New Engine Thrust Calculation For Arrivals ICRAT 2004 Ivan de Lépinay, ENVISA, Paris (France) based on a dynamic equilibrium equation Welcome!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal FACC Briefing 4 October 2012.
Advertisements

52 RCACS Ground School Theory of Flight PO 402 EO 4
Flight Operations.
Principles of Flight Leading Cadet Training Resources.
Lesson 17 High Lift Devices
JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures
Lecture 3: Take-off Performance
A unique TOOLSET for ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILTY ASSESSMENT TESA Tous droits réservés ©net-aviation.com.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
OPSG 1 JAR OPS Noise Abatement Procedures Capt. Claude Godel OST 05-4.
Gliding.
AE 1350 LECTURE #3 TOPICS PREVIOUSLY COVERED Roadmap of Disciplines “English” to “S.I.” units Common Aerospace Terminology Airplane Axes and Motion This.
Principles of Flight Learning Outcome 3
Estimating Requirements and Costs of 4D ATM in High Density Terminal Areas Gunnar Schwoch DLR Institute of Flight Guidance Braunschweig, Germany ICNS 2012.
International Civil Aviation Organization Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Saulo Da Silva Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology.
Aircraft Dynamic Response
Applications from packages I to III
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
Takeoff Performance Jet Aircraft Performance
CAEP Working Group 3 Emissions Technical Issues Robert J. Shuter Rapporteur WG 3.
Aerodynamic Theory Review 3
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Lecture 7: DESCENT PERFORMANCE
Rob Eagles Director ASIA PACIFIC Safety, Operations & Infrastructure.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
Airport Airside Panel Madrid May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE Arturo Benito.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag.
EUROCONTROL European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
Basic Aeronautics Know the principles of basic aeronautics. 1. Describe the effects of angle of attack. 2. Identify the four forces of flight.
Aviation and its environmental impact
Basic Aeronautics Know the principles of basic aeronautics. 1. Describe the effects of angle of attack. 2. Identify the four forces of flight. Lesson.
Chalmers University of Technology Elementary axial turbine theory –Velocity triangles –Degree of reaction –Blade loading coefficient, flow coefficient.
14/01/20161 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP HOW TO SAVE FUEL.
Performance Charts.
Speeding up and slowing down f = ma Terminal velocity.
Zuliana-July Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE By: Zuliana Ismail, 2010.
April 9-11, 2001 Colloquium on Environmental Aspects of Aviation A European Perspective on Noise Ingemar Skogö.
Aerodynamic Design of a Light Aircraft
Quantifying Lift. Consider… 767 refused take-off: PEfO1Oo&hl=en PEfO1Oo&hl=en F16
Larry Ley | Digital Aviation | Boeing Commercial Airplanes
NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE DESIGN
Flight Operations.
HOW TO SAVE FUEL BY LOSING TIME? Air Traffic Management Panel
Performance Based Transition
AIRCRAFT MASS (WEIGHT) & PERFORMANCE
Aerodynamics Chapter 3 Aerodynamics of Flight.
AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE Director Fleet Planning & Environment-IBERIA
Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Aerodynamic force (lift) Moving air Airfoil.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Noise Prediction Modeling I
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Saulo Da Silva
Airfoils and Simulation
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
Civil jet aircraft performance
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
Chapter 2 – Thrust and Drag
Airport Noise Modelling - Overview
Using and rearranging the lift calculation
Verification of Aircraft Noise and Performance Data
Introduction to Aeronautical Engineering
Airfoils and Simulation
Drag and Lift Elliott.
A European Perspective
CAEP Working Group 3 Emissions Technical Issues
ROMATSA – SAFETY, EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN ATM
Presentation transcript:

New Engine Thrust Calculation For Arrivals ICRAT 2004 Ivan de Lépinay, ENVISA, Paris (France) based on a dynamic equilibrium equation Welcome!

New Engine Thrust Calculation For Arrivals ICRAT 2004 Introduction based on a dynamic equilibrium equation Scope of the presentation Basics of the environmental impact assessment of aviation Objectives of the SOURDINE II project Reasons for deriving a new thrust equation for arrivals Main principles of the calculation Comparison of results with aircraft manufacturer data Suggestions for further developments

Environmental Impact of Civil Aviation ICRAT 2004 Environmental impact of civil aviation Key facts and figures:  Main types of aircraft pollution: noise and emissions.  1% of the EU population is affected by aircraft noise levels of 65 dB A and more – against 19% for road traffic.  Aircraft CO 2 emissions represent around 4% of the total CO 2 emissions in the EU.  Benefits of the progress in the design of engines are balanced by the traffic increase.  June 2002: Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament on the assessment and management of environmental noise.

The Balanced Approach ICRAT 2004 Environmental impact of civil aviation Reduction of Noise at Source Land-Use Planning and Management Noise Abatement Operational Procedures Operating Restrictions Aircraft Noise Management

Assessing the Noise of Aircraft ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling (Acft Type, Thrust) d Required data (e.g. the Integrated Noise Model) Standard data  Noise-Power-Distance curves  Aircraft data (weight, engine type) Study-specific data  Airport data  Traffic sample  3D trajectories (radar or sim.)  Speed profile (radar or sim.)  Thrust profile (not available from radar or simulated data) (Noise)

Standard Profiles – Altitude (departure) ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Standard Profiles – Speed (departure) ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Standard Profiles – Thrust (departure) ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Noise Contours Maps ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Noise Contours Maps ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Noise Contours Maps ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Standard Profiles – Altitude (departure) ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Real Profiles – Altitude (departure) ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Standard Profile – Altitude (approach) ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

Real Profiles – Altitude (approach) ICRAT 2004 Aircraft Noise Modelling

What is ENHANCE? ICRAT 2004 EuropeaN Harmonised Aircraft Noise Contour modelling Environment  Key Tasks:  Pre-process the user data into the noise model format (dbIV for the INM)  Compute the thrust associated with radar/simulated data (corrected net thrust per engine for the INM)  Easily assign pre-defined fixed-points profiles to radar/simulated ground tracks.  Specifically:  INM uses Standard Profiles for each aircraft type  ENHANCE uses a Profile for each flight. (profile = height, speed & thrust vs distance from runway end) Aircraft Noise Modelling

From Radar / Simulation to the INM ICRAT 2004 ENHANCE INM Airport Data Operational Data Radar / Sim Trajectories (X,Y,Z,v) Aircraft dtb (INM 7.0) study cases runways tracks profiles ASCII, MS Access, MS Excel (any column layout) INM dbf input files (one track/profile for each flight) Aircraft Noise Modelling

The SOURDINE II Project ICRAT 2004 The SOURDINE II Project Study of Optimisation procedURes for Decreasing the Impact of NoisE  Funded by the European Commission  Consortium: AENA, AIRBUS France, EEC, INECO, ISDEFE, NLR, SICTA.  Development of new environmental friendly approach and departure procedures + validation in terms of cost, safety, efficiency and operational feasibility.

Engine Noise vs. Airframe Noise ICRAT 2004 The SOURDINE II Project Take-Off Noise Landing Noise

Deriving the New Thrust Equation ICRAT 2004 Deriving the new thrust equation Forces applying on the aircraft: W the weight (=m*g) L the lift D the drag T the total engines’ thrust

Forces Equilibrium ICRAT 2004 Deriving the new thrust equation Dynamic equilibrium: Projected on X and Y axes:

New Thrust Equation ICRAT 2004 Deriving the new thrust equation R f = D / L (drag over lift) is function of:  aircraft configuration  true airspeed  angle of attack

Drag and Lift ICRAT 2004 Deriving the new thrust equation Withρ the air density around the airplane; S the gross wing surface area; C L, C D non-dimensional force coefficients which depend on the aircraft shape, angle of attack, and both the air compressibility and viscosity. Available from BADA

Angle of Attack ICRAT 2004 Deriving the new thrust equation

Results – Comparison with Airbus Data ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data Data provided by Airbus (A320 standard approach, time step 1s)  Aircraft altitude  True airspeed  Weight  Angle of attack  Lift  Drag  Total thrust

Altitude Profile ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Speed Profile ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Drag over Lift – Calculation Step 10s ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Thrust – Calculation Step 10s ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Thrust with Angle of Attack – Step 10s ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Drag over Lift – Calculation Step 2s ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Thrust – Calculation Step 2s ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Thrust with Angle of Attack – Step 2s ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Small Time Step Limitations ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data

Interpretation of Graphs ICRAT 2004 Results - Comparison with Airbus Data  Good correlation during idle thrust phase and final approach.  The angle of attack allows an even better correlation during the final approach segment.  Necessity to use a calculation time step smaller than the typical time of a configuration change for thrust and drag over lift.  Necessity to use a larger calculation time step for the descent angle and acceleration to avoid side effects of altitude and speed measurement inaccuracies.

Further Developments ICRAT 2004 Further Developments Validation with other aircraft types – obtain extra performance data from aircraft manufacturers. Profile smoothing tools to avoid irregularities due to a low measurement accuracy (radar data). Validation of BADA drag and lift coefficients on landing procedures with longer sequences for each intermediate aircraft configuration. Test equation with non ISA atmospheric conditions. Test equation with departure profiles – derated thrust …

New Engine Thrust Calculation For Arrivals ICRAT 2004 Thank you for your attention! based on a dynamic equilibrium equation Thank you for your attention! Ivan de Lépinay ENVISA tel: