Diagnostic Tasks in the Special Education Classroom WERA Conference March 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome Math Leaders Mac Scoring Training Year 13 …analyzing student thinking and improving instruction.
Advertisements

December 14, 2010 Proportionality Through Similarity and Geometry.
Effectively Diagnose and Address Gaps in Student Content Knowledge Brooke Monroe eLearning Specialist & Regional Manager 3P Learning / Mathletics
Riverpoint Partnership for Math and Science.  Who are we? A group of high school, college and university faculty from 7 school districts, 2 community.
HOW MIGHT WE SUPPORT TEACHERS AS THEY DEEPEN THEIR OWN UNDERSTANDING AND EXPLORE STUDENT THINKING RELATED TO THE K-6 GEOMETRY PROGRESSION? GINI STIMPSON.
Dallas Independent School District Conrad High School August 2013.
Increasing Accessibility to Algebra & Geometry for ALL Students MASSACHUSETTS SUMMER INSTITUTE.
March Madness  It’s tournament time and its going to be awesome baby!! Throughout this webquest you are going to realize how we use graph theory in our.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Overview 1 © 2011 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Mathematics General Overview.
Twinkle, Twinkle, Little STAAR K-2 Connections
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
EasyCBM: Benchmarking and Progress Monitoring System Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information Shereen Henry Math Instructional.
Calculators Not! Why Not? Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE SDCTM Feb.8, 2014.
BUILDING LEARNING PROGRESSIONS WITH THE COMMON CORE By Marcia Torgrude.
Welcome to your child’s 6 th Grade Math Class On Team (6B) Welcome to your child’s 6 th Grade Math Class On Team (6B) Where we try to make sense of numbers.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
MONTGOMERY MATH K-4 WHY MATH IN FOCUS? May 28, 2013 Board of Education Meeting Amy Wish K-4 Supervisor of Mathematics and Science.
THE ONTARIO CURRICULUM GRADES 1-8 (read p 1-9 of the mathematics curriculum) FIVE STRANDS:  Number Sense and Numeration  Measurement  Geometry and Spatial.
LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TRANSITIONING TO THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS The Math Department.
Introduction to the Common Core Mathematics Standards Presented by Frank H. Osborne, Ph. D. © 2015 EMSE 3123 Math and Science in Education 1.
Standards-Based Education in Texas
Strategies for Efficient Scoring Jeanne Stone, UC Irvine PACT Conference October 22, 2009.
MELROSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS MELROSE VETERANS MEMORIAL MIDDLE SCHOOL OCTOBER 2013 MCAS Spring 2013 Results.
Welcome Math Leaders Mac Scoring Training Year 17 …analyzing student thinking and improving instruction.
How to read the grade level standards Standards Clusters Domains define what students should understand and be able to do. are groups of related standards.
Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment.
Jan. 19 th DART STATEMENTS I can identify the weight of the Explore test on K- PREP. I understand my responsibility or role with the preparation.
Grade 7 Pre-Algebra Extended Session April 26, :30-11:00 Room 606.
Two key suggestions that came from the various focus groups across Ontario were:
2005 Connecticut Mathematics Curriculum Framework: Building Understanding Across the Grades November 9, 2005.
2009 CAHSEE Review 10th Grade Test Date Wed. March 18th.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
Misunderstood Minds 1.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
A mission to improve school mathematics Funded by NSF, Amoco, GTE, and others A partnership among researchers, mathematics educators, and teachers 25.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2007 STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS EDUCATION Standards established by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Content.
CEDAR RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 15, 2015 acos2010.wikispaces.com.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
SECONDARY MATHEMATICS APRIL 26, PRESENTATION History: Steering Committee Course Progressions and transition Secondary I and Credit Graduation Requirements.
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Pennsylvania Standard J. Geometry Standard
Math in the Common Core Era: Helping All Students Succeed
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Principles and Standards for grades pre-K-2.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
In Chapter 3, you studied different ways to represent patterns. You organized information into tables, graphed information about patterns, and learned.
3-D’ville Unit Portfolio Presentation Catherine Nosky Kiva Elementary - Sixth Grade Math.
Lunch and Learn: A Collaborative Time for North Carolina Teachers Your Presenter Information.
Chapter 8 Spreadsheets. Examining Spreadsheets  Basic Functions Performing Calculations Sorting Data Selecting Data Creating Graphs and Charts.
Using the Standards for Mastery Learning September 7, 2010 Math & ELA.
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS (NCTM) Ontario Association of Mathematics Educators (OAME)  The primary professional organization for teacher.
Gap Closing Grade 6 Number Sense. Your Questions What questions do you have?
Middle School Math at Endeavor Charter School By Carolyn Southard learn do The only way to learn mathematics is to do mathematics. -Paul Halmos.
TEERAWIT TINPRAPA M.Ed(mathematics education).  Pre-K-2  Grades 3-5  Grades 6-8  Grades 9-12.
Introduction to Math Methods Math Standards. Why can math be fun? Math can be fun because… it can have so much variety in topics. many different ways.
MATH BY MEAGHAN, ROWEN, ELSIE. CONTENT LIST ▪ INTRODUCTION : Past vs Present ▪ SELECTING APPROPRIATE MATH : Math Standards ▪ RESEARCH ON MATH INSTRUCTION.
F.M. Kearns Primary School 5 Year School Improvement Plan
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
Please sit at the appropriate table with your IC/Principal.
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
Region 14 Mathematics Curriculum Update K-8
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Scope and Sequence in Math
JACKSON SCHOOL DISTRICT Middle School Math Informational Night
Scope and Sequence in Math
Presentation transcript:

Diagnostic Tasks in the Special Education Classroom WERA Conference March 2009

Introductions  Who are we? –Sasha Hammond  Math Coordinator, ESD 105 –Dee Dee Gaub  Special Education Teacher, East Valley S.D. –Shawn Morton  Special Education Teacher, East Valley S.D.  Who are you?

What was our dilemma?  How do we implement the research from our trainings into our classrooms?  How do we create goals and objectives that match the student data provided by the school psychologist?  How do we measure progress towards these goals and objectives in an ongoing and efficient way?  How do we align materials to the state standards, the goals and objectives, and individual student needs?  How do we differentiate between reasoning and calculation in mathematics?

Our Process So far…..

Step 1: Examining the Current Assessments  Why are they not working? –Cumbersome –Time Consuming –Inconsistent  What else could we use? –Examined FSiM Diagnostic tasks –Identified tasks that met our students’ needs

Step 2: Aligning Diagnostic Tasks  Alignment to the strands of math –Sorting within the strands  Aligned to student needs –What were the goals and objectives needed to fulfill IEP’s?  Alignment to Standards –Created rubrics that crossed the grade levels.

Step 3: Examine Psychologists’ Evaluation –Note: We wish we would have done this first!  What is being classified as calculation?  What is classified as reasoning?  What is the testing protocol?  What is not tested?  What input did the school psychologist have to help with our process?  How can we work together better as a team?

Step 4: Separating Calculation from Reasoning  Separation was based on WIAT-II evaluation.  Determined we would start with calculation because our program, Connecting Math Concepts, had this focus.  Identified other resources for reasoning.

Step 5: Calculation  Examined program assessments for placement.  Matched those skills to the skills identified in the psychologist’s report.  Differentiated skills into levels.  Determined the program covered all of the skills identified as calculation.

Step 6: Periodic Assessments for Calculation  Identified where skills were assessed throughout math program.  Determined what was taught in the program that could be de-emphasized.  Allowed us to focus our intervention on the concepts identified as student objectives.  The program placement aligned with psychologist’s evaluation.  Discovered that other resources would need to be used for reasoning.  Filled in gaps in the program’s assessments.  Aligned calculation objectives to state standards.

Step 7: Tackling Reasoning  What resources do we have access to?  What resources might we need?  How are the concepts broken down within the strands?  How do the concepts grow through the developmental phases?  How will we measure this growth?

Our Resources  Groundworks, Creative Publications  Think Tanks, Origo  FSiM  Math Whizz  Teacher to Teacher

Breaking Down the Strands  Reasoning with Numbers –Representation –Number Sense –Ratio and Proportion –Number Theory –Computation

Cont.  Measurement –Units –Measurement Sense –Conversions –Scale –Formulas

Cont.  Reasoning with Geometry –Attributes of Shapes –Composing and Decomposing Shapes –Spatial Reasoning –Transformations –Relationships Among Shapes

Cont.  Reasoning with Algebra –Representations –Proportional Reasoning –Balance –Function –Inductive Reasoning

Cont.  Reasoning with Probability and Statistics –Ways to Count –Probability –Interpret Data –Organize Data –Describe Data

Developmental Progression of Concepts  FSiM alignment of concepts as they progress through the resources.  Alignment of diagnostic tasks to the progression of concepts.  Alignment to psychologist’s evaluation and reporting.  Creation of clear, consistent, measurable goals and objectives.

Examining the Diagnostics  How we use diagnostic tasks to understand student thinking and measure student progress.

Where we are going with this…  Finish the alignment work.  Pilot the diagnostic tasks.  Share the work throughout the district.  Fill in the gaps.  Figure out what else we’ve missed!

Questions and Suggestions