Cancer stem cells IOSI Journal Club Giulia Poretti January 19, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discovery: Stem Cell Biology NIH Actions Continue infrastructure award program Characterize cell lines Stimulate more research on basic biology Train.
Advertisements

Abstract: We aimed to determine the role that integrin  4 plays in glioma cell migration as well as glioma stem cell differentiation. Evidence indicates.
Research Techniques Made Simple: Identifying the Stem Cell Krisztian Nemeth, Sarolta Karpati Department of Dermatology, Venerology, and Dermatooncology,
Mesenchymal and Tissue-Specific Stem Cells ChemEng 590B: Tissue Engineering Lecture 4 January 31 st, 2013.
MiRNA-drug resistance mechanisms Summary Hypothesis: The interplay between miRNAs, signaling pathways and epigenetic and genetic alterations are responsible.
Cancer Cancer originates in dividing cells –Intestinal lining (colon) –Lung tissue –Breast tissue (glands/ducts) –Prostate (gland) –White blood cells.
Robert Farley University of Rhode Island Department of Biomedical Engineering.
Figure 11.14a The Biology of Cancer (© Garland Science 2007) Excise cancer from Breast Isolate Cancer cells No Tumor Inject mice 10 3 cells 10 4 cells.
Stem Cell Basics Introduction to Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells.
When mammalian cells are subjected to stress signals, oxygen deficiency, radiation, DNA damage, or Chemo- therapeutic drugs, p53 is activated, leading.
Quezada et al. J. Exp. Med. Vol. 205 No Presenters: Denise Rush Szymon Rus Harleen Saini.
Inhibition of SHH signaling enhances Docetaxel efficacy in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells Sierra L. Lawhorne 1,2, Sakthivel Muniyan 1, Parthasarathy.
{ Targeting and killing of malignant gliomas by specific stem cells expressing a suicide gene.
Cancer stem cell assays Dr. Serdar Sivgin September 2010 Kayseri.
Increased Radiation Resistance of Mouse Mammary Side Population Stem/Progenitor Cells: Role of Wnt/ ß -Catenin Signaling Wendy A. Woodward MD-PhD, Mercy.
Dysregulation of the miR-34a-SIRT1 axis inhibits breast cancer stemness Gary Xiao, Ph.D. Professor and Director School of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology.
Dr. Ziad W Jaradat Cancer Stem Cells. Recently biologically distinct and relatively rare populations of tumor-initiating cells have been identified in.
MiR-19b/20a/92a regulates the self- renewal and proliferation of gastric cancer stem cells Journal of Cell Science (IF=5.325) 报告人:黄美玲
Normal haemopoiesis. ABNORMALITIES IN THE HEMOPOIETIC SYSTEM CAN LEAD TO HEMOGLOBINOPATHIES HEMOPHILIA DEFECTS IN HEMOSTASIS/THROMBOSIS HEMATOLOGICAL.
IGF-1R: A key linker between chemoresistance and cancer stem cells in epithelial ovarian cancer cells Ram Kumar Singh, Ankit Jinager, Ajit Dhadwe, Abhijit.
Identification of functional endothelial progenitor cells suitable for the treatment of ischemic tissue using human umbilical cord blood Authors: Source:
Dr. Sheila Singh’s Laboratory Lab overview Operating since August 2007 Located at the Stem Cell & Cancer Research Institute at McMaster Main Campus Research.
Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells 113 회 lab seminar 석사 1 년 신호수.
Lecture #9 Date______ Chapter 21~ The Genetic Basis of Development.
Benign Versus Malignant Tumors
Speaker:郭庭維 戴郁亭 Date:104/05/26
Manifestation of Novel Social Challenges of the European Union in the Teaching Material of Medical Biotechnology Master’s Programmes at the University.
Cancer immunotherapy: an update
Human embryonic stem cells (hES cells) and human induced-pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells) are uniquely defined by their pluripotent differentiation potential.
Cancer Therapies DNA microarrays are used to assess the relative expression of thousands of genes simultaneously—relative expression means that.
Identification of Cancer Stem Cells using Flow Cytometry Analysis تعيين الخلايا الجذعية السرطانية باستخدام تحليل التدفق الخلوي Dr. Ayat Al-Ghafari Biochemistry.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Advances in Translational Research in Neuro-oncology.
Biology Developmental Genetics Lecture #7 - Stem Cells.
Cancer stem cells in solid tumors Laurie E Ailles and Irving L Weissman Stanford University School of Medicine Current opinion in biotechnology 2007,
Cancer Stem Cell Xie Li & Li Rutian. Beginning of the Cancer Stem Cell Concept  1937: Jacob Furth and Morton Kahn: a single leukaemic cell was able.
Discovery: Stem Cell Biology NIH Actions Continue infrastructure award program Characterize cell lines Stimulate more research on basic biology Train.
Lung Cancer Stem Cell: Fancy Conceptual Model of Tumor Biology or Cornerstone of a Forthcoming Therapeutic Breakthrough?  Tony Sourisseau, PhD, Khaled.
Fig. 4. Effect of FTY720 on brain tumor stem cell (BTSC) invasiveness
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from primary chronic myelogenous leukemia patient samples by Keiki Kumano, Shunya Arai, Masataka Hosoi, Kazuki.
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 2 Promotes Tumor Proliferation and Induces Radio Resistance in Glioblastoma  Jia Wang, Tong Yang, Gaofeng Xu, Hao Liu, Chunying.
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2018)
Cassie J. Clarke, Tessa L. Holyoake  Experimental Hematology 
Myung Jin Son, Kevin Woolard, Do-Hyun Nam, Jeongwu Lee, Howard A. Fine 
Cancer stem cells and their application into targeted therapy for cancer Mol. Bio. Lab Park Ji Won Supervisor ; Dae Youn Hwang.
Improving T-cell expansion and function for adoptive T-cell therapy using ex vivo treatment with PI3Kδ inhibitors and VIP antagonists by Christopher T.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Lecture #9 Date______ Chapter 21~ The Genetic Basis of Development.
Figure 2 Host immune responses, not the radiosensitivity
Lung Cancer Stem Cell: Fancy Conceptual Model of Tumor Biology or Cornerstone of a Forthcoming Therapeutic Breakthrough?  Tony Sourisseau, PhD, Khaled.
T Cells Redirected to EphA2 for the Immunotherapy of Glioblastoma
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Michael D. Brooks, Monika L. Burness, Max S. Wicha  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Cancer Stem Cells: Current Status and Evolving Complexities
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
SLAM Family Markers Resolve Functionally Distinct Subpopulations of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Multipotent Progenitors  Hideyuki Oguro, Lei Ding, Sean J.
Protracted temozolomide (TMZ) treatment leads to acquired TMZ resistance in glioblastoma (GBM) cells in vivo. Protracted temozolomide (TMZ) treatment leads.
Attacking Cancer at Its Root
From Vaccines to Memory and Back
Cabozantinib causes significant tumor cell elimination in vivo, but modest apoptosis induction in vitro. Cabozantinib causes significant tumor cell elimination.
BH3-targeted inhibitors drive specific resistance in human cell lines, which can be overcome with alternating or combining inhibitors. BH3-targeted inhibitors.
Mohammed Charbat.
Presentation transcript:

Cancer stem cells IOSI Journal Club Giulia Poretti January 19, 2007

stem cells (sc) SELF-RENEWAL i.e. replenish the repertoire of identical stem cell DIFFERENTIATION i.e. create a heterogeneous progeny differentiating to mature cells EXTRAORDINARY PROLIFERATION POTENTIAL HOMEOSTATIC CONTROL according to the influence of microenvironment. Modified from Clarke MF et al. Cell. 2006;124: Stem cells → progenitor cells → mature cells

cancer stem cells (csc) SELF-RENEWAL DIFFERENTIATION PROLIFERATIVE ABILITY ABERRANT REGULATION Modified from Bjerkvig R et al. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5: Minority of cancer cells with tumorigenic potential NORMAL TUMORAL

stem cells: identifying properties SELF-RENEWAL DIFFERENTIATION EXTENSIVE PROLIFERATION POTENTIAL Are the minority subpopulation in a given tissue Mainly appear to be in a quiescent cell-cycle state long-lived cells giving rise to short-lived, differentiated cells Highly influenced by signals form their microenvironment Characterized by specific surface markers

Therapeutic implications Resistance to treatment → absence of the targeted biological property (imatinib mesylate in CML) → quiescent state → expression of efflux proteins protecting vs xenobiotic toxins Relapse Metastasis Strategies to target cancer stem cells: Immunotherapy against stem-cell-specific markers Combination of treatment vs tumor burden and treatment vs cancer stem cells Therapies promoting differentiation of cancer stem cells

Assays in stem cell research Surrogate in vitro and in vivo studies Clonogenic assays Repopulation experiments in immunodeficient mice strains STEM CELLS 1960s: transplantation experiments in immunodeficient mice →very small population of cells responsible for reconstitution →surface marker phenotype negative for lineage-specific antigen CANCER STEM CELLS 1990s: AML cells transplanted in immunodeficient mice →cells able to sustain tumor growth are a minority subpopulation →reconstitution of the phenotypic heterogeneity of donor tumor

Brain tumor: „Neurosphere“ assay Cell culture system for normal neural stem cells → long-term self-renewing → multi-lineage-differentiating Galli R et al. Cancer Res ;64: : isolation and serial propagation of „cancer neurospheres“ → long-term self-renewing → multi-lineage-differentiating → in vivo tumorigenicity Singh SK et al. Nature ;432: : Cell surface marker CD133 identifies glioma stem cells

Cancer stem cells models Acute myelogenous leukemia: [CD34+,CD38-] Breast Cancer: [CD44+, CD24-/low] Brain tumor: [CD133+] Prostate cancer: [CD44+] Colon cancer: [CD133+]

Cancer stem cells models Glioma stem cells are identified by CD133+ cell-surface marker Glioma CD133+ cells are resistant to radiation Radioresistance due to more efficient activation of DNA damage checkpoint Proof of principle: radioresistance of CD133+ glioma stem cells can be reversed with inhibitor of DNA damage checkpoint Biological explanation of the long-term failure of radiation therapy: tumorigenic subpopulation of CD133+ glioma cells is not eliminated

Experimental models in vitro models (ex vivo ) Cultured cell from human glioma xenograft: D456MG D54MG Patient glioblastoma samples in vivo models Human xenograft models in immunocompromised mice

Resistance to radiation: → given by CD133+

Glioma xenograft D456MG: in vivo CD133+ enrichment after radiation →no significant difference between sc and ic →enriched CD133+ population 48h after radiation (3-5x)

in vitro CD133+ enrichment after radiation Cultures from human glioma xenograft (D54MG): →48h after radiation: 3x enrichment Patient glioblastoma samples:

in vitro CD133+ enrichment after radiation CD133+ and CD133- cells derived from patient glioblastoma sample: → separately dye-labeled CD133+ (green) CD133- (red) → mixed (5%CD133+)

CD133+ enrichment due to clone selection CD133+ expression is not induced by irradiation

Irradiation effects at molecular level DNA damage (alkaline comet assay): CD133+ cells repaired the DNA damage more efficiently than CD133-

Irradiation effects at molecular level Early DNA damage checkpoint responses (phosphorylation) checked before treatment and after 1h. Higher amount of phosphorylated proteins in CD133+. Early DNA damage checkpoint responses:

Radioresistance at molecular level Activation of cleaved caspase-3 (apoptosis) assessed after 24h in vitro irradiation in vivo irradiation

Radioresistance at molecular level Activation of apoptosis assessed after 20h in vitro irradiation

Radioresistance: proof of principle at cellular level Cell survival as assessed by colony formation assay

Radioresistance: proof of principle in vivo DNA repair machinery induced by DNA damage is as promizing drug target to overcome radioresistance.

CD133+ subpopulation have cancer stem cell properties

in vivo tumorigenic potential

tumorigenic potential proportional to CD133+ Increased CD133+ cell fractions dose-dependently decreased tumor latency increased tumor growth and vascularisation

serial propagation of tumor (secondary tumor formation) Tumor cells derived from irradiated xenografts are enriched in CD133+ tumor cells and show increased tumorigenic potential when xenotransplanted in immunocompromised mice

serial propagation of tumor with selected CD133+ CD133+ cells derived from xenografts are patient sample show tumorigenic potential independently of prior irradiation.

in vivo tumorigenic potential of selected CD133+ tumor cells D456MG CD133- (2 x 10 6 ) formed small tumors in 2 out of 5 xenotransplanted in immunocompromised mice. CD133+ cells (10 4 ) from patient sample or xenograft transplanted into brains of immunocompromised mice. Brain observed at appearence of neurological signs or after 8 weeks. in vitro irradiation

Self-renewal potential

„Cancer neurospheres“ assay Purified CD133+ tumor cells from glioma xenografts (D456MG) and patient samples (T3379, T3317) form neurospheres.

Expression of specific surface markers Multi-lineage differentiation ability

Stem cell-specific markers Identified on neurospheres formed from CD133+ tumor cells from glioma xenografts (D456MG) and patient samples (T3379) by immunofluorescence.

Markers of differentiated cells: in vitro in vitro irradiation

Markers of differentiated cells: in vivo Immunofluorescent staining of frozen sections of tumors generated by CD133+ (source not specified)

Concluding remarks Glioma cell lines D456MG and D54MG are p53 wild-type Radiation on individual cells ex vivo: → absence of specific microenvironment Lack of conservation in the experimental models adopted for the different assays

Haematoxylin:blue staining of the nuclues Eosin:pink staininig of cytoplasm

CD133+ enrichment due to clone selection

Remarks Glioma cell lines D456MG and D54MG are p53 wild-type Radiation on individual cells ex vivo: → absence of specific microenvironment CD133+ glioma stem cells treated with ChK inhibitor DBH were not xenotransplanted to evaluate tumorigenicity