SUBMISSION BY THE INSTITUTE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND LABOUR LAW STUDIES IN RE: PROVISION OF LAND AND ASSISTANCE AMENDMENT BILL [B40-2008]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Arts and Culture Briefing on the Use of Official Languages Bill to the Select Committee on Education and Recreation Date:15 August 2012.
Advertisements

1 CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982 Some Notable Features. 2 PART I CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS  Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize.
Comparative protection of rights approach with another country.
Presentation to the Joint Committees’ Meeting on Second 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa Special Measures Bill (proposed section 76 B ) and 2010.
The Special Investigations Unit Act Presentation to Ad-hoc Committee on the President’s response to the Public Protector.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Absa Bank Ltd Submission on the Expropriation Bill(‘the Bill’)
Presentation to the Ad Hoc Parliamentary Committee on the 1913 Native Land Act Department of Public Works 19 August
Presentation to Public Works Portfolio Committee Department of Public Works 17 April
Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic Development South African Post Office SOC Limited Amendment Bill, 2013 Department.
RATIFICATION OF THE 1986 INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANISATION (ILO) BRIEFING BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR.
LOCAL GOVERNANCE IN THE 21 ST CENTURY: FRAUD, CORRUPTION AND ETHICS (THE UGANDA EXPERIENCE) PAPER PRESENTED AT TRAINING WORKSHOP HELD AT DOCKLANDS HOTEL.
THE MARINE LIVING RESOURCES AMENDMENT BILL (B30B), 2013.
Oral Submission on the Tobacco Products Control Amendment Bill, 2008 to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Health JT International South Africa (Pty)
Royal Bafokeng Nation: Oral s ubmissions on the Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Bill, 14 of August 2012.
1 Department of Social Development (University of Cape Town) submission to the Justice Portfolio Committee on the Child Justice Bill submission to the.
JáN KIMÁK LEGAL CONCEPT OF EQUALITY IN INTERNATIONAL & NATIONAL LAW
POLICY, LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND NATIONAL STRATEGY A PAPER PRESENTED BY KENYA LAW REFORM COMMISSION (KLRC) AT LAICO REGENCY IN THE WORKSHOP.
A.ABDULLAEV, Director of the Public Fund for Support and Development of Print Media and Information Agencies of Uzbekistan.
1 FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE CENTRE AMENDMENT BILL Briefing to the Select Committee on Finance 10 June June 2008.
1. Our submissions focus on : The two-stage amendment process The legal entity proposed to represent communities The recognition of customary rights Need.
1 PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: 31 AUGUST 2005 Status of legislation currently dealt with by the Department of Public Works AB Annandale Director:
“ The eviction of farm dwellers ” Presentation to the Select Committee on Agriculture and Land Affairs 27 February 2007.
1 PRIVATE MEMBERS’ LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL REGARDING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE BOARD OF THE LAND AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK Presentation to the Committee.
Grundgesetz Basic Law Basics Mc
Rates Policy Review Presentation 2013 CITY OF JOHANNESBURG.
1 THE NURSING BILL BRIEFING BY THE NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CAPE TOWN 15 NOVEMBER 2005.
The Debt Collectors Amendment Bill 2016 THE DEBT COLLECTORS AMENDMENT BILL 2015 A CRITICAL EVALUATION Dawid Marais.
CLOSE CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT BILL, 2005 Chief Director Policy and Legislation 18 May 2005.
RATIFICATION OF THE CAPE TOWN AGREEMEMENT OF 2012 ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE TORREMOLLINOS PROTOCOL OF 1993 RELATING TO THE INTERNATIONAL.
RULES GOVERNING PRIVATE MEMBERS’ LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS Presentation by NA Table to Committee on Private Members’ Legislative Proposals and Special Petitions.
Expropriation Bill 2015 portfolio committee Public Works public hearing 30 July Context: Infrastructure Development Act; SPLUMA; Restitution 2Unregistered.
Making South Africa a Global Leader in Harnessing ICTs for Socio-economic Development South African Post Office Bill, [B2-2010] Department of Communications.
Department of Arts and Culture PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: ARTS AND CULTURE ON THE SOUTH AFRICAN LANGUAGES BILL NOVEMBER 2011 MR SIBUSISO.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INDUSTRY COMPANIES BILL [B ] 13 August 2008 By: Bernard Peter Agulhas – Acting Chief Executive.
DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LAND REFORM SECTIONAL TITLES AMENDMENT BILL, 2010 Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Rural Development and.
SUBMISSIONS ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CHILDREN’S ACT Children’s Amendment Bill Presented by Julie Todd on behalf of CHILD WELFARE SOUTH AFRICA.
Comparative Approaches to Protection of Human Rights.
 New Employee Invention System & Guidelines therefor in Japan Pre-Meeting AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute January 26, 2016 La Quinta Sumiko Kobayashi 1.
PRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED SECURITY INDUSTRY REGULATION BILL, 2001 by Francois Slabbert Manager: Legislation and Policy Development 02 May 2001.
SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN ALBANIA SOCIALNET This project is funded by the European Union.
MPRDA AMENDMENT BILL Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Amendment Bill (B15D of 2013) Parliament June, 2017 Phiwe Ndinisa Land and Accountability.
Europe’s ‘Highly Competitive Social Market’ Economy
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Communications on the:
BRIEFING BY THE NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry, Promotion and Protection of Investment Bill, B18 of 2015 Palesa Madi, Candidate Attorney Ayabonga Nase, Candidate.
THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENT BILL (B )
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol.
the Protection and Promotion of Investment Bill
Portfolio Committee on Public Works
ICASA AMENDMENT BILL Vodacom’s Presentation to the
BRIEFING TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND JUSTICE ON THE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ,BILL, 2017 [B10B-2017] 1 NOVEMBER 2017.
SUBMISSION BY BUSA TO THE PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND INDUSTRY REGARDING THE BROAD BASED-BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT AMENDMENT BILL MARCH.
“Gautrain Management Agency Amendment Bill” 25 May 2017
Presentation to the Standing Committee on the Auditor General
PRESENTATION TO THE dti PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE
NATIONAL FORESTS AMENDMENT BILL
EXTENSION OF SECURTY OF TENURE AMENDMENT BILL, [B 24B—2015]
Department of Land Affairs Presentation to the
Amendments to the Rental Housing Act, 1999 (Act No. 50 of 1999).
Introduction Welcome national and parliamentary debate;
PRESENTATION OF THE COMMISSION FOR GENDER EQUALITY AMENDEMENT BILL TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE 19 JUNE 2013.
PRESENTATION TO: THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE BROADBAND INFRACO BILL, 2007
Constitutional Review Committee Submission 08 March 2019
European Union Law Daniele Gallo
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRESENTATION: COMMENTS ON THE FOREIGN SERVICE BILL [B ]
Legal Practice Amendment Bill
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Introduction.
Presentation transcript:

SUBMISSION BY THE INSTITUTE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL AND LABOUR LAW STUDIES IN RE: PROVISION OF LAND AND ASSISTANCE AMENDMENT BILL [B ]

A. INTRODUCTION: 1.These comments are furnished by the Institute for Constitutional and Labour Law Studies (“the Institute”). 2.The Institute is a Section 21 Company established to, inter alia, within the legislative framework applicable in the Republic of South Africa, study, investigate and comment upon (where necessary) issues of constitutional and labour law importance.

3. These comments follow upon the written invitation issued by Honourable R. Mohlaloga, Member of Parliament and Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Agriculture and Land Affairs. 4. The Institute is a non-partisan association (not for gain) and seeks to, inter alia, promote upholding of the Constitution, its values and importance within the broader South African community.

B. CONSIDERATIONS 1.The Institute’s comments and submissions on the Provision of Land and Assistance Amendment Bill (“the Amendment Bill”) are founded upon the following relevant considerations: 1.1 Consideration and implementation of all relevant provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa is regarded as paramount and non-negotiable.

1.2 Obviously, the provisions of the Provision of Land and Assistance Act, 1993 (“the Act”), were thoroughly considered. Act No. 106 of 1996 (as amended). 1.3 The Institute seeks to protect the freedoms, values and rights entrenched in the Constitution and is opposed to attempts to validate land reform through any process bringing about fresh

discrimination against current lawful land owners and/or occupiers and their dependants. 1.4 The Institute is in favour of attempts to activate legislation whereby the process of reform is stimulated whilst consideration is paid to the realities and importance of various relevant factors including: modern day micro- and macro economic principles;

1.4.2 the importance of sustainable investor relations, particularly with foreign investors whose investments are of vital importance to inter alia support our currency valuation; the sustainability of full-scale economic growth within the Republic of South Africa; the envious protection of constitutionally entrenched rights of our citizens;

1.4.5 the accountability of national government in respect of balancing competing rights of citizens within the Republic of South Africa; the protection of the rights and interests of all minority groups (and persons) in the RSA.

C. COMMENTS ON THE AMENDMENT BILL 1.The Institute is opposed to the apparent fast track manner in which the Department and Parliament wish to amend the Act. 2. In this regard it is emphasized that the Act, as it currently reads, provides for the provision of land as well as assistance to a far broader group of persons than what is intended through the introduction of the amendments proposed in the Amendment Bill.

3.Should the Amendment Bill be adopted and the Act amended accordingly, all persons who may currently or in future qualify for land provision and/or assistance (in accordance with the provisions of the Act) who are not regarded as “historically disadvantaged persons”, are excluded from the potential advantages afforded under the Act (as it currently reads). 4. It would therefore be necessary, in the Institute’s respectful opinion, that the implications of the content of the Amendment Bill be considered carefully. It would also be necessary to seriously consider why it is intended that exclusion of a

large category of people (those not to be regarded as “historically disadvantaged persons”) should occur. 5.Such exclusion of persons, as referred to herein above, is not only unfortunate but without merit and potentially unconstitutional. 6.It would appear as if the Amendment Bill is introduced in an attempt to, not only advantage the ideals of land reform but also to disseminate the intention of Parliament that the provision of property and assistance

would definitely continue to occur to the express exclusion and detriment of others not regarded as historically disadvantaged. Any such intention is untenable and should be strenuously guarded against. 7.The Institute is of the respectful opinion that the aforementioned implications of the Amendment Bill cannot be countenanced. 8. Adoption of the Amendment Bill would be paying mere lip service to the protection of the rights and interests (including potential

rights and potential interests) of persons falling within minority groupings within the Republic of South Africa (i.e. persons not qualifying to be regarded as “historically disadvantaged persons”). 9.The Institute acknowledges that the insertion of section 1A, whereby the objects of the Act are described, is necessary. The following remarks are relevant:

9.1 Clause 1A(a)(i) imports the possibility that persons who already own land also qualify for assistance in terms of the Act. 9.2 The Act expressly provides in section 10(2)(a) that, for the purposes of subsection 10(1), a person who may be granted an advance or a subsidy are, inter alia, “persons who have no land or who have limited access to land, and who wish to gain access to land or to additional land”.

9.3 The Amendment Bill thereby expressly provides that even historically disadvantaged persons who already own land qualify for assistance in terms of the Act. 9.4The Institute is of the respectful opinion that this intention is regrettable as it may serve to be to the detriment of not only so- called historically disadvantaged persons, but also other persons who have no land or access to land.

9.5 The sharp edge of the argument is simply that persons who already have land should not be in the front of the queue when the advantages available in terms of the Act are being considered. 10. The provisions of clause 10 of the Amendment Bill under the heading “Provision of Property for Land Reform Purposes” is unfortunate and not supported by the Institute, due to the following reasons:

10.1 Sufficient and already far-reaching land reform legislation is in existence The heading of clause 10 stands in direct contradiction with the title of the Act. The latter is expressly limited to “provision of land and assistance” whilst the heading of clause 10, as proposed in the Amendment Bill, extends the provision of land to the provision of “property for land reform purposes”.

10.3 Furthermore, the Institute has difficulty in understanding the necessity for acquisition of movable property and/or a business or other economic enterprise as a going concern and/or the shares in or the right, title or interest in or to a juristic person or other entity or a trust, to fulfill the intended purpose of “land reform”. 11. The intention of the Amendment Bill is clearly not to advance and protect ideals and constitutional rights such as:

11.1The right to equal protection and benefit of the law (see section 9(1) of the Constitution); 11.2The rights of a person(s) or community whose tenure of land is legally insecure as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices to tenure which is legally secure or to comparable redress (see the provisions of section 25(6) of the Constitution). Notably such a person(s) or community may potentially include also those not necessarily falling under the banner of “historically disadvantaged persons / communities”.

12.It is respectfully submitted by the Institute that the Amendment Bill aims to limit the rights of persons not falling under the banner of “historically disadvantaged persons” in a manner which is unreasonable and unjustifiable in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom. This is particularly so in view of the fact that far- reaching legislation already exist in terms whereof the ideals of land and/or property reform is being addressed.

13.Such limitation of rights of persons not incorporated under the banner of “historically disadvantaged persons” cannot be countenanced and in this regard the Institute relies on the provisions of section 36(2) of the Constitution, which reads: “Except as provided in subsection (1) or in any other provision of the Constitution, no law may limit any right entrenched in the Bill of Rights.”

14. In the premises it would therefore be requested by the Institute that Parliament reconsiders the whole of the content of the Amendment Bill and that it be decided to reject the Amendment Bill as provided for in section 75(1)(a)(iii) of the Constitution.