Life in the Fastlane: RUI Dr. Kristi H. Martines Director of Grant Development Office of Research, Grants & Contracts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship: What is it? 3 years of funding: $30k/year as stipend $10,500/year for tuition $1,000 one-time international travel allowance.
Advertisements

Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Cross-Cutting and Special Interest Programs NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.
NSF Research Proposal Review Guidelines. Criterion 1: What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? How important is the proposed activity.
Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney Division of Environmental Biology
NSF Merit Review and Proposal Preparation Mark Courtney, Ph.D Adjunct, Department of Biology New Mexico State University 24 September 2008.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Cedric L. Williams, Ph. D. Professor Dept. of Psychology and Graduate Program in Neuroscience University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA Council on Undergraduate.
NSF East Asia and Pacific Summer Institutes (EAPSI) Shelley Hawthorne Smith UA Graduate College Office of Fellowships and Community Engagement
The Proposal Review Process Matt Germonprez Mutual of Omaha Associate Professor ISQA College of IS&T.
Preparation/Content of an NSF proposal NSF proposals are uploaded to the Fastlane website prior to submission (NIH uses Grants.gov): 1.Cover sheet (basic.
NSF Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants Improve dissertation research – Provide funds not normally available to graduate students significant data-gathering.
DIMACS/CCICADA/DIMATIA/Rutgers Math REU
How to Write Grants Version 2009.
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Workshop NSF Major Research Instrumentation grants program NSF approach to research in undergraduate institutions Supporting students on grants Introduction.
Research Grant Proposal Writing: Bucknell Trends and Faculty Perspectives Mike Malusis, Tom Solomon, and Rick Rosenberg Engineering Faculty Learning Series.
(from 2003 workshop presentation on NSF funding mechanisms & proposal strategies)
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
EAS 299 Writing research papers
Graduate Research Fellowship Program National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Operations Center.
Overview of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) Program Office of Integrative Activities National Science.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program November 2007 Major Research Instrumentation EPSCoR PI Meeting November 6-9,
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 9, 2014 Required Elements of the Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Emily Lynn Grant Administrator Office of Sponsored Projects and Research Administration.
Tips for Writing a Successful Grant Proposal Diana Lipscomb Associate Dean for Faculty and Research CCAS.
NSF FastLane Division of Sponsored Research Presents:
WE ARE A COMPLEX LAND. MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS DESIRE TO HELP OTHERS MEANING TO LIFE ESTEEM NEEDS RECOGNITION & APPRECIATION BELONGINGNESS AND LOVE.
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
National Science Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) Site Program.
Submitting a Proposal: Best Practices By: Anu Singh Science Assistant
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Biomedical Science and Engineering Funding Opportunities at NSF Semahat Demir Program Director Biomedical Engineering Program National Science Foundation.
Technology and Innovation Development Award (TIDA) Presenter Dr Michael Ryan SFI.
Promoting Diversity at the Graduate Level in Mathematics: A National Forum MSRI October 16, 2008 Deborah Lockhart Executive Officer, Division of Mathematical.
 How the knowledge created advances our theoretical understanding of the study topic, so that others interested in similar situations but in a different.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
NSF Programs for Faculty Scripps Research Institute April 30, 2009 George Kenyon NSF Division of Chemistry
NSF: Proposal and Merit Review Process Muriel Poston, Ph.D. National Science Foundation 2005.
CAREER WORKSHOP APRIL 6, 2015 Required Elements of the NSF Proposal Beth Hodges Director, Office of Proposal Development FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY.
Funding Caroline Wardle Senior Science Advisor, CISE Directorate National Science Foundation
National Science Foundation. Seeking Doctoral Dissertation Support from the National Science Foundation: Do’s and Don’ts Program Officer Political Science.
Proposal Preparation NSF Regional Grants Conference October 4 - 5, 2004 St. Louis, MO Hosted by: Washington University.

NSF Peer Review: Panelist Perspective QEM Biology Workshop; 10/21/05 Dr. Mildred Huff Ofosu Asst. Vice President; Sponsored Programs & Research; Morgan.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
National Science Foundation Jan R. Taylor, Ph.D. Director of Research Programs Division of Science and Research WV Higher Education Policy Commission.
NSF Office of Integrative Activities Major Research Instrumentation Program September 2007 Major Research Instrumentation QEM Workshop 2007 September 28,
NSF Funding Opportunities Anthony Garza. General Funding Opportunities Standard proposals or investigator-initiated research projects (submission once.
How to Obtain NSF Grants Review of Proposal Pieces A workshop providing information on the process of applying for external research awards. Sponsored.
Improving Research Proposals: Writing Proposals and the Proposal Review Process Heather Macdonald (based on material from Richelle Allen-King, Cathy Manduca,
Pre-Submission Proposal Preparation Proposal Processing & Review.
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Nancy Lutz, Program Director Economics NSF Day Conference SUNY Albany, October 2011.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2016
CARER Proposal Writing Workshop November 2004
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2018
Proposal Preparation.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2017
Gulf States Math Alliance 2019 Conference
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Intellectual Merit & Broader Impact Statements August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Dr. Kristi H. Martines Director of Grant Development Office of Research, Grants & Contracts

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Research in Undergraduate Institutions (RUI) …supports research at undergraduate institutions through the funding of 1.individual and collaborative research projects (RUI,C-RUI), 2.the purchase of shared-use research instrumentation, and 3.Research Opportunity Awards (ROA) for work with NSF-supported investigators at other institutions.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI: A Crosscutting Program Crosscutting? Directorates for: –Biological Sciences - Engineering –Computer and Information Science and Engineering –Education and Human Resources –Geosciences –Mathematical and Physical Sciences –Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences –Office of Integrative Activities –Office of Polar Programs

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Eligibility Information Eligible "predominantly undergraduate" institutions include NKU. Eligible departments at NKU: –Biological Sciences - Political Science –Chemistry - Geography –Physics & Geology - Economics –Mathematics - Education –Technology - Psychology –Information Systems –Sociology, Anthropology & Philosophy

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI and C-RUI Eligibility: faculty research projects submitted by individual faculty members or groups of collaborating investigators Collaboration is KEY! TALK TO THE PROGRAM OFFICER!!!!

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Shared Research Instrumentation and Tools Many disciplines have specific program announcements for shared research instrumentation… Instrumentation and Facilities Program, Division of Earth Sciences -- PD PD PD Multi-User Biological Equipment and Instrumentation Resources -- NSF NSF NSF Chemistry Research Instrumentation and Facilities --: NSF NSF 00-81NSF Instrumentation and Materials Research -- NSF NSF NSF Scientific Computing Research Environments For the Mathematical Sciences (SCREMS -- NSF NSF NSF Research Equipment Funding - Chemical and Transport Systems Division -- NSF NSF NSF UNIDATA Equipment Grants -- NSF NSF 00-51NSF Research Experiences for Undergraduates: Supplements and Sites -- NSF NSF NSF Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement -- NSF NSF 00-63NSF CISE Educational Innovation -- NSF NSF 00-33NSF Combined Research-Curriculum Development -- NSF NSF 00-66NSF Informal Science Education - Supplements to Active Research Awards -- NSF NSF NSF Connections to the Internet -- NSF NSF NSF Grant Opportunities for Academic Liaison with Industry (GOALI) -- NSF NSF NSF

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Shared Research Instrumentation and Tools research instrumentation or equipment, or database purchase or access Primary Justification for requesting such instrumentation must be the research it will enable, but its use in the institution's instructional program is both expected and encouraged.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Research Opportunity Awards (ROA) enable faculty members at undergraduate institutions to pursue research as visiting scientists with NSF-supported investigators at other institutions Funded as “supplements to ongoing NSF research grants” Requests for ROAs are submitted to NSF by the host institution

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Research Opportunity Awards (ROA) Purpose of ROA: –to increase the visitor's research capability and effectiveness, –to improve research and teaching at his or her home institution, and –to enhance the NSF-funded research of the host principal investigator (PI) ROA activities are summer experiences, but partial support of sabbaticals is sometimes provided. ROAs are made at the discretion of the program officer whose budget provides the funding.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Research Opportunity Awards (ROA) Potential host researchers may be identified through the search of award abstracts on the NSF Web site

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Awards Awards for faculty research projects will usually be for a period of 3 years, whereas awards for shared-use major instrumentation are usually for a period of 1 to 2 years. Award size of individual investigator RUI projects has ranged from approximately $10,000 to over $100,000. Awards for collaborative proposals are expected to be at a higher level, depending on the number of faculty and co-workers involved.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Awards In general, the budget should be appropriate to the scope of the project. CONTACT THE NSF disciplinary program officer to determine if the proposed budget is within the appropriate funding range for the particular program and circumstances.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Awards Deadlines: they vary by directorate, if there are any! CALL THE PROGRAM OFFICER!

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation EVERY NSF GRANT MUST BE SUBMITTED THROUGH FASTLANE!! *RUI proposals differ from other proposals primarily in that they must contain –(1) a Certification of RUI Eligibility and –(2) a separate RUI Impact Statement (see below).

Life in the Fastlane: RUI ROA Proposal Preparation EVERY NSF GRANT MUST BE SUBMITTED THROUGH FASTLANE!! A formal request for an ROA supplement must be made by the host institution of the NSF-supported PI If funds for the ROA are to be generated by rearranging the project budget of an ongoing award without changing the scope of the project, notification of the NSF program officer is the only requirement. Arrangements for supplemental ROA support to an existing award should be discussed with the cognizant disciplinary program officer and tentative approval obtained prior to submission of the request.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI ROA Proposal Preparation ROA: The formal ROA request letter must be submitted via FastLane as a supplement at least 3 months before funds will be needed. Proposal should include: –description of the arrangements and the work to be performed by the ROA visitor, –statement of the contribution of this work to the NSF-supported project and to the visitor’s future research and home organization, –budget with appropriate explanatory information, and –biographical sketch of the visitor.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Shared Instrumentation Proposals must: –describe specific research project (or projects) to be conducted using the instrumentation or databases, –state why the instrumentation is essential, and

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Shared Instrumentation Proposals must: –describe the impact of the project and the instrumentation on the department's research environment. –sufficient detail must be provided for reviewers to judge the merit of the problems to be addressed and the methods proposed.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation Include the acronym “RUI” in the title of the proposal entered on the Cover Sheet, e.g. "RUI: Behavioral and neurochemical analysis of a new animal model of Huntington’s disease." Project Description should include: (1)“Results from Prior NSF Support” (0-5 pages) (0-5 pages) (2) “Future Plans” (0-10 pages)

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation (1) RESULTS OF PRIOR RESEARCH –Up to 5 pages –Any NSF grant within past five years –A chance to show that you can do good work – there probably ought to be an element of self- promotion in this section –Describe the work you completed with prior support –Publications from prior work

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation (1)RESULTS OF PRIOR RESEARCH –Human Resource Development – student involvement –Relation of prior work to current proposal –Mention other work that precedes your request and the progress you have made, either as “prior results” or integrated into your “future plans,” whether or not it was supported by NSF

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation (2) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (1-15 pp) should include: should include: –Objectives for the work and its expected significance; –relation to the present state of knowledge and to work in progress in the field;

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation (2) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (1-15 pp) should include: should include: –description of the general plan of the work, including experimental methods and analysis and, if appropriate, plans for archival materials or data-sharing. –For collaborative proposals, the thematic basis of the collaboration(s) underlying the research project and a description of the expected contribution of each of the faculty members to the proposed research project.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation Collaborative proposals are expected to include (1) a strong research activity whose scientific merit is clearly enhanced by development of the collaboration, (2) a project theme that takes advantage of the strengths of the particular institution(s), justifying the nature of the research in that context, and (3) a research plan that enhances the research productivity of all faculty and student investigators involved.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation Project Description should include: –A description of how student involvement in the research project and in the presentation of research results will be fostered; –how the research will be integrated with the students' education; –how the equipment, if requested, will enhance the research; and –educational uses planned for the instrumentation.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation Faculty participants should include in their "Biographical Sketches" publications with undergraduate co-authors (with student names labeled by an asterisk).

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Budgets NSF RUI allows –salaries and wages + fringe benefits, –research assistantships –Travel –materials and supplies –publication costs and page charges, –consultant services, –essential equipment, –indirect costs

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Budgets Cost sharing (matching): not required, but provide examples of how NKU supports your work, include dollar value when possible –Faculty/student travel support –Equipment maintenance –Dedicated lab space –Equipment

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation Impact Statement (max. 5 pages) A chance to promote your activities –Institutional –Departmental –Individual *Importance of research to all three *Success stories within all three *The approach taken by any or all three to provide students with a better educational experience and success

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation Impact Statement (max. 5 pages) –What obstacles must you overcome? Heavy teaching loads availability (or lack) of support personnel nature of experimental and computational facilities, and features of the student population

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation Impact statement should also describe: –record of the department(s) and institution(s) in educating undergraduates for science and engineering careers; –the plans to attract qualified undergraduate students to the project, including the criteria for their selection; –how you will increase the participation of groups underrepresented in science and engineering;

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation Impact statement should also describe: –any plans for measuring the effect of participation on the participating students both during and after their undergraduate years; and –the anticipated contribution of new research tools (instrumentation, databases, etc.) to both educational and research opportunities for students and faculty.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI RUI Proposal Preparation A representative of NKU signs a Certification of RUI Eligibility included in the Supplementary Documentation section of the proposal.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Review Criteria for RUI Reviewers are peers with expertise in the substantive area of the proposed research or education project. –selected by Program Officers –proposer should suggest at the time of submission, the names of appropriate or inappropriate reviewers.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Review Criteria for RUI Project summary must highlight intellectual merit and broader impacts Project description must detail intellectual merit and broader impacts

Life in the Fastlane: RUI What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity? –How important is proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across fields? –How well qualified is the proposer(s) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) –Does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? –How well conceived/organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?

Life in the Fastlane: RUI What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity? –How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning? –How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? –To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? –Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding? –What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Review Criteria for RUI Integration of Research and Education 1.How is research and education integrated in the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions? 2.What opportunities are available where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the diversity of learning perspectives?

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Review Criteria for RUI Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities 1.Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens - women and men, underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities - is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. 2.NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Review Criteria for RUI Specific to RUI and ROA Special instructions are supplied, calling attention to the Impact Statement and the special circumstances under which RUI investigators work. Reviewers are asked to recognize the potentially slower publication rate of investigators and the pace of their research may be slower at a predominantly undergraduate institution. The description of the environment in which the principal investigator works should be so written as to permit the reviewers to take such factors into account.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Review Criteria for RUI Reviewers will look for indications of impacts such as: –increased faculty involvement in the mainstream of research; –direct student experience in research; –acquisition of research instrumentation that will improve faculty and student research opportunities; and –enhanced departmental ability to prepare students for entry into graduate study or scientific and engineering careers, as well as to provide a research-enriched learning environment for all students.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Review Criteria for RUI Evaluation of research instrumentation proposals –criticality of the instrumentation for the research proposed, –the expected extent of usage of the instrumentation and the number of investigators and students benefiting,and –the institution's commitment for operation and maintenance.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI Review Criteria for RUI A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and signed by each reviewer.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI FASTLANE… 1.PI/Co-PI Information 2.Cover Sheet 3.Project Summary (include broader impacts and intellectual merit) 4.Table of Contents (An automatic function of Fastlane) 5.Project Description 6.References Cited

Life in the Fastlane: RUI FASTLANE… 7.Biographical Sketches (Vitae – 2 page per person highlighting info specifically relating the project; list collaborators, former advisors; up to 10 publications) 8.Budgets (Including Justification) (WORK OUT Budget with Mary Ucci (x5768; and RGC will enter this budget information into FASTLANE) – you must write the justification though. 9.Current and Pending Support: total award amount, dates of program/project, title, funding agency, number of person-months per year devoted to the project (calendar, or academic and summer), project location, is it current, pending or planned in near future. 9.Current and Pending Support: total award amount, dates of program/project, title, funding agency, number of person-months per year devoted to the project (calendar, or academic and summer), project location, is it current, pending or planned in near future.

Life in the Fastlane: RUI FASTLANE… 10.Facilities, Equipment and other Resources 11.Supplementary Docs (Appendices if allowed, RUI certification, Impact Statement) 12.Link Collaborative Proposals 13.List of Suggested Reviewers (optional) 14.Deviation Authorization (if applicable) 15.Additional Single Copy Documents 16.Project Data Form (always to be completed by PI)

Life in the Fastlane: RUI