How good is our third sector organisation? Elizabeth Morrison March 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PSG Competencies to CS Competency Framework Map showing some of the principal areas of synergy CS Competencies PSG Competencies Leading and Communicating.
Advertisements

Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Developing an Evaluation Strategy – experience in DFID Nick York Director – Country, Corporate and Global Evaluations, World Bank IEG Former Chief Professional.
Head of Learning: Job description
Engaging with the NHS Commissioning Board and the impact of the changes in the wider LHE Simon Weldon, NHS Commissioning Board London Regional Team London.
David Taylor Formerly Director of Inspection, Ofsted
Salford Community, Health and Social Care Directorate Investors in People Feedback 2006.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Local Education and Training Boards Adam C Wardle Managing Director, Yorkshire and the Humber Local Education and Training Board.
Risk and Resilience Delivered by Alba
Integration of Adult Health and Social Care VHS Member event, Monday 1 July Grant Hughes, Scottish Government
Modernising Pharmacy Regulation An inspector calls: A new regulatory model in pharmacy Mark Voce Head of Inspection, GPhC Date.
Challenge Questions How well do we meet the need of our stakeholders?
Challenge Questions How good is our operational management?
Challenge Questions What outcomes have we achieved?
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
Presented by Modernising pharmacy regulation: an inspector calls Helen Jackson.
Research and Museums Galleries Scotland KT Scotland: Policy and Practice Conference 23 April 2010 Alison Turnbull Head of Research & Standards.
Ofsted lessons Clerks’ Update Jan Ofsted Sept 2012 The key judgements: Inspectors must judge the quality of education provided in the school – its.
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 Updates continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director & Caroline Lansdown.
NATT Conference – 7 th March 2011 Rehana Minhas Director of Equality- Education Leeds.
Highbury College Business Support – a focus on student success Prepared for: Outstanding Showcase Date: 4 November 2011.
The role of governance in self-assessment NATSPEC conference Sue Preece HMI March
1 School Inspection Update Key Changes since January 2014 …continued 17 June 2014 Name Farzana Aldridge – Strategic Director Caroline Lansdown – Senior.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Southend Borough Council Children’s Safeguarding Peer Review 30 April 2010 Review findings and prioritisation conference Appendix 1.
CPD Network meeting 1 February 2008 Annette Bruton Chief Inspector, HMIE.
Children, Young People and Families Early Intervention Fund and Adult Learning and Empowering Communities Fund Application support July/August 2015.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Professional framework for public sector employees Using the framework.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
How well is the Strategic Funding Partnership model working? Aspect Review Elizabeth Morrison March 2014.
The Scottish Association of BUILDING STANDARDS MANAGERS Incorporating the Scottish Association of Chief Building Control Officers and representing Local.
NHS Education for Scotland Defining A Quality Improvement Framework For A Coordinated Service Model Workshop 27 th May 2003 Dr Ann Wales NHS Scotland Library.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
Better Community Engagement Training for Trainers Course Day 1 This was developed as part of the Scottish Government’s Better Community Engagement Programme.
VCFP Review Report from the VCFP Steering Group. Why Review VCFP The external environment that we work in is significantly changing; there is a shift.
Comprehensive Area Assessment and UoR Calderdale partners 18 th May 2009.
Queen’s Management & Leadership Framework
LIFELONG GUIDANCE SYSTEMS: COMMON EUROPEAN REFERENCE TOOLS ELGPN PEER LEARNING ACTIVITY WP2 Prague April 2008 Dr John McCarthy, Director International.
GHCCG Staff Survey Results Robert Willis Wednesday 12th June 2013.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Transforming lives through learning EVALUATING THE PRIMARY CURRICULUM Sadie Cushley and Alison Drever, Education Scotland.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Social Value What does it mean to you? Alva Bailey Head of Community Safety.
How good is our school? (4 th edition) Professional learning events November 2015.
FE Staff Governors Conference Characteristics of effective governance Vivien Shipley HMI 3 December 2009.
PowerPoint Guidance Layout for title or holding page By Creative Services Text should be ranged left, used in white only and main headings be set in 30.
Transforming lives through learning SCHOOLS IMPROVEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMME Welcome and Introductions Alastair Delaney Strategic Director Education Scotland.
Being The Best We Can A self-evaluation & improvement process for libraries Key results for Victoria’s public library services.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Health and Social Care Integration Update Name Role October 2015.
Child Centred Principles of the Quality Standards Day 2.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.
Local Education and Training Boards Tim Gilpin Director of Workforce and Education NHS North of England.
Reforming the State System for the provision of social services, setting the vision, aims and objectives: The United Kingdom Experience Mr Sean Holland.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
April 2016 Marie Keen Quality Improvement Officer – Early Years
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
Conditions for learning Aiming for excellence in self-evaluation.
North East Professional Exchange Introduction May 2016.
Parents Meeting to discuss Ofsted Report
This is a front cover page and can only be used at the beginning of a PowerPoint presentation once. Do not add anything else to this screen if it is being.
Hampshire FA Equality Action Plan Overview
Improvements following Inspection-Capacity to Improve
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
How good is our third sector organisation?
Joint inspections and co-operation in Scotland
Lifelong Learning Planning for Improvement 1st November 2017
Strategy April 2018 – March 2022.
Presentation transcript:

How good is our third sector organisation? Elizabeth Morrison March 2014

The third sector makes a direct impact on the growth of Scotland's economy, the wellbeing of its citizens and the improvement of its public services.

This resource is designed to help third sector organisations self-evaluate and plan for improvement more effectively, there is no expectation that this needs to be used for this or any other purpose. It is important that organisations use a toolkit of different approaches matched most appropriately to specific circumstances and differing contexts. Many third sector organisations already have very good systems and processes in place for this which they should continue to use.

The culture for self-evaluation Looking inwards Looking outwards Looking forwards

Looking inwards Basic process of self-evaluation  How are we doing?  How do we know?  What are we going to do now?

A ‘standard’ is a Benchmark You can measure whether or not you have reached a standard - achieved/not achieved

STANDARDS yes/no achieved or not achieved seen or not seen

‘quality’, on the other hand, is associated with the idea of value worth degree of extent of merit significance

When we evaluate quality we ask questions like How good? To what extent? How well?

NOT ‘IS IT THERE?’ or HOW MANY?

Evaluating quality Quality is evaluated through the use of ‘quality indicators’ or ‘QIs’. Why do we use quality indicators? Evaluations against QIs are professional judgments. By using QIs, we ensure consistency across different contexts

Using indicators to evaluate quality  The use of QIs requires the evaluator to balance the strengths and areas for improvement and come to an overall view.  The evaluation is based on the relative importance of each of the strengths and areas for improvement, and their impact  not on the numbers of strengths/weaknesses.  It is generally easier to measure achievement of a standard than to evaluate quality.  Evaluation of quality is therefore a professional skill.

Quality indicators balance strengths and areas for improvement importance NOT numbers

Public assurance requires us to measure whether organisations reach minimum standards. We need to evaluate quality if we want to help organisations to improve.

Structure  Based on outcomes, processes and leadership  Structure in line with other public service self-evaluation frameworks  QIs grouped under 6 important questions

Six key questions  What key outcomes have we achieved?  How well do we meet the needs of our stakeholders  How good is our delivery of key processes?  How good is our operational management?  How good is our strategic leadership?  What is our capacity for improvement?

Our self-evaluation frameworks

outcomes processes inputs Evaluating quality

Links between quality indicators within a quality framework QIs are related to each other. The relationships are causal. When you make evaluations in relation to one QI you also need to check the evaluations given for other QIs to make sure they make sense.

How do you evaluate the overall quality of a third sector organisation?

How do you evaluate the overall quality of anything?

How do you evaluate the overall quality of a…….. football club?

Is it a successful football club? 1. The team’s performance How well is the club doing? Number of games won – getting better or worse? How many goals scored? Performance compared with that of other clubs? Outcomes and achievements

2. Impact on people What do supporters think of the club? How well is the club doing? Does it live up to people’s expectations? What do the fans think? How many people come to the games? Do people want to become regular supporters? Do people look sad or happy during the game? Outcomes and achievements

How well is the club doing? How well does it live up to people’s expectations? 3. Impact on team members Are the players highly motivated? Are there a lot of transfer requests Does it have a high absence rate ? Does it have a high turnover of players? What do players think of the quality of coaching? Is it a good club to play for? Outcomes and achievements

How well is the club doing? How well does it live up to people’s expectations? Does it have a good reputation? In the local area? In Scotland? In Europe? Worldwide? 4. Impact on the community Outcomes and achievements

How well is the club doing? How well does it meet people’s expectations? How well does the team play? 5.Teamwork 6.Skills 7.Fitness Does the team play well? Does the team play with flair? Does it have a good blend of strengths in defence, mid-field and attack? Outcomes and achievements Quality of play Is the team fit and prepared for the rigours of a full game?

How well is the club doing? How well does it live up to people’s expectations ? How well does the team play? How well is the club managed? 8. Observation and monitoring of matches Identifying strengths in the team Identifying areas for improvement Is the club well run? Providing feedback to players Quality of play Outcomes and achievementsManagement and leadership

How well is the club doing? How well does it live up to people’s expectations ? How well does the team play? How well is the club managed? 9. Management of staff Is there a good training programme? Does it make sure players play to their strengths? Is the club well run? Does it deal well in the transfer market? Quality of play Outcomes and achievementsManagement and leadership

How well is the club doing? How well does it live up to people’s expectations ? How well does the team play? How well is the club managed? 8. Observation and monitoring of matches Identifying strengths in the team Identifying areas for improvement Is the club well run? Providing feedback to players Quality of play Outcomes and achievementsManagement and leadership

How well is the club doing? How well does it live up to people’s expectations ? How well does the team play? How well is the club managed? 9. Management of staff Is there a good training programme? Does it make sure players play to their strengths? Is the club well run? Does it deal well in the transfer market? Quality of play Outcomes and achievementsManagement and leadership

How well is the club doing? How well does it live up to people’s expectations? How well does the team play? How well is the club managed? Is the club well run? 10. Management of Resources Does it manage its money well? Is it good at getting sponsorship? Does it manage its grounds and facilities well? Management and leadership Quality of play Outcomes and achievements

How well is the club doing? How well does it live up to people’s expectations? How well does the team play? How well is the club managed? How well is the club led? 11. Leadership of the manager 12. Leadership of the Chief Executive & Board of Directors Does the club have a clear vision of what it is aiming for? Do the chief executive, manager and captain provide strong direction? Is the club well led? Are they prepared to make hard decisions to improve performance? Do they have the support of fans and players? Does the club know its strengths and weaknesses and is it making improvements? Does the club have a plan for improving results? Outcomes and achievements Quality of play Management and leadership

How do you evaluate the overall quality of a football club?

How well is the club managed? How well does the team play? How well does it live up to people’s expectations? 1. The team’s performance 2. Impact on people 3. Impact on team members 4. Impact on the community 5. Teamwork 6.Skills 7. Fitness 8. Observation and monitoring of matches 9. Management and support of team 10. Management of resources 11. Leadership of the manager 12. Leadership of the Chief Executive & Board of Directors How well is the club doing? How well is the club led? Outcomes and achievements Quality of play Leadership and management Cause and effect Framework for evaluating the quality of a football club

How good is our delivery of key processes? What key outcomes have we achieved? 1. Key performance outcomes 1.1 Improvement in performance 1.2 Adherence to statutory principles and fulfilment of statutory duties 5. Delivery of key processes 5.1 Delivering services 5.2 Developing, managing and improving relationships with service users and other stakeholders 5.3 Inclusion, equality and fairness 9. Strategic leadership 9.1 Vision, values and aims 9.2 Leadership and direction 9.3 Leading people and developing partnerships 9.4 Leadership of innovation, change and improvement 9.5 Securing improvement of quality and impact of services 2. Impact on service users 2.1 Impact on service users 3. Impact on staff 3.1 Impact on staff 4. Impact on the community 4.1 Impact on the local community 4.2 Impact on the wider community 6. Operational management 6.1 Policy review and development 6.2 Participation of service users and other stakeholders 6.3 Planning of key processes 7. Staffing 7.1 Management and deployment of staff 7.2 Career-long professional learning 8. Partnerships and resources 8.1 Partnership working 8.2 Financial management 8.3 Resource management 8.4 Knowledge and information management How good is our strategic leadership? How well do we meet the needs of our stakeholders? How good is our operational management? What is our capacity for improvement? 10. Capacity for improvement Global judgement based on evidence of all key areas, in particular, outcomes, impact and leadership