The Importance of Strategic Litigation: the experience in Britain Peter Reading Director of Legal Policy Equality and Human Rights Commission, Britain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Religious – Belief Discrimination Awareness Training Steve Baldwin.
Advertisements

1 Providing robust data to support evidence based policies for child friendly justice.
EQUINET E UROPEAN N ETWORK OF E QUALITY B ODIES The role of National Equality Bodies in the implementation of EU equal treatment legislation.
Convincing national courts to refer a case to the CJEU: lessons from particular cases EQUINET 28 March 2012 Clare Collier, Senior Lawyer, Equality and.
F910 – PROMOTING QUALITY CARE
The Equality and Human Rights Agenda and the Possible Implications for Regulation David Darton, Director of Foresight, Equality and Human Rights Commission.
The Equality Bill Summary and key issues Barbara Waters Chief Executive, Skill.
UCU Post-’92 staff conference The public sector duties in higher education Nicola Dandridge Equality Challenge Unit 23 November 2007.
An Overview of the European Policy Framework on Gender Equality Gender Agenda – Women, Men, Age and Employment in the Performing Arts.
A Framework for Fairness: Proposals for a Single Equality Bill Discrimination Law Review.
Foundation Degree Values and Diversity Understanding Legislation
MOCK-UP Aarhus Convention Task Force on Access to Information Item 2(a) Scope of Environmental Information Presentation by UK Palais des Nations, 3-5 December.
The Equality Act 2010 The Equality and Human Rights Commission Claudia Bennett Senior Solicitor 1.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
Conflicts between religion or belief and other protected groups Peter Reading Director of Legal Policy Equality and Human Rights Commission, Britain.
The Equality Act 2010 & The Equality and Human Rights Commission Lynn Welsh Head of Legal 1.
The Court of Justice European Law in the Making. Terminology Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Venue Venue Standing Standing Chambers Chambers Plenary Session.
EU Anti-Discrimination Legislation Tansy Hutchinson Policy Officer European Network Against Racism.
Co-funded by the PROGRESS Programme of the European Union EQUINET – European Network of Equality Bodies 2014 Equinet Annual General Meeting 4 December.
EU joining the ECHR New opportunities under two legal systems EQUINET HIGH-LEVEL LEGAL SEMINAR Brussels, 1 – 2 July 2010 Dr. Mario OETHEIMER EU Agency.
Main title Subheading Human Rights: Tackling social exclusion and inequality.
European Ombudsman Access to environmental information Task Force on Access to Information Geneva, 4 December 2014.
EU and promotion of human rights in the member states: Do we need an internal control mechanism? The case of Greece. Theofania Antoniou PhD candidate Panteion.
Equality and Human Rights Commission. Overview of the Morning EHRC – What we do Human Rights Inquiry Making sense of Human Rights Table sessions.
Putting the UN Disability Convention into practice Sara Brunet, Senior Lawyer and UNCRPD lead officer, EHRC.
Equality Act 2010 The Equality and Human Rights Commission Claudia Bennett Senior Solicitor 1.
Equal Opportunities and Sport
Equality and Human Rights Commission Neil Martin Regional Advisor, Yorkshire & Humber.
Welcoming the Equality Act 2010 Equality Law Conference 8 December 2010 John Wadham Group Legal Director Equality and Human Rights Commission.
Equality Act 2010 The Equality and Human Rights Commission Sarah Gilzean Senior Solicitor 1.
Identifying Human Rights The protections offered by the ECHR and the Human Rights Act 1998 Brayne & Carr: Law for Social Workers: 10e Chapter 3.
The European Union Race Directive attorney Lilla Farkas LLM.
JáN KIMÁK LEGAL CONCEPT OF EQUALITY IN INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL LAW
Nothing About Us Without Us w w w. e d f - f e p h. o r g EUROPEAN DISABILITY FORUM: WORK & VISION PEKKA TUOMINEN Finnish Association of People with Physical.
The Equality Commission Role and Services
1 Community Legislation on Equal Treatment DG ‘Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities’ Equality, Action against Discrimination: Legal Questions.
Equinet Legal Training Lessons Learned and Practical Experiences from Northern Ireland.
Velia Hartland Adviser for Vulnerable Pupils & Ethnic Minority Achievement Equalities Training for Schools and Governing Bodies.
Jackie Driver Head of Good Relations Disability Related Harassment Review January 2013.
EHRC & RELIGION OR BELIEF Wayne Vincent & Steve Bennett Equality and Human Rights Commission in Wales.
Equinet Legal Seminar 30 June 2009 ECJ limits in discrimination. Preliminary ruling procedure before ECJ. How national equality bodies can make use of.
European Commission Employment & Social Affairs European Union against Discrimination Article 13 European Legislation to Combat Discrimination ENAR Conference,
The Principles Governing EU Environmental Law. 2 The importance of EU Environmental Law at the European and globallevel The importance of EU Environmental.
Equinet Legal Seminar 1 July 2010 New Equinet report: Influencing the Interpretation of the Law – Powers and Practices of Equality Bodies Nanna Margrethe.
Nony Ardill Senior Lawyer Equality and Human Rights Commission.
A QUESTION OF FAITH: RELIGION AND BELIEF IN EUROPE Equinet LWG 2011 Jayne Hardwick Moderator Equinet – Legal Working Group.
Public Sector Duty: Putting Equality and Human Rights at the Heart of the National Drugs Strategy NIALL CROWLEY.
What Does the Equality Bill Mean for You? The Equality Bill: 1.confirming/harmonising rights, and 2.confirming powers; strengthening equality duties Barbara.
The European Women’s Lobby Working together for women’s rights and gender equality in Europe Eha Reitelmann Estonian expert to the EWL Observatory on violence.
Doc.JUDr.Soňa Skulová, Ph.D. Principles of Good Governance.
Peter Reading Equality and Human Rights Commission United Kingdom 1.
Specialised Body to Fight Racism SHEILA ROGERS Commission for Racial Equality (London)
Equality, Diversity and Rights Equal opportunities legislation.
November 2012 Briefing on exposure draft Human Rights and Anti- Discrimination Bill.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
The anti-discrimination legislation in Albania Presentation of the corresponding EU Directives and of their approximation.
Understanding Equality in Customer care. Aims Barnet PCT,our stakeholders and contractors have a moral, legal and business case and duty to deliver equality.
Current challenges in the field of equality law Dr Sara Benedi Lahuerta Equinet Conference Strengthening the effectiveness.
The fundamental rights of LGBT citizens in Europe – EU legislation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Human Rights in Complaints Handling and Inquiries: Perspectives from the Equality and Human Rights Commission Jonathan Timbers – Policy Manager, Equality.
Good practices to combat discrimination on the grounds of race and ethnic origin
Interactive Gaming Council Board Meeting I-Gaming Legal status
HUMAN RIGHTS Discrimination
MULTIPLE AND INTERSECTIONAL DISCRIMINATION - CHALLENGES SERBIA
Litigation Strategy Consultation
Forth Valley Third Sector Conference - Taking a human rights based approach Cathy Asante - Legal Officer.
Advice needs in 2018 – Equality and Human Rights
ARTICLE 16 OF REGULATION (EC) 1083/2006
Current challenges in the field of equality law
European Standards for Equality Bodies An Equinet journey
Presentation transcript:

The Importance of Strategic Litigation: the experience in Britain Peter Reading Director of Legal Policy Equality and Human Rights Commission, Britain July 2010

The Importance of Strategic litigation What is strategic litigation and why is it important? EHRC powers and approach to strategic litigation Examples of Strategic litigation

What is strategic litigation and why is it important? Strategic litigation is litigation which is: -strategic: -part of a strategy identifying criteria and proposed areas for involvement in litigation -often linked to other work of the organisation: inquiries, policy proposals, research and communications -maximum impact: concerned with achieving broad social change rather than merely individual justice in key areas of discrimination and human rights; -Effective use of resources: it seeks to make maximum use of scarce resources 3

Why strategic litigation? - To fulfil obligations of Equality Bodies under the Directives; -Equality Bodies have a legal obligation under the Equality Directives (Race and Gender Directives) to promote equality. - Competences are required to include “providing independent assistance to victims of discrimination...” -Opportunity to influence the interpretation of national and EU equality law; -Equality Bodies seen as authoritative and independent: eg Pre-charge detention periods for terrorism offences

EHRC powers and approach to strategic litigation Mandate covers equality as well as human rights under the ECHR Are involved in proceedings in domestic courts and tribunals, the European Court of Justice, European Court of Human Rights Provide advice and representation to individuals Conciliation Fund other organisations to provide advice and representation Can bring judicial review proceedings in our own name Interventions Discriminatory advertisements proceedings Cannot decide or make recommendations on discrimination 5

Approach to strategic litigation Developed a litigation strategy Criteria for litigation include: - case will clarify an important point of law - will have a significant impact on a particular sector - challenges a policy or practice that has caused significant disadvantage - challenges multiple/ intersectional discrimination

Approach to strategic litigation Criteria for litigation include: - involves balancing rights of different groups: eg groups based on sexual orientation and religious groups - is cost effective taking into account likelihood of success; - would contribute substantially to other areas of work; - will extend or strengthen protection from discrimination and human rights; - draws attention to a priority issue and as a result leads to change.

8 Strategic Litigation Support every case No priorities No selection criteria Win or lose Very few partnerships No linkage with regulatory powers Clear priorities & careful selection Greatest impact on law and no of people Fund partners for non-strategic cases Proactive – source cases from partners Linked with regulatory powers No cases supported No relationships with partners No linkage with regulatory powers Some cases but lack of strategic focus Wait & see what comes in Partnerships undeveloped Insufficient consideration of regulatory powers and options

Approach to strategic litigation Representation: 48 cases (2008), 50 (2009) Interventions: 14 cases (2008), 18 (2009) on equality Approximately 20 others relating to human rights (domestically and in ECHR) Preliminary rulings (ECJ): 1 Judicial Review: nil Discriminatory advertisements: nil Legal Grants: £4 million to 91 projects and organisations

Examples of strategic Litigation Coleman v Attridge Law C-303/06 Discrimination by association Framework Directive 2000/78/EC Does protection from direct discrimination and harassment under the Directive extend to situation where person claiming discrimination is not disabled but associated with a disabled person?

Examples of strategic Litigation Coleman v Attridge Law C-303/06 Discrimination by association Opinion of the Advocate General Aim of Directive is to protect the “dignity and autonomy of the persons belonging to those suspect classifications” Human dignity of a disabled person can be affected where those associated with them (eg family and friends) are discriminated against.

Examples of strategic Litigation Coleman v Attridge Law C-303/06 Discrimination by association Grand Chamber Distinction between direct discrimination and harassment (use term “on grounds of”) and indirect discrimination which refers to provisions that would put “persons with a particular disability” at disadvantage. Implications for: -all carers of disabled persons; -all other grounds under all Equality Directives; -Discrimination by perception or assumption.

Examples of strategic Litigation Saeedi v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal The Charter of Fundamental Rights Facts: - return of an asylum seeker from UK to Greece under Dublin Regulations. - requirement to return asylum seeker to country of arrival in EU for determination of claim - Risk of being returned to Iraq and subject to torture (article 3 of the Charter and article 3 ECHR)

Examples of strategic Litigation Saeedi v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal The Charter of Fundamental Rights EHRC applied to intervene on issue of the effect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and UK Protocol. Charter has binding force since 1 December 2009: article 6(1) TEU Applies to all EU institutions, legislation, policies and Member States in implementing EU legislation. National courts need to apply the Charter to cases involving the application of EU law (including Equality Directives)

Examples of strategic Litigation Saeedi v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal The Charter of Fundamental Rights High Court Cranston J “Given the Polish and United Kingdom Protocol, the Charter cannot be directly relied on as against the United Kingdom although it is an indirect influence as an aid to interpretation.” Failure to by the government to directly apply the Charter was therefore unlawful and matter should be remitted.

Examples of strategic Litigation Masih v Awaz FM Employment Tribunal X v Mid Sussex CAB Court of Appeal Discrimination against volunteers Whether volunteers are are protected in any way by the Framework Directive 2000/78/EC Directive applies to “conditions for access to employment, to self employment or to occupation” (article 3) Impact on disabled person, women and younger people

Examples of strategic Litigation Masih v Awaz FM Employment Tribunal X v Mid Sussex CAB Court of Appeal Discrimination against volunteers Seeking references to the ECJ on both cases Involvement of Equinet: examining the legal issues and providing evidence that will be used: -in the Court of Appeal proceedings (Oct 2010) -ECJ if references made. Equinet directly involved in ECJ strategic litigation!

‘Building a society built on fairness and respect where people are confident in all aspects of their diversity.’