Lessons from the ATLAS SCT alignment system for LC detector and MDI alignment and new technology developments DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold1 Armin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
12. July 2002Visit of Jonathan Dorfan to RAL1 Linear Collider Alignment and Survey LiCAS.
Advertisements

X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.
X-ray Survey of the ATLAS SCT Hardware Overview Nick Brett and Jim Loken
Frequency Scanning Interferometry (FSI) measurements
Solomon William KAMUGASA
Stephen Gibson, ATLAS Offline Alignment, 2 nd July Incorporating FSI with the Offline Alignment Overview ATLAS Group, University of Oxford Stephen.
S. M. Gibson, IWAA7 November ATLAS Group, University of Oxford, UK S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, A. Mitra, D. F. Howell, R. B. Nickerson Geodetic Grids.
MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
AMULET Advanced Metrology Using LasEr Tracers John Dale.
Metrology and pre-alignment of the components of CLIC in the PACMAN project S. W. Kamugasa, V. Vlachakis CLIC Workshop January 2015 CERN, Geneva,
The LiCAS FSI Subsystem Current Status and Initial Measurements John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IOP HEP April 2008.
X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.
ILC roles Interferometry Results 2009 / 2010 Mon 20 Apr :00 JST (01:00 UTC) MDI TILC09 – Tsukuba OXFORD MONALISA 1.
Accelerator and Beam Delivery The LC-ABD (Linear Collider: Accelerator and Beam Delivery) consortium is a group of UK institutes aiming to develop new.
The Linear Collider Alignment and Survey (LiCAS) Project Richard Bingham*, Edward Botcherby*, Paul Coe*, Grzegorz Grzelak*, Ankush Mitra*, Johannes Prenting.
LiCAS Project: FSI Overview Richard Bingham, Edward Botcherby, Paul Coe, John Green, Grzegorz Grzelak, Ankush Mitra, John Nixon, Armin Reichold University.
LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
Final Doublet Stability and in-detector Interferometry MONALISA David Urner Oxford University.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau.
Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey IWAA08, G. Moss 1 The LiCAS LSM System First measurements from the Laser Straightness.
Workshop TS May 2008 GENERAL CLIC ALIGNMENT Progresses and strategy. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, TS/SU/MTI.
S. M. Gibson, P. A. Coe, Photon02, 5 th September Coordinate Measurement in 2-D and 3-D Geometries using FSI Overview ATLAS Group, University of.
X-Ray Survey of The ATLAS SCT. The ATLAS Semi-Conductor Tracker.
Frequency Scanning Interferometry in detail 3 Oxford contributions to IWAA 2002 Multiple, simultaneous length measurements S. M. Gibson et al (After the.
S. Gibson FSI Offline Analysis 9 th October FSI Alignment: Offline Analysis Overview ATLAS Group, University of Oxford Stephen Gibson, Danny Hindson,
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team with 3D views and data from Hubert Gerwig, Richard Rosing and Juha Kemppinen Pre-alignment.
H. SCHMICKLER Alignment challenges for a future linear collider.
1 CMS Tracker Alignment and Implications for Physics Performance Nhan Tran Johns Hopkins University CMS Collaboration SPLIT
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
MONALISA an Update David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
Menu Software Week LHC Alignment Workshop ID Detector News CSC for Alignment To Do List Strategy for a physics analysis start Miscellanea (computing,
CMS ECAL Laser Monitoring System Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology, on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group High-resolution, high-granularity.
Welcome to MONALISA A brief introduction. Who we are... David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Electronics support from CEG Central Electronics.
CLICdp achievements in 2014 and goals for 2015 Lucie Linssen, CERN on behalf of the CLICdp collaboration CLIC workshop, January 30 th
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
09:40 – 10:00 (JST) Wed 5 Mar 2008 MONALISA : JAI Oxford MDI ATF2 TILC08 Sendai Japan 1 / 26 MONALISA Laser based alignment and stability monitoring.
(Some thoughts/reminders on) Calibration/alignment scenarios for ILD/ILC Jan Timmermans – NIKHEF Amsterdam 07 Sep 2014ILD meeting Oshu1.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
Printing: This poster is 48” wide by 36” high. It’s designed to be printed on a large-format printer. Customizing the Content: The placeholders in this.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
Chris Parkes, Silvia Borghi, Christoph Hombach WP2 Alignment Task: Status Report Introduction Alignment Monitoring – LHCb VELO Weak Modes – LHCb VELO AIDA.
Laser Alignment System for LumiCal and BeamCal Arkadiusz Moszczyński, Wojciech Wierba, Leszek Zawiejski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Cracow 22nd FCAL.
P. Brückman de Renstrom Alignment Strategy for ATLAS Vertex 2006 Perugia, September 2006 p1p1 Alignment Strategy for the ATLAS Tracker Pawel Brückman.
1 ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alignment LHC Days in Split, 5-9 Oct J.Krstic, M.Milosavljevic Institute of Physics, Belgrade D.Fassouliotis,C.Kourkoumelis,
Track-based alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector Sergio Gonzalez-Sevilla Instituto de Física Corpuscular (IFIC) On behalf of the ATLAS Inner Detector.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
CLIC08 Workshop, CERN October 2008 PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDY STATUS AND MODEL FOR THE BEAM DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS TS/SU/MTI Thomas TOUZE Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
WP3 Frequency Scanning Interferometry Analysis Techniques for the LiCAS RTRS John Dale.
Continuous Frequency Scanning Interferometry
Detector Alignment with Tracks Wouter Hulsbergen (Nikhef, BFYS)
on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Need for Alignment Position of off-momentum proton w.r.t. beam
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
AMULET Advanced Metrology Using LasEr Tracers (and various other bits)
LightGage™ Frequency Scanning Technology
David Urner, Armin Reichold , Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

Lessons from the ATLAS SCT alignment system for LC detector and MDI alignment and new technology developments DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold1 Armin Reichold for the AMULET collaboration

Overview ATLAS SCT online FSI alignment (60%) – Purpose and Requirements – How it works – How it was meant to be used – How the SCT performed – How it is actually used Improvements in FSI technology (30%) – Dynamic FSI – Commercial availability Conceptual LC alignment applications & conclusions (10%) DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold2

Disclaimer I am not a member of the ATLAS collaboration (any more) I WAS involved in building the online FSI alignment system for the SCT Now working on new FSI technology Conclusions concerning ATLAS arise from contact with colleagues (R. Nickerson, S. Gibson, P. Coe), discussions and papers (see list at end of talk) ATLAS alignment pictures and graphs largely from: ## = “Rapid precise shape monitoring of the ATLAS silicon tracker”, S. Gibson, see Bibliography DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold3

ATLAS SCT online alignment system Purpose: – Follow changes of tracking detector shape which are too fast to catch with track-based alignment These were expected due to heat load variations from trigger rate changes and other sources – Correct detector positions during such changes – Statistical misalignment of tracker elements should not increase statistical error on track parameters by more than 20% at any time – Constrain deformation modes that are “weakly” measured by track alignment LC-2013 Armin Reichold4 ~7m ##

Resolution requirements – ATLAS tracker resolutions are moderate compared to LC plans ATLAS Pixels: σ r*φ = 10 µm, σ z = 115 µm (LC: 4-7 µm) ATLAS Strips: σ r*φ = 17 µm (LC: 12 µm) – Demands on alignment accuracies for ATLAS: Pixels: σ align-r*φ = 7 µm Strips: σ align-r*φ = 12 µm DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold5 ATLAS SCT online alignment system

Stephen Gibson et al Rapid precise shape monitoring of the ATLAS silicon tracker 6 Examples of weakly constrained modes “clocking”  R (VTX constraint) “telescope”  z~R radial distortions (various)  dependent sagitta  X  a  bR  cR 2  dependent sagitta “Global twist”  Rcot(  ) global sagitta  R … These need extra handles to measure such as: Common vertex for a group of tracks (VTX constraint), Constraints on track parameters or vertex position (external tracking (TRT, Muons), calorimetery, resonance mass, etc.) Cosmic events (not from vertex) External measurements of alignment parameters (hardware alignment systems, mechanical constraints, etc). [PHYSTAT’05 proceedings] Some types of distortions can leave the tracks helical, but systematically biased

ATLAS SCT online alignment system How it works – Geodetic grid of length between nodes on support structure – Frequency Scanning Interferometry (FSI) designed to measure 842 lengths relative to stable reference interferometer – Monitor support structure NOT sensors (too many DOF=34,992) – Lengths measured “simultaneously” to a precision of < 1µm. – Repeat every 10 min. to track deflections DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold7 End-cap SCT grid (165) Barrel SCT grid (512)

Stephen Gibson et al Rapid precise shape monitoring of the ATLAS silicon tracker 8 Very Basic Principle of FSI TUNABLE LASER sweep  To interferometer with length to be measured DETECTOR M1 M2 Reference Interferometer with fixed length I MEASURED   I REF   Ratio of phase change = Ratio of lengths  /c]D   /c]L 

Stephen Gibson et al Rapid precise shape monitoring of the ATLAS silicon tracker 9 ATLAS SCT online alignment system: System Overview Laser room above ground Underground read-out rack ATLAS detector

Stephen Gibson et al Rapid precise shape monitoring of the ATLAS silicon tracker 10 Tuneable laser amplifier system

DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold11

ATLAS SCT online alignment system Front-end components of – minimal mass – high radiation tolerance DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold12

DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold13 FSI grid nodes attached to inner surface of SCT carbon-fibre cylinder ATLAS SCT online alignment system ##

ATLAS SCT online alignment system How it was meant to be used Determine approximate FSI network geometry via: – Design positions – Photogrammetry of end views (64 markers, 20 microns transverse accuracy) Quasi-geodetic grid needs assumptions to solve  study structure deflections (FEA, ESPI deflection measurements) Relate FSI grid shape to detector module positions – x-ray survey cancelled FSI monitors support shape changes – assume low order deflections (low spatial frequencies) of support from FEA – translate these into module position corrections Combine – FSI module correction every 10 min – track alignment of high order deflections (excluding low orders). DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold14

ATLAS SCT online alignment system But …. SCT is super stable: – stdev ~25 nm over 2 hours before and after solenoid ramp – stdev < 50nm over 24 hours – Only few barrel interferometers shown DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold15 B=2 Tesla B=0 Tesla

ATLAS SCT online alignment system And very repeatable – after solenoid ramp – return to start values to stdev ≈ 49nm around old values – only few barrel lines shown – Therefore  DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold16

ATLAS SCT online alignment system How it is actually used FSI distortion measurements not needed during regular operation (detector too stable) Alignment done by tracks alone (no FSI corrections) FSI determines periods of stability for track alignment What alignment people would have liked instead: – FSI system more optimised to measure “weak modes” – ATLAS upgrade tracker will be planned with this in mind DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold17

ATLAS SCT online alignment system By now this is “old” technology – lasers: λ=835nm (not telecoms) – Slow mode hop free tuning – small tuning range – external beam splitters – metal reflectors – two fibres for each line – reference interferometer defines the length scale – but this has improved … DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold18

New FSI technology FSI development continued after ATLAS Initially work aimed at LC applications – LiCAS = ILC main linac alignment – AMULET = FF stabilisation – Ended abruptly when STFC withdrew UK support for ILC Later work aimed at commercialisation – Projects: AMULET, Comet – new funding via EPSRC, ETALON AG, NPL – Aims: Measure absolute length in meters traceable to SI definition Measure varying length L(t) not only tolerate changes and average Higher measurement frequency Lower cost Improve practicability (speed, analysis, handling, etc.) Make it into a toolkit for metrology applications DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold19

Dynamic FSI: Schematic (Patented) DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold20

Dynamic FSI: hardware changes Moved to telecoms wavelength 1550nm – wide tuning range O(100nm) – fast tuning O(1000nm/s) – cheap lasers and other components – cheap extra power due to EDFA – Easier to be eye safe Both lasers present in all interferometers simultaneously (no multiplexing or chopping) Gas absorption cells provide length scale via physically fixed absorption features – naturally long term stable – minimal influence from environment (pressure shifts) – traceable to SI meter via frequency comparison – much cheaper & simpler than invar reference Fibre reference interferometers – stability required over O(1 sec) – length measured each “shot” – compact, cheap, coiled fibre interferometer Single fibre for delivery and readout No external beam splitter (fibre end = beam splitter) Use collimated beams up to 50m DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold21 Long arm reflection from retro reflector Short arm reflection from fibre tip inside collimator

Dynamic FSI: new capabilities Measure changing (< 19 mm/s) ABSOLUTE distances time resolved at 2.77 MHz inside each scan Scan resolution better than ± 0.1μm Scan repetition rates 0.1 to 10 Hz Absolute measurement uncertainty <±0.5 μm/m (at 95% CL) over life time DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold22

Dynamic FSI: verification 0.2 to 20m DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold23 188nm= 464pm= measurement noise truly random  average many measurements to improve resolution if target is stable

Dynamic FSI: Measurement Results with commercial Multiline™ system – One line monitor piezo-driven vibrating target 60 cm away – One line monitors linear motion of target on stepper motor stage cm away LVMC 2012 A Novel Multichannel Interferometer System For Measuring Absolute Distances <=18 mm/s Hz

Monitoring of a vibrating target LVMC 2012 A Novel Multichannel Interferometer System For Measuring Absolute Distances Hz 5.5 μm 900 Hz 600 Hz

Monitoring of a slowly moving target LVMC 2012 A Novel Multichannel Interferometer System For Measuring Absolute Distances mm 1 mm Velocity = 18 mm/s 1 μ m

Dynamic FSI: Commercial Multiline™ system from ATAON AG /products/multiline /products/multiline 24 measurement lines Up to 88 lines with extra DAQ cards in current DAQ crate Laser system can power up to 200 lines With EDFA practically no limit on number of lines Extra DAQ crates attached via USB Fully calibrated and traceable Entire system in single “small” rack CERN and SLAC will buy DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold27 Courtesy of ETALON-AG Multiline System in development rack smaller rack

What do we need to align for LC Track and Vertex detectors – Higher resolution compared to ATLAS wants better alignment – Lower mass (LC vertex det = few 0.1% X0, ATLAS pixels few % X0) will make distortions bigger – Push-Pull makes distortions more frequent and likely – tracker needs to be aligned to other non-tracking detectors as well (cannot be done with track alignment) Entire detector needs to be aligned to beam line after push pull MDI elements – hard to reach inside detector – Push pull will move them around – see next slide for some concepts DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold28

DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold29 Harry van der Graaf / NIKHEF (CLIC solution for FF pre-alignment from Lau Gatignon’s talk, Tue. am) replace zerodure sokes with FSI lines lines of sight as long as you like  may go entirely outside detector no mass  no vibration fed into quadrupoles minimal cross-section  easier integration augment Rasnik with FSI see motion of spoke ends if space found on outside: extend to FSI network connect network to outside world (beamline, detector)

DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold30 (CLIC solution for QD0 pre-alignment from Lau Gatignon’s talk, Tue. am) no need for ring FSI markers can go directly onto quadrupole

Conclusions FSI technology matured and commercially available FSI can be a powerful tool for various alignment systems It is Pointless to hardware align DOF that either: – are readily determined by track alignment  must know track alignment capabilities – or do not vary significantly during operation  design of hardware alignment is also integral to design of support structure Weak modes can eventually be aligned with tracks but: – needs special constraints (invariant masses, common vertex, external tracking, calorimetry, cosmics) – therefore takes a lot of data over a long time – hardware alignment can track weak modes over long times and enable track alignment data to be used over long times  Hardware and track alignment must be designed together with tracking mechanics ATLAS upgrade projects are now starting to go through this process ATLAS expertise grown over first run is “available and willing to help” Sorry: All LC alignment specific technical work unfunded in UK But: There is hope and there is interest DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold31

Thanks to The AMULET collaboration: – John Dale 1, Ben Hughes 2, Andrew Lancaster 3, Andrew Lewis 2, Armin Reichold 3, Heinrich Schwenke 4, Matt Warden 1 1: DESY, 2:NPL, 3:Oxford JAI, 4:ETALON AG The ATLAS SCT alignment team The audience for all that patience DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold32

BACKUP SLIDES AND REPEATS FOR PDF PRINTS DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold33

Bibliography of ATLAS stuff Rapid precise shape monitoring of the ATLAS silicon tracker. S. Gibson – Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector Tracking System with 2010 LHC proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV – ATLAS-CONF First data from the ATLAS Inner Detector FSI Alignment System – – Study of alignment-related systematic effects on the ATLAS Inner Detector track reconstruction, – A NOVEL METHOD FOR ATLAS FSI ALIGNMENT BASED ON RAPID, DIRECT PHASE MONITORING, – – DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold34

Dynamic FSI: Commercial Multiline™ system from ATAON AG /products/multiline /products/multiline 24 measurement lines Up to 88 lines with extra DAQ cards in current DAQ crate Laser system can power up to 200 lines Extra DAQ crates attached via USB With EDFA practically no limit on number of lines Fully calibrated and traceable Entire system in single small rack CERN and SLAC will buy DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold35 Courtesy of ETALON-AG

What do we need to align for LC A word on FF stabilisation – Continuous dynamic FSI exists (thesis A. Lancaster) – Higher resolutions are coming available (thesis A. Lancaster) – Combinations with classical interferometry are being tested  nm resolutions are the aim Sorry: All LC alignment specific technical work currently unfunded But: There is hope and there is interest DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold36

DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold37 End-cap FSI (1/18) ##

ATLAS SCT online alignment system ATLAS FSI operation methods – “Absolute mode”: Measure OPD ratio of unknown interferometer to stabilised, evacuated reference interferometer one length measurement every frequency scan O(once per 8 minutes) sub-micron sensitivity (varies with signal to noise) – “Vibrato mode”: Relative change of measurement interferometer length Once every 8 seconds 50nm sensitivity DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold38

DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold39

DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold40

Stephen Gibson et al Rapid precise shape monitoring of the ATLAS silicon tracker 41 Two colour laser amplifier system

Stephen Gibson et al Rapid precise shape monitoring of the ATLAS silicon tracker 42 Two colour laser amplifier system

DESY, 29/05/2013LC-2013 Armin Reichold43