on Ultra Fast Timing Detectors With: (ANL) Karen Byrum, Gary Drake, Bob Wagner (UC) Henry Frisch,
1 QUARTIC: UTA Update Andrew Brandt, Chance Harenza, Joaquin Noyola, Pedro Duarte Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike Albrow’s concept for a fast time resolution.
Monika Grothe, Forward Proton Detectors at High Luminosities at the LHC, ICHEP06 1 Forward Proton Detectors at High Luminosity at the LHC Monika Grothe.
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate students investigate.
Peter Križan, Ljubljana March 17, 2006 Super B Workshop, Frascati Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Aerogel RICH and TOP: summary.
Fast Timing Workshop Krakow, Nov 29 - Dec 1 st 2010 Part 2b.
TOF for ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream and downstream of central detector to precisely.
May 31, 2008 SuperB PID sessionMarko Starič, Ljubljana Marko Starič J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Report on hardware tests and MC studies in Ljubljana.
Blair Ratcliff2 nd Workshop on SuperB, Frascati, March Status Update: the Focusing DIRC Prototype at SLAC Blair Ratcliff Blair Ratcliff Representing:
Experimental set-up Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE Multi-Channel MCP PMTs S.Korpar a,b, R.Dolenec.
Photodetection EDIT EDIT 2011 N. Dinu, T. Gys, C. Joram, S. Korpar, Y. Musienko, V. Puill, D. Renker 1 Micro Channel plate PMT (MCP-PMT) Similar to ordinary.
ATLAS Forward Proton Electronics Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington 1 AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream.
1 QUARTIC Update Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington), Mike Albrow (FNAL), Jim Pinfold (Alberta) Preliminary UTA drawing of Mike Albrow’s concept for a fast time.
FP420/AFP Timing Two types of Cerenkov detector are employed: QUARTIC – two QUARTIC detectors each with 4 rows of 8 fused silica bar allowing up to a 4-fold.
The primary goal has been to have the AFP timing system fully defined for the AFP Technical Proposal by December The end result should be a system.
“End station A setup” data analysis Josef Uher. Outline Introduction to setup and analysis Quartz bar start counter MA and MCP PMT in the prototype.
Experimental set-up for on the bench tests Abstract Modeling of processes in the MCP PMT Timing and Cross-Talk Properties of BURLE/Photonis Multi-Channel.
Andrew BrandtSept 13 th 2005FP420/Cerenkov Intro 1 Location of LHC in France and Switzerland, with lake Geneva and the Alps in the background The ATLAS.
ON BEHALF OF THE LHCb RICH/TORCH COLLABORATION
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
work for PID in Novosibirsk E.A.Kravchenko Budker INP, Novosibirsk.
PID for super Belle (design consideration) K. Inami (Nagoya-u) - Barrel (TOP counter) - Possible configuration - Geometry - Endcap (Aerogel RICH) - Photo.
Mike AlbrowSept 14 th 2006Time-of-Flight with GASTOFs im Test Beam 1 Fast Timing Counters for FP420/CMS and Test Beam Particle ID Mike Albrow, September.
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
Fast Timing Mtg April 15 th 2009 Mike Albrow Fast Timing studies at Fermilab : Test beam plans notes from meeting April 15 th 2009 MTest May Wed 27 th.
July 4, 2008 SuperBelle Meeting, KEKPeter Križan, Ljubljana Peter Križan University of Ljubljana and J. Stefan Institute Burle MCP PMTs as photon detector.
Barrel PID upgrade K. Inami (Nagoya) Ljubljana, Hawaii, Cincinnati and PID group - R&D status - Structure design - Prototype study - Beam test - Photon.
FIT (Fast Interaction Trigger) detector development for ALICE experiment at LHC (CREN) Institute for Nuclear Research (INR RAS) National Research Nuclear.
1 10 Psec Workshop April 28 at UTA Follow up on visit to SLAC to meet Jerry Va’vra and very successful Pico-Second Timing Hardware Workshop at University.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
1992PH.D. UCLA/CERN (UA8 Experiment discovered hard diffraction) Post-doc and Wilson Fellow at Fermilab -Discovered hard color singlet exchange.
The FP420 R&D Project Motivation from KMR calculations (e.g. hep-ph ) Selection rules mean that central system is (to a good approx) 0 ++ If you.
High Energy Physics at UTA UTA faculty Andrew Brandt, Kaushik De, Amir Farbin, Andrew White, Jae Yu along with many post-docs, graduate and undergraduate.
Module-0 of AFP ToF Detector Libor Nozka on behalf of ATLAS Forward Proton Group Palacky University 1.
Jean-François Genat Fast Timing Workshop June 8-10th 2015 FZU Prague Timing Methods with Fast Integrated Technologies 1.
Christian Lippmann (ALICE TRD), DPG-Tagung Köln Position Resolution, Electron Identification and Transition Radiation Spectra with Prototypes.
Overview of detector requirements Purpose: To put today’s session into context. Steve Watts and Krzysztof Piotrzkowski.
FP420/AFP Fast Timing Stage I: LHC luminosity 2 x10 33  t < 20 ps (
Quartic tests at Fermilab test beam June rd 2015 One “prototype” module made. #1 ? To CERN mid July for August test beam.
Pileup Background Rejection Ex, Two protons from one interaction and two b-jets from another Fast Timing Detectors for FP420 z=c(TR-TL)/2  z (mm) =0.21.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Mike AlbrowFP420 – May Timing and Pile-up Considerations 1 Pile-up in trigger and pile-up off-line (HLT) very different issues. Here I consider.
AFP Fast Timing System Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington in collaboration with Alberta, Giessen, Stony Brook, and FNAL, Louvain, LLNL (CMS)
TORCH IOP meeting Manchester March 31, 2015 TORCH Maarten van Dijk On behalf of the TORCH collaboration (CERN, University of Oxford,
TORCH – a Cherenkov based Time-of- Flight Detector Euan N. Cowie on behalf of the TORCH collaboration E N Cowie - TORCH - TIPP June 2014.
Mike AlbrowSept 8 th 2005Test Beam for FP420 Vacuum Chambers/Detectors 1 Things we need to test (and why) How we could, together with BTeV people, detectors,
Matthias Hoek Institut für Kernphysik Next Generation Cherenkov Counters* *For Accelerator Experiments 52. International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics.
10 picoseconds original design goal (light travels 3mm in 10 psec!) gives large factor of background rejection; Phase I: lum up to several  t
PROJECT X PHYSICS STUDY WORKSHOP (PXPS 2012) Working Group on Time of Flight Conveners: Mike Albrow (FNAL) & Bob Wagner (ANL) New directions in fast timing:
Mike Albrow, FermilabHPS Comments, Manchester 20l0 Some random HPS comments Mike Albrow HPS is accepted in CMS as an R&D project : Physics case is accepted.
Time resolution for the full detector system: 1. Intrinsec detector time resolution 2. Jitter in PMT's 3. Electronics (AMP/CFD/TDC) 4. Reference Timing.
ATLAS Forward Proton Upgrade AFP concept: adds new ATLAS sub-detectors at 220 and 420 m upstream and downstream of central detector to precisely measure.
Prospect of SiPM application to TOF in PANDA
Andrew Brandt, University of Texas at Arlington
HPS: R&D issues Krzysztof Piotrzkowski (UCLouvain/CERN)
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
Test Beam Studies for FP420 Fast Timing
Andrew Brandt (UT-Arlington), Mike Albrow (FNAL),
Central Exclusive Production of BSM Higgs bosons decaying to jets
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
Latest Results from T979: PSec Time-of-flight
Variable distance from beam.
Performance test of a RICH with time-of-flight information
Presentation transcript:

Groups Involved University of Alberta, University of Texas at Arlington, University College London. Prague, Saclay, Stoneybrook, Giessen, Manchester, Fermilab, Louvain, Kansas INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

The ATLAS Forward Detectors AFP INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

The AFP Project AFP is designed to tag forward protons Selection rules mean that central system is (to a good approx) 0++ If you see a new particle produced exclusively with proton tags you know its QN CP violation in the Higgs sector shows up directly as azimuthal asymmetries Proton tagging may be the discovery channel in certain regions of the MSSM Tagging the protons means excellent central mass resolution (~ GeV) Tracking detector requirements Close to beam => edgeless detectors High Luminosity => radiation hard Few micron resolution We need to suppress pile-up (keep the rapidity gaps open) This is done by ultra-fast ToF detectors (to determine vertex) ATLAS INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

Precision timing will be required to reduce pile-up background, enabling AFP to operate at design luminosity Backgrounds are: Three interactions, one with a central system, and two with opposite direction single diffractive protons Two interactions, one with a central system, and the second with two opposite direction protons Two interactions, one with a central system and a proton, the second with a proton in the opposite direction. James L Pinfold Manchester [X][p][p] [X][pp][Xp][p] Scales with L 3 Scales with L 2 Rationale for Fast Timing Detectors (1) INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

For two protons coming from the same event: Z-position = ½ ( Dt=t L - t R )c dZ-position = (c/ √2)  t Aim for  t = 10(20) ps   Z ~ 2.1(4.2) mm (look for match with ATLAS/CMS main Z) For  t = 20 ps, we obtain a factor of 24 for the first two cases and 17 for the third. Case (a) dominates at high luminosity, and in the case of  t = 10 ps, we would expect a factor of nearly 50 rejection, enabling FP420 to operate at the design lumi. James L Pinfold Manchester Rationale for Fast Timing Detectors (2) INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

Baseline Plan James L Pinfold Manchester Two types of Cerenkov detector are employed: GASTOF – a gas Cerenkov detector that makes a single measurement QUARTIC – two QUARTIC detectors each with 4 rows of 8 < ~90 mm long fused silica bar allowing up to a 4-fold improvement of resolution over that of a single bar Both detectors employ Micro Channel Plate PMTs (MCP-PMTs) 30 cm INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

Micro-channel Plate PMT (MCP-PMT) We are working with 10 micron Burle tubes at present INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

QUARTIC- Alberta, FNAL, UTA Each QUARTIC detector has 4 rows of 8 6mm x 6mm x ≤ ~10 cm long fused silica bars The refractive index of fused silica is ~1.5 ( Cerenkov angle of 50 o ) An array of bars is mounted at the Cerenkov angle to minimize the # reflections as the light propagates to the MCP-PMT. The QUARTIC detectors will be positioned after the last 3D-Si tracking station because of the multiple scattering effects in the fused silica. This arrangement is intrinsically rad hard James L Pinfold Manchester INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

A QUARTIC Prototype 1)Use short bars and reflective light guide PRO: Less time dispersion CON: less light OR 2) Use longer bars as the light guide PRO: more light CON: more time disp. INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

QUARTIC FE-Electronics The readout electronics must be fast with low noise to attain the best timing resolution – a single electronics channel : Amplifier and Constant Fraction Discriminator Louvain & Alberta have a similar CFD design designed to work with rise times as short as 150 ps and to be insensitive to amp non linearity & sat. The TDC (for the test beam we used the Phillips ps TDC) The baseline solution for the final detector is the HPTDC that has a ~20ps resolution – it is radiation hard and LHC compatible (a 40 MHz clock, etc) The Alberta group has designed & built an 8 ch. HPTDC prototype board For the GASTOF detector a single photon counter (Boston Elec. SPC-134-5ps rise time ) can replace the amp+CFD+TDC ($10K/ch.) James L Pinfold Manchester Combined in the ALTA approach INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

QUARTIC Electronics – the CFD Mini-module approach tuned LCFD mini-module to Burle and Hamamatsu rise times; 12 channel NIM unit good performance : <10 ps resolution for ≥ 4 PE’s Remote control for threshold ZX60 3 GHz amp INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

QUARTIC Electronics – the HPTDC 12 ps resolution with pulser; Successfully tested at UTA laser test stand with laser / 10  m tube/ZX60 amp/LCFD 13.7 ps with split CFD signal INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

\ James L Pinfold Manchester A reference is obtained from the 400 MHz LHC RF converted to an optical pulse which is split and sent along fibres to both L & R detectors for each BC - pulse to pulse jitter between pulse arrival is negligible To monitor long term drifts (e.g.  T between 2 arms) the optical signal will be split at the detectors & returned to source for comparison At the detector stations the optical pulses are converted to electrical signals and are recorded in the detector TDCs – this conversion is envisaged to give an r.m.s (L-R) jitter of 4 ps. Our reference timing system is designed to provide  LR ~5 ps The Reference Timing System INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

Testing QUARTIC Fermilab Test beam T958 experiment to study fast timing counters for FP420 Used prototype detector to test concept Test beam at Fermilab Sep. 2006, Mar.+Jul CERN October 2007, June 2008 LASER Test set up in 2009 (including 6GHz Scope) INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

Timing – CERN Test-Beam 2008 Dt 56.6/1.4=40 ps/ Bar including CFD! Time difference between two 9 cm quartz bars after constant fraction discrimination is 56 ps, implies a single bar resolution of 40 ps for about 10 PE’s(expected 10 PE’s from simulations). Need to show improvement of resolution with # independent measurement (  N) N pe =(area/rms) 2 16 INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

The √N Effect 7/14/ ps16.6 ps 15.7 ps 10.3 ps Measure time difference of 3 separate fibers (100 pe’s) wrt reference tube Correct for T0 offset, average and take new time difference wrt reference tube (expect ~9.5 get 10.3 ps ) INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

MCP-PMT Rate & Current Limits We need to establish if the MCP-PMT’s are capable of coping with the large expected rates at the LHC: up to 15 MHz in a 6mm x 6mm pixel of the MCP-PMT The limiting factor is the current in the tube given by: I = f(p frequency) x N PE x e x G(gain) Using 1 MHz for low lumi conditions and 15 MHz for hi-lumi, with a gain of 5x10 4 (!) and 10 PE’s expected for our detector, we obtain current limits of 0.24 & 3.5  A/cm 2 When the tube current is too high the gain falls - saturation Laser test stand test at UTA show that saturation starts around 0.4  A/cm 2 for the 10  m pore size Burle MCP-PMT Luckily, we now have access to a Burle Planicon tube with 10X higher current capability – but we still need to test it INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

The Lifetime Challenge Lifetime due to photocathode damage from positive ions is proportional to extracted charge: Q/year = I*10 7 sec/year Using the current limits mentioned previously we get to 35 C/ cm 2 /yr (assuming 5x10 4 gain) at the highest lumi This is a factor of ~50 more than the expected tube lifetime! We are pursuing the development of a tube with a ~50 times longer lifetime, the avenues of improvement are: Including an ion barrier – giving a factor of 5  6 Electron scrubbing gives a factor of 5  6 (Photonis tests) Z stack design gives a factor of ~10 improvement (NIM A598,160,09) Arradiance coating gives a factor of ~10 improvement (under study) INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

Conclusion We are on track to reach the 10 micron time resolution required More work has to determine final parameters of the detector and electronics design We have a R&D project to solve the lifetime problem for MCPs at the highest luminosities We are working with three major manufacturers in this area: PHOTONIS, PHOTEK and ARRADIANCE The way forward seems well determined! INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

Last Words Photon-photon Photo-production Proton Pomeron-Pomeron (or g-g) INTRO QUARTIC Detector Readout Testing QUARTIC Challenges Conclusions

EXTRA SLIDES