TAKS 2007 Performance Mathematics TAKS 2007 Performance Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Norms Exemplary Locus of Control. Lora Darden Tests primarily assess cultural differences… This is particularly true if tests have a low alignment or.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Yag-O-Matic! Created by Shelby Waller, Missy Mayfield, and Kathy Harvey, Region 9 ESC.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Curriculum and Assessment Management Solutions Make Unified and Effective Classroom Instruction a Reality.
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Developed by the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC) CSCOPE End of Year Update Planning for /18/2015.
TeacherSchoolStudent Percentile Average 50 The Effects of Teachers and Schools on Student Achievement Over 2 consecutive years Marzano, R. J. (2003).
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Curriculum Collaborative. Agenda Welcome Ice Breaker Overview of Curriculum Collaborative Activity Reflections (Sentence Stems)
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
Developing a Common Language about Curriculum Academy 2012.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Achievement Gap Task Force Superintendents’ and Principals’ Forum February 24, 2014.
Curriculum & Alignment Institute Susan McCauley, Ph.D.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
SAS Curriculum Mapping
CSCOPE English Language Arts Spanish Language Arts Overview.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Science Curriculum Topic Study Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
Developing an Online Course: A Road Map for the Process English Language Arts 3-5: Vocabulary.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
10/15/ Welcome  Introductions  Norms / Housekeeping.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series A Framework for Formative Assessment November 15, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon Dr. Greg Wheeler.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
English Language Acquisition Professional Learning Community WIDA Standards Organizational Meeting March 8, 2011.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Curriculum Updates and Draft Instructional Framework I.Welcoming and Thank you… II.Implementation timeline and where we are… III.Review of the Curriculum,
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
The College Board Standards for College Success CCSSO – SEC State Collaborative Alignment Study CCSSO-SEC Meeting and Content Analysis Workshop San Diego,
Developed by the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC) EXTREME MAKEOVER CSCOPE Language Arts Edition.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
KUD Know –Purpose of the Model Core Curriculum –Our Timeline and Action Plan –Expectations for aligning Model Core Curriculum Essential Concepts or Skill.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
CASD Librarians: Do You Speak SAS? What We Need to Know October 25, 2011.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1 Leadership Module 3: Introduction to Content Alignment.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
EARLY LEARNING & KINDERGARTEN STANDARDS ALIGNMENT: A CLEAR PATH TO SUCCESS THROUGH ALIGNED STANDARDS August 18, 2015.
Curriculum Mapping Wednesday October 29 Pierre High School.
ESD Regional Workshop Year 1 Workshop 2. Welcome Back to the Leadership Academy.
Collaboration in Education Developing an Equal Opportunity to Learn Cindy Foster, David Jones Everett Public Schools April 12, 2007.
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
Welcome Opening Prayer ED 212 Foundations of Education.
Standards Support System Curriculum Project South Carolina Department of Education Office of Standards and Support S3S3.
New School Year Preview HISD Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment Tools & Resources TEAM HISD Literacy Support Network/Job Alike August 17, 2010.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
NAVIGATING CSCOPE JENNIFER PAYNE, CSCOPE CONSULTANT, ESC XIV
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
Designing Curriculum for the Next Generation
A Guaranteed, Viable, and Engaging Curriculum
CORE Guaranteed & Viable Curriculum
Effective After-School Programs Presented by
Presentation transcript:

TAKS 2007 Performance Mathematics

TAKS 2007 Performance Science

TAKS 2007 Performance Reading/English Language Arts

TAKS 2007 Performance Writing

TAKS 2007 Performance Social Studies

What is our Goal? To improve student proficiency in Math and Science In order to accomplish this goal, we must be one united system. Not individual islands.

Benefits of Curriculum Alignment Ensure Equity Rational System Alignment makes education in Llano a system Alignment reduces and refocuses teacher planning time. Alignment reduces the time teachers spend trying to define what the TEKS mean Alignment reduces gaps and unproductive redundancies Alignment allows us to work smarter

Guaranteed Viable Curriculum New TEKS New tests New standards New teachers New graduation plans Time is right for new curriculum.

Student Learning Issues Missing learning Incomplete learning Inaccurate learning Competing learning

Education: Blueprint to the Future By 2040, Texas will see a 75% increase in the number of children in our public schools. If our schools are unable to keep pace with the needs of students today, our labor force in 2040 will be less well-educated, but we will live in a more technologically sophisticated society and international community than we live in today. A rigorous, relevant curriculum for all students is an important factor for the short and long term health of our state and our society.

1. When you look at your data, what does it tell you? - What about the district’s curriculum? - Whose responsibility is it? 2. Is the curriculum being implemented in every classroom? - Whose responsibility is this? 3. At what quality level is the curriculum being delivered? -Whose responsibility is this? Guiding Questions

The School Factors Guaranteed and viable curriculum Challenging goals and effective feedback Parent and community involvement Safe and orderly environment Collegiality and professionalism Robert Marzano, What Works in Schools

Guaranteed Viable Curriculum Opportunity to Learn –If students do not have the opportunity to learn the content expected of them, there is little chance that they will. Time –Given the massive amount of content to be taught, we don’t have time in our busy school calendars for redundancies.

Marzano’s Action Steps 1.Identify & communicate the essential content for all students 2.Ensure that the essential content can be addressed in the amount of time available for instruction 3.Sequence and organize the content to provide ample opportunity to learn 4.Ensure teachers address the essential content 5.Protect the instructional time available

CSCOPE Developed by the system of ESCs with content area expert writers and developers Online system that is customizable to your district needs Affordable Curriculum – Assessment – Instruction – Professional Development

ESC Development Team

Research Base Curriculum Design, Standards, Instructional Design –Robert Marzano –Fenwick English –Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe –Heidi Hayes Jacobs –John Crain –James Barufaldi –H. Lynn Erickson Learning Theory –Reuven Feurstein –Lev Vegotsky Professional Development –Thomas Guskey –Linda Hammond

What is curriculum all about? What WhyHow

Difference Between Curriculum and Instruction (Crane) What –The stuff –The content standard –Knowledge and skills Why –What we want the kids to do with the stuff –The performance standard How –Instruction component –How do we design instructional activities so that students learn the stuff and are able to perform at the level indicated in the performance indicator?

What is negotiable in the process? The “What” is NON-NEGOTIABLE. The “Why” is NON-NEGOTIABLE. The “How” is negotiable within limits: –Children learn what they are supposed to learn. –Everyone is treated with courtesy and respect. –Paint generally stays on the walls. –Tiered by teacher developmental level. (Crane)

CENTRALIZED TESTING CENTRALIZED CURRICULUM TIGHT FIT (no slack) Slack in the System (Fenwick English) Requires SLACK is the presence of “space” within the three elements of quality control that creates ambiguity and erodes a tight linkage between the three elements

TEKS and the Curriculum So, do the TEKS provide all that we need to know in order to create a guaranteed viable curriculum? Can the TEKS be the curriculum? Can a textbook be the curriculum? Can a program be the curriculum? Would a first year teacher know what to teach from just looking at the TEKS? Do the TEKS alone tell us how they will be tested on TAKS?

TEKS The TEKS are a framework for curriculum development. They were NEVER intended to be the curriculum. The TEKS lack specificity. The TEKS are not sequenced into units of instruction TEKS statements have including and such as statements for a few TEKS.

3 rd Grade ELA 105 Student Expectations *Unique Examples

5 th Grade Science 39 Student Expectations *Unique Examples

6 th Grade Math 35 Student Expectations *Unique Examples

ELA and Punctuation What should be taught if the TEKS said … –1 st Grade-Use basic punctuation. –4 th Grade-Punctuate correctly to clarify and enhance meaning. –8 th Grade-Punctuate correctly to clarify and enhance meaning.

Punctuation Marks Period (2 rules) Question mark (3 rules) Comma (23 rules) Colon (4 rules) Semicolon (6 rules) Apostrophe (2 rules) Quotation marks (9 rules) Hyphen (7 rules) Dash (4 rules) Parentheses Brackets Ellipsis dots

Science TEKS Science Concepts 2 nd Grade –2.9(A) identify the external characteristics of different kinds of plants and animals that allow their needs to be met; 3 rd Grade –3.9(A) observe and identify characteristics among species that allow each to survive and reproduce; 4 th Grade –4.8(A) identify characteristics that allow members within a species to survive and reproduce

If these are the TEKS, would a teacher know what he/she is supposed to teach and what students are supposed to learn? Would an assessment-item writer be able to construct an item that would align with the taught curriculum? Considerations

TEKS-Science with specificity 2.9A Identify the external characteristics of different kinds of plants and animals that allow their needs to be met. Animal characteristics include: Types of mouths Ways to move Outer coverings Plant characteristics include: Root length Leaf type Stem type Seed type 3.9A Observe and identify characteristics among species that allow each to survive and reproduce. Including: Bird beak and feet Skin coloration Thorns on plants Waxy skin on desert plants Gills in fish Regeneration 4.8A Identify characteristics that allow members within a species to survive and reproduce. Animals including: Body parts Body coverings Camouflage Mimicry Defense mechanisms against predators and climate Plants including: Size and pattern of plant root system Size and shape of leaves Seed dispersal

True Alignment Every student expectation should have an including statement. –We need the specificity to be sure that everyone understands their responsibilities in the TEKS and gets to the heart of the curriculum for student learning.

CSCOPE Components Vertical Alignment Documents –Specificity for each Student Expectation Year at a Glance Instructional Focus Documents –Six weeks bundles that organize the specified student expectations into logical units Units of Study –Overview of learning that include standards, –Rationale, lessons, misconceptions and much more

CSCOPE Components Lessons –Stand-alone, state developed, customized district lessons – all built on research based lesson design Lesson Planner TEKS Verification Matrix Unit Tests –Common assessments including items in TAKS format for each six weeks Statewide professional development Customized professional development

Vertical Alignment Documents Assure equity Backload tested standards Reduce gaps and unproductive redundancies –Love Units

Vertical Alignment Documents

Year at a Glance Organize TEKS by six or nine weeks Organize Units of Study

Instructional Focus Documents The TEKS are not organized for instructional delivery. –Arranged in strands, NOT coherent units of instruction –Not arranged on a time-line Instructional Focus Documents place TEKS in a coherent, rational sequence of instruction –Indicate the TEKS and the specificity that will be addressed in the instructional unit –Refocus teacher planning time –Ensure learning to performance indicators –Provide rationale

Instructional Focus Documents

Units of Study Built around instructional sequence Performance Indicators Free of commercial products and not tied to a particular textbook Add/adapt/change the learning experiences as long as students can perform at a rigorous level Provide examples of the How

Units of Study Key Elements –Concepts –Key Understandings and Guiding Questions –Specified TEKS –Performance Indicators –Sequence of Lesson Activities –Reference to State Lessons –Customizable District Lessons –Key Content, Skills, Materials, Vocabulary –Misconceptions

Instructional Delivery Sequenced Plan of Learning Activities (Unit) Excite Explore Explain Extend Instructional Development Curriculum Framework Concepts & Key Understandings Unit Map TEKS Performance Indicators Key Understandings Performance Continuum Sequence Topics Embed Concepts Draft Performance Indicators Instructional Focus TEKS “Unpack” ConceptSkills Content SEQUENCED

Lessons Built on the 5E Model –Engage –Explore –Explain –Extend/Elaborate –Evaluate

Lessons

More Lessons State Lessons District Lessons Make it yours!

Other CSCOPE Components TEKS Verification Matrix Unit Tests –Common assessments including items in TAKS format for each six weeks Statewide professional development Customized professional development

Teacher Level of Development Experienced AND Successful (VAD, IFD, Assessment) Experienced BUT Struggling New to grade level New to profession VAD IFD Units Lessons Assessments

Online Curriculum Management System

Online System - NER Web-Based Curriculum Management System (Housing mechanism) Operational 24/7 - Technical Support via the phone or the Internet Partnership with National Education Resources for over a decade

District Curriculum hosted online Domain name registration Unlimited number of users The ability to share units, daily lessons and rubrics with other districts using the service

Pricing Structure Online System System Support Additional Professional Development

ESC XIII Commitment Provide full access to the CSCOPE Curriculum System. Provide training for designated district curriculum leaders on the operations and implementation of the system. Coordinate with NER service providers on end-user issues. Provide consultation and technical assistance. Provide eight (8) days professional development on the implementation of the system onsite and or in cluster sites Provide quarterly leadership professional development activities Provide professional development teleconferences and webcasts each six weeks for each grade level. Ongoing listserv support.

District Commitment Designate a district contact/representative for coordination purposes Engage in a preplanning process with ESC staff on implementation sequence Dedicate staff time to implementation of the curriculum Provide release time for teachers and principals to participate in staff development activities of the cooperative. Abide by the terms of the End User License Agreement. Provide a current listing of all approved district domain names. Provide ESC with teacher names, grade level course assignments, addresses. Provide ESC13 with one (1) district curriculum user assignment. Participate in user group meetings

Success Stories Teachers are talking, planning, and collaborating ideas! Students are engaged in relevant activities and making connections to prior learning. A wealth of resources provided with lessons Challenging learning through performance indicators and teachers are beginning to embrace performance indicators Spiraling of instruction-not just teach once and move on Provides tremendous support for new teachers and for teachers with new assignments

What are the benefits? Providing a guaranteed, viable curriculum to teachers Provide a common language, structure, and process for curriculum development and access Designed to align the written, the taught, and the tested curriculum into a seamless web

Blueprint for Student Success CSCOPE –Clearly articulates the expectations of students identified in the TEKS Concepts and understandings Performances and products Instructional delivery –Provides the tools for teachers to teach the TEKS

CSCOPE provides the blueprint for the essential outcome of curriculum… Success for Our Kids.

Contact Ervin Knezek

Math Vertical Alignment When: June 6 and 7 Where: Llano Junior High computer labs Time: 9:00 – 4:00 Who: Llano and Johnson City