Emerging Multinational Initiatives in Tertiary Education SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference August 13, 2010 Maureen McLaughlin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lifelong Guidance: A Key to Lifelong Learning – EU Policy Perspective John McCarthy European Commission DG EAC Vocational Training Policy Unit.
Advertisements

Developing Curriculum for Excellence: A Local Authority Perspective Andrew Griffiths Head of Education Aberdeenshire Council.
FRAMEWORK FOR QUALIFICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA Tirana, March 2005.
EUROPEAN UNION EDUCATION POLICY TOOLS PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
The role of learning outcomes in developing and reforming the Norwegian education and training system Tessaloniki Oct. 15 Ms Kari Berg.
Bologna Process in terms of EU aims and objectives
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS: Challenging technical questions!
Learning outcomes in the context of the Bologna reforms Сейдахметова Римма Ганиевна Bologna Process and Academic Mobility Center Ministry of Education.
Employability in context of the Bologna Process Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat Yerevan, May 2014.
Carolyn Bew Anne Boddington University of Brighton
1 Development of National Qualification Frameworks Gerald Burke Monash University – ACER Centre for the Economics of Education and Training (CEET) Regional.
Bologna and the Third Cycle Anthony J Vickers UK Bologna Expert.
BOLOGNA PROCESS and the COUNCIL OF EUROPE CONTRIBUTION RUDN, Moscow, 12 December December 2007 Katia Dolgova-Dreyer, Council of Europe.
SQA Standards Colloquium 28 February 2013 – Can Qualification Frameworks Provide a Useful Basis for Comparing Qualifications? Aileen Ponton, CEO,SCQF Partnership.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
HOW CAN YOU HELP EMU TOWARDS INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION BY EUA?
Towards a European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning Consultation.
1 Members’ Forum  QP Concept and Philosophy  Transitional Arrangements  Accreditation Process.
Minimum Core Skills and embedding. A study by the National Research and Development Centre (NRDC) 2006 discovered that…. Learners on embedded courses.
CHANGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS OF THE SS. CYRIL AND METHODIUS UNIVERSITY IN SKOPJE Prof. Dr. Velimir Stojkovski Rector Ss. Cyril and Methodius University.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
The European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
The Perspectives from Universities Regarding Implementation of Indonesia Qualification Framework Gerardus Polla Rector of BINUS University 29 April 2009.
ESCO and the envisaged role of the European Taxonomy of Occupations, Qualifications, Skills and Competences for (Vocational) Education and Training DISCO.
Quality Assurance in a Changing World María José Lemaitre INQAAHE Conference Abu Dhabi, March 2009.
Doctoral education through students’ eyes Juuso Leivonen The 21st century doctorate – sharing European developments Scotland House Conference.
Unit 1 The Bologna process and its impact on the Russian system of higher education.
For education and learning QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS (QFs) AND RECOGNITION New subsidiary text to the Lisbon Recognition Convention (LRC) Regional Meeting.
Higher Education and Research Council of Europe September 2006.
BOLOGNA PROCESS and LEARNING OUTCOMES THE BIGGER PICTURE.
1 National qualifications frameworks in Europe – developments and challenges Jens Bjornavold, Helsinki 17 June 2010.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
The European Credit system The European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training (ECVET)
1 VOCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS SYSTEM INTURKEY İbrahim BÜKEL Board Member Turkish Board of Education Ministry of National Education Budapest
1 Implementation of the Dutch national Qualifiation Framework, the NLQF June 17, 2010 Karin van der Sanden Projectleader NLQF Dutch Ministry of Education.
The national system of qualifications and interests of the stakeholders in the development of higher education Rimma Seidakhmetova Bologna Process and.
Quality Assurance in Staff Development Training Seminar on Implementation of Effective Quality Assurance Systems in Romanian Higher Education Institutions.
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS AND RECOGNITION IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA Meeting of Asian and European Rectors Berlin, October 27 – 29, 2008 Sjur.
Romanian VET following ECVET recommendation National Centre for TVET Development Romania.
SCHE in the Netherlands and other developments Hans Daale Leido Golden Sands - June 16, 2009.
ECVET som teknisk rammeverk Oppstartsseminar Oslo
1 Validation of non-formal and informal learning in Europe The challenging move from policy to practise Jens Bjornavold Rotterdam, 10 April 2014.
Recognition of Prior Learning for Individuals and Organisations Andy Gibbs October 2013.
Scottish Qualifications Authority National Qualifications Group Awards: 2009 Conference Dr John Allan Curriculum for Excellence and NQGAs.
ECVET AIMS AND KEY DOCUMENTS DARKO MALI (CPI, LJUBLJANA) BLED, 17 SEPTEMBER 2013.
Workshop 4: Recognition of non-formal and informal learning Espoo Lauri Savisaari.
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS AND STRUCTURAL REFORMS IN THE EHEA Sjur Bergan, Council of Europe Regional Ministerial Meeting Yerevan, October , 2013.
Workshop 4: Recognition of non-formal and informal learning Espoo Lauri Savisaari.
Towards a European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning Consultation Jens Bjornavold, European Commission, Directorate-General for Education.
EQF Facts and Questions. Conclusions The EQF has become a driver for national reform! A momentum has been created The EQF has become a driver for national.
Plurilingualism in Higher Education – Opportunities and Challenges Waldemar Martyniuk Language Policy Division Council of Europe Strasbourg, France.
QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA: DEVELOPMENTS AND OVERVIEW OF THE ISSUES Launching meeting for a South East European QF.
Ss Cyril & Methodius University Skopje, June 2009 GUIDE FOR DESIGNING A NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR HE Elizabeta Bahtovska.
National Qualification Frameworks Vincent McBride, ETF.
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Skopje, June 2009 Nadezda Uzelac MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Presentation on Outcomes Assessment Presentation on Outcomes Assessment toCCED Mohawk Valley Community College October 11, 2004.
Tallinn, 19 November 2009 Mike Coles Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, London The EQF – a platform for collaboration, integration and reform.
National Qualifications Framework Silesian University of Technology Faculty of Transport Ph.D. Rafał Burdzik.
Quality assurance, learning outcomes and qualification frameworks Tia Loukkola Director for Institutional Development 22 January 2016.
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
Why Qualifications Frameworks
Making use of Qualification Frameworks
Purpose of referencing
Education and Training Statistics Luxembourg
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Assessment and Accreditation
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
Republic of Macedonia - Ministry of Education and Science
Presentation transcript:

Emerging Multinational Initiatives in Tertiary Education SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference August 13, 2010 Maureen McLaughlin

Examine three emerging multinational initiatives, each related in some way to issue of student outcomes in tertiary education – AHELO – Bologna – Qualifications frameworks Existence of these initiatives reflects the high level of interest internationally in student outcomes – What is each initiative? – What is the current status? – Opportunities and possible pitfalls – Degree of US involvement; role of states Today’s Presentation

Desired Benefits of the Initiatives Improve quality of student outcomes Measure knowledge, skills and competencies of students Provide clear measures of student qualifications Encourage comparability, transparency and mutual recognition of qualifications Improve links to the labor market and provide mobility Identify strengths and weaknesses of educational outcomes and make changes

Promise vs. Reality Highly ambitious goals -- to what extent can these initiatives achieve the desired results? What are the possible pitfalls? Unintended consequences? What are appropriate roles for different players in these initiatives? – States, federal government, accreditation, institutions Are the initiatives appropriate for all countries?

Newest Initiative: AHELO Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes OECD initiative with stated goal to – Develop internationally comparable test of knowledge, skills and competencies for college students Sometimes referred to as PISA for college students – PISA very helpful international assessment of the knowledge and skills of 15-year olds in reading, math and science AHELO has many differences from PISA, however – More complex, more challenging to develop measures for college students

AHELO: Two strands plus contextual questionnaires Skills all students need Critical thinking, reasoning, problem solving, and writing Based on US Collegiate Learning Assessment Generic Skills Discipline-specific knowledge Ability to apply knowledge to other situations Feasibility study: economics and engineering Discipline-specific Skills

AHELO: Is it feasible? Feasibility testing: January 2010 – December 2012 – Develop and validate testing instruments – Administer tests on sample basis – Assess results of feasibility stage 15 countries, international experts and representatives of higher education involved in feasibility testing US involvement in feasibility study of generic skills–four states, SHEEO, ED, foundations Based on results of feasibility testing, make decision on whether to go to full-scale implementation

Bologna: Create European Higher Education Area Bologna process started in 1999 Goals: – Facilitate mobility of students, graduates and higher education staff across Europe; – Prepare students for future careers and life in democratic societies and support their personal development; and – Offer broad access to high-quality higher education, based on democratic principles and academic freedom. Specific objectives – Easily readable and comparable degrees (eg, BA,MA, PhD) across countries – Fair and mutual recognition of qualifications

Bologna: Evolving and ongoing 47 participating countries in and around Europe, up from 29 countries initially High-level interest and much has happened but still a work in progress 2008 report on National Action Plans identified outstanding issues – For ex, recognition statement vs full comparability, consistency of national legislation, varying quality of information across countries Takes time to make big changes, especially with the range of countries, some of whom joined only in recent years

Bologna: Results of first decade Higher education looks substantially different than 10 years ago – Legislation and regulations have changed quite a bit – Some mobility from short-term credit programs to degree But, impact on larger, substantive goals is still wanting – Student mobility in Europe did not increase substantially – Variable speed in implementation across countries – Impacts on institutions not easily seen Extent to which objectives of compatibility, comparability and attractiveness of education will be achieved is an open question – Depends on future commitment and actions Source: Independent Assessment Report on First Decade of Bologna (CHEPS et al)

Qualifications Frameworks: Purpose and Status A framework within which qualifications of an education system can be compared and linked – Describes what learners should know, understand and be able to do on the basis of a given qualification – Shows how learners can move from one qualification to another within a system – Integrates different levels of education including secondary schooling and tertiary education European Qualifications Framework – umbrella framework for Bologna countries – Eight certified national qualifications frameworks, rest expected by Other countries, such as Australia and New Zealand, also have qualifications frameworks

Qualifications Frameworks: Irish Example

Qualifications Frameworks: Illustrative Example of Implementation in Vocational Area Knowledge, skills and competencies Occupational standards Recognized qualifications Employers & Industry Employers & Industry Education: Formal & Non-formal Education: Formal & Non-formal Assessment measurement Vocational Qualifications Authority

Issues for Discussion Would a national qualifications framework with individual state frameworks make sense for the US to consider? – For ex, European framework with national frameworks – How to think about it: who would convene? coordinate? support? – Appropriate roles for institutions, accreditation, states, federal government – Opportunity to link across K-12 and tertiary and within tertiary Future of AHELO unknown but good that US, including four states, is involved in feasibility study – A seat at the table: participate in design, debate and final decisions – Involvement in discipline-specific strands? States can partner with other countries on tertiary education – For example, with countries of similar size or similar issues to discuss and learn from each other on policy as well as implementation – Wellington group (US, England, Ireland, Scotland, Australia and New Zealand) with SHEEO leading US involvement