1 A Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Presentation Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Richard White and Bob Algozzine Integrated Systems for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
Targeted & Individual Systems of Support Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri – Columbia OSEP Center for Positive Behavior Interventions.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
BEHAVIOR and READING IMPROVEMENT CENTER university of north carolina at charlotte Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Bob Algozzine and Richard White.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
Evaluation in Michigan’s Model Steve Goodman National PBIS Leadership Forum October, 2010
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
Data Summit July 27, 2012 Stephanie Smyka RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.
Response to Intervention
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports, 2008 December, 2008.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
1. Learn how data tools can be used to: ◦ help staff get started with School-wide PBIS ◦ check implementation fidelity ◦ monitor progress and establish.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Notes for Trainers (Day Training)
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Impacting Students with Autism through All 3 Tiers of PBIS Bob Putnam May Institute National Autism Center Kathy Gould Illinois Autism Training and Technical.
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Tier 2/3 Advanced Behavior Supports: Session 2 KENTUCKY.
Integrating Academics (RtI) and Behavior (PBIS) Virginia Department of Education Office of Student Services Dr. Cynthia A. Cave February 2014.
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
XXXXX School Ci3T Implementation Report Social Validity and Treatment Integrity 20XX – 20XX ____________________________________ Fall 20XX Lane and Oakes.
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Tier 2/Tier 3 Refresher Small Group.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

1 A Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Presentation Integrating Academic and Behavior Support Richard White and Bob Algozzine Integrated Systems for ALL Students National Forum for Implementers of School-Wide PBS Hyatt Regency O’Hare October 30, 2008

2 Presentation Objectives  Describe the specific behavior programs and related supportive interventions that were used in the schools at each tier.  Describe the specific reading programs and related supportive interventions that were used in the schools at each tier.  Describe how the school PBS team used the SWIS assessments and other behavioral data-bases to monitor behavioral progress and make instructional decisions.  Describe how school grade level teams used the DIBELS assessments and other criterion- referenced assessments to monitor reading progress and make instructional decisions.  Describe major positive outcomes associated with this five-year research effort.

3 Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Project Goal  To identify, implement, and evaluate primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions designed to prevent children from experiencing reading and behavior problems in school.

4 BRIC BEHAVIOR MODEL

5 BRIC: Primary Level  Positive Unified Behavior Support (PUBS) Model of School-wide PBIS Implementation and outcomes monitored by School Positive Behavior Support Team

6 PUBS Components  School-wide rules and procedures  Unified K-1 and 2-5 classroom rules  Explicit professional development for teaching and reinforcing rules and procedures  Unified school-wide correction procedures for ODR and classroom disruption  SWIS compliant ODR form across schools

7 Explicit Fidelity Measures Frequency of reinforcement continent to school rules Frequency teaching events (prompts cues, models) related to school rules. Corrective teaching procedural reliability Voice tone procedural reliability.

8 BRIC Behavior: Secondary Level  Phase One: Contracts and/or Monitoring  Phase Two: Social Skills Instruction Individual (one-on-one) Targeted groups Boys Town Model (Dowd & Tierney, 2005)

9 BRIC Phase I Secondary Interventions  Contingency contracting  Teacher Monitoring  Teacher Evaluation  Self-Monitoring  Self-Evaluation

10 Secondary Intervention Fidelity Criteria  Uniform fidelity requirements across schools  Uniform sample recording forms across schools with options

11

12

13

14

15

16 BRIC Behavior: Tertiary Level  System of Care Child-Family Team Meetings FBA-BIP Wraparound Planning

17 PUBS Fidelity Outcomes

18 Select Secondary Fidelity Outcomes  Secondary Interventions (Indirect)  Teacher Monitoring0.84  Student Contract0.78  Teacher Evaluation0.98

19 Behavior and Reading Improvement Center Positive Unified Behavior Support  Outcome Measures School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Frequency and type of office referrals using the School-wide Information System (SWIS). Frequency of class passes.

20 SET Benchmark Comparison

21 Prevalence of Secondary-Tertiary: All Measures

22 Number of Office Discipline ReferralsPBSBRICCONTROL 4% 1-2% 2% 9% 3-8% 11% 87% 91-96% 87 Office Referral Comparisons

23 BRIC Reading Model

24 Three-Tier Reading Model Tier I Core Classroom Instruction All Students Tier 2 Supplemental Instruction Minimum of 10+ min/day (+Tier I) Teaching Format: Small group Progress Monitoring: Every other week Tier 3 Intensive Intervention Minimum of 30+ min/day (+Tier I) Teaching Format: Small group or 1:1 Progress Monitoring: Every week

25 Open Court

26 Early Reading Tutor

27 Reading Mastery

28 Intervention Programs by Tier and Grade Level DecodingFluency Grade Levels SecondaryTertiarySecondaryTertiary K-1Early Reading Tutor Reading Mastery Open Court Intervention Kit 2RM II (fast cycle) If the student does not place in RM II, do not place him/her in RM I. Instead, place him/her in ERT Ear. Rdg. Tutor Peer Coaching (in classroom with teacher) Small Group (when the school schedule has a special intervention period) 1:1 Fluency Tutoring

29 Intensifying Instruction  Regroup students  Provide instruction 1:1  Provide 2 lessons/day  Preteach/reteach before/after lessons  Program modifications Building frequent reviews into the intervention Incorporating multi-sensory strategies

30 Comprehensive School Model for Reading

31 Roles of School Staff in BRIC Reading Model **The Literacy Facilitator/Lead Teacher conducting fidelity observation provides feedback to the tutor at the end of the session and provides instructional support such as, modeling a lesson for the tutor, providing side-by-side coaching on specific components, or answering questions regarding implementation. Who?How?When? Professional Development Provided by Conducting Screening (and Benchmark Assessments) Assessment Team Using DIBELS Assessment Materials Fall, Winter, Spring School System, Literacy Facilitator Planning and Scheduling of Students Administration, Literacy Facilitator Meet to Discuss School Schedule Fall (Review after Winter Benchmark Assessment) n/a Ensuring Strong and Regular Implementation Literacy Facilitator/ Lead Teachers Training, Using Fidelity Checklists On-going** School System & Literacy Facilitator/Lead Teachers Progress Monitoring Assessment Team and/or Classroom Teachers Using DIBELS Assessment Materials For students identified ‘Strategic’: every 2 weeks For students identified ‘Intensive: every week Literacy Facilitator Instructional Decision-Making Literacy Facilitator, Classroom Teachers ( and Intervention Team) Review Student Progress, Frequency of Implementation, Fidelity of Implementation During Grade Level Meetings, Monthly Meetings with Principal, & Intervention Team Meetings Literacy Facilitator

32 BRIC Schoolwide Reading Model Evaluation Tool Component Evaluation Question 0=not at all 1=some degree 2= as defined by BRIC Score by School Final Year (05-06) / Sustainability Year (06-07) School Start-upA school-wide assessment system (e.g., DIBELS) and database are established and maintained for documenting student performance. 2 / 2 1-a. ScreeningAll students are assessed at the beginning of each school year and these measures are used to determine appropriate instructional placements. 2 / 2 2-a. SchedulingSupplemental instruction is provided for students identified at risk (i.e., students who fail to make adequate progress). 2 / 2 3. PlacementPlacement decisions are made using project guidelines. 1 / 12 / 21 / 12 / 1 2 / 2 4-a. Ensuring Strong and Regular Implementation Fidelity observations have been conducted for staff providing secondary level interventions. 1 / 12 / 2 2 / 1 2 / 21 / 1 4-b.Fidelity observations have been conducted for staff providing tertiary level interventions. 1 / 12 / 2 2 / 1 2 / 21 / 1 4-d.The literacy facilitator monitors tutors to make sure groups are meeting regularly. 2 / 1 1 / 12 / 1 2 / 22 / 1

33 BRIC Schoolwide Reading Model Evaluation Tool 5-a. Progress Monitoring Progress monitoring data for students identified Strategic is collected frequently. 2 / 2 5-b.Progress monitoring data for students identified Intensive is collected frequently. 2 / 2 2 / 12 / 2 6-a. Instructional Decision Making The literacy leader is involved in meeting to discuss data (e.g., progress monitoring, tutor records) and other information to make instructional decisions 2 / 12 / 21 / 12 / 1 2 / 22 / 1 TOTAL for Final Year (05-06) / Sustainability Year (06-07) (out of 22) 18/1622/2118/1822/1522/1622/2119/17

34 Behavior and Reading Improvement Center For More Information… Project Investigator: Bob Algozzine BRIC/EDLD/Education Project Co-Director/ Reading Director: Nancy Cooke BRIC/SPCD/Education Behavior Director: Richard White BRIC/SPCD/Education ] ]

35 Question and Answer Guidelines Leave Firearms at the Door Focus on What We Know Don’t Worry…Be Happy!